Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Elastic Security vs Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
5.5
Elastic Security offers cost-effective ROI within two years despite mixed reviews on premium support and varying user experiences.
Sentiment score
8.0
Trellix EDR boosts ROI with comprehensive visibility, rapid investigation, and breach prevention, enhancing data security and organizational credibility.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.3
Elastic Security's community support is praised, but technical support experiences vary, with mixed reviews on responsiveness and service quality.
Sentiment score
10.0
Trellix EDR support varies from excellent to inadequate, with issues in response times, knowledge, language barriers, and recent merger impacts.
Support is prompt and helpful.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.3
Elastic Security scales well across environments, needing planning but suiting diverse business sizes and cloud infrastructure scalability.
Sentiment score
7.5
Trellix EDR is scalable, cloud-based, and well-suited for various business sizes, despite occasional performance concerns from users.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.6
Elastic Security is reliable and stable, with configuration-dependent performance; careful planning ensures stability despite occasional upgrade issues.
Sentiment score
7.6
Trellix EDR is highly stable, with performance issues on older Windows versions resolved in recent updates, requiring good internet connectivity.
In terms of stability, I would rate Elastic a solid eight out of ten.
 

Room For Improvement

Elastic Security needs better authentication, user interface, AI features, documentation, integrations, marketing, and improved scalability for user satisfaction.
Trellix EDR needs performance improvements, a modern dashboard, enhanced policy enforcement, better macOS compatibility, and improved integration and detection capabilities.
CrowdStrike and Defender have more established threat intelligence integration due to having a larger client base.
 

Setup Cost

Elastic Security is cost-effective with open-source options, offering flexible plans but may incur costs for advanced features.
The pricing is reasonable, especially for Small Medium Enterprises (SMEs), making it a viable option for businesses building their security infrastructure.
 

Valuable Features

Elastic Security offers rapid searching, scalability, visualization, machine learning, and seamless integration, making it user-friendly and cost-effective.
The tool is praised for advanced threat protection, ease of use, real-time monitoring, scalability, and comprehensive investigative capabilities.
Elastic Security offers good insight regarding alerts, reports, and cases.
 

Categories and Ranking

Elastic Security
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
16th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
62
Ranking in other categories
Log Management (5th), Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (5th), Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (6th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (8th)
Trellix Endpoint Detection ...
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
24th
Average Rating
7.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
22
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of Elastic Security is 2.7%, up from 2.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) is 0.9%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
 

Featured Reviews

Gajewski Marek - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides good anomaly detection and connectivity reporting
We previously used Splunk but switched to Elastic Security because Splunk was more expensive. Feature-wise, both tools are pretty much the same. They have almost the same functions. Elastic Security has a much better AI assistant that allows you to ask questions like a normal person. With Elastic Security, I can also predict the price and how much it will cost. Splunks's pricing depends on how much data we use and the different add-ons I have to add. The pricing is much better with Elastic Security.
Juan Muriel - PeerSpot reviewer
Completely automated, affordable, and provides good technical functionalities
The antivirus and DLP features are valuable. Now, we have a campaign to encrypt all the drives of the company. We have a solution for network access control from Fortinet. When Trellix detects some threats, the device is isolated in a quarantine zone for examination. We integrate Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response with other solutions to perform such isolations. We also use products for log monitoring and correlation and create use cases for automatic response.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Government
10%
University
7%
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Government
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Datadog vs ELK: which one is good in terms of performance, cost and efficiency?
With Datadog, we have near-live visibility across our entire platform. We have seen APM metrics impacted several times lately using the dashboards we have created with Datadog; they are very good c...
What do you like most about Elastic Security?
Elastic provides the capability to index quickly due to the reverse indexes it offers. This data is crucial as it contains critical information. The reverse index allows fast data indexing because ...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Elastic Security?
Elastic Security is cost-effective compared to Defender and CrowdStrike. The pricing is reasonable, especially for Small Medium Enterprises (SMEs), making it a viable option for businesses building...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response?
Pricing is a problem in South Africa. It could be cheaper here. The rand-to-dollar exchange rate makes it expensive for us. A 25 dollar endpoint cost becomes quite significant when converted to rand.
What needs improvement with McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response?
When it comes to some unknown fileless attacks, the tool is not able to detect them properly, making it an area where improvements are required. The tool's support needs to improve in the areas of ...
 

Also Known As

Elastic SIEM, ELK Logstash
McAfee MVISION EDR, MVISION EDR, MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Texas A&M, U.S. Air Force, NuScale Power, Martin's Point Health Care
Sutherland Global Services
Find out what your peers are saying about Elastic Security vs. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.