Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Logo

Top 10 Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Alternatives

Vendor: Trellix
3.7 out of 5
Post review

Top Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, and Fortinet FortiEDR. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) surpasses its competitors by providing advanced threat detection, real-time data analysis, and seamless integration with existing systems, ensuring comprehensive security coverage and faster incident response times.

Trellix Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Trellix, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon offers advanced threat intelligence, efficient setup, and minimal performance impact. In comparison, Trellix EDR integrates antivirus and detection features with strong investigative tools. CrowdStrike's cost may deter small businesses, while Trellix provides flexible pricing suitable for cost-sensitive buyers.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Report
CrowdStrike Falcon presents a higher initial setup cost, while Trellix EDR offers a more budget-friendly setup, highlighting a cost-effective option for organizations seeking efficient endpoint protection.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon presents a higher initial setup cost, while Trellix EDR offers a more budget-friendly setup, highlighting a cost-effective option for organizations seeking efficient endpoint protection.
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Logo
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
4.0 out of 5
Trellix EDR excels in threat hunting and remediation with robust analytics and automation. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint integrates seamlessly into the Microsoft ecosystem, providing advanced threat intelligence. Trellix is valued for customization and support, while Microsoft Defender simplifies deployment with broader features.
Download Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Report
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) customers report moderate setup costs, while Microsoft Defender for Endpoint users experience significantly lower initial expenses.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) customers report moderate setup costs, while Microsoft Defender for Endpoint users experience significantly lower initial expenses.
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR
4.0 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR
4.0 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR is valued for its automation capabilities and seamless integration with other Fortinet products. In comparison, Trellix EDR stands out due to its advanced analytics and robust threat detection. Fortinet FortiEDR is easier to deploy, while Trellix EDR offers comprehensive support documentation.
Download Fortinet FortiEDR vs. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Report
Fortinet FortiEDR setup cost is widely considered budget-friendly while Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) setup cost is notably higher, reflecting its advanced features.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiEDR setup cost is widely considered budget-friendly while Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) setup cost is notably higher, reflecting its advanced features.
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Logo
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Complete
4.4 out of 5
SentinelOne Singularity Complete is praised for automated threat detection, machine learning, and ease of deployment. In comparison, Trellix EDR offers advanced analytics and comprehensive visibility. SentinelOne is favored for pricing and support, while Trellix appeals with its feature set despite higher costs.
Download SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Report
SentinelOne Singularity Complete has a lower setup cost, while Trellix EDR requires a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
SentinelOne Singularity Complete has a lower setup cost, while Trellix EDR requires a higher initial investment.
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Logo
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Logo
Cisco Secure Endpoint
4.3 out of 5
Cisco Secure Endpoint is renowned for its integration capabilities and real-time protection. In comparison, Trellix EDR excels in behavioral analytics and forensic abilities. Cisco's broad coverage benefits existing Cisco customers, while Trellix offers superior threat detection, justifying its higher cost with long-term ROI.
Download Cisco Secure Endpoint vs. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Report
Cisco Secure Endpoint is typically lauded for its straightforward and cost-effective setup, whereas Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) often encounters criticism for its higher initial setup costs.
View comparison
Pricing
Cisco Secure Endpoint is typically lauded for its straightforward and cost-effective setup, whereas Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) often encounters criticism for its higher initial setup costs.
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Logo
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Logo
IBM Security QRadar
4.0 out of 5
IBM Security QRadar excels in data consolidation and scalability for comprehensive security, ideal for complex environments with extensive compliance needs. In comparison, Trellix EDR offers robust threat detection and endpoint protection, appealing to businesses seeking efficient integration and competitive pricing.
Download IBM Security QRadar vs. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Report
IBM Security QRadar has a higher initial setup cost compared to Trellix EDR, which offers a more budget-friendly implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM Security QRadar has a higher initial setup cost compared to Trellix EDR, which offers a more budget-friendly implementation.
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Logo
Elastic Security
3.8 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Logo
Elastic Security
3.8 out of 5
Elastic Security, favored for its comprehensive SIEM capabilities and straightforward deployment, offers competitive pricing with clear ROI. In comparison, Trellix EDR's superior threat detection and response features yield a high ROI despite a higher price, making it ideal for advanced security needs.
Download Elastic Security vs. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Report
Elastic Security setup is costly, while Trellix EDR offers a more affordable initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Elastic Security setup is costly, while Trellix EDR offers a more affordable initial setup.
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Logo
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Logo
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security
4.1 out of 5
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security offers robust threat detection and automated response capabilities with straightforward deployment and responsive customer service, suitable for easier integration. In comparison, Trellix EDR is valued for comprehensive analytics, advanced threat intelligence, and deep threat analysis, justifying its higher price despite requiring more initial configuration.
Download Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Report
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security has a setup cost noted for its ease, whereas Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) has a more intricate and potentially higher setup cost.
View comparison
Pricing
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security has a setup cost noted for its ease, whereas Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) has a more intricate and potentially higher setup cost.
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Logo
Trend Vision One
4.3 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Logo
Trend Vision One
4.3 out of 5

Trend Vision One offers comprehensive protection for endpoints, networks, and email with centralized visibility. It is valued for its attack surface management, real-time threat detection, integrated management, ease of deployment, and user-friendly interface.

Download Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs. Trend Vision One Report
It would be nice if it was a little bit cheaper, but I think it has a fair price. It is comparable to others in the market.
The price is reasonable. It's not exorbitant. CrowdStrike and other players are on the higher side.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
It would be nice if it was a little bit cheaper, but I think it has a fair price. It is comparable to others in the market.
The price is reasonable. It's not exorbitant. CrowdStrike and other players are on the higher side.
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Logo
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Logo
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint
3.9 out of 5
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint excels in support and pricing satisfaction, while Trellix EDR offers a robust feature set with comprehensive threat analysis and detailed reporting. In comparison, Trellix users benefit from advanced analytics and integration but face a steeper learning curve during deployment.
Download Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint has a moderate setup cost, whereas Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) has a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint has a moderate setup cost, whereas Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) has a higher initial investment.
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Logo
Cynet
4.4 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Logo
Cynet
4.4 out of 5
Cynet offers automated remediation and quick setup, suiting buyers needing cost-effective solutions. In comparison, Trellix EDR's advanced threat detection and comprehensive policies justify a higher price. Cynet's pricing and fast deployment appeal to budget-conscious buyers, while Trellix attracts those seeking advanced security.
Download Cynet vs. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Report
Cynet features a low setup cost, while Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) has a higher setup cost.
View comparison
Pricing
Cynet features a low setup cost, while Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) has a higher setup cost.
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Logo
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert
4.1 out of 5
Trellix EDR excels with advanced threat detection and response, cost-effectiveness, and strong customer support. In comparison, Kaspersky EDR Expert offers superior integration with malware analysis tools and comprehensive threat intelligence. Trellix’s pricing appeals to cost-conscious buyers, while Kaspersky’s features justify its higher cost.
Download Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert vs. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Report
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) has a low setup cost while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert features a higher setup cost. Trellix offers more affordable initial deployment but Kaspersky provides comprehensive initial support.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) has a low setup cost while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert features a higher setup cost. Trellix offers more affordable initial deployment but Kaspersky provides comprehensive initial support.
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Logo
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response
4.0 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response excels in customer support and integration capabilities, making it a cost-effective choice. In comparison, Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response stands out for its feature-rich offering, advanced threat intelligence, and perceived higher value, justifying its pricing.
Download Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response vs. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Report
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) has affordable setup costs, while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response demands a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) has affordable setup costs, while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response demands a higher initial investment.
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Logo
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Logo
Sangfor Endpoint Secure
4.1 out of 5
Trellix EDR offers comprehensive threat detection, advanced analytics, and integration with other security tools. In comparison, Sangfor Endpoint Secure provides robust malware protection, real-time monitoring, and a user-friendly management console. Trellix EDR's straightforward deployment and reliable support contrast with Sangfor Endpoint Secure's cost-effective, value-for-money proposition.
Download Sangfor Endpoint Secure vs. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Report
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) setup cost is higher due to its advanced features, whereas Sangfor Endpoint Secure offers a more budget-friendly setup cost.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) setup cost is higher due to its advanced features, whereas Sangfor Endpoint Secure offers a more budget-friendly setup cost.
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Logo
N-able EDR
1 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Logo
N-able EDR
1 out of 5
Trellix EDR excels in advanced threat detection and automation, making it ideal for addressing complex threats. In comparison, N-able EDR offers superior ease of use and customer support, suitable for those prioritizing straightforward deployment and management. Trellix focuses on automation, while N-able emphasizes user-friendliness.
Download N-able EDR vs. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Report
Trellix EDR incurs a significant setup cost, whereas N-able EDR offers lower initial setup expenses, highlighting an important financial consideration for businesses.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix EDR incurs a significant setup cost, whereas N-able EDR offers lower initial setup expenses, highlighting an important financial consideration for businesses.

Related categories

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)