Sangfor Endpoint Secure vs Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) comparison

Sangfor and Trellix are both solutions in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category. Sangfor is ranked #22 with an average rating of 8.2, while Trellix is ranked #24 with an average rating of 7.5. Sangfor holds a 0.8% mindshare in EDR, compared to Trellix’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Sangfor users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Trellix users who would recommend it.

Sangfor Endpoint Secure

Read 11 Sangfor Endpoint Secure reviews

1,291 Views
820 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Trellix Endpoint Detection ...

Read 23 Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews

1,739 Views
1,052 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Sangfor Endpoint Secure

Trellix Endpoint Detection ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) and Sangfor Endpoint Secure compete in the endpoint security solutions category. Based on user reviews, Trellix has the upper hand due to its comprehensive customer service and overall effectiveness, while Sangfor is noted for its feature set, which users feel justifies its pricing.

Features: Trellix EDR offers robust real-time threat detection, seamless integration capabilities, and comprehensive customer service. Sangfor Endpoint Secure provides adaptive threat intelligence, ease of managing multiple endpoints, and advanced threat intelligence.

Room for Improvement: Trellix EDR could improve its reporting and analytics capabilities and add more intuitive management tools. Sangfor Endpoint Secure needs better support for complex environments, a more intuitive management interface, and enhanced support for diverse IT infrastructures.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Trellix EDR is known for easy deployment and responsive customer support. Sangfor Endpoint Secure has a simple deployment process but could benefit from more proactive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Trellix EDR is reasonably priced with good ROI due to its security features. Sangfor Endpoint Secure has higher setup costs, but users find the ROI justified by its advanced functionalities.

To learn more, read our detailed Sangfor Endpoint Secure vs. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Sangfor Endpoint Secure vs. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 839,255 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Sangfor Endpoint Secure

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

22nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Trellix Endpoint Detection ...

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

24th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of Sangfor Endpoint Secure is 0.8%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) is 0.9%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Featured Reviews

Shiraz Ali

Networking Solutions Specialist at GBM

Provides a unified and multi-layer security solution

I believe Sangfor Endpoint Secure could improve in terms of its user interface and management capabilities. Having a single, more user-friendly management console, like a one-window approach, would streamline the user experience and make it easier for administrators to handle security tasks more efficiently. Sangfor Endpoint Secure currently only allows one manager to control clients, and it lacks a backup system. It would be better if it supported a secondary manager for backup in case the primary one fails, ensuring uninterrupted service.

Read full review

CESARCASTRO

Committee of IT Cybersececurity at a energy/utilities company with 51-200 employees

Enhancements needed for security alerts while ongoing training strengthens defenses

This year, I am going to improve some tools to be installed or maybe acquire some services to better manage our web services and work with my coworkers. Application fiber also needs attention. Nowadays I am making applications that are publicly seen on the Internet. I need some protection, possibly multi-factor authentication improvements. I am seeing, for workflows, some sort of ethical hacking to test our environment. Knowledge of everything, not only the product - maybe some kind of alerts - needs to emerge. I see the current ones as very low-tier, and they must improve.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature I have found in the system is its comprehensive end-to-end protection."

"The product's initial setup phase was straightforward."

"The user-friendliness of Sangfor Endpoint Secure is particularly impressive. Even with basic technical knowledge, users can easily navigate the system, make changes, and implement updates."

"The tool's most valuable features are control access, endpoint security, and load balancing of ISPs."

"What stands out to me is the dual-end user interface they provide."

"It has a quick response time, threat intelligence, cybersecurity features, quick report generation, behavior analysis, dynamic detection, and quarantine features."

"I like the tool's honeypot feature. Some features include having a honeypot to detect attacks in a certain area. Additionally, there is RDP protection, which means that when we remote into our server or any endpoint, we must enter a password as a second layer of security. It can also integrate with next-generation firewalls."

"Sangfor Endpoint Secure has some good policy certificates."

More Sangfor Endpoint Secure pros

"The biggest strength of the solution is that it's an integrated product that includes EDR and antivirus."

"What we're using the most and what we found valuable in McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response are Web Control, Advanced Threat Protection, and Threat Prevention features."

"When Trellix detects some threats, the device is isolated in a quarantine zone for examination."

"This is a stable product."

"Trellix has done a good job reducing threats."

"Trellix has a user-friendly interface."

"It relies on external systems for detection and then asks the endpoint to handle blocking. However, the most crucial feature is its investigative capabilities. With real-time search and other functionalities, it enables comprehensive detection and response."

"The product provides a one-click recovery of encrypted files."

More Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) pros

Cons

"When an issue occurs, the response time for first-level support and the time taken for meetings could be improved."

"The interface has too many buttons, making it cluttered."

"Sometimes, the VPN is not secure and doesn't work properly in Sangfor Endpoint Secure."

"I face issues while migrating from Kaspersky to Sangfor Endpoint Secure."

"Sangfor Endpoint Secure performs poorly."

"I believe Sangfor Endpoint Secure could improve in terms of its user interface and management capabilities."

"It would be much more convenient if the migration tool could be installed directly on the customer's VMs, enabling a smoother migration process to the new infrastructure, with potential restrictions addressed accordingly."

"Currently, the tool lacks reporting functionalities."

More Sangfor Endpoint Secure cons

"The alert feature of McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response needs improvement because for you to get the alerts, you have to log on to the portal. What my company needs is a tool that sends you alerts. For example, if it detects a threat on your machine, it should send you an alert. My company gets the alerts instead from the antivirus software rather than the EDR. If you want to see the alerts on McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response, you have to connect to the system manually. Another area for improvement in the tool is the reporting. My company needs weekly and monthly reports about the alerts, but you can't extract reports from McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response, so a decision was made to move to another EDR solution, particularly Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, next month. My company tested Microsoft Defender for Endpoint via a POC for one to three months. The resource usage of McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response is also an area for improvement because it consumes a lot of memory. For example, during the on-demand scan, you can't work because of the high CPU usage. You need to schedule the scans. McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response has a lot of modules, but my company doesn't use all modules."

"The searching capabilities for the IOCs can be further improved"

"For Spanish users, it is necessary to have a knowledge base specifically designed for them, which is currently not available."

"Trellix does not support Linux and Mac."

"The console has a lot of bugs, and it creates many issues."

"The solution's downside stems from the fact that Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) and McAfee MVISION Endpoint are not combined into a single solution, so from an improvement perspective, they need to be combined into a single solution."

"I remember doing many tickets for Trellix support, and my EDR was not properly functioning. I didn't feel the detection or the real protection."

"Some modules that are doing machine learning and artificial intelligence are blocking our processes."

More Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Its "pay as you grow" model offers cost-effectiveness compared to major cloud providers."

"Sangfor Endpoint Secure's pricing is cheap. I rate it seven out of ten."

"Price-wise, Sangfor Endpoint Secure can be considered a competitively priced product in the market as it offers quite low prices compared to other solutions."

"Sangfor Endpoint Secure is not a cheap solution."

"We were using Hyper-V. So, we switched to Sangfor because of the pricing."

"The product is expensive compared to other vendors."

"The solution is cheap. It is cheaper than other products by 15-20 percent."

"The product’s pricing is reasonable."

"Speaking about the price, you must use the product to find the product's cost for you."

"Pricing for McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response is not that expensive, but it's not something that a startup could buy. Pricing for it is for midsized businesses. There's an additional payment if you want data retention for more than thirty days. They gave us data retention for thirty days. Then if you want longer data retention, they have the paid option for a three-month data retention period and for a one-year data retention period."

"The price is reasonable."

"The cost is okay, compared to other products."

"The pricing is always high."

"The licensing costs attached to the solution are very easy to manage. There is a need to make yearly payments towards the licensing costs."

"Pricing is a problem in South Africa. It could be cheaper here. The rand-to-dollar exchange rate makes it expensive for us. A 25 dollar endpoint cost becomes quite significant when converted to rand."

More Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

839,255 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

12%

Government

11%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Sangfor Endpoint Secure?

Sangfor Endpoint Secure has some good policy certificates.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Sangfor Endpoint Secure?

The interface has too many buttons, making it cluttered. It would be better if it were a simplified version with fewer buttons and a more consolidated layout.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Sangfor Endpoint Secure?

Sangfor Endpoint Secure is easy to handle with its user-friendly interface. The four engines it utilizes for endpoint detection provide fewer false positives compared to other solutions. It is used...

See all answers

What do you like most about McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response?

Trellix has a user-friendly interface.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response?

I haven't had any really great problems with pricing in the past two or three years.

See all answers

What needs improvement with McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response?

See all answers

Comparisons

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response vs Sangfor Endpoint Secure

Compared 21% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Sangfor Endpoint Secure

Compared 17% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Sangfor Endpoint Secure

Compared 12% of the time

Bitdefender GravityZone EDR vs Sangfor Endpoint Secure

Compared 8% of the time

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert vs Sangfor Endpoint Secure

Compared 4% of the time

More Sangfor Endpoint Secure Competitors

Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) vs Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Compared 51% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Compared 15% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Compared 7% of the time

Trend Vision One vs Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Compared 5% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Compared 3% of the time

More Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Sangfor Endpoint Secure

February 2025

Download Sangfor Endpoint Secure product report

Buyer's Guide

Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

February 2025

Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) report

Download Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) product report

Also Known As

No data available

McAfee MVISION EDR, MVISION EDR, MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response

Overview

Organizations use Sangfor Endpoint Secure for endpoint protection and security management, managing devices, servers, and networks against malicious threats. It also assists in blocking websites, managing infrastructure, applications, antivirus needs, and aids in migrating to cloud environments.

Sangfor Endpoint Secure offers end-to-end protection, incorporating file protection, AI detection, behavior analysis, access control, and ISP load balancing. It facilitates VM migration with minimal downtime and includes a dual-end user interface for creating firewall rules, uploading images, and configuring VM settings. Enhancements such as Hyper-V capabilities, policy certificates, honeypot features, and next-generation firewall integrations are available. However, Sangfor Endpoint Secure could improve on console management, reporting functionalities, public cloud migration support, navigation, VPN system issues, licensing, update management, transitioning processes, and incorporating healing capabilities.

What are its most important features?

Comprehensive end-to-end protection including file protection
AI detection and behavior analysis
Access control and ISP load balancing
Ease of VM migration with minimal downtime
Streamlined dual-end user interface for firewall rules and VM settings
Hyper-V capabilities and policy certificates
Honeypot feature for attack detection and RDP protection
Integration with next-generation firewalls

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Enhanced device, server, and network security from malicious threats
Simplified migration from on-premises to cloud environments
User-friendly navigation and management capabilities
Advanced detection and behavior analysis reducing potential threats
Streamlined enforcement of robust security policies

Sangfor Endpoint Secure is implemented across various industries to ensure comprehensive security management and protection. IT departments leverage its VM migration capabilities for seamless transitions to cloud environments. Healthcare organizations use it to secure sensitive patient data, while educational institutions utilize it for safeguarding academic records and personal information. Financial services employ it to protect critical transactional data and adhere to stringent compliance requirements.

Sangfor

Reduce Alert Noise

Reduce the time to detect and respond to threats. Trellix EDR helps security analysts quickly prioritize threats and minimize potential disruption.

Do More with Existing Resources

Guided investigation automatically asks and answers questions while gathering, summarizing, and visualizing evidence from multiple sources—reducing the need for more SOC resources.

Low-Maintenance Cloud Solution

Cloud-based deployment and analytics enables your skilled security analysts to focus on strategic defense, instead of tool maintenance. Benefit from implementing the right solution for you.

Trellix

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Sutherland Global Services

Buyer's Guide

Sangfor Endpoint Secure vs. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

January 2025

Free Report: Sangfor Endpoint Secure vs. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Find out what your peers are saying about Sangfor Endpoint Secure vs. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

839,255 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Sangfor Endpoint Secure vs. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) report.

See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.