Sangfor Endpoint Secure vs Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) comparison

Sangfor and Trellix are both solutions in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category. Sangfor is ranked #22 with an average rating of 8.2, while Trellix is ranked #24 with an average rating of 7.7. Sangfor holds a 1.0% mindshare in EDR, compared to Trellix’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Sangfor users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Trellix users who would recommend it.

Sangfor Endpoint Secure

Read 11 Sangfor Endpoint Secure reviews

1,126 Views
742 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Trellix Endpoint Detection ...

Read 22 Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews

1,762 Views
1,018 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Sangfor Endpoint Secure

Trellix Endpoint Detection ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) and Sangfor Endpoint Secure compete in the endpoint security solutions category. Based on user reviews, Trellix has the upper hand due to its comprehensive customer service and overall effectiveness, while Sangfor is noted for its feature set, which users feel justifies its pricing.

Features: Trellix EDR offers robust real-time threat detection, seamless integration capabilities, and comprehensive customer service. Sangfor Endpoint Secure provides adaptive threat intelligence, ease of managing multiple endpoints, and advanced threat intelligence.

Room for Improvement: Trellix EDR could improve its reporting and analytics capabilities and add more intuitive management tools. Sangfor Endpoint Secure needs better support for complex environments, a more intuitive management interface, and enhanced support for diverse IT infrastructures.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Trellix EDR is known for easy deployment and responsive customer support. Sangfor Endpoint Secure has a simple deployment process but could benefit from more proactive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Trellix EDR is reasonably priced with good ROI due to its security features. Sangfor Endpoint Secure has higher setup costs, but users find the ROI justified by its advanced functionalities.

To learn more, read our detailed Sangfor Endpoint Secure vs. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Sangfor Endpoint Secure vs. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,168 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Sangfor Endpoint Secure

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

22nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Trellix Endpoint Detection ...

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

24th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of Sangfor Endpoint Secure is 1.0%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) is 0.9%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Featured Reviews

Shiraz Ali

Networking Solutions Specialist at GBM

Provides a unified and multi-layer security solution

I believe Sangfor Endpoint Secure could improve in terms of its user interface and management capabilities. Having a single, more user-friendly management console, like a one-window approach, would streamline the user experience and make it easier for administrators to handle security tasks more efficiently. Sangfor Endpoint Secure currently only allows one manager to control clients, and it lacks a backup system. It would be better if it supported a secondary manager for backup in case the primary one fails, ensuring uninterrupted service.

Read full review

Juan Muriel

IT Management Specialist at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

Completely automated, affordable, and provides good technical functionalities

The antivirus and DLP features are valuable. Now, we have a campaign to encrypt all the drives of the company. We have a solution for network access control from Fortinet. When Trellix detects some threats, the device is isolated in a quarantine zone for examination. We integrate Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response with other solutions to perform such isolations. We also use products for log monitoring and correlation and create use cases for automatic response.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Sangfor Endpoint Secure has some good policy certificates."

"We use the product for network protection from any malicious threat."

"It has a quick response time, threat intelligence, cybersecurity features, quick report generation, behavior analysis, dynamic detection, and quarantine features."

"The tool's most valuable features are control access, endpoint security, and load balancing of ISPs."

"The most valuable feature I have found in the system is its comprehensive end-to-end protection."

"The product's initial setup phase was straightforward."

"What stands out to me is the dual-end user interface they provide."

"The user-friendliness of Sangfor Endpoint Secure is particularly impressive. Even with basic technical knowledge, users can easily navigate the system, make changes, and implement updates."

More Sangfor Endpoint Secure pros

"The biggest strength of the solution is that it's an integrated product that includes EDR and antivirus."

"The most useful features are behavior monitoring, DLP, and access control. The automation has gotten much better in the last two years than when it was McAfee. It works better now and integrates more smoothly."

"The dashboard makes it easier and more effective to analyze data."

"When Trellix detects some threats, the device is isolated in a quarantine zone for examination."

"The investigation and rule detection feature of the solution has proven most useful for our company"

"It relies on external systems for detection and then asks the endpoint to handle blocking. However, the most crucial feature is its investigative capabilities. With real-time search and other functionalities, it enables comprehensive detection and response."

"It is a scalable solution and very easy to use."

"If there is any malicious behavior in the workstation or server, the tool stops or isolates it automatically and generates alerts."

More Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) pros

Cons

"I face issues while migrating from Kaspersky to Sangfor Endpoint Secure."

"Sometimes, the VPN is not secure and doesn't work properly in Sangfor Endpoint Secure."

"I believe Sangfor Endpoint Secure could improve in terms of its user interface and management capabilities."

"There are a few areas for improvement. We have encountered licensing issues on occasion, and sometimes updates don't apply properly."

"It is complicated to establish a tunnel due to technical issues in the VPN system."

"It would be much more convenient if the migration tool could be installed directly on the customer's VMs, enabling a smoother migration process to the new infrastructure, with potential restrictions addressed accordingly."

"Sangfor Endpoint Secure should include healing capabilities."

"Sangfor Endpoint Secure performs poorly."

More Sangfor Endpoint Secure cons

"The technical support must be improved."

"Trellix does not support Linux and Mac."

"The main drawbacks are resources and processing time, as it consumes a lot of CPU and RAM."

"An area for improvement in McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response is the historical search. For example: when you have information on the artifact and a precedent, you want to do a search, and that is a bit lacking in the tool."

"I'd like the tool to become more like an XDR, with one management system and endpoint activation."

"The graphical view for nodes must be increased."

"The dashboard is split across different platforms. For example, if you want information on Incident Detection, you have to access one dashboard, and for DLP reporting, there's a separate platform. This fragmentation means you can't access everything from a single dashboard."

"The dashboard and reporting features are not so user-friendly or intuitive, so they need some work."

More Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is expensive compared to other vendors."

"Sangfor Endpoint Secure's pricing is cheap. I rate it seven out of ten."

"The solution is cheap. It is cheaper than other products by 15-20 percent."

"We were using Hyper-V. So, we switched to Sangfor because of the pricing."

"Sangfor Endpoint Secure is not a cheap solution."

"Its "pay as you grow" model offers cost-effectiveness compared to major cloud providers."

"Price-wise, Sangfor Endpoint Secure can be considered a competitively priced product in the market as it offers quite low prices compared to other solutions."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is low and ten is high, I rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten."

"McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response is reasonable in terms of cost. It's a tool my company has been using for a few years now. It costs $25,000 to $30,000 for six hundred users."

"Pricing is a problem in South Africa. It could be cheaper here. The rand-to-dollar exchange rate makes it expensive for us. A 25 dollar endpoint cost becomes quite significant when converted to rand."

"Pricing for McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response is not that expensive, but it's not something that a startup could buy. Pricing for it is for midsized businesses. There's an additional payment if you want data retention for more than thirty days. They gave us data retention for thirty days. Then if you want longer data retention, they have the paid option for a three-month data retention period and for a one-year data retention period."

"The pricing is always high."

"The cost is okay, compared to other products."

"Speaking about the price, you must use the product to find the product's cost for you."

"The price is reasonable."

More Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

12%

Government

11%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Sangfor Endpoint Secure?

Sangfor Endpoint Secure has some good policy certificates.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Sangfor Endpoint Secure?

The interface has too many buttons, making it cluttered. It would be better if it were a simplified version with fewer buttons and a more consolidated layout.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Sangfor Endpoint Secure?

Sangfor Endpoint Secure is easy to handle with its user-friendly interface. The four engines it utilizes for endpoint detection provide fewer false positives compared to other solutions. It is used...

See all answers

What do you like most about McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response?

Trellix has a user-friendly interface.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response?

Pricing is a problem in South Africa. It could be cheaper here. The rand-to-dollar exchange rate makes it expensive for us. A 25 dollar endpoint cost becomes quite significant when converted to rand.

See all answers

What needs improvement with McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response?

When it comes to some unknown fileless attacks, the tool is not able to detect them properly, making it an area where improvements are required. The tool's support needs to improve in the areas of ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response vs Sangfor Endpoint Secure

Compared 22% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Sangfor Endpoint Secure

Compared 17% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Sangfor Endpoint Secure

Compared 13% of the time

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security vs Sangfor Endpoint Secure

Compared 8% of the time

Fortinet FortiEDR vs Sangfor Endpoint Secure

Compared 3% of the time

More Sangfor Endpoint Secure Competitors

Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) vs Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Compared 51% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Compared 9% of the time

Trellix Active Response vs Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Compared 5% of the time

Cynet vs Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Compared 3% of the time

More Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Sangfor Endpoint Secure

November 2024

Download Sangfor Endpoint Secure product report

Buyer's Guide

Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

November 2024

Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) report

Download Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) product report

Also Known As

No data available

McAfee MVISION EDR, MVISION EDR, MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response

Learn More

Sangfor

Trellix

Overview

Organizations use Sangfor Endpoint Secure for endpoint protection and security management, managing devices, servers, and networks against malicious threats. It also assists in blocking websites, managing infrastructure, applications, antivirus needs, and aids in migrating to cloud environments.

Sangfor Endpoint Secure offers end-to-end protection, incorporating file protection, AI detection, behavior analysis, access control, and ISP load balancing. It facilitates VM migration with minimal downtime and includes a dual-end user interface for creating firewall rules, uploading images, and configuring VM settings. Enhancements such as Hyper-V capabilities, policy certificates, honeypot features, and next-generation firewall integrations are available. However, Sangfor Endpoint Secure could improve on console management, reporting functionalities, public cloud migration support, navigation, VPN system issues, licensing, update management, transitioning processes, and incorporating healing capabilities.

What are its most important features?

Comprehensive end-to-end protection including file protection
AI detection and behavior analysis
Access control and ISP load balancing
Ease of VM migration with minimal downtime
Streamlined dual-end user interface for firewall rules and VM settings
Hyper-V capabilities and policy certificates
Honeypot feature for attack detection and RDP protection
Integration with next-generation firewalls

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Enhanced device, server, and network security from malicious threats
Simplified migration from on-premises to cloud environments
User-friendly navigation and management capabilities
Advanced detection and behavior analysis reducing potential threats
Streamlined enforcement of robust security policies

Sangfor Endpoint Secure is implemented across various industries to ensure comprehensive security management and protection. IT departments leverage its VM migration capabilities for seamless transitions to cloud environments. Healthcare organizations use it to secure sensitive patient data, while educational institutions utilize it for safeguarding academic records and personal information. Financial services employ it to protect critical transactional data and adhere to stringent compliance requirements.

Reduce Alert Noise

Reduce the time to detect and respond to threats. Trellix EDR helps security analysts quickly prioritize threats and minimize potential disruption.

Do More with Existing Resources

Guided investigation automatically asks and answers questions while gathering, summarizing, and visualizing evidence from multiple sources—reducing the need for more SOC resources.

Low-Maintenance Cloud Solution

Cloud-based deployment and analytics enables your skilled security analysts to focus on strategic defense, instead of tool maintenance. Benefit from implementing the right solution for you.

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Sutherland Global Services

Buyer's Guide

Sangfor Endpoint Secure vs. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

December 2024

Free Report: Sangfor Endpoint Secure vs. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Find out what your peers are saying about Sangfor Endpoint Secure vs. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Sangfor Endpoint Secure vs. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) report.

See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.