N-able EDR vs Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) comparison

N-able and Trellix are both solutions in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category. N-able is ranked #55 with an average rating of 7.0, while Trellix is ranked #24 with an average rating of 7.5. N-able holds a 0.4% mindshare in EDR, compared to Trellix’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of N-able users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Trellix users who would recommend it.

N-able EDR

Read 3 N-able EDR reviews

710 Views
548 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Trellix Endpoint Detection ...

Read 23 Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews

1,723 Views
1,064 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

N-able EDR

Trellix Endpoint Detection ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) and N-able EDR are both robust tools in the endpoint detection market. Trellix EDR stands out for its feature set and deployment flexibility, while N-able EDR is favored for customer service and pricing.

Features: Trellix EDR offers advanced threat detection capabilities, integration with other security tools, and a comprehensive feature set. N-able EDR is known for its ease of use, comprehensive reporting features, and user-friendly interface.

Room for Improvement: Trellix EDR needs better documentation, more intuitive alerting options, and improved user guidance. N-able EDR requires enhanced threat intelligence, better automation capabilities, and more robust threat response features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Trellix EDR is noted for smooth deployment and quick setup, although it has a steeper learning curve. N-able EDR is praised for straightforward deployment and exceptional customer support.

Pricing and ROI: Trellix EDR is perceived as more expensive but justifies the cost with its comprehensive features. N-able EDR offers competitive pricing with users reporting high ROI and quicker returns.

To learn more, read our detailed N-able EDR vs. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

N-able EDR vs. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 849,190 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

N-able EDR

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

55th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Trellix Endpoint Detection ...

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

24th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of N-able EDR is 0.4%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) is 1.0%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Featured Reviews

Yazan Albaw

Customer Success Director at We Cybers

N-able EDR SentinelOne delivers advanced endpoint protection through real-time threat detection, automated response, and comprehensive visibility to safeguard against cyber threats.

N-able EDR SentinelOne is renowned for its exceptional detection and protection capabilities, ranked number one by Gartner and MITRE ATT&CK. It offers robust defense against various threats, including malware, fileless attacks, phishing, and insider threats. The solution excels in identifying suspicious behavior and promptly notifying engineers of potential threats. A key feature is its auto-response capability. You can configure automatic responses to threats, which significantly reduces the time and effort required to manage incidents. Enhanced by machine learning, these automated responses are both efficient and adaptive. Additionally, N-able EDR integrates seamlessly with RMM (Remote Monitoring and Management), allowing us to monitor EDR performance, detect failures, and oversee network performance from a single, unified dashboard. This integration streamlines management and enhances overall efficiency.

Read full review

CESARCASTRO

Committee of IT Cybersececurity at a energy/utilities company with 51-200 employees

Enhancements needed for security alerts while ongoing training strengthens defenses

This year, I am going to improve some tools to be installed or maybe acquire some services to better manage our web services and work with my coworkers. Application fiber also needs attention. Nowadays I am making applications that are publicly seen on the Internet. I need some protection, possibly multi-factor authentication improvements. I am seeing, for workflows, some sort of ethical hacking to test our environment. Knowledge of everything, not only the product - maybe some kind of alerts - needs to emerge. I see the current ones as very low-tier, and they must improve.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features are the rollback feature, it's important for us. The AI models and are good."

"The most valuable feature, which I can describe as the '360 vision' of the inventory device, provides a complete view of all the devices."

"It provides visibility and a storyline to track the virus or malware's activities, showing infected processes and changes made."

"The investigation and rule detection feature of the solution has proven most useful for our company"

"The most valuable feature I found in McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response is the guided analytics or guided EDR investigation."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its area for threat detection."

"The most useful features are behavior monitoring, DLP, and access control. The automation has gotten much better in the last two years than when it was McAfee. It works better now and integrates more smoothly."

"Trellix has done a good job reducing threats."

"It is a scalable solution and very easy to use."

"What we're using the most and what we found valuable in McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response are Web Control, Advanced Threat Protection, and Threat Prevention features."

"The biggest strength of the solution is that it's an integrated product that includes EDR and antivirus."

More Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) pros

Cons

"Concerning the license, if I add one more device without a license, it will automatically subscribe to a license. I do not appreciate that."

"We have a lot of false positives we see in the dashboard. I think this is the only problem we are facing."

"I would like to see them add support for both Android and iOS smartphones."

"I would rate the scalability as seven out of ten. The capability is useful. Concerning the license, if I add one more device without a license, it will automatically subscribe to a license. I do not appreciate that."

"The dashboard is split across different platforms. For example, if you want information on Incident Detection, you have to access one dashboard, and for DLP reporting, there's a separate platform. This fragmentation means you can't access everything from a single dashboard."

"For Spanish users, it is necessary to have a knowledge base specifically designed for them, which is currently not available."

"I need some protection, possibly multi-factor authentication improvements."

"One of the issues about the product stems from the failure to work on its administrative scalability. The aforementioned area can be considered for improvement."

"I remember doing many tickets for Trellix support, and my EDR was not properly functioning. I didn't feel the detection or the real protection."

"The solution lacks the ability to integrate with external platforms. In future releases of the solution, I would like to see the solution increase its integration capabilities with external platforms."

"The graphical view for nodes must be increased."

"An area for improvement in McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response is the historical search. For example: when you have information on the artifact and a precedent, you want to do a search, and that is a bit lacking in the tool."

More Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is average."

"Speaking about the price, you must use the product to find the product's cost for you."

"Pricing for McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response is not that expensive, but it's not something that a startup could buy. Pricing for it is for midsized businesses. There's an additional payment if you want data retention for more than thirty days. They gave us data retention for thirty days. Then if you want longer data retention, they have the paid option for a three-month data retention period and for a one-year data retention period."

"The price is reasonable."

"The licensing costs attached to the solution are very easy to manage. There is a need to make yearly payments towards the licensing costs."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is low and ten is high, I rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten."

"McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response is reasonable in terms of cost. It's a tool my company has been using for a few years now. It costs $25,000 to $30,000 for six hundred users."

"Pricing is a problem in South Africa. It could be cheaper here. The rand-to-dollar exchange rate makes it expensive for us. A 25 dollar endpoint cost becomes quite significant when converted to rand."

"The cost is okay, compared to other products."

More Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

849,190 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Non Profit

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Government

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with N-able EDR?

I do not have any ideas for improvement. It is a good solution, however, I am not an expert, so I do not have more ideas on this.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for N-able EDR?

I use N-able EDR for monitoring the devices of my company.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering N-able EDR?

The overall solution rating is seven out of ten. Scalability and integration could be improved, particularly with Microsoft tools.

See all answers

What do you like most about McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response?

Trellix has a user-friendly interface.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response?

I haven't had any really great problems with pricing in the past two or three years.

See all answers

What needs improvement with McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response?

See all answers

Comparisons

CrowdStrike Falcon vs N-able EDR

Compared 40% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs N-able EDR

Compared 29% of the time

ESET Inspect vs N-able EDR

Compared 13% of the time

Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs N-able EDR

Compared 10% of the time

Huntress Managed EDR vs N-able EDR

Compared 9% of the time

More N-able EDR Competitors

Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) vs Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Compared 51% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Compared 15% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Compared 6% of the time

Trend Vision One vs Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Compared 5% of the time

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Compared 4% of the time

More Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

January 2025

Download N-able EDR product report

Buyer's Guide

Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

March 2025

Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) report

Download Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) product report

Also Known As

No data available

McAfee MVISION EDR, MVISION EDR, MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response

Overview

N-able EDR provides comprehensive endpoint detection and response capabilities, ensuring system security and facilitating rapid incident response. Users highlight its effectiveness in detecting threats and appreciate its detailed reporting and seamless integration with existing IT infrastructure.

N-able EDR stands out with its robust threat detection, efficient endpoint protection, and comprehensive incident reporting. It offers constant monitoring and protection against malware and other cyber threats. Users find the configuration easy and appreciate the detailed alerts and analysis. With real-time monitoring and automated threat response, N-able EDR allows for high customization, contributing to enhanced security management. However, users suggest improvements in customization, reporting capabilities, scalability, and faster response times.

What are the standout features of N-able EDR?

Robust Threat Detection: Detects various cyber threats efficiently.
Simple System Configuration: Easy to set up and deploy.
Efficient Endpoint Protection: Provides continuous monitoring and protection.
Comprehensive Incident Reporting: Offers detailed reports and analysis.
Seamless Integration: Integrates smoothly with existing IT infrastructure.
Real-time Monitoring: Monitors systems in real-time.
Automated Threat Response: Responds to threats automatically.
High Customization: Offers customization options to suit security needs.

What benefits or ROI should be considered?

Improved Security: Enhanced threat detection and rapid response ensure systems stay secure.
Time Savings: Automated responses and easy configuration save time for IT teams.
Detailed Insights: Comprehensive reports and alerts provide valuable security insights.
Operational Efficiency: Seamless integration with existing tools boosts operational efficiency.

N-able EDR is widely implemented across industries such as finance, healthcare, and retail. In finance, it's crucial for protecting sensitive data and ensuring compliance. Healthcare entities utilize it for safeguarding patient information against breaches. Retailers rely on its robust protection to secure transactional data from cyber threats.

N-able

Reduce Alert Noise

Reduce the time to detect and respond to threats. Trellix EDR helps security analysts quickly prioritize threats and minimize potential disruption.

Do More with Existing Resources

Guided investigation automatically asks and answers questions while gathering, summarizing, and visualizing evidence from multiple sources—reducing the need for more SOC resources.

Low-Maintenance Cloud Solution

Cloud-based deployment and analytics enables your skilled security analysts to focus on strategic defense, instead of tool maintenance. Benefit from implementing the right solution for you.

Trellix

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Sutherland Global Services

Buyer's Guide

N-able EDR vs. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

April 2025

Free Report: N-able EDR vs. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Find out what your peers are saying about N-able EDR vs. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

849,190 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our N-able EDR vs. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) report.

See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.