Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

N-able EDR vs Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) comparison

N-able and Trellix are both solutions in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category. N-able is ranked #55 with an average rating of 7.0, while Trellix is ranked #24 with an average rating of 7.5. N-able holds a 0.4% mindshare in EDR, compared to Trellix’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of N-able users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Trellix users who would recommend it.
N-able EDR
Read 3 N-able EDR reviews
  • 710 Views
  • 548 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Trellix Endpoint Detection ...
Read 23 Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews
  • 1,723 Views
  • 1,064 Comparison Views
83% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) and N-able EDR are both robust tools in the endpoint detection market. Trellix EDR stands out for its feature set and deployment flexibility, while N-able EDR is favored for customer service and pricing.

Features: Trellix EDR offers advanced threat detection capabilities, integration with other security tools, and a comprehensive feature set. N-able EDR is known for its ease of use, comprehensive reporting features, and user-friendly interface.

Room for Improvement: Trellix EDR needs better documentation, more intuitive alerting options, and improved user guidance. N-able EDR requires enhanced threat intelligence, better automation capabilities, and more robust threat response features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Trellix EDR is noted for smooth deployment and quick setup, although it has a steeper learning curve. N-able EDR is praised for straightforward deployment and exceptional customer support.

Pricing and ROI: Trellix EDR is perceived as more expensive but justifies the cost with its comprehensive features. N-able EDR offers competitive pricing with users reporting high ROI and quicker returns.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed N-able EDR vs. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Report (Updated: March 2025).
Buyer's Guide
N-able EDR vs. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
March 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 845,040 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

N-able EDR
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
55th
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.7
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Trellix Endpoint Detection ...
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
24th
Average Rating
7.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
23
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of N-able EDR is 0.4%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) is 1.0%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
 

Featured Reviews

Yazan Albaw - PeerSpot reviewer
N-able EDR SentinelOne delivers advanced endpoint protection through real-time threat detection, automated response, and comprehensive visibility to safeguard against cyber threats.
N-able EDR SentinelOne is renowned for its exceptional detection and protection capabilities, ranked number one by Gartner and MITRE ATT&CK. It offers robust defense against various threats, including malware, fileless attacks, phishing, and insider threats. The solution excels in identifying suspicious behavior and promptly notifying engineers of potential threats. A key feature is its auto-response capability. You can configure automatic responses to threats, which significantly reduces the time and effort required to manage incidents. Enhanced by machine learning, these automated responses are both efficient and adaptive. Additionally, N-able EDR integrates seamlessly with RMM (Remote Monitoring and Management), allowing us to monitor EDR performance, detect failures, and oversee network performance from a single, unified dashboard. This integration streamlines management and enhances overall efficiency.
Read full review
CESARCASTRO - PeerSpot reviewer
Enhancements needed for security alerts while ongoing training strengthens defenses
This year, I am going to improve some tools to be installed or maybe acquire some services to better manage our web services and work with my coworkers. Application fiber also needs attention. Nowadays I am making applications that are publicly seen on the Internet. I need some protection, possibly multi-factor authentication improvements. I am seeing, for workflows, some sort of ethical hacking to test our environment. Knowledge of everything, not only the product - maybe some kind of alerts - needs to emerge. I see the current ones as very low-tier, and they must improve.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It provides visibility and a storyline to track the virus or malware's activities, showing infected processes and changes made."
"The most valuable feature, which I can describe as the '360 vision' of the inventory device, provides a complete view of all the devices."
"The most valuable feature, which I can describe as the '360 vision' of the inventory device, provides a complete view of all the devices."
"The most valuable features are the rollback feature, it's important for us. The AI models and are good."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its area for threat detection."
"If there is any malicious behavior in the workstation or server, the tool stops or isolates it automatically and generates alerts."
"Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) offers endpoint protection and helps collect information while also allowing users to investigate malicious files in an IT environment...It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."
"It is a scalable solution and very easy to use."
"Trellix has a user-friendly interface."
"The dashboard makes it easier and more effective to analyze data."
"This is a stable product."
"The product and the services we have are quite good."
More Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) pros
 

Cons

"Concerning the license, if I add one more device without a license, it will automatically subscribe to a license. I do not appreciate that."
"I would like to see them add support for both Android and iOS smartphones."
"We have a lot of false positives we see in the dashboard. I think this is the only problem we are facing."
"I would rate the scalability as seven out of ten. The capability is useful. Concerning the license, if I add one more device without a license, it will automatically subscribe to a license. I do not appreciate that."
"An area for improvement in McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response is the historical search. For example: when you have information on the artifact and a precedent, you want to do a search, and that is a bit lacking in the tool."
"The endpoints and utilization are too high, which impacts the production activity."
"Some modules that are doing machine learning and artificial intelligence are blocking our processes."
"One of the issues about the product stems from the failure to work on its administrative scalability. The aforementioned area can be considered for improvement."
"The main drawbacks are resources and processing time, as it consumes a lot of CPU and RAM."
"The searching capabilities for the IOCs can be further improved"
"The dashboard and reporting features are not so user-friendly or intuitive, so they need some work."
"I'd like the tool to become more like an XDR, with one management system and endpoint activation."
More Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is average."
"The product’s pricing is reasonable."
"The cost is okay, compared to other products."
"The price is reasonable."
"Pricing is a problem in South Africa. It could be cheaper here. The rand-to-dollar exchange rate makes it expensive for us. A 25 dollar endpoint cost becomes quite significant when converted to rand."
"On a scale of one to ten, where one is low and ten is high, I rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten."
"The pricing is always high."
"The licensing costs attached to the solution are very easy to manage. There is a need to make yearly payments towards the licensing costs."
"Speaking about the price, you must use the product to find the product's cost for you."
More Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
18%
Comms Service Provider
11%
Non Profit
8%
Healthcare Company
7%
Computer Software Company
13%
Government
12%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with N-able EDR?
I do not have any ideas for improvement. It is a good solution, however, I am not an expert, so I do not have more ideas on this.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for N-able EDR?
I use N-able EDR for monitoring the devices of my company.
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering N-able EDR?
The overall solution rating is seven out of ten. Scalability and integration could be improved, particularly with Microsoft tools.
See all answers
What do you like most about McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response?
Trellix has a user-friendly interface.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response?
I haven't had any really great problems with pricing in the past two or three years.
See all answers
What needs improvement with McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response?
This year, I am going to improve some tools to be installed or maybe acquire some services to better manage our web services and work with my coworkers. Application fiber also needs attention. Nowa...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

CrowdStrike Falcon vs N-able EDR Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon vs N-able EDR
Compared 41% of the time
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs N-able EDR Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs N-able EDR
Compared 28% of the time
ESET Inspect vs N-able EDR Logo
ESET Inspect vs N-able EDR
Compared 11% of the time
Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs N-able EDR Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs N-able EDR
Compared 10% of the time
Huntress Managed EDR vs N-able EDR Logo
Huntress Managed EDR vs N-able EDR
Compared 10% of the time
More N-able EDR Competitors
Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) vs Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) vs Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
Compared 52% of the time
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
Compared 15% of the time
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
Compared 6% of the time
Trend Vision One vs Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Logo
Trend Vision One vs Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
Compared 5% of the time
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Logo
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
Compared 4% of the time
More Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
January 2025
N-able EDR reportDownload N-able EDR product report
Buyer's Guide
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
March 2025
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reportDownload Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
McAfee MVISION EDR, MVISION EDR, MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response
 

Overview

N-able EDR provides comprehensive endpoint detection and response capabilities, ensuring system security and facilitating rapid incident response. Users highlight its effectiveness in detecting threats and appreciate its detailed reporting and seamless integration with existing IT infrastructure.

N-able EDR stands out with its robust threat detection, efficient endpoint protection, and comprehensive incident reporting. It offers constant monitoring and protection against malware and other cyber threats. Users find the configuration easy and appreciate the detailed alerts and analysis. With real-time monitoring and automated threat response, N-able EDR allows for high customization, contributing to enhanced security management. However, users suggest improvements in customization, reporting capabilities, scalability, and faster response times.

What are the standout features of N-able EDR?
  • Robust Threat Detection: Detects various cyber threats efficiently.
  • Simple System Configuration: Easy to set up and deploy.
  • Efficient Endpoint Protection: Provides continuous monitoring and protection.
  • Comprehensive Incident Reporting: Offers detailed reports and analysis.
  • Seamless Integration: Integrates smoothly with existing IT infrastructure.
  • Real-time Monitoring: Monitors systems in real-time.
  • Automated Threat Response: Responds to threats automatically.
  • High Customization: Offers customization options to suit security needs.
What benefits or ROI should be considered?
  • Improved Security: Enhanced threat detection and rapid response ensure systems stay secure.
  • Time Savings: Automated responses and easy configuration save time for IT teams.
  • Detailed Insights: Comprehensive reports and alerts provide valuable security insights.
  • Operational Efficiency: Seamless integration with existing tools boosts operational efficiency.

N-able EDR is widely implemented across industries such as finance, healthcare, and retail. In finance, it's crucial for protecting sensitive data and ensuring compliance. Healthcare entities utilize it for safeguarding patient information against breaches. Retailers rely on its robust protection to secure transactional data from cyber threats.

N-able

Reduce Alert Noise

Reduce the time to detect and respond to threats. Trellix EDR helps security analysts quickly prioritize threats and minimize potential disruption.

Do More with Existing Resources

Guided investigation automatically asks and answers questions while gathering, summarizing, and visualizing evidence from multiple sources—reducing the need for more SOC resources.

Low-Maintenance Cloud Solution

Cloud-based deployment and analytics enables your skilled security analysts to focus on strategic defense, instead of tool maintenance. Benefit from implementing the right solution for you.

Trellix
 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Sutherland Global Services
Buyer's Guide
N-able EDR vs. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
March 2025
Free Report: N-able EDR vs. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
Find out what your peers are saying about N-able EDR vs. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our N-able EDR vs. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) report.
See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.