N-able EDR vs Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) comparison

N-able and Trellix are both solutions in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category. N-able is ranked #57, while Trellix is ranked #24 with an average rating of 7.7. N-able holds a 0.4% mindshare in EDR, compared to Trellix’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Trellix users are willing to recommend the solution.

N-able EDR

Read 2 N-able EDR reviews

879 Views
668 Comparison Views

0% willing to recommend

Trellix Endpoint Detection ...

Read 22 Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews

1,762 Views
1,018 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

N-able EDR

Trellix Endpoint Detection ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) and N-able EDR are both robust tools in the endpoint detection market. Trellix EDR stands out for its feature set and deployment flexibility, while N-able EDR is favored for customer service and pricing.

Features: Trellix EDR offers advanced threat detection capabilities, integration with other security tools, and a comprehensive feature set. N-able EDR is known for its ease of use, comprehensive reporting features, and user-friendly interface.

Room for Improvement: Trellix EDR needs better documentation, more intuitive alerting options, and improved user guidance. N-able EDR requires enhanced threat intelligence, better automation capabilities, and more robust threat response features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Trellix EDR is noted for smooth deployment and quick setup, although it has a steeper learning curve. N-able EDR is praised for straightforward deployment and exceptional customer support.

Pricing and ROI: Trellix EDR is perceived as more expensive but justifies the cost with its comprehensive features. N-able EDR offers competitive pricing with users reporting high ROI and quicker returns.

To learn more, read our detailed N-able EDR vs. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

N-able EDR vs. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,053 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

N-able EDR

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

57th

Average Rating

0.0

Reviews Sentiment

9.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Trellix Endpoint Detection ...

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

24th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of N-able EDR is 0.4%, down from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) is 0.9%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Featured Reviews

Yazan Albaw

Customer Success Director at We Cybers

N-able EDR SentinelOne delivers advanced endpoint protection through real-time threat detection, automated response, and comprehensive visibility to safeguard against cyber threats.

N-able EDR SentinelOne is renowned for its exceptional detection and protection capabilities, ranked number one by Gartner and MITRE ATT&CK. It offers robust defense against various threats, including malware, fileless attacks, phishing, and insider threats. The solution excels in identifying suspicious behavior and promptly notifying engineers of potential threats. A key feature is its auto-response capability. You can configure automatic responses to threats, which significantly reduces the time and effort required to manage incidents. Enhanced by machine learning, these automated responses are both efficient and adaptive. Additionally, N-able EDR integrates seamlessly with RMM (Remote Monitoring and Management), allowing us to monitor EDR performance, detect failures, and oversee network performance from a single, unified dashboard. This integration streamlines management and enhances overall efficiency.

Read full review

Juan Muriel

IT Management Specialist at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

Completely automated, affordable, and provides good technical functionalities

The antivirus and DLP features are valuable. Now, we have a campaign to encrypt all the drives of the company. We have a solution for network access control from Fortinet. When Trellix detects some threats, the device is isolated in a quarantine zone for examination. We integrate Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response with other solutions to perform such isolations. We also use products for log monitoring and correlation and create use cases for automatic response.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features are the rollback feature, it's important for us. The AI models and are good."

"It provides visibility and a storyline to track the virus or malware's activities, showing infected processes and changes made."

"The most valuable feature I found in McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response is the guided analytics or guided EDR investigation."

"What we're using the most and what we found valuable in McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response are Web Control, Advanced Threat Protection, and Threat Prevention features."

"The biggest strength of the solution is that it's an integrated product that includes EDR and antivirus."

"This is a stable product."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its area for threat detection."

"The product is user-friendly."

"The product's initial setup phase was very straightforward since you just need to install it, and it works."

"The most valuable features of the solution are the ability to isolate or quarantine devices and block or detect Ransomware and other well-known tools that are used to exploit vulnerabilities on devices."

More Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) pros

Cons

"We have a lot of false positives we see in the dashboard. I think this is the only problem we are facing."

"I would like to see them add support for both Android and iOS smartphones."

"Trellix does not support Linux and Mac."

"The searching capabilities for the IOCs can be further improved"

"The console has a lot of bugs, and it creates many issues."

"The dashboard and reporting features are not so user-friendly or intuitive, so they need some work."

"The alert feature of McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response needs improvement because for you to get the alerts, you have to log on to the portal. What my company needs is a tool that sends you alerts. For example, if it detects a threat on your machine, it should send you an alert. My company gets the alerts instead from the antivirus software rather than the EDR. If you want to see the alerts on McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response, you have to connect to the system manually. Another area for improvement in the tool is the reporting. My company needs weekly and monthly reports about the alerts, but you can't extract reports from McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response, so a decision was made to move to another EDR solution, particularly Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, next month. My company tested Microsoft Defender for Endpoint via a POC for one to three months. The resource usage of McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response is also an area for improvement because it consumes a lot of memory. For example, during the on-demand scan, you can't work because of the high CPU usage. You need to schedule the scans. McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response has a lot of modules, but my company doesn't use all modules."

"Some modules that are doing machine learning and artificial intelligence are blocking our processes."

"For Spanish users, it is necessary to have a knowledge base specifically designed for them, which is currently not available."

"The main drawbacks are resources and processing time, as it consumes a lot of CPU and RAM."

More Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is average."

"The cost is okay, compared to other products."

"McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response is reasonable in terms of cost. It's a tool my company has been using for a few years now. It costs $25,000 to $30,000 for six hundred users."

"The product’s pricing is reasonable."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is low and ten is high, I rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten."

"Speaking about the price, you must use the product to find the product's cost for you."

"The pricing is always high."

"Pricing for McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response is not that expensive, but it's not something that a startup could buy. Pricing for it is for midsized businesses. There's an additional payment if you want data retention for more than thirty days. They gave us data retention for thirty days. Then if you want longer data retention, they have the paid option for a three-month data retention period and for a one-year data retention period."

"The price is reasonable."

More Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

19%

Government

Legal Firm

Construction Company

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with N-able EDR?

While N-able EDR SentinelOne excels in protecting endpoints from a wide range of cybersecurity threats, it currently does not support mobile devices. Adding support for both Android and iOS smartph...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for N-able EDR?

Our customers use N-able EDR SentinelOne to safeguard servers and workstations from cybersecurity threats, including malicious software, ransomware, and malware. EDR is no longer a luxury but a nec...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering N-able EDR?

I would rate N-able EDR SentinelOne a ten out of ten for its outstanding performance and capabilities. It effectively supports Windows, Linux, and macOS, allowing us to secure servers and workstati...

See all answers

What do you like most about McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response?

Trellix has a user-friendly interface.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response?

Pricing is a problem in South Africa. It could be cheaper here. The rand-to-dollar exchange rate makes it expensive for us. A 25 dollar endpoint cost becomes quite significant when converted to rand.

See all answers

What needs improvement with McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response?

When it comes to some unknown fileless attacks, the tool is not able to detect them properly, making it an area where improvements are required. The tool's support needs to improve in the areas of ...

See all answers

Comparisons

CrowdStrike Falcon vs N-able EDR

Compared 49% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs N-able EDR

Compared 36% of the time

ESET Inspect vs N-able EDR

Compared 15% of the time

More N-able EDR Competitors

Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) vs Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Compared 51% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Compared 9% of the time

Trellix Active Response vs Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Compared 5% of the time

Fortinet FortiEDR vs Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Compared 4% of the time

More Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

December 2024

Download N-able EDR product report

Buyer's Guide

Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

November 2024

Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) report

Download Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) product report

Also Known As

No data available

McAfee MVISION EDR, MVISION EDR, MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response

Learn More

N-able

Trellix

Overview

N-able EDR provides comprehensive endpoint detection and response capabilities, ensuring system security and facilitating rapid incident response. Users highlight its effectiveness in detecting threats and appreciate its detailed reporting and seamless integration with existing IT infrastructure.

N-able EDR stands out with its robust threat detection, efficient endpoint protection, and comprehensive incident reporting. It offers constant monitoring and protection against malware and other cyber threats. Users find the configuration easy and appreciate the detailed alerts and analysis. With real-time monitoring and automated threat response, N-able EDR allows for high customization, contributing to enhanced security management. However, users suggest improvements in customization, reporting capabilities, scalability, and faster response times.

What are the standout features of N-able EDR?

Robust Threat Detection: Detects various cyber threats efficiently.
Simple System Configuration: Easy to set up and deploy.
Efficient Endpoint Protection: Provides continuous monitoring and protection.
Comprehensive Incident Reporting: Offers detailed reports and analysis.
Seamless Integration: Integrates smoothly with existing IT infrastructure.
Real-time Monitoring: Monitors systems in real-time.
Automated Threat Response: Responds to threats automatically.
High Customization: Offers customization options to suit security needs.

What benefits or ROI should be considered?

Improved Security: Enhanced threat detection and rapid response ensure systems stay secure.
Time Savings: Automated responses and easy configuration save time for IT teams.
Detailed Insights: Comprehensive reports and alerts provide valuable security insights.
Operational Efficiency: Seamless integration with existing tools boosts operational efficiency.

N-able EDR is widely implemented across industries such as finance, healthcare, and retail. In finance, it's crucial for protecting sensitive data and ensuring compliance. Healthcare entities utilize it for safeguarding patient information against breaches. Retailers rely on its robust protection to secure transactional data from cyber threats.

Reduce Alert Noise

Reduce the time to detect and respond to threats. Trellix EDR helps security analysts quickly prioritize threats and minimize potential disruption.

Do More with Existing Resources

Guided investigation automatically asks and answers questions while gathering, summarizing, and visualizing evidence from multiple sources—reducing the need for more SOC resources.

Low-Maintenance Cloud Solution

Cloud-based deployment and analytics enables your skilled security analysts to focus on strategic defense, instead of tool maintenance. Benefit from implementing the right solution for you.

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Sutherland Global Services

Buyer's Guide

N-able EDR vs. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

December 2024

Free Report: N-able EDR vs. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Find out what your peers are saying about N-able EDR vs. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our N-able EDR vs. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) report.

See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.