Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
N-able EDR Logo

Top 10 N-able EDR Alternatives

Vendor: N-able
Post review

Top N-able EDR Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to N-able EDR based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include CrowdStrike Falcon, Cisco Secure Endpoint, and SentinelOne Singularity Complete. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. N-able EDR surpasses its competitors by offering real-time threat detection, advanced threat intelligence integration, and automated response capabilities, providing unparalleled protection and ease-of-use for IT professionals.

N-able Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with N-able, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
N-able EDR Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
N-able EDR Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon offers advanced threat detection with its AI-driven intelligence, appealing to those needing rapid cloud integration. In comparison, N-able EDR attracts users requiring customizable security policies and robust incident response capabilities, with cost-efficient pricing and strong IT infrastructure compatibility.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. N-able EDR Report
CrowdStrike Falcon has a higher initial setup cost compared to N-able EDR, which offers a more budget-friendly setup.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon has a higher initial setup cost compared to N-able EDR, which offers a more budget-friendly setup.
N-able EDR Logo
N-able EDR Logo
Cisco Secure Endpoint
4.3 out of 5
Cisco Secure Endpoint is favored for its cost-effectiveness and smooth deployment. In comparison, N-able EDR's real-time monitoring and advanced features justify its higher cost. Cisco stands out in pricing and support, while N-able excels in sophisticated features and scalability.
Download Cisco Secure Endpoint vs. N-able EDR Report
Cisco Secure Endpoint has a higher initial setup cost, while N-able EDR offers a more budget-friendly setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Cisco Secure Endpoint has a higher initial setup cost, while N-able EDR offers a more budget-friendly setup.
N-able EDR Logo
N-able EDR Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Complete
4.4 out of 5
SentinelOne Singularity Complete excels in automated threat detection and rapid remediation, making it ideal for users prioritizing automation. In comparison, N-able EDR stands out for its flexible integration and detailed threat insights, appealing to those needing seamless compatibility with other tools.
Download N-able EDR vs. SentinelOne Singularity Complete Report
SentinelOne Singularity Complete has a straightforward setup cost, while N-able EDR presents a more complex pricing structure. SentinelOne offers a simpler cost model compared to N-able EDR's varied pricing.
View comparison
Pricing
SentinelOne Singularity Complete has a straightforward setup cost, while N-able EDR presents a more complex pricing structure. SentinelOne offers a simpler cost model compared to N-able EDR's varied pricing.
N-able EDR Logo
Elastic Security
3.8 out of 5
N-able EDR Logo
Elastic Security
3.8 out of 5
Elastic Security excels in flexible features and active threat detection, while N-able EDR offers a comprehensive suite and ease of integration. In comparison, Elastic Security's customizable policies are a highlight, but N-able EDR's detailed reporting and extensive endpoint coverage appeal to tech buyers seeking seamless, automated responses.
Download Elastic Security vs. N-able EDR Report
Elastic Security has a lower initial setup cost, while N-able EDR incurs higher setup expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Elastic Security has a lower initial setup cost, while N-able EDR incurs higher setup expenses.
N-able EDR Logo
N-able EDR Logo
Intercept X Endpoint
4.2 out of 5
Intercept X Endpoint excels in malware protection and comprehensive threat detection. In comparison, N-able EDR offers superior integration with IT infrastructure and automation. Intercept X Endpoint provides ease of deployment and competitive pricing, while N-able EDR justifies its cost with advanced capabilities and higher security assurance.
Download Intercept X Endpoint vs. N-able EDR Report
Intercept X Endpoint has a lower setup cost, making it more budget-friendly, while N-able EDR tends to have a higher initial setup cost, reflecting its extensive features.
View comparison
Pricing
Intercept X Endpoint has a lower setup cost, making it more budget-friendly, while N-able EDR tends to have a higher initial setup cost, reflecting its extensive features.
N-able EDR Logo
Trend Vision One
4.3 out of 5
N-able EDR Logo
Trend Vision One
4.3 out of 5


The Trend Micro Vision One platform is designed to extend threat detection and response across an organization's digital landscape. It is crafted to deliver advanced threat intelligence, using a layered approach to protect against a wide range of cyber threats.

Download N-able EDR vs. Trend Vision One Report
It would be nice if it was a little bit cheaper, but I think it has a fair price. It is comparable to others in the market.
The price is reasonable. It's not exorbitant. CrowdStrike and other players are on the higher side.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
It would be nice if it was a little bit cheaper, but I think it has a fair price. It is comparable to others in the market.
The price is reasonable. It's not exorbitant. CrowdStrike and other players are on the higher side.
N-able EDR Logo
N-able EDR Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint
4.4 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint is known for its comprehensive threat prevention and user-friendly management console, making it a suitable choice for those seeking ease of deployment and customer service. In comparison, N-able EDR stands out for its robust features, advanced threat detection, and automated response workflows.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. N-able EDR Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has a higher initial setup cost, while N-able EDR is more affordable upfront. Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers more comprehensive features, though its higher setup cost may be a consideration.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has a higher initial setup cost, while N-able EDR is more affordable upfront. Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers more comprehensive features, though its higher setup cost may be a consideration.
N-able EDR Logo
N-able EDR Logo
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
3.7 out of 5
Trellix EDR excels in advanced threat detection and automation, making it ideal for addressing complex threats. In comparison, N-able EDR offers superior ease of use and customer support, suitable for those prioritizing straightforward deployment and management. Trellix focuses on automation, while N-able emphasizes user-friendliness.
Download N-able EDR vs. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Report
Trellix EDR incurs a significant setup cost, whereas N-able EDR offers lower initial setup expenses, highlighting an important financial consideration for businesses.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix EDR incurs a significant setup cost, whereas N-able EDR offers lower initial setup expenses, highlighting an important financial consideration for businesses.
N-able EDR Logo
ESET Inspect
3.8 out of 5
N-able EDR Logo
ESET Inspect
3.8 out of 5
ESET Inspect excels in detailed reporting and advanced threat detection, making it ideal for users needing comprehensive visibility. In comparison, N-able EDR streamlines integration and real-time monitoring for those prioritizing ease of deployment and efficient customer service over extensive threat analysis.
Download ESET Inspect vs. N-able EDR Report
ESET Inspect has a lower setup cost compared to N-able EDR, which offers extensive features.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Inspect has a lower setup cost compared to N-able EDR, which offers extensive features.

Related categories

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)