Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) comparison

Trellix Endpoint Security and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint are leading solutions in endpoint security. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint stands out due to its integration capabilities and real-time threat detection.

Features: Trellix Endpoint Security offers advanced threat protection, extensive customization options, and a range of deployment models. Microsoft Defender provides powerful real-time threat detection, excellent integration with other Microsoft products, and automated response features. Defender's automation and integration give it an edge over ENS.

Room for Improvement: Trellix ENS could improve its user-friendliness and reduce false positives. Microsoft Defender users often mention the need for better alert management and more accurate threat detection capabilities. Each product has distinct areas for enhancement, often reflecting their different strengths.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Trellix ENS offers flexible deployment models and extensive customer support, though setup can be complex. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is praised for its straightforward deployment, especially within Microsoft environments, but users sometimes find customer support less responsive. Deployment ease favors Defender, but ENS provides robust support.

Pricing and ROI: Trellix ENS often involves higher setup costs but offers substantial ROI through its advanced features and customization. Microsoft Defender's pricing is competitive, particularly for those already using Microsoft services, with a strong ROI due to its efficiency and lower overhead. While ENS may have higher upfront costs, Defender's integration and cost-efficiency often result in better overall value.