Trellix Active Response vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) comparison

Trellix Active Response and Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) are both solutions in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category. Trellix Active Response is ranked #66, while Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is ranked #17 with an average rating of 7.6. Trellix Active Response holds a 0.2% mindshare in EDR, compared to Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)’s 2.1% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) users are willing to recommend the solution.

Trellix Active Response

Read 3 Trellix Active Response reviews

411 Views
297 Comparison Views

0% willing to recommend

Trellix Endpoint Security (...

Read 53 Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) reviews

4,559 Views
3,454 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Trellix Active Response

Trellix Endpoint Security (...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Trellix Active Response and Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) are two powerful security solutions competing in the endpoint protection space. While users appreciate Trellix Active Response for its pricing and support, ENS is considered superior in terms of features.

Features: Trellix Active Response is noted for its real-time threat detection, automated response capabilities, and efficient specific threat detections. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) offers comprehensive endpoint protection, advanced threat prevention, and remediation tools, making it more versatile with a broader suite of protections.

Room for Improvement: Trellix Active Response could improve its integration capabilities with other security tools. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) needs better optimization for system performance and enhancements in analytics. Despite these points, ENS is seen as a more robust solution requiring better performance management.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Trellix Active Response users find the deployment process simple and the customer support responsive. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is straightforward to deploy and receives praise for comprehensive customer support that assists throughout the deployment process and beyond. Both products offer solid customer service, but ENS stands out with more detailed support options.

Pricing and ROI: Trellix Active Response is more cost-effective upfront with a lower setup cost. However, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) delivers a higher ROI due to its extensive features and durability, justifying the higher price and initial investment.

To learn more, read our detailed Trellix Active Response vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Trellix Active Response vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,067 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Trellix Active Response

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

66th

Average Rating

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Trellix Endpoint Security (...

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

17th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (24th)

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of Trellix Active Response is 0.2%, down from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is 2.1%, down from 2.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Featured Reviews

LeonWessels

IT Security Manager at Telecommunications Services of Trinidad & Tobago Limited (TSTT)

Lighter with good stability and pretty good technical support

It's still not lightweight enough and not as light as they claim to be with the McAfee area of a next-gen AV. They can do some improvements along that line. There needs to be some improvement around the white-listing or black-listing. The product could improve aspects around the removal of blacklisted applications, et cetera. This was an exercise to centralize the AV cell, and that's how we ended up upgrading. The truth, however, is that I was really looking for something much more advanced with user behavior analytics and some AI features that the other competitor's next-gen AV does offer. It is okay for what it's doing now, however, it's not the ultimate software. There are some components on the cloud that should also reside in the on-prem deployment models but don't. They should ensure they are doing parallel development for cloud and on-prem when they are doing R&D.

Read full review

Venugopal Potumudi

Senior Consultant at Tata Consultancy

Reliable with good independent modules and a straightforward setup

I'd rate the solution seven out of ten. Having used Trend Micro as well, I would rate Trend Micro higher. However, I would still choose this product as a second option. When we recommend a product, we would recommend something based on the fit of the product and customer requirements. We worked with Defender, we worked with Trend Micro, and we worked with McAfee. All of them almost overlap in multiple use cases. That said, we do see the customer IT strategy and where they're going, and they are adopting Azure more. We know there are certain limitations in their landscape where there may be some old legacy systems, and in that case, then we would either switch back to McAfee or Trend Micro instead of Defender.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is scalable."

"We are hoping to automate detection and response and take advantage of user behavior analytics, given that we are working from home. About half of our workers are still remote, so Active Response gives us that visibility and lets us automate a number of those events."

"It's a little lighter compared to the older version, which was mostly signature-based."

"It's good that it periodically scans all my drives. I can stay up to date with the status of my drivers and update them if needed."

"What I like most about McAfee MVISION Endpoint is that it's very user-friendly. You do need some knowledge on how to navigate the portal, but as soon as you've gained that knowledge, navigation will no longer be an issue. I have no complaints about McAfee MVISION Endpoint. For me, the product is perfect the way it is. It's great right now, and it's doing good as it is."

"If the network has seen something, we can use that to put a block to all the endpoints."

"The most valuable feature is user-based policy provision."

"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."

"The stability has been great."

"The most valuable features of McAfee MVISION Endpoint are advanced threat protection, web filtering, and removable storage devices in the DLP."

"It is scalable and stable and the initial setup is the easiest part of using the product."

More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) pros

Cons

"There are some components on the cloud that should also reside in the on-prem deployment models but don't."

"While the product is good, we are currently facing support issues."

"I also expected Active Response 's user interface to be much more analytical."

"The detection and response capabilities need to be improved."

"The Linux support is very poor. I use base detection. Currently, they are providing malware protection and logon track features in Windows and Mac. These features aren't available in Linux. It will be helpful to extend these capabilities to Linux. We would also like assets grouping and device lock protection features, which are included in their roadmap."

"The price of McAfee MVISION Endpoint could improve."

"Sometimes, one might face issues with the scalability of the product. The aforementioned area can be considered for improvement."

"Performance is a problematic area in the solution needing improvement."

"The product could be flexible and offer better pricing."

"We would like to solution to offer better security."

"Most of these types of solutions including others, such as Carbon Black and FortiEDR, all have the same features. However, Carbon Black is the leader when it comes to being robust and user-friendly and this solution should improve in those areas to stay more competitive."

More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Our costs were somewhere around $600K in Trinidad dollars, which might be about $100K US. We have the ETP plus the EDR. Our recent renewal was 1800 licenses as opposed to the full amount. Our transaction cost was about $600K Trinidad dollars, which is somewhere around $90-100K US."

"It is not so cheap in comparison to Sophos and other solutions."

"The pricing is mid-ranged and quite reasonable compared to other similar products."

"I don't think there are any extra expenses besides its licensing costs."

"There's a subscription on a yearly basis. It's not that expensive; it's quite affordable."

"It was an annual fee. There was just one overall fee."

"Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is not a cheap solution...I don't think any costs are involved in the maintenance of the solution."

"The product pricing is high."

"It is based on an annual subscription."

More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

25%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Comms Service Provider

University

Computer Software Company

15%

Government

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How does McAfee Endpoint Security compare with MVISION?

The flexible manageability of McAfee Endpoint Security is one of our favorite aspects of this solution. You can deploy various components as desired with McAfee Endpoint Security, whereas many othe...

See all answers

How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with FireEye Endpoint Security?

The Crowdstrike Falcon program has a simple to use user interface, making it both an easy to use as well as an effective program. Its graphical design is such that it makes an extremely useful too...

See all answers

What do you like most about McAfee MVISION Endpoint?

The product's initial setup phase was straightforward.

See all answers

Comparisons

Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Trellix Active Response

Compared 58% of the time

More Trellix Active Response Competitors

Trellix Endpoint Security vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Compared 22% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Compared 17% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Compared 14% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Compared 13% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Compared 6% of the time

More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

December 2024

Download Trellix Active Response product report

Buyer's Guide

Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

November 2024

Download Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) product report

Also Known As

McAfee Active Response

McAfee MVISION Endpoint, Trellix Endpoint Security (HX)

Learn More

Trellix

Overview

Continuous Visibility into Your Endpoints:
Capture and monitor events, files, host flows, process objects, context, and system state changes that may be indicators of attack or dormant attack components.

Identify and Remediate Breaches Faster:
Access tools you need to quickly correct security issues. Send intelligence to analytics, operations, and forensic teams.

Target Critical Threats:
Get preconfigured and customizable actions when triggered, so you can target and eliminate threats.

Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is a comprehensive solution designed to protect organizations from advanced cyber threats. With its advanced threat detection capabilities, ENS provides real-time visibility into endpoint activities, enabling proactive threat hunting and response.

It leverages machine learning algorithms to identify and block sophisticated malware, ransomware, and zero-day attacks. ENS also offers robust data loss prevention (DLP) features, preventing sensitive information from being leaked or stolen. With its centralized management console, ENS allows administrators to easily deploy, monitor, and manage security policies across all endpoints.

ENS provides seamless integration with existing security infrastructure, ensuring a layered defense approach. With Trellix ENS, organizations can enhance their security posture and safeguard their critical assets from evolving cyber threats.

Sample Customers

Liquor Control Board of Ontario

Tech Resources Limited, Globe Telecom, Rizal Commercial Banking Corporation

Buyer's Guide

Trellix Active Response vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

December 2024

Free Report: Trellix Active Response vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Find out what your peers are saying about Trellix Active Response vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Trellix Active Response vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) report.

See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.