Elastic Security vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) comparison

Elastic and Trellix are both solutions in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category. Elastic is ranked #16 with an average rating of 7.7, while Trellix is ranked #17 with an average rating of 7.5. Elastic holds a 2.8% mindshare in EDR, compared to Trellix’s 2.1% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Elastic users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Trellix users who would recommend it.

Elastic Security

Read 61 Elastic Security reviews

4,548 Views
3,797 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Trellix Endpoint Security (...

Read 53 Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) reviews

4,891 Views
3,628 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Elastic Security

Trellix Endpoint Security (...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Elastic Security and Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) are leading security solutions aiming to protect enterprises. While Elastic Security is notable for its affordability and deployment simplicity, Trellix ENS has the upper hand in feature richness and customer support.

Features: Elastic Security offers comprehensive threat detection, superior analytics, and effective security measures. Trellix ENS includes automated response capabilities, extensive integration options, and detailed functionalities.

Room for Improvement: Elastic Security could improve on scalability, advanced threat capabilities, and predictive threat detection. Trellix ENS should work on simplifying its configuration process, enhancing resource efficiency, and making deployment less complex.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Elastic Security is known for its quick, simple deployment and robust customer support. Trellix ENS has a more involved deployment process, but its top-tier customer service provides extensive guidance throughout the setup.

Pricing and ROI: Elastic Security is cost-effective, offering satisfactory ROI. Trellix ENS, though higher in cost, justifies it with superior features and high ROI reported by users.

To learn more, read our detailed Elastic Security vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Elastic Security vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 816,406 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Elastic Security

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

16th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (5th), Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (5th), Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (6th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (8th)

Trellix Endpoint Security (...

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

17th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (22nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of Elastic Security is 2.8%, up from 2.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is 2.1%, down from 2.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Featured Reviews

Gajewski Marek

Chief Technology Officer & Co-founder at CS2

Provides good anomaly detection and connectivity reporting

We previously used Splunk but switched to Elastic Security because Splunk was more expensive. Feature-wise, both tools are pretty much the same. They have almost the same functions. Elastic Security has a much better AI assistant that allows you to ask questions like a normal person. With Elastic Security, I can also predict the price and how much it will cost. Splunks's pricing depends on how much data we use and the different add-ons I have to add. The pricing is much better with Elastic Security.

Read full review

Venugopal Potumudi

Senior Consultant at Tata Consultancy

Reliable with good independent modules and a straightforward setup

I'd rate the solution seven out of ten. Having used Trend Micro as well, I would rate Trend Micro higher. However, I would still choose this product as a second option. When we recommend a product, we would recommend something based on the fit of the product and customer requirements. We worked with Defender, we worked with Trend Micro, and we worked with McAfee. All of them almost overlap in multiple use cases. That said, we do see the customer IT strategy and where they're going, and they are adopting Azure more. We know there are certain limitations in their landscape where there may be some old legacy systems, and in that case, then we would either switch back to McAfee or Trend Micro instead of Defender.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The visualization is very good."

"The tool's functionality is good for overall security and incident response times."

"I use the stack every morning to check the errors and it's just so clear. I don't see any disadvantage to using Logstash."

"ELK Logstash is easy and fast, at least for the initial setup with the out of box uses."

"I can look at events from more than one source across multiple different locations and find patterns or anomalies. The machine learning capabilities are helpful, and I can create rules for notifications to be more proactive rather than responding after something has gone wrong."

"The most valuable features are the speed, detail, and visualization. It has the latest standards."

"Elastic Security is very easy to adapt."

"The stability of the solution is good."

More Elastic Security pros

"I have not received any complaints about the performance."

"FireEye Endpoint Security's scalability is awesome. I think it is one of the best on that front."

"The extendability is great."

"I found the initial setup to be easy."

"If the network has seen something, we can use that to put a block to all the endpoints."

"The threat scanning is excellent. It uses predictive technology and I can utilize attack data to help us fine-tune our systems and network infrastructure. This protects us against current and future attacks."

"HIPS protects server files from being modified or deleted by unauthorized users. It's primarily deployed in the web tier."

"Technical support is excellent."

More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) pros

Cons

"We're using the open-source edition, for now, I think maybe they can allow their OLED plugin to be open source, as at the moment it is commercialised."

"The biggest challenge has been related to the implementation."

"Authentication is not a default in Kibana. We need to have another tool to have authentication and authorization. These two should be part of Kibana."

"I think because we are a cybersecurity company, the thing that can be improved is the prebuilt tools, especially quality. Compared to its competitor, they still have fewer prebuilt security rules. Elastic Security, in terms of generating alerts, cannot group the same products into one another. Even though the alerts are the same, they still generate them one by one. So, it is very noisy in our dashboard. I would like the Elastic Security admin to group all the same alarms into one alarm so that our dashboard is not noisy."

"We'd like to see some more artificial intelligence capabilities."

"If you compare this with CrowdStrike or Carbon Black, they can improve."

"The training that is offered for Elastic is in need of improvement because there is no depth to it."

"I want to find an automatic security system in the tool, like a SOAR solution. I am looking forward to seeing a SOAR system in the tool."

More Elastic Security cons

"The way that signatures work when using this solution could be improved. They could be more user friendly. We would like the ability to select a client's signature from a menu or file share to save time."

"The performance could be better. I noticed that it slows down a bit."

"From an improvement perspective, I want everything in the solution to be free."

"The customization capabilities of the solution are an area where it lacks, so it would be great if our company could customize the solution to meet the demands of our customers."

"The complexity of advanced modules can be improved."

"The initial setup can be a bit complicated for those unfamiliar with the product."

"One suggestion is they should reduce the constant notifications. Whenever I open my laptop, there are too many notifications from McAfee, and it gets annoying."

"Intrusion detection and intervention seem to be falling behind the competition."

More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is not expensive and costs around ten dollars a month."

"We use the open-source version, so there is no charge for this solution."

"It's a monthly cost with Elastic SIEM, but I am not sure of the exact cost."

"Affordable but with additional costs"

"Elastic Security is free to use."

"The tool's pricing is flexible and comes at unit cost. You don't have to pay for everything."

"Compared to other products such as Dynatrace, this is one of the cheaper options."

"We are using the free, open-source version of this solution."

More Elastic Security pricing and cost advice

"The pricing is mid-ranged and quite reasonable compared to other similar products."

"The price of the product is similar to the ones in the market that offer the same features."

"Microsoft Defender is not cheap and from a cost perspective, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is a better option."

"It is based on an annual subscription."

"Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) has a reasonable price."

"They should reduce the cost or make it free, open-source software."

"Licensing fees are billed on a yearly basis."

"Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is not a cheap solution...I don't think any costs are involved in the maintenance of the solution."

More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

10%

University

Computer Software Company

15%

Government

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Datadog vs ELK: which one is good in terms of performance, cost and efficiency?

With Datadog, we have near-live visibility across our entire platform. We have seen APM metrics impacted several times lately using the dashboards we have created with Datadog; they are very good c...

See all answers

What do you like most about Elastic Security?

Elastic provides the capability to index quickly due to the reverse indexes it offers. This data is crucial as it contains critical information. The reverse index allows fast data indexing because ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Elastic Security?

Compared to other tools, Elastic Security is a cheaper solution.

See all answers

How does McAfee Endpoint Security compare with MVISION?

The flexible manageability of McAfee Endpoint Security is one of our favorite aspects of this solution. You can deploy various components as desired with McAfee Endpoint Security, whereas many othe...

See all answers

How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with FireEye Endpoint Security?

The Crowdstrike Falcon program has a simple to use user interface, making it both an easy to use as well as an effective program. Its graphical design is such that it makes an extremely useful too...

See all answers

What do you like most about McAfee MVISION Endpoint?

The product's initial setup phase was straightforward.

See all answers

Comparisons

Wazuh vs Elastic Security

Compared 33% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Elastic Security

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs Elastic Security

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Sentinel vs Elastic Security

Compared 7% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Elastic Security

Compared 6% of the time

More Elastic Security Competitors

Trellix Endpoint Security vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Compared 24% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Compared 17% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Compared 13% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Compared 12% of the time

VMware Carbon Black Endpoint vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Compared 1% of the time

More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Elastic Security

November 2024

Download Elastic Security product report

Buyer's Guide

Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

October 2024

Download Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) product report

Also Known As

Elastic SIEM, ELK Logstash

McAfee MVISION Endpoint, Trellix Endpoint Security (HX)

Learn More

Elastic

Trellix

Overview

Elastic Security is a robust, open-source security solution designed to offer integrated threat prevention, detection, and response capabilities across an organization's entire digital estate. Part of the Elastic Stack (which includes Elasticsearch, Logstash, and Kibana), Elastic Security leverages the power of search, analytics, and data aggregation to provide real-time insight into threats and vulnerabilities. It is a comprehensive platform that supports a wide range of security needs, from endpoint protection to cloud and network security, making it a versatile choice for organizations looking to enhance their cybersecurity posture.

Elastic Security combines the features of a security information and event management (SIEM) system with endpoint protection, allowing organizations to detect, investigate, and respond to threats in real time. This unified approach helps reduce complexity and improve the efficiency of security operations.

Additional offerings and benefits:

The platform utilizes advanced analytics, machine learning algorithms, and anomaly detection to identify threats and suspicious activities.
It offers extensive integration options with other tools and platforms, facilitating a more cohesive and comprehensive security ecosystem.
With Kibana, users gain access to powerful visualization tools and dashboards that provide real-time insight into security data.

Finally, Elastic Security benefits from a global community of users who contribute to its threat intelligence, helping to enhance its detection capabilities. This collaborative approach ensures that the solution remains on the cutting edge of cybersecurity, with up-to-date information on the latest threats and vulnerabilities.

Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is a comprehensive solution designed to protect organizations from advanced cyber threats. With its advanced threat detection capabilities, ENS provides real-time visibility into endpoint activities, enabling proactive threat hunting and response.

It leverages machine learning algorithms to identify and block sophisticated malware, ransomware, and zero-day attacks. ENS also offers robust data loss prevention (DLP) features, preventing sensitive information from being leaked or stolen. With its centralized management console, ENS allows administrators to easily deploy, monitor, and manage security policies across all endpoints.

ENS provides seamless integration with existing security infrastructure, ensuring a layered defense approach. With Trellix ENS, organizations can enhance their security posture and safeguard their critical assets from evolving cyber threats.

Sample Customers

Texas A&M, U.S. Air Force, NuScale Power, Martin's Point Health Care

Tech Resources Limited, Globe Telecom, Rizal Commercial Banking Corporation

Buyer's Guide

Elastic Security vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

October 2024

Free Report: Elastic Security vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Find out what your peers are saying about Elastic Security vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Elastic Security vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) report.

See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.