Dataloader.io vs TIBCO BusinessWorks comparison

"he product’s most valuable feature is ease of access."

"I find DataLoader's ability to easily integrate with external keys valuable, which is a bit more challenging with DBM."

"DataLoader is cost-effective since it is free."

"Drag and drop make it easier to build the service end to end."

"The ability to link to different technologies is valuable to us."

"It is very stable. It is a market leader, and it has connectors to many of the legacy systems. It also has enterprise cloud connectors."

"The most valuable features are the stability and the time to market."

"The Business Studio interface based on SCA Standards helps to show the business logic at first look and improve code maintenance."

"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten…On a scale from one to ten, where one is difficult, and ten is easy, I rate the initial setup a nine."

"It is very valuable for my work, helping me communicate with other branches, parse data, and change data formats to respond to the front channels with the correct format."

"The initial setup of TIBCO BusinessWorks was straightforward since we have used the solution in our organization for a long time."

"DataLoader has limitations, including constraints with file sizes and transactions."

"We need help with large data migrations. It only works well for a few thousand records or less than a million records."

"Dataloader has limitations, including constraints with file sizes and transactions. Additionally, at times it can be slow, and when integrating DBM, we find it more complex than Dataloader."

"The solution’s customer support should be improved."

"Though it is a stable product, if we have an issue with the product, it gets difficult, and it gets really difficult to explain the issue to the support team. Also, it takes a long time to get resolved."

"Scaling with the solution is costly because if we need to scale up, we have to buy more memory. That means more money. Solutions like Camel or Pulsar come with built-in options to scale horizontally, vertically, region-wide or country-wide."

"There are not many plugins available to integrate the databases. We have to write it in Java and integrate it. The developers should have more knowledge. These are the three main aspects that they could improve."

"TIBCO BusinessWorks could be improved with cloud support."

"I'd like to see a new cloud approach in the next release. They need to work on integrations, stability and management issues on their cloud platform."

"I would like the solution to be integrated into the cloud."

"There are multiple plugins which increase the number of product installations."

"The product is inexpensive and economical."

"I don't have the prices of the products, but I know that TIBCO is not a cheap solution. I think that this solution is more suitable for large companies because I don't think that small- or medium-sized companies would have the money for this solution. WSO2 has the community version for free, so many of the smaller companies can use it. I'm not sure what the prices are for support, though, so I suppose the support for WSO2 is not cheap either."

"The solution is too expensive. It's one of the most expensive solutions out there, particularly because there are so many open-source competitors on the market. I don't know the exact numbers, however."

"TIBCO BusinessWorks is expensive."

"Licensing scheme is too rigid"

"It is a bit expensive for medium-sized companies. If you are migrating from the current version to the container-supported version, it is quite expensive. The existing licensing will not work because the product platform itself is different."

"The cost depends on the components required."

"The license is expensive, and I would rate it one out of ten."

"TIBCO licensing is yearly and very costly for a company like ours."