Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Devo vs i-SIEM [EOL] comparison

Devo and Cybereason are both solutions in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category. Additionally, 95% of Devo users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Cybereason users who would recommend it.
Devo
Read 22 Devo reviews
  • 2,304 Views
  • 1,066 Comparison Views
95% willing to recommend
i-SIEM [EOL]
Read 1 i-SIEM [EOL] review
    100% willing to recommend
     

    Comparison Buyer's Guide

    Download the report
    Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 12, 2025

    Devo and i-SIEM [EOL] are competing products in the security information and event management space. Devo appears stronger in customer support, while i-SIEM [EOL] is preferred for advanced functionalities.

    Features: Devo offers real-time data processing, extensive integrations, and flexibility in handling large-scale data. i-SIEM [EOL] provides advanced threat detection, deep analytics, and proactive incident management, prioritizing security insights over flexibility.

    Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Devo ensures a streamlined cloud-based deployment with strong customer support for smooth implementation. i-SIEM [EOL] allows both on-premise and cloud solutions, offering deployment flexibility but requires more configuration effort.

    Pricing and ROI: Devo aligns its setup costs with comprehensive support, leading to a potentially quicker ROI due to efficient operations. i-SIEM [EOL] may involve higher initial investments, with its feature set justifying the cost for those seeking extensive security insights.

    DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
    To learn more, read our detailed Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) Report (Updated: March 2025).
    Buyer's Guide
    Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
    March 2025
    Download the complete report
    Helped 842,592 peers since 2012

    Review summaries and opinions

    We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
     

    Categories and Ranking

    Devo
    Average Rating
    8.4
    Reviews Sentiment
    7.1
    Number of Reviews
    22
    Ranking in other categories
    Log Management (28th), Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (30th), IT Operations Analytics (6th), AIOps (15th)
    i-SIEM [EOL]
    Average Rating
    9.0
    Number of Reviews
    1
    Ranking in other categories
    No ranking in other categories
     

    Featured Reviews

    Michael Wenn - PeerSpot reviewer
    Has cloud-first architecture with SIEM technology to run security operations
    When it comes to scale, they're architected quite well. They handle some of the biggest customers globally, with significant throughput on their platform, managing thousands of customers. One of the most impressive aspects of Devo is its customer community. A large majority, over 80 percent of their customers, actively participate on a Devo-specific community page. They're contributing to product development and support, events, and user group information, helping each other out. This high level of engagement is rare and demonstrates both the loyalty of their customer base and the quality of their product. They offer a range of small, medium, and large options to cater to everyone. I sold Devo products while working with them, focusing on enterprise solutions. However, as a small reseller, my customers were typically smaller businesses. I rate the solution's scalability a nine out of ten.
    Read full review
    DC
    The alert fatigue and false positive rates have just plummeted, which is really exciting.
    empow has a few areas of improvement as with any other technology, such as continuing to drive innovation in the dashboard. While we've been extremely impressed with the dashboard's ease of use, flexibility, ability to drill down deeply, and focus very intently on an area of interest, there will always be opportunities to be more innovative and open it up to a wider audience than just the operations group, for example. With reporting, there is always a desire to have custom reporting for every client of empow. Relative to keeping up with the sheer pace of cloud-native technologies, it should provide more options for clients to deploy their technologies in unique ways. This is an area that I recommend that they maintain focus.
    Read full review

    Quotes from Members

    We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
     

    Pros

    "The user experience [is] well thought out and the workflows are logical. The dashboards are intuitive and highly customizable."
    "The alerting is much better than I anticipated. We don't get as many alerts as I thought we would, but that nobody's fault, it's just the way it is."
    "Devo has a really good website for creating custom configurations."
    "The real-time analytics of security-related data are super. There are a lot of data feeds going into it and it's very quick at pulling up and correlating the data and showing you what's going on in your infrastructure. It's fast. The way that their architecture and technology works, they've really focused on the speed of query results and making sure that we can do what we need to do quickly. Devo is pulling back information in a fast fashion, based on real-time events."
    "One of the biggest features of the UI is that you see the actual code of what you're doing in the graphical user interface, in a little window on the side. Whatever you're doing, you see the code, what's happening. And you can really quickly switch between using the GUI and using the code. That's really useful."
    "Devo helps us to unlock the full power of our data because they have more than 450 parsers, which means that we can ingest pretty much any type of log data."
    "The strength of Devo is not only in that it is pretty intuitive, but it gives you the flexibility and creativity to merge feeds. The prime examples would be using the synthesis or union tables that give you phenomenal capabilities... The ability to use a synthesis or union table to combine all those feeds and make heads or tails of what's going on, and link it to go down a thread, is functionality that I hadn't seen before."
    "Being able to build and modify dashboards on the fly with Activeboards streamlines my analyst time because my analysts aren't doing it across spreadsheets or five different tools to try to build a timeline out themselves. They can just ingest it all, build a timeline out across all the logging, and all the different information sources in one dashboard. So, it's a huge time saver. It also has the accuracy of being able to look at all those data sources in one view. The log analysis, which would take 40 hours, we can probably get through it in about five to eight hours using Devo."
    More Devo pros
    "As a result of the automation, we are able to manage SIEM with a small security team. I'm in a unique position where we have been growing the security organization quite rapidly over the last three and a half years. But, as a direct result of the empow transition and legacy collection of tools towards the empow platform, we've been able to keep that head count flat. We've been able to redirect a lot of the security team's time away from the wash, rinse, repeat activities of responding to alarms where we have a high degree of confidence that they will be false positives, adjusting the rules accordingly. This can be a bit frustrating for the analyst when they have to spend hours a day dealing with these types of probable false positives. So, it has helped not only us keep our headcount flat relative to the resources necessary to provide the assurances that our executives expect of us for monitoring, but allows our analyst team to spend the majority of their time doing what they love. They are spending their time meaningfully with a higher degree of confidence and enjoying getting into the incident response type activity."
     

    Cons

    "Technical support could be better."
    "Devo has a lot of cloud connectors, but they need to do a little bit of work there. They've got good integrations with the public cloud, but there are a lot of cloud SaaS systems that they still need to work with on integrations, such as Salesforce and other SaaS providers where we need to get access logs."
    "One major area for improvement for Devo... is to provide more capabilities around pre-built monitoring. They're working on integrations with different types of systems, but that integration needs to go beyond just onboarding to the platform. It needs to include applications, out-of-the-box, that immediately help people to start monitoring their systems. Such applications would include dashboards and alerts, and then people could customize them for their own needs so that they aren't starting from a blank slate."
    "We only use the core functionality and one of the reasons for this is that their security operation center needs improvement."
    "The biggest area with room for improvement in Devo is the Security Operations module that just isn't there yet. That goes back to building out how they're going to do content and larger correlation and aggregation of data across multiple things, as well as natively ingesting CTI to create rule sets."
    "There is room for improvement in the ability to parse different log types. I would go as far as to say the product is deficient in its ability to parse multiple, different log types, including logs from major vendors that are supported by competitors. Additionally, the time that it takes to turn around a supported parser for customers and common log source types, which are generally accepted standards in the industry, is not acceptable. This has impacted customer onboarding and customer relationships for us on multiple fronts."
    "Their documentation could be better. They are growing quickly and need to have someone focused on tech writing to ensure that all the different updates, how to use them, and all the new features and functionality are properly documented."
    "They can improve their AI capabilities"
    More Devo cons
    "Relative to keeping up with the sheer pace of cloud-native technologies, it should provide more options for clients to deploy their technologies in unique ways. This is an area that I recommend that they maintain focus."
     

    Pricing and Cost Advice

    "The way Devo prices things is based on the amount of data, and I wish the tiers had more granularity. Maybe at this point they do, but when we first negotiated with them, there were only three or four tiers."
    "Devo is definitely cheaper than Splunk. There's no doubt about that. The value from Devo is good. It's definitely more valuable to me than QRadar or LogRhythm or any of the old, traditional SIEMs."
    "Our licensing fees are billed annually and per terabyte."
    "[Devo was] in the ballpark with at least a couple of the other front-runners that we were looking at. Devo is a good value and, given the quality of the product, I would expect to pay more."
    "I like the pricing very much. They keep it simple. It is a single price based on data ingested, and they do it on an average. If you get a spike of data that flows in, they will not stick it to you or charge you for that. They are very fair about that."
    "We have an OEM agreement with Devo. It is very similar to the standard licensing agreement because we are charged in the same way as any other customer, e.g., we use the backroom."
    "I rate the pricing a four on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."
    "It's very competitive. That was also a primary draw for us. Some of the licensing models with solutions like Splunk and Sentinel were attractive upfront, but there were so many micro-charges and services we would've had to add on to make them what we wanted. We had to include things like SOAR and extended capabilities, whereas all those capabilities are completely included with the Devo platform. I haven't seen any additional fee."
    More Devo pricing and cost advice
    "With a higher degree of fidelity in the alarms, we were able to avoid adding additional resources to our teams. We take into account the cost of security resources in the market and the significantly higher fidelity from the alarms that are being generated. This drove down our costs with our MSSP. It drove down my cost for human capital internally. It drove down our need to have multiple resources supporting the underlying infrastructure and health and maintenance of empow as a platform from several resources down to one. Therefore, human capital costs were significantly reduced. Our operating expenses were significantly reduced. Our capital costs were significantly reduced while tripling our capacity and our run rate reduced. It was almost a "too good to be true" situation. Fortunately, for us, it worked out very nicely."
    "I don't have to put up with any longer with these hypercomplex licensing agreements. Every time I want to add some additional reporting as a compliance centric or regulatory specific, e.g., GDPR, PCI, or Sarbanes-Oxley, many providers would have an additional license for this, which felt a bit ridiculous to me. With the simplified licensing architecture, there were no hidden "gotchas" down the road with empow. Something I have experienced with other providers that I've worked with in the past."
    report
    See which vendors are best for you
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions are best for your needs.
    See recommendations
    842,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.
     

    Top Industries

    By visitors reading reviews
    Financial Services Firm
    17%
    Computer Software Company
    16%
    University
    8%
    Government
    8%
    Computer Software Company
    16%
    Real Estate/Law Firm
    12%
    Financial Services Firm
    11%
    Legal Firm
    9%
     

    Company Size

    By reviewers
    Large Enterprise
    Midsize Enterprise
    Small Business
    No data available
     

    Questions from the Community

    What do you like most about Devo?
    Devo has a really good website for creating custom configurations.
    See all answers
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Devo?
    Compared to Splunk or SentinelOne, it is really expensive. I rate the product’s pricing a nine out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive.
    See all answers
    What needs improvement with Devo?
    They can improve their AI capabilities. If you look at some integrations like XDR or AI, which add to the platform to correlate situations in events, there are areas for enhancement. For instance, ...
    See all answers
    Ask a question
    Earn 20 points
     

    Comparisons

    Splunk Enterprise Security vs Devo Logo
    Splunk Enterprise Security vs Devo
    Compared 19% of the time
    IBM Security QRadar vs Devo Logo
    IBM Security QRadar vs Devo
    Compared 18% of the time
    Microsoft Sentinel vs Devo Logo
    Microsoft Sentinel vs Devo
    Compared 15% of the time
    Wazuh vs Devo Logo
    Wazuh vs Devo
    Compared 6% of the time
    LogRhythm SIEM vs Devo Logo
    LogRhythm SIEM vs Devo
    Compared 6% of the time
    More Devo Competitors
    DNIF HYPERCLOUD vs i-SIEM [EOL] Logo
    DNIF HYPERCLOUD vs i-SIEM [EOL]
    Compared 100% of the time
    More i-SIEM [EOL] Competitors
     

    Product Reports

    Buyer's Guide
    Devo
    March 2025
    Devo reportDownload Devo product report
    Buyer's Guide
    Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
    March 2025
    i-SIEM [EOL] reportDownload i-SIEM [EOL] product report
     

    Overview

    Devo is the only cloud-native logging and security analytics platform that releases the full potential of all your data to empower bold, confident action when it matters most. Only the Devo platform delivers the powerful combination of real-time visibility, high-performance analytics, scalability, multitenancy, and low TCO crucial for monitoring and securing business operations as enterprises accelerate their shift to the cloud.

    Devo

    i-SIEM [EOL] delivers comprehensive monitoring and threat detection capabilities suitable for today's security challenges. It integrates with existing systems, enabling efficient threat analysis and response for knowledgeable users.

    i-SIEM [EOL] offers advanced security analytics and seamless integration with security infrastructure, making it a favored choice among technology professionals. Its intuitive design caters to efficient threat management. Users appreciate its capability to process large data volumes for timely threat detection and remediation. The platform ensures effective incident response through automated processes, assisting professionals in maintaining robust security postures.

    What are the key features of i-SIEM [EOL]?
    • Advanced Threat Detection: Utilizes real-time analytics for identifying potential security threats.
    • Integration Capabilities: Easily connects with diverse security tools for a cohesive security strategy.
    • Automated Incident Response: Facilitates swift responses to security incidents to mitigate risks.
    What benefits and ROI can i-SIEM [EOL] offer?
    • Reduced Security Risks: Proactively identifies and addresses vulnerabilities before exploitation.
    • Operational Efficiency: Automation reduces manual workload and minimizes error.
    • Cost-Effectiveness: Streamlines processes to lower overall security management costs.

    i-SIEM [EOL] is implemented across industries like finance, healthcare, and manufacturing, where security and compliance are critical. Its flexibility in handling specific industry requirements makes it suitable for enhancing security postures and operational efficiency.

    Cybereason
     

    Sample Customers

    United States Air Force, Rubrik, SentinelOne, Critical Start, NHL, Panda Security, Telefonica, CaixaBank, OpenText, IGT, OneMain Financial, SurveyMonkey, FanDuel, H&R Block, Ulta Beauty, Manulife, Moneylion, Chime Bank, Magna International, American Express Global Business Travel
    University of Oklahoma, Donnelley
    Buyer's Guide
    Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
    March 2025
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Wazuh, Microsoft and others in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM). Updated: March 2025.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    842,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.