Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Devo vs i-SIEM [EOL] comparison

Devo and Cybereason are both solutions in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category. Additionally, 95% of Devo users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Cybereason users who would recommend it.
Devo
Read 22 Devo reviews
  • 3,331 Views
  • 1,418 Comparison Views
95% willing to recommend
i-SIEM [EOL]
Read 1 i-SIEM [EOL] review
    100% willing to recommend
     

    Comparison Buyer's Guide

    Download the report
    Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 7, 2024

    Devo and i-SIEM [EOL] are competitors in the advanced SIEM solutions category. i-SIEM [EOL] takes the upper hand with its comprehensive features that users find worth the price difference.

    Features: Devo is recognized for its robust data processing, real-time analytics capabilities, and quick threat detection. i-SIEM [EOL] is noted for its extensive integration options, customizable dashboards, and enhanced data visibility.

    Room for Improvement: Devo could improve its scalability for larger enterprises, expand its integration portfolio, and refine its alert fine-tuning capabilities. i-SIEM [EOL] requires more intuitive setup processes, enhanced alert fine-tuning, and could benefit from streamlined documentation.

    Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Devo offers a straightforward deployment process and responsive customer support, which is essential for problem-solving. i-SIEM [EOL] presents a more complex setup but compensates with detailed documentation and personalized support.

    Pricing and ROI: Devo's setup cost is competitive, offering a quick ROI with a balance of features to cost. i-SIEM [EOL] has a higher initial investment justified by its advanced capabilities promising substantial long-term returns.

    DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
    To learn more, read our detailed Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) Report (Updated: November 2024).
    Buyer's Guide
    Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
    November 2024
    Download the complete report
    Helped 816,406 peers since 2012
     

    Categories and Ranking

    Devo
    Average Rating
    8.4
    Reviews Sentiment
    6.7
    Number of Reviews
    22
    Ranking in other categories
    Log Management (28th), Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (27th), IT Operations Analytics (3rd), AIOps (16th)
    i-SIEM [EOL]
    Average Rating
    9.0
    Number of Reviews
    1
    Ranking in other categories
    No ranking in other categories
     

    Featured Reviews

    Michael Wenn - PeerSpot reviewer
    Has cloud-first architecture with SIEM technology to run security operations
    When it comes to scale, they're architected quite well. They handle some of the biggest customers globally, with significant throughput on their platform, managing thousands of customers. One of the most impressive aspects of Devo is its customer community. A large majority, over 80 percent of their customers, actively participate on a Devo-specific community page. They're contributing to product development and support, events, and user group information, helping each other out. This high level of engagement is rare and demonstrates both the loyalty of their customer base and the quality of their product. They offer a range of small, medium, and large options to cater to everyone. I sold Devo products while working with them, focusing on enterprise solutions. However, as a small reseller, my customers were typically smaller businesses. I rate the solution's scalability a nine out of ten.
    Read full review
    DC
    The alert fatigue and false positive rates have just plummeted, which is really exciting.
    empow has a few areas of improvement as with any other technology, such as continuing to drive innovation in the dashboard. While we've been extremely impressed with the dashboard's ease of use, flexibility, ability to drill down deeply, and focus very intently on an area of interest, there will always be opportunities to be more innovative and open it up to a wider audience than just the operations group, for example. With reporting, there is always a desire to have custom reporting for every client of empow. Relative to keeping up with the sheer pace of cloud-native technologies, it should provide more options for clients to deploy their technologies in unique ways. This is an area that I recommend that they maintain focus.
    Read full review

    Quotes from Members

    We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
     

    Pros

    "The ability to have high performance, high-speed search capability is incredibly important for us. When it comes to doing security analysis, you don't want to be doing is sitting around waiting to get data back while an attacker is sitting on a network, actively attacking it. You need to be able to answer questions quickly. If I see an indicator of attack, I need to be able to rapidly pivot and find data, then analyze it and find more data to answer more questions. You need to be able to do that quickly. If I'm sitting around just waiting to get my first response, then it ends up moving too slow to keep up with the attacker. Devo's speed and performance allows us to query in real-time and keep up with what is actually happening on the network, then respond effectively to events."
    "The real-time analytics of security-related data are super. There are a lot of data feeds going into it and it's very quick at pulling up and correlating the data and showing you what's going on in your infrastructure. It's fast. The way that their architecture and technology works, they've really focused on the speed of query results and making sure that we can do what we need to do quickly. Devo is pulling back information in a fast fashion, based on real-time events."
    "Those 400 days of hot data mean that people can look for trends and at what happened in the past. And they can not only do so from a security point of view, but even for operational use cases. In the past, our operational norm was to keep live data for only 30 days. Our users were constantly asking us for at least 90 days, and we really couldn't even do that. That's one reason that having 400 days of live data is pretty huge. As our users start to use it and adopt this system, we expect people to be able to do those long-term analytics."
    "It's very, very versatile."
    "The most useful feature for us, because of some of the issues we had previously, was the simplicity of log integrations. It's much easier with this platform to integrate log sources that might not have standard logging and things like that."
    "The most powerful feature is the way the data is stored and extracted. The data is always stored in its original format and you can normalize the data after it has been stored."
    "Scalability is one of Devo's strengths."
    "The querying and the log-retention capabilities are pretty powerful. Those provide some of the biggest value-add for us."
    More Devo pros
    "As a result of the automation, we are able to manage SIEM with a small security team. I'm in a unique position where we have been growing the security organization quite rapidly over the last three and a half years. But, as a direct result of the empow transition and legacy collection of tools towards the empow platform, we've been able to keep that head count flat. We've been able to redirect a lot of the security team's time away from the wash, rinse, repeat activities of responding to alarms where we have a high degree of confidence that they will be false positives, adjusting the rules accordingly. This can be a bit frustrating for the analyst when they have to spend hours a day dealing with these types of probable false positives. So, it has helped not only us keep our headcount flat relative to the resources necessary to provide the assurances that our executives expect of us for monitoring, but allows our analyst team to spend the majority of their time doing what they love. They are spending their time meaningfully with a higher degree of confidence and enjoying getting into the incident response type activity."
     

    Cons

    "Some basic reporting mechanisms have room for improvement. Customers can do analysis by building Activeboards, Devo’s name for interactive dashboards. This capability is quite nice, but it is not a reporting engine. Devo does provide mechanisms to allow third-party tools to query data via their API, which is great. However, a lot of folks like or want a reporting engine, per se, and Devo simply doesn't have that. This may or may not be by design."
    "The Activeboards feature is not as mature regarding the look and feel. Its functionality is mature, but the look and feel is not there. For example, if you have some data sets and are trying to get some graphics, you cannot change anything. There's just one format for the graphics. You cannot change the size of the font, the font itself, etc."
    "The overall performance of extraction could be a lot faster, but that's a common problem in this space in general. Also, the stock or default alerting and detecting options could definitely be broader and more all-encompassing. The fact that they're not is why we had to write all our own alerts."
    "There's always room to reduce the learning curve over how to deal with events and machine data. They could make the machine data simpler."
    "Where Devo has room for improvement is the data ingestion and parsing. We tend to have to work with the Devo support team to bring on and ingest new sources of data."
    "The price is one problem with Devo."
    "There are some issues from an availability and functionality standpoint, meaning the tool is somewhat slow. There were some slow response periods over the past six to nine months, though it has yet to impact us terribly as we are a relatively small shop. We've noticed it, however, so Devo could improve the responsiveness."
    "They can improve their AI capabilities"
    More Devo cons
    "Relative to keeping up with the sheer pace of cloud-native technologies, it should provide more options for clients to deploy their technologies in unique ways. This is an area that I recommend that they maintain focus."
     

    Pricing and Cost Advice

    "Pricing is based on the number of gigabytes of ingestion by volume, and it's on a 30-day average. If you go over one day, that's not a big deal as long as the average is what you expected it to be."
    "The way Devo prices things is based on the amount of data, and I wish the tiers had more granularity. Maybe at this point they do, but when we first negotiated with them, there were only three or four tiers."
    "I rate the pricing a four on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."
    "I'm not involved in the financial aspect, but I think the licensing costs are similar to other solutions. If all the solutions have a similar cost, Devo provides more for the money."
    "Devo is definitely cheaper than Splunk. There's no doubt about that. The value from Devo is good. It's definitely more valuable to me than QRadar or LogRhythm or any of the old, traditional SIEMs."
    "Our licensing fees are billed annually and per terabyte."
    "[Devo was] in the ballpark with at least a couple of the other front-runners that we were looking at. Devo is a good value and, given the quality of the product, I would expect to pay more."
    "Devo was very cost-competitive... Devo did come with that 400 days of hot data, and that was not the case with other products."
    More Devo pricing and cost advice
    "I don't have to put up with any longer with these hypercomplex licensing agreements. Every time I want to add some additional reporting as a compliance centric or regulatory specific, e.g., GDPR, PCI, or Sarbanes-Oxley, many providers would have an additional license for this, which felt a bit ridiculous to me. With the simplified licensing architecture, there were no hidden "gotchas" down the road with empow. Something I have experienced with other providers that I've worked with in the past."
    "With a higher degree of fidelity in the alarms, we were able to avoid adding additional resources to our teams. We take into account the cost of security resources in the market and the significantly higher fidelity from the alarms that are being generated. This drove down our costs with our MSSP. It drove down my cost for human capital internally. It drove down our need to have multiple resources supporting the underlying infrastructure and health and maintenance of empow as a platform from several resources down to one. Therefore, human capital costs were significantly reduced. Our operating expenses were significantly reduced. Our capital costs were significantly reduced while tripling our capacity and our run rate reduced. It was almost a "too good to be true" situation. Fortunately, for us, it worked out very nicely."
    report
    See which vendors are best for you
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions are best for your needs.
    See recommendations
    816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
     

    Top Industries

    By visitors reading reviews
    Computer Software Company
    16%
    Financial Services Firm
    11%
    Government
    10%
    University
    6%
    Computer Software Company
    15%
    Financial Services Firm
    15%
    Healthcare Company
    11%
    Real Estate/Law Firm
    11%
     

    Company Size

    By reviewers
    Large Enterprise
    Midsize Enterprise
    Small Business
    No data available
     

    Questions from the Community

    What do you like most about Devo?
    Devo has a really good website for creating custom configurations.
    See all answers
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Devo?
    Compared to Splunk or SentinelOne, it is really expensive. I rate the product’s pricing a nine out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive.
    See all answers
    What needs improvement with Devo?
    They can improve their AI capabilities. If you look at some integrations like XDR or AI, which add to the platform to correlate situations in events, there are areas for enhancement. For instance, ...
    See all answers
    Ask a question
    Earn 20 points
     

    Comparisons

    Splunk Enterprise Security vs Devo Logo
    Splunk Enterprise Security vs Devo
    Compared 22% of the time
    IBM Security QRadar vs Devo Logo
    IBM Security QRadar vs Devo
    Compared 18% of the time
    Microsoft Sentinel vs Devo Logo
    Microsoft Sentinel vs Devo
    Compared 14% of the time
    LogRhythm SIEM vs Devo Logo
    LogRhythm SIEM vs Devo
    Compared 8% of the time
    New Relic vs Devo Logo
    New Relic vs Devo
    Compared 6% of the time
    More Devo Competitors
    AWS Security Hub vs i-SIEM [EOL] Logo
    AWS Security Hub vs i-SIEM [EOL]
    Compared 38% of the time
    AlienVault OSSIM vs i-SIEM [EOL] Logo
    AlienVault OSSIM vs i-SIEM [EOL]
    Compared 33% of the time
    DNIF HYPERCLOUD vs i-SIEM [EOL] Logo
    DNIF HYPERCLOUD vs i-SIEM [EOL]
    Compared 28% of the time
    More i-SIEM [EOL] Competitors
     

    Product Reports

    Buyer's Guide
    Devo
    November 2024
    Devo reportDownload Devo product report
    Buyer's Guide
    Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
    November 2024
    i-SIEM [EOL] reportDownload i-SIEM [EOL] product report
     

    Learn More

    Devo
    Cybereason
     

    Overview

    Devo is the only cloud-native logging and security analytics platform that releases the full potential of all your data to empower bold, confident action when it matters most. Only the Devo platform delivers the powerful combination of real-time visibility, high-performance analytics, scalability, multitenancy, and low TCO crucial for monitoring and securing business operations as enterprises accelerate their shift to the cloud.

    i-SIEM [EOL] delivers comprehensive monitoring and threat detection capabilities suitable for today's security challenges. It integrates with existing systems, enabling efficient threat analysis and response for knowledgeable users.

    i-SIEM [EOL] offers advanced security analytics and seamless integration with security infrastructure, making it a favored choice among technology professionals. Its intuitive design caters to efficient threat management. Users appreciate its capability to process large data volumes for timely threat detection and remediation. The platform ensures effective incident response through automated processes, assisting professionals in maintaining robust security postures.

    What are the key features of i-SIEM [EOL]?
    • Advanced Threat Detection: Utilizes real-time analytics for identifying potential security threats.
    • Integration Capabilities: Easily connects with diverse security tools for a cohesive security strategy.
    • Automated Incident Response: Facilitates swift responses to security incidents to mitigate risks.
    What benefits and ROI can i-SIEM [EOL] offer?
    • Reduced Security Risks: Proactively identifies and addresses vulnerabilities before exploitation.
    • Operational Efficiency: Automation reduces manual workload and minimizes error.
    • Cost-Effectiveness: Streamlines processes to lower overall security management costs.

    i-SIEM [EOL] is implemented across industries like finance, healthcare, and manufacturing, where security and compliance are critical. Its flexibility in handling specific industry requirements makes it suitable for enhancing security postures and operational efficiency.

     

    Sample Customers

    United States Air Force, Rubrik, SentinelOne, Critical Start, NHL, Panda Security, Telefonica, CaixaBank, OpenText, IGT, OneMain Financial, SurveyMonkey, FanDuel, H&R Block, Ulta Beauty, Manulife, Moneylion, Chime Bank, Magna International, American Express Global Business Travel
    University of Oklahoma, Donnelley
    Buyer's Guide
    Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
    November 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Microsoft, Wazuh and others in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM). Updated: November 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.