Digital Guardian vs SonicWall Capture Client comparison

Fortra and SonicWall are both solutions in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category. Fortra is ranked #41 with an average rating of 7.8, while SonicWall is ranked #44 with an average rating of 8.0. Fortra holds a 0.5% mindshare in EDR, compared to SonicWall’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 77% of Fortra users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of SonicWall users who would recommend it.

Digital Guardian

Read 11 Digital Guardian reviews

1,115 Views
715 Comparison Views

77% willing to recommend

SonicWall Capture Client

Read 9 SonicWall Capture Client reviews

1,261 Views
909 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Digital Guardian

SonicWall Capture Client

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Digital Guardian and SonicWall Capture Client are two prominent security solutions. SonicWall Capture Client seems to have the upper hand due to its user-friendly management and advanced features.

Features: Digital Guardian is recognized for powerful data classification, robust data protection, and DLP capabilities. SonicWall Capture Client offers seamless integration with other security products, real-time threat detection, and user-friendly management features.

Room for Improvement: Digital Guardian's interface is complex, its reporting tools are difficult to navigate, and it lacks a streamlined user experience. SonicWall Capture Client could improve its update process, add more customizable options, and refine some of its features for better usability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Digital Guardian's deployment can be cumbersome, requiring extensive IT support. Its customer service is responsive but sometimes slow. SonicWall Capture Client offers a smoother deployment with minimal issues and effective customer support, making it more favorable in this regard.

Pricing and ROI: Digital Guardian has a high initial setup investment and is perceived as costly, but its ROI is substantial for stringent data protection needs. SonicWall Capture Client has a higher subscription cost but delivers considerable value through its extensive features and effective threat management, justifying its price as a better investment for comprehensive security needs.

To learn more, read our detailed Digital Guardian vs. SonicWall Capture Client Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Digital Guardian vs. SonicWall Capture Client

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 848,253 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Digital Guardian

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

41st

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (11th), Endpoint Encryption (9th), Mobile Data Protection (7th), Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (23rd)

SonicWall Capture Client

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

44th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (47th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of Digital Guardian is 0.5%, down from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SonicWall Capture Client is 0.6%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Featured Reviews

Sandeep Jopat

Cyber Security Researcher at a engineering company with 10,001+ employees

Highly customizable, helpful support, and multiple modules available

Digital Guardian is generally considered stable, with its robust data loss prevention capabilities being highly valued by organizations. However, as with any complex software solution, there may be occasional challenges in terms of compatibility with certain operating systems or applications. In such cases, it may be necessary to modify settings or entries within Digital Guardian to ensure optimal performance. Overall, Digital Guardian is a stable solution that can be highly customized to meet the specific needs and requirements of organizations. As with any software solution, regular maintenance and support from a team of experts is necessary to ensure optimal performance and stability.

Read full review

LUIZ FERNANDO MARIANO SILVA

Data Office Protect - DPO at DATATRUSTY TECNOLOGIA

Enables faster updates and provides an easy-to-use user interface

I have an advanced license that includes all features. Though we have the license, we cannot use it completely because it is not enabled in the Microsoft tier. It does not make sense. We do not want to buy it separately because the price is different if we buy separate licenses.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"There is a built-in endpoint detection response that helps save money."

"It can scale from 100 to 10,000. There's no problem with the scalability."

"Some of the features that are highly appreciated are its robust data loss prevention capabilities, flexible deployment options, and the ability to monitor data transfer across multiple vectors."

"We have been able to monitor access to files from each of our workstations."

"The technical support is really terrific."

"The feature we call desktop recording is the most valuable aspect of the solution. Not only can we collect data from the user's usage, but we also capture his screenshots when he is trying to steal the data."

"The most valuable feature of Digital Guardian is its reputation. They have scored high on the Gartner Magic Quadrant."

"It has the added advantage of offering forensic analysis."

More Digital Guardian pros

"SonicWall Capture Client's scalability is nice."

"The product’s interface is easy to use."

"The threat protection feature of SonicWall Capture Client is most valuable."

"SonicWall Capture Client has a serial number to connect to your firewall."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"Overall, what I love the most about SonicWall Capture Client is its management console. SonicWall Capture Client also has the intelligence to tell you which computer is online, what OS it uses, etc. I also found the rollback feature and SentinelOne integration valuable in SonicWall Capture Client. Rollback is a powerful feature of the solution because it's similar to locking your endpoint during an attack, so you won't have to pay the hackers, particularly during ransomware attacks. That feature in SonicWall Capture Client allows you to get back your endpoint or make your endpoint right again after an attack. I also like that it isn't complex to remove the engine error from the endpoint because you only have to provide the security key from SonicWall Capture Client, so the process is simple. It's not complex."

"The solution serves as a very stable platform."

"The most valuable features of SonicWall Capture Client are CSC (Capture Security Center), RTDMI (Real-Time Deep Memory Inspection), and the deep memory inspection feature."

More SonicWall Capture Client pros

Cons

"It would be helpful if there was an on-premise version of the solution for companies that cannot use the cloud, such as government sectors."

"Technical support could be better."

"When considering potential areas for improvement, it may be beneficial for Digital Guardian to optimize its processes and reduce the computational demands on the system, particularly with regard to high CPU usage. Although Digital Guardian offers numerous benefits, it can consume a substantial amount of RAM and CPU power."

"Digital Guardian is an excellent solution but our experience with the partner has been the most horrible experience we have ever had with any partner."

"The initial setup is a bit more complex than other solutions."

"I would like to see the workflow, to get all the rules and policies set up, be less complicated."

"The room for improvement with Digital Guardian is that it will be better with the Linux agent because it is the only DLP solution for Linux workstations. It still needs to upgrade the agents to the latest version for the Linux kernel."

"There are a lot of issues with the current version of the Endpoint agent. It's not stable, it's resource-consuming, and there are some performance issues. If they could improve the stability of the agent it would be great."

More Digital Guardian cons

"It takes technical support too long to resolve an issue."

"SonicWall Capture Client could be made a little lighter than it currently is in terms of memory consumption."

"The vulnerability reports need to be better. Windows Defender detected some issues that SonicWall Capture Client couldn't."

"An area for improvement in SonicWall Capture Client is TenantCloud support. Suppose you want to implement SonicWall Capture Client. You'll have to register it on MySonicWall. Then once your SonicWall Capture Client license expires and you don't want to renew it, you can't delete it from your MySonicWall account, so that's an area for improvement."

"SonicWall Capture Client should use less of our PC's memory, as it tends to slow down the performance."

"The implementation is not easy."

"The biggest issue with SonicWall Capture Client is network latency."

"They should improve their user interface."

More SonicWall Capture Client cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Digital Guardian has both, subscription and perpetual licenses, but I think when everything (all technologies) will go to the cloud they will only offer subscriptions."

"I rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten because Digital Guardian is expensive."

"If I compare Digital Guardian with Symantec, the license cost is lower, but McAfee can be cheaper than Digital Guardian. It depends on how many licenses you plan to buy and how big the project is. The cost is not so high as Symantec, but not as cheap as McAfee. They can easily sell the solution for price."

"The cost was around $300,000."

"The price of Digital Guardian is expensive."

"The price of Digital Guardian is on the higher end compared to other vendors."

"You have to pay for the solution, and a lot of customers do not want to pay."

"Here in Indonesia, SonicWall Capture Client costs five hundred thousand rupiahs for every endpoint. If I'm correct, you only have to pay the licensing fee, and there's no additional fee. To me, the pricing for SonicWall Capture Client is four out of five."

"The product is very expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

848,253 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

23%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

Educational Organization

Real Estate/Law Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Digital Guardian?

I like the solution's adaptive inspection and container inspection.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Digital Guardian?

Technical support is included in the subscription package. But if, during the subscription, our clients want to include the professional services of a Digital Guardian engineer, the price changes. ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Digital Guardian?

If the client uses Windows 10 or 11 and Microsoft updates the operating system's version, Digital Guardian must update their product to match compatibility.

See all answers

What do you like most about SonicWall Capture Client?

SonicWall Capture Client's scalability is nice.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SonicWall Capture Client?

SonicWall Capture Client offers a cost-effective solution that's cheaper compared to other vendors like CrowdStrike.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SonicWall Capture Client?

SonicWall Capture Client could benefit from an improved graphical user interface with more modern and minimal icons. Additionally, one of the drawbacks is that I cannot use Advanced and Premier lic...

See all answers

Comparisons

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs Digital Guardian

Compared 27% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs Digital Guardian

Compared 9% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Digital Guardian

Compared 8% of the time

Symantec Data Loss Prevention vs Digital Guardian

Compared 7% of the time

Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Digital Guardian

Compared 6% of the time

More Digital Guardian Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs SonicWall Capture Client

Compared 18% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs SonicWall Capture Client

Compared 17% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs SonicWall Capture Client

Compared 15% of the time

Bitdefender Total Security vs SonicWall Capture Client

Compared 8% of the time

Fortinet FortiClient vs SonicWall Capture Client

Compared 6% of the time

More SonicWall Capture Client Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Digital Guardian

April 2025

Download Digital Guardian product report

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

April 2025

Download SonicWall Capture Client product report

Overview

Digital Guardian is proud to be part of Fortra’s comprehensive cybersecurity portfolio, and one of the Data Protection family of products. Fortra simplifies today’s complex cybersecurity landscape by bringing complementary products together to solve problems in innovative ways. These integrated, scalable solutions address the fast-changing challenges you face in safeguarding your organization. With the help of the powerful protection from Digital Guardian and others, Fortra is your relentless ally, here for you every step of the way throughout your cybersecurity journey.

Fortra

SonicWall Capture Client is a unified client platform that delivers multiple endpoint protection capabilities, including next-generation malware protection and application vulnerability intelligence. It leverages cloud sandbox file testing, comprehensive reporting, and enforcement for endpoint protection.

SonicWall

Sample Customers

The Fifth Avenue Theatre, Jabil Circuit

Luton College

Buyer's Guide

Digital Guardian vs. SonicWall Capture Client

March 2025

Free Report: Digital Guardian vs. SonicWall Capture Client

Find out what your peers are saying about Digital Guardian vs. SonicWall Capture Client and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

848,253 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Digital Guardian vs. SonicWall Capture Client report.

See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.