Digital Guardian vs Tanium comparison

Read 16 Tanium reviews

4,829 Views
3,386 Comparison Views

73% willing to recommend

Digital Guardian

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Digital Guardian and Tanium offer powerful cybersecurity solutions, each with distinct advantages. Based on the results, Tanium has the upper hand due to its extensive features and robust threat management offerings.

Features: Digital Guardian is praised for its data protection, endpoint security, and user activity monitoring. Tanium is commended for comprehensive threat detection, rapid response capabilities, and real-time data collection. Despite Digital Guardian's valued features, Tanium's broader threat management offerings give it an edge.

Room for Improvement: Digital Guardian could improve reporting capabilities, integration options, and user interface. Tanium users desire enhancements in usability, quicker updates, and streamlined workflows. Both products have areas to enhance, but Tanium's issues are more about performance than fundamental capability gaps.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Digital Guardian users report straightforward deployment and commendable customer service. Tanium has a more complex deployment process, but users find its customer support highly responsive and knowledgeable. Digital Guardian wins on ease of deployment, while Tanium excels in customer service quality.

Pricing and ROI: Digital Guardian is considered more cost-effective with a quicker ROI based on user reviews. Tanium, despite its higher cost, is seen as worth the investment due to its advanced features, driving a higher perceived value. Digital Guardian offers better initial pricing, but Tanium provides greater long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed Digital Guardian vs. Tanium Report (Updated: March 2025).

Digital Guardian vs. Tanium

Download the complete report

Helped 842,690 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Digital Guardian

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

31st

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (9th), Endpoint Encryption (7th), Mobile Data Protection (5th), Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (20th)

Tanium

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

27th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Server Monitoring (9th), Vulnerability Management (26th), Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (37th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of Digital Guardian is 0.5%, down from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tanium is 2.4%, up from 2.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Featured Reviews

Sandeep Jopat

Cyber Security Researcher at a engineering company with 10,001+ employees

Highly customizable, helpful support, and multiple modules available

Digital Guardian is generally considered stable, with its robust data loss prevention capabilities being highly valued by organizations. However, as with any complex software solution, there may be occasional challenges in terms of compatibility with certain operating systems or applications. In such cases, it may be necessary to modify settings or entries within Digital Guardian to ensure optimal performance. Overall, Digital Guardian is a stable solution that can be highly customized to meet the specific needs and requirements of organizations. As with any software solution, regular maintenance and support from a team of experts is necessary to ensure optimal performance and stability.

Read full review

Mo Vermeiren

Cybersecurity Business & Technology Consultant at Capgemini

Is able to make several campaigns work in parallel, but the user interface needs improvement

It's mainly used by the cybersecurity team for Windows patching and deployment of some software solutions I like the fact that you can create patching campaigns depending on the area of your network that you want to address first. I like the ability it has to make several campaigns that work in…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"In Digital Guardian, they have the cloud correlation servers that give you visibility work like EBR and the correlation server works very well for security analysis."

"It has been scalable."

"It has the added advantage of offering forensic analysis."

"There is a built-in endpoint detection response that helps save money."

"I like the solution's adaptive inspection and container inspection."

"It can scale from 100 to 10,000. There's no problem with the scalability."

"Some of the features that are highly appreciated are its robust data loss prevention capabilities, flexible deployment options, and the ability to monitor data transfer across multiple vectors."

"The most valuable feature of Digital Guardian is its reputation. They have scored high on the Gartner Magic Quadrant."

More Digital Guardian pros

"The product is granular and can build complex roles compared to other EDR vendors."

"I'm not so familiar with the tool but I like the interaction of the console to the picture. Patching is the primary model I have been focusing on for the last couple of weeks. So I have created a proof of concept environment and have been checking the available features."

"Tanium has made the process of detecting threats more proactive with its detection. So, the process is easier and more efficient."

"When I push a quick update, it's done right away, and I can rescan immediately to confirm completion within minutes."

"Threat hunting is a very good feature on Tanium. We have just started using it and have not used it extensively."

"Tanium's most valuable feature is its instant discovery aspect."

"Tanium's most valuable features are patch management, inventory, and distribution software."

"The solution is scalable and helps to understand how infrastructure works. It helps to improve the health of the organization."

More Tanium pros

Cons

"The solution has complexities around policy creation and deployment."

"Technical support could be better."

"The room for improvement with Digital Guardian is that it will be better with the Linux agent because it is the only DLP solution for Linux workstations. It still needs to upgrade the agents to the latest version for the Linux kernel."

"Some features on Mac and Linux are not complete currently. For example, some device control features haven't been transferred over to the other systems. If they could have their Windows features also available on Mac and Linux, that would be perfect. Some of our customers have a Mac environment for their RD environment. Having the solution fully capable of handling everything in a Mac environment is crucial."

"It would be helpful if there was an on-premise version of the solution for companies that cannot use the cloud, such as government sectors."

"I would like to see the workflow, to get all the rules and policies set up, be less complicated."

"The initial setup is a bit more complex than other solutions."

"There are a lot of issues with the current version of the Endpoint agent. It's not stable, it's resource-consuming, and there are some performance issues. If they could improve the stability of the agent it would be great."

More Digital Guardian cons

"The solution lacks mobility."

"When working with Tanium, there are some older devices that haven't been patched for a long time, and certain patches are not included in Tanium."

"The performance could improve in future releases. We have had performance issues in specialized web environments, but overall I think the problems are less than 2% of the computer systems being used."

"The main issues are the network connection because different customers have issues with their networks. It's difficult implementing this type of solution because the network is the main feature in the architecture for these types of solutions. Tanium could improve by creating some network optimization."

"The solution needs to improve the reporting and tracking capabilities."

"It is not really additional functions, or the features that are needed, rather the complexity would be reduced based on the number of modules required to put together a comprehensive operational security and risk compliance model."

"Any movement into a SaaS solution has challenges since the processes and data flows are not well defined. Hence, you need to build it at the same time."

"The solution can give a lot of false positives."

More Tanium cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost was around $300,000."

"The price of Digital Guardian is on the higher end compared to other vendors."

"If I compare Digital Guardian with Symantec, the license cost is lower, but McAfee can be cheaper than Digital Guardian. It depends on how many licenses you plan to buy and how big the project is. The cost is not so high as Symantec, but not as cheap as McAfee. They can easily sell the solution for price."

"The price of Digital Guardian is expensive."

"I rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten because Digital Guardian is expensive."

"Digital Guardian has both, subscription and perpetual licenses, but I think when everything (all technologies) will go to the cloud they will only offer subscriptions."

"The solution is expensive but it's a good investment."

"Tanium is a more expensive solution in Latin America than some of the competitors, such as BigFix."

"It's an expensive solution. It would be nice if the cost were lower."

"The product's pricing differs from region to region depending on negotiations and the number of endpoints."

"There is an annual license required to use this solution."

"The solution offers value for money."

"It is higher than some competitors in the market."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

842,690 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

23%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

17%

Government

13%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Digital Guardian?

I like the solution's adaptive inspection and container inspection.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Digital Guardian?

Technical support is included in the subscription package. But if, during the subscription, our clients want to include the professional services of a Digital Guardian engineer, the price changes. ...

What needs improvement with Digital Guardian?

If the client uses Windows 10 or 11 and Microsoft updates the operating system's version, Digital Guardian must update their product to match compatibility.

What do you like most about Tanium?

Tanium’s linear-chain architecture is valuable.

What needs improvement with Tanium?

When working with Tanium, there are some older devices that haven't been patched for a long time, and certain patches are not included in Tanium. I have to search outside to download patches, creat...

What is your primary use case for Tanium?

We primarily use Tanium for patching, focusing on vulnerabilities. Our major goal with Tanium is to patch based on vulnerabilities detected by our other vulnerability tools.

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs Digital Guardian

Comparisons

Compared 28% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs Digital Guardian

Compared 9% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Digital Guardian

Compared 8% of the time

Symantec Data Loss Prevention vs Digital Guardian

Compared 7% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Digital Guardian

Compared 3% of the time

More Digital Guardian Competitors

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Tanium

Compared 16% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Tanium

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Tanium

Compared 9% of the time

ServiceNow Discovery vs Tanium

Compared 6% of the time

BigFix vs Tanium

Compared 6% of the time

More Tanium Competitors

Product Reports

Digital Guardian

Download Digital Guardian product report

Download Tanium product report

Overview

Digital Guardian is proud to be part of Fortra’s comprehensive cybersecurity portfolio, and one of the Data Protection family of products. Fortra simplifies today’s complex cybersecurity landscape by bringing complementary products together to solve problems in innovative ways. These integrated, scalable solutions address the fast-changing challenges you face in safeguarding your organization. With the help of the powerful protection from Digital Guardian and others, Fortra is your relentless ally, here for you every step of the way throughout your cybersecurity journey.

Fortra

Tanium Endpoint Platform reduces security risk, improves agility & increases efficiency, a fundamentally new approach to endpoint security's threat detection, indicent response, vulnerability assessment and configuration compliance & with management's software distribution, asset utilization, asset inventory and patch management.

Sample Customers

The Fifth Avenue Theatre, Jabil Circuit

JPMorgan Chase, eBay, Amazon, US Bank, MetLife, pwc, Cerner, Delphi, MGM Grand, New York Life

Digital Guardian vs. Tanium