Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Jira vs SwiftKanban comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 6, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Jira
Ranking in Project Management Software
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
274
Ranking in other categories
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (1st), Application Requirements Management (1st)
SwiftKanban
Ranking in Project Management Software
53rd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Project Management Software category, the mindshare of Jira is 9.0%, up from 8.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SwiftKanban is 0.3%, down from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Project Management Software
 

Featured Reviews

AmitUbale - PeerSpot reviewer
Efficient project management that's comprehensive and and helps with time efficiency
We use Jira primarily for project management within the organization. It helps us manage tasks, bug management, and tracking tickets effectively. We assign tickets to individual team members and track them easily For project management, Jira has helped facilitate efficient task segregation and…
Venu Vashistha - PeerSpot reviewer
Good reporting, quick configurations, and helpful support
It's a cloud-based setup, so there's no challenge in getting everything up and running. The downtime should be minimal. I'd rate the process nine out of ten in terms of ease of deployment. There is a three-month implementation exercise that we control. We have five people who were part of the implementation and maintenance process. They are admins and web developers.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"We love the bulk edit feature. Jira also integrates well with Bitbucket."
"The UI is good. It's simple and not very complicated. It's very good for tracking."
"I have found Jira to be scalable."
"The layout, workflow, automation, and metrics are helpful in Jira."
"The sprint tracking is really helpful and very convenient."
"We can create multiple boards for the same product backlogs."
"Jira is very useful for project management for internal projects."
"Issue linking has enabled teams to trace issues."
"The reporting part is very good."
 

Cons

"If CI/CD is integrated with it, it would be better. I've used Azure DevOps before, and it's nice to have everything, such as CI/CD Repos and other things, integrated. Jira has fewer integrations. Azure DevOps has an easier interface, and it has got everything in one spot. I don't have to jump around in different applications."
"I don't know whether there is a Jira problem or a test risk problem, however, sometimes, we face issues on fetching the reports."
"Sometimes the screens can be a bit too busy. There's often a lot of information on the screen. I think paring things down and applying some UX improvements might enhance the look and feel of the interface."
"I want the tool to integrate connectors."
"Jira required a significant amount of system resources, particularly for larger organizations with extensive workflows and numerous projects."
"Of course, the price could always be cheaper."
"Users can be confused about how to use this tool as it's very complex."
"There could be an improvement in loading files and images for more than 50 MB. It would be good if it allowed more than 100 MB."
"Some of the reports could be automated."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool's pricing is reasonable."
"It is an affordable tool."
"The tool is expensive."
"I rate the tool's pricing a five out of ten. It's paid yearly."
"It is very cheap if you forego the local instance and stick to the cloud."
"I don't have the number, but I sure wish Jira was less expensive. Its price point should be a little lower, and it should be more flexible for users who are just ticket viewers."
"The pricing for Jira is reasonable, although I think they can bring it down because the plugins cost extra."
"The cost is about $10 per user, per month."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Management Software solutions are best for your needs.
861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
16%
Manufacturing Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Computer Software Company
9%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Is Jira better or would you go with Micro Focus ALM Octane?
Hi Netanya, Basically , it all depends on the use cases for your environment and the business needs. Hope the below data may be relevant to you for identifying your needs and deciding on the approp...
Which is better - Jira or Microsoft Azure DevOps?
Jira is a great centralized tool for just about everything, from local team management to keeping track of products and work logs. It is easy to implement and navigate, and it is stable and scalabl...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Jira?
We operate under a nonlimited license with Jira, allowing a number of users to access it with a single enterprise license.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Also Known As

Jira Software
Digité SwiftEASe
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Square, Nasa, eBay, Cisco, SalesForce, Adobe, BNP Paribas, BMW and LinkedIn, Pfizer, Citi.
Alchemetrics, Ding, MSG Systems, Worthington Industries, Teradata, Teradata - Agile COE, Teradata India, Tedder Industries, Instem
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Asana, monday.com and others in Project Management Software. Updated: July 2025.
861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.