DNIF HYPERCLOUD vs NetWitness Platform comparison

"I like the MITRE table, a feature I saw for the first time in the same solution. There was one MITRE tactic table, which can be used to identify threats if you have all kinds of rules enabled or if you have rules for all the tactics in the MITRE table. There are 14 tables in MITRE, and those 14 tables consist of multiple columns, tactics, and techniques. It was one of the first SIEM tools I saw that had that particular MITRE table. On that basis, you can create new rules and identify existing ones. At any point, if an alert is triggered, it will try to match it to any of those MITRE tactics. I liked that creating a workbook on MITRE business was straightforward. I also like that you can search using SQL or DQL."

"The User Behavior Analytics is a built-in threat-hunting feature. It detects and reports on any kind of malware or ransomware that enters the network."

"The solution is quite stable and offers good performance. It also works on a virtual machine. We haven't found any issues with it so far. It's been reliable."

"The dashboard is helpful, and it creates visualizations to let staff review event data and identify patterns and anomalies."

"The beauty of the solution is that you can develop infrastructure for a data lake using open sources that are separate from the licenses."

"Great for scaling productivity for log monitoring purposes."

"The response time on queries is super-fast."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is the number of EPS it can handle."

"It's fully scalable. There is no limit. Of course, the license limits per day the number of terabytes. In my opinion, it's very flexible."

"The most valuable features are the integration and ease of use."

"The product has a user-friendly interface and a valuable feature for threat intelligence integration."

"In my opinion, the solution's most valuable feature is its capacity to monitor network traffic, logs from devices within the network, and network captures. This capability extends beyond logs to include full network capturing."

"The software is scalable to whatever is required, and you can also put a lot of resources in the cloud."

"The most valuable features are the packet inspection and the automated incident response."

"NetWitness can be highly beneficial for incident detection and response."

"The packet capture aspect of it is a valuable feature because it is quite different from a traditional SIEM solution that only carries out investigations based on captured logs."

"The EBA could be improved."

"I feel that DNIF needs to invest more in marketing, considering that it operates at a very competitive speed."

"There are currently some issues with machine learning plug-ins."

"I think DNIF HYPERCLOUD can implement the ability to export more than 100,000. At the moment, we can't go beyond that. So many times, if you're checking for the firewall logs and working on something related to authentication or network-related traffic, while that log count is low, the account goes beyond that. You can't restrict the logs or the amount of data you can export. It's very important for my situation. It would be better if they could increase the capacity of exports. Although there are many more types of searching in DNIF HYPERCLOUD, people still struggle to query out what they want because not everyone is good at SQL or DQL. The easiest way to query out in DNIF is using the GUI-based interface. But in the GUI interface, you can use operator calls. It gets tricky when you want to search for a specific type of event. You don't know where it will be passed and whether it will be consistent. In the initial phase, it's tough for us to use DNIF. You cannot pass every event in a stable DNIF. When we used that particular tool, we used to get those logs, but sometimes many things are not getting passed. So, we used to export the sheet or export the data into Excel and weigh the required details. In the next release, I would like them to improve the export of the columns and make the application more user-friendly. I would also like a threat-hunting feature in the next release."

"Dependency on the DNIF support team was frustrating."

"The solution's command line should be simpler so that routine commands can be used."

"The solution should be able to connect to endpoints, such as desktops and laptops... If this solution had a smart connector to these logs- Windows, Linux, or any other logs - without affecting the performance of the connector, that would be wonderful."

"The vendor is fairly new and it's not as big as some of the international competitors. It's not a mature product. If you ask them to move data, it might take a lot of time."

"Technical support could be improved."

"Its technical support could be better."

"The log system is a bit complex and has room for improvement."

"I'd like to see improvement in its ease of use. It's basically unusable. It's overly complex."

"Lots of competing products have vulnerability protection built into their products, and this solution would be improved by including that support."

"The system looks like it is a mix of a bunch of different systems, and nothing looked like it was quite together."

"Log aggregation is an issue with this solution because there are a huge number of alerts in a single instance."

"There is no support for this product in this country, so problems have to be resolved through global technical teams."

"The pricing is based on the log size."

"Price-wise, the product is quite economical. I rate the solution's price as three or four on a scale of one to ten, where one is considered to be a very economically priced tool."

"The solution requires a huge infrastructure and that is costly."

"In comparison to other SIEM solutions such as Splunk, NetWitness is less costly."

"It provides tools to assist in selecting the appropriate license and usage scenarios."

"The product price was reasonable for my region and the market."

"There is a licensing fee and the customer can choose whether he wishes this to be subscription-based or perpetual."

"The tool is very expensive, so I rate the pricing a ten out of ten. The solution has an annual subscription."

"It’s cheaper to run virtual machines in a VMware environment."

"The licenses are good but the cost is very expensive."

"It is cheap."