Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

DNIF HYPERCLOUD vs Splunk Enterprise Security comparison

NETMONASTERY and Splunk are both solutions in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category. NETMONASTERY is ranked #21 with an average rating of 7.8, while Splunk is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.4. NETMONASTERY holds a 0.3% mindshare in SIEM, compared to Splunk’s 10.9% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of NETMONASTERY users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Splunk users who would recommend it.
DNIF HYPERCLOUD
Read 8 DNIF HYPERCLOUD reviews
  • 759 Views
  • 448 Comparison Views
85% willing to recommend
Splunk Enterprise Security
Read 301 Splunk Enterprise Security reviews
  • 17,426 Views
  • 14,446 Comparison Views
93% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 29, 2024

Splunk Enterprise Security and DNIF HYPERCLOUD compete in the cybersecurity domain. Splunk Enterprise Security seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set and robust support, while DNIF HYPERCLOUD is favored for its user-friendliness and affordability.

Features: Splunk Enterprise Security offers comprehensive analytics capabilities, scalability, and the ability to handle large data sets. DNIF HYPERCLOUD is praised for its flexibility, efficient detection mechanisms, and innovative features for rapid threat identification.

Room for Improvement: Splunk Enterprise Security users seek a more intuitive setup, improved learning resources, and streamlined deployment processes. DNIF HYPERCLOUD users suggest better integration with third-party tools, enhanced documentation, and extended support hours.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Splunk Enterprise Security has a complex deployment process and strong customer support. DNIF HYPERCLOUD is known for its straightforward deployment and satisfactory customer service, though it could benefit from expanded support hours.

Pricing and ROI: Splunk Enterprise Security has higher setup costs, which can be a barrier for smaller organizations but delivers substantial ROI through its sophisticated capabilities. DNIF HYPERCLOUD is more affordable, providing good value and quicker ROI for those seeking effective yet economical solutions.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed DNIF HYPERCLOUD vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report (Updated: October 2024).
Buyer's Guide
DNIF HYPERCLOUD vs. Splunk Enterprise Security
October 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 816,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Setup Cost

Sentiment score
5.9
DNIF HYPERCLOUD is affordable for new SOCs, but infrastructure costs and budget evaluation are essential for ROI.
Sentiment score
7.7
Splunk Enterprise Security's pricing is perceived as high due to its licensing model and extensive features, often deterring SMEs.
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.2
Splunk Enterprise Security's support is generally praised for responsiveness and knowledge but criticized for delays and inconsistent quality.
 

Room For Improvement

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
6.2
Splunk Enterprise Security is costly and complex, with users seeking better integration, usability, support, and enhanced features like AI.
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
6.0
Splunk Enterprise Security is scalable and adaptable, handling large data volumes and multiple users easily but can be costly.
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
4.8
Splunk Enterprise Security is praised for stability, reliability, low maintenance, and high performance, with minor issues quickly resolved.
 

Valuable Features

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
8.7
Splunk Enterprise Security excels in dashboards, reporting, flexibility, scalability, support, log aggregation, alerting, integration, and efficient large data handling.
 

Categories and Ranking

DNIF HYPERCLOUD
Ranking in Log Management
20th
Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
21st
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (10th), Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (14th)
Splunk Enterprise Security
Ranking in Log Management
1st
Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
1st
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
301
Ranking in other categories
IT Operations Analytics (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category, the mindshare of DNIF HYPERCLOUD is 0.3%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Splunk Enterprise Security is 10.9%, down from 14.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
 

Featured Reviews

Kishore Tiwari - PeerSpot reviewer
Development from open sources is very valuable but a huge infrastructure is required
The solution's command line should be simpler so that routine commands can be used. The search configuration is a bit different than other OEMs or SIEM solutions like ArcSight or QRadar that are easy to search because they operate similarly. The logic is there and the solution supplies a pretty good explanation. Basically, DNIF spelled out is the opposite of FIND. You have to find commands whenever you want to search something. For example, a highway gets you to your destination but there is an alternate way people don't yet know about. Gartner or Forrester haven't yet studied it. We were a bit nervous when we were trying to get familiar with the solution. We wondered if we could realize ROI because the commands and ways of pulling data were different to us. We raised a case with the support team and their professionals provided the needed support. The command line is user friendly once you understand it. If you need immediate use, then you might want to get assistance from someone who is well-versed in methods for using key patterns to find things. Lengthier files for threat hunting or analysis are needed. The correlation happens, but exporting a large number of files to abstract them is not possible. For example, I want to present raw data to management so I should be able to customize a date range in my query and download the files.
Read full review
Avinash Gopu. - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers good visibility into multiple environments, significantly reduces our alert volume, and speeds up our security investigations
There are limitations with Splunk not detecting all user activity, especially on mainframes and network devices. This is because Splunk relies on agents, which cannot access certain workstations. In these cases, we have to rely on application data. For example, with mainframes, manual reports are generated and sent to Splunk, limiting visibility to what's manually reported. This lack of automation for specific platforms needs improvement from Splunk. Additionally, API access is limited for other applications that rely on API calls and requests. This requires heavy customization on Splunk's end. These are the main challenges we've encountered. Monitoring multiple cloud platforms, like Azure, GCP, and AWS, with Splunk Enterprise Security presents some challenges. While Splunk provides different connectors for each provider, consolidating data from two domains across distinct cloud environments can be complex. However, leveraging pre-built templates and Splunk's data collation capabilities can help overcome these hurdles. Despite initial difficulties, I believe Splunk can effectively address this task, earning it an eight out of ten rating for its multi-cloud monitoring capabilities. While Splunk Enterprise Security offers insider threat detection capabilities, its effectiveness could be enhanced by integrating with additional tools, such as endpoint security solutions. This integrated approach is particularly crucial for financial institutions, which often require dedicated endpoint security teams. While using multiple tools is valuable, further improvements within Splunk itself are also necessary. Considering both external integration and internal development, I would rate its current insider threat detection capabilities as three out of ten. Threat detection is where Splunk falls behind. While it offers tools, other use cases require additional work. PAM is an enterprise tool that centralizes information about users, servers, and everything else. It needs real-time monitoring, which I haven't seen in any of the companies I've worked for. They only rely on Splunk for alerting, but real-time monitoring should be handled by the endpoint security team's tools. This means there's no detection or analysis at the machine or endpoint level. Additionally, threat analysis reporting is also absent.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

VS
Feb 26, 2015
HP ArcSight vs. IBM QRadar vs. ​McAfee Nitro vs. Splunk vs. RSA Security vs. LogRhythm
We at Infosecnirvana.com have done several posts on SIEM. After the Dummies Guide on SIEM, we are following it up with a SIEM Product Comparison – 101 deck. So, here it is for your viewing pleasure. Let me know what you think by posting your comments below. The key products compared here are…
Read full review
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Real Estate/Law Firm
10%
Construction Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
14%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about DNIF HYPERCLOUD?
The dashboard is helpful, and it creates visualizations to let staff review event data and identify patterns and anomalies.
See all answers
What needs improvement with DNIF HYPERCLOUD?
A lot of people don't know about DNIF HYPERCLOUD, but they do know about products like Splunk, QRadar, ArcSight, and some other SIEM solutions. DNIF is not a known name in the market. From an impro...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for DNIF HYPERCLOUD?
DNIF HYPERCLOUD is a good SIEM solution. One of the tools' features is very high scalability in terms of the events generated per second. The product is aligned with the MITRE ATT&CK framework....
See all answers
What SOC product do you recommend?
For tools I’d recommend: -SIEM- LogRhythm -SOAR- Palo Alto XSOAR Doing commercial w/o both (or at least an XDR) is asking to miss details that are critical, and ending up a statistic. Also, rememb...
See all answers
What is a better choice, Splunk or Azure Sentinel?
It would really depend on (1) which logs you need to ingest and (2) what are your use cases Splunk is easy for ingestion of anything, but the charge per GB/Day Indexed and it gets expensive as log ...
See all answers
How does Splunk compare with Azure Monitor?
Splunk handles a high amount of data very well. We use Splunk to capture information and as an aggregator for monitoring information from different sources. Splunk is very good at alerting us if we...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

IBM Security QRadar vs DNIF HYPERCLOUD Logo
IBM Security QRadar vs DNIF HYPERCLOUD
Compared 56% of the time
More DNIF HYPERCLOUD Competitors
Wazuh vs Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Wazuh vs Splunk Enterprise Security
Compared 11% of the time
IBM Security QRadar vs Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
IBM Security QRadar vs Splunk Enterprise Security
Compared 9% of the time
Dynatrace vs Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Dynatrace vs Splunk Enterprise Security
Compared 8% of the time
Datadog vs Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Datadog vs Splunk Enterprise Security
Compared 4% of the time
AppDynamics vs Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
AppDynamics vs Splunk Enterprise Security
Compared 4% of the time
More Splunk Enterprise Security Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
DNIF HYPERCLOUD
November 2024
DNIF HYPERCLOUD reportDownload DNIF HYPERCLOUD product report
Buyer's Guide
Splunk Enterprise Security
October 2024
Splunk Enterprise Security reportDownload Splunk Enterprise Security product report
 

Learn More

NETMONASTERY
Splunk
 

Overview

DNIF HYPERCLOUD is a cloud native platform that brings the functionality of SIEM, UEBA and SOAR into a single continuous workflow to solve cybersecurity challenges at scale. DNIF HYPERCLOUD is the flagship SaaS platform from NETMONASTERY that delivers key detection functionality using big data analytics and machine learning. NETMONASTERY aims to deliver a platform that helps customers in ingesting machine data and automatically identify anomalies in these data streams using machine learning and outlier detection algorithms. The objective is to make it easy for untrained engineers and analysts to use the platform and extract benefit reliably and efficiently.

Splunk Enterprise Security is widely used for security operations, including threat detection, incident response, and log monitoring. It centralizes log management, offers security analytics, and ensures compliance, enhancing the overall security posture of organizations.

Companies leverage Splunk Enterprise Security to monitor endpoints, networks, and users, detecting anomalies, brute force attacks, and unauthorized access. They use it for fraud detection, machine learning, and real-time alerts within their SOCs. The platform enhances visibility and correlates data from multiple sources to identify security threats efficiently. Key features include comprehensive dashboards, excellent reporting capabilities, robust log aggregation, and flexible data ingestion. Users appreciate its SIEM capabilities, threat intelligence, risk-based alerting, and correlation searches. Highly scalable and stable, it suits multi-cloud environments, reducing alert volumes and speeding up investigations.

What are the key features?
  • Comprehensive Dashboards: Provide a holistic view of security operations.
  • Flexible Data Ingestion: Supports various data sources for better analysis.
  • Robust Log Aggregation: Centralizes log management for easier monitoring.
  • Machine Learning Toolkit: Enhances threat detection and prediction capabilities.
  • SIEM Capabilities: Integrates security information and event management.
  • Threat Intelligence: Utilizes external information to improve security measures.
  • Risk-Based Alerting: Prioritizes alerts based on the risk they pose.
  • Correlation Searches: Identifies and correlates security events effectively.
What benefits or ROI should users look for?
  • Enhanced Visibility: Improves monitoring across endpoints, networks, and users.
  • Faster Incident Response: Speeds up identification and resolution of security issues.
  • Reduced Alert Volumes: Lowers false positives and enhances signal-to-noise ratio.
  • Scalability: Adapts to growing and changing security needs.
  • Improved Security Operations: Integrates multiple security facets into one platform.

Splunk Enterprise Security is implemented across industries like finance, healthcare, and retail. Financial institutions use it for fraud detection and compliance, while healthcare organizations leverage its capabilities to safeguard patient data. Retailers deploy it to protect customer information and ensure secure transactions.

 

Sample Customers

Mahindra & Mahindra, Tata Consultancy Services (TCS), ICICI Bank, Yes Bank, Tata Motors, RBL Bank
Splunk has more than 7,000 customers spread across over 90 countries. These customers include Telenor, UniCredit, ideeli, McKenney's, Tesco, and SurveyMonkey.
Buyer's Guide
DNIF HYPERCLOUD vs. Splunk Enterprise Security
October 2024
Free Report: DNIF HYPERCLOUD vs. Splunk Enterprise Security
Find out what your peers are saying about DNIF HYPERCLOUD vs. Splunk Enterprise Security and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our DNIF HYPERCLOUD vs. Splunk Enterprise Security report.
See our list of best Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) vendors and best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.