Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

DNIF HYPERCLOUD vs Splunk Enterprise Security comparison

NETMONASTERY and Splunk are both solutions in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category. NETMONASTERY is ranked #53, while Splunk is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.3. NETMONASTERY holds a 0.7% mindshare in SIEM, compared to Splunk’s 8.0% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of NETMONASTERY users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Splunk users who would recommend it.
DNIF HYPERCLOUD
Read 8 DNIF HYPERCLOUD reviews
  • 1,294 Views
  • 815 Comparison Views
85% willing to recommend
Splunk Enterprise Security
Read 374 Splunk Enterprise Security reviews
  • 23,828 Views
  • 12,152 Comparison Views
94% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 19, 2025

Splunk Enterprise Security and DNIF HYPERCLOUD compete in the SIEM category. Splunk appears to have the advantage due to its advanced features and integration capabilities, appealing to large enterprises seeking robust security solutions.

Features: Splunk Enterprise Security offers robust data integration, visualization capabilities, and advanced threat detection, including Risk-Based Alerting and User Behavior Analytics. Its Mission Control and customizable dashboards enhance security management for large enterprises. DNIF HYPERCLOUD provides SQL/DQL search capabilities, efficient multi-cloud management, and essential compliance features, focusing on budget-conscious environments.

Room for Improvement: Splunk could enhance its GUI, simplify operational workflows, and improve integration flexibility. Its complex pricing model is another challenge. DNIF HYPERCLOUD needs to address GUI improvements, export limits, and integration, especially in threat management. It also faces scalability issues and complexity with machine learning plugins.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Splunk supports flexible deployments across Public, Private, and Hybrid Clouds with extensive documentation and community support. However, complexities in setup and support response times can be problematic. DNIF HYPERCLOUD offers straightforward deployments at competitive pricing but relies heavily on backend support, potentially delaying issue resolutions. Its customer service is competent in simpler environments but could benefit from documentation improvements.

Pricing and ROI: Splunk's high pricing reflects its premium features, offering significant ROI for enterprises maximizing its capabilities, though smaller businesses may find it cost-prohibitive. DNIF HYPERCLOUD provides an economical pricing model based on log volume, appealing to budget-conscious firms. While it delivers substantial value, infrastructure demands could impact ROI.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed DNIF HYPERCLOUD vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report (Updated: December 2025).
Buyer's Guide
DNIF HYPERCLOUD vs. Splunk Enterprise Security
December 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 879,310 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

DNIF HYPERCLOUD
Ranking in Log Management
49th
Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
53rd
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (21st), Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (28th)
Splunk Enterprise Security
Ranking in Log Management
2nd
Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
1st
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
374
Ranking in other categories
IT Operations Analytics (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2025, in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category, the mindshare of DNIF HYPERCLOUD is 0.7%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Splunk Enterprise Security is 8.0%, down from 10.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Splunk Enterprise Security8.0%
DNIF HYPERCLOUD0.7%
Other91.3%
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
 

Featured Reviews

Kishore Tiwari - PeerSpot reviewer
Kishore Tiwari
Deputy General Manager - Information Security (Lead ISA) at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Development from open sources is very valuable but a huge infrastructure is required
The solution's command line should be simpler so that routine commands can be used. The search configuration is a bit different than other OEMs or SIEM solutions like ArcSight or QRadar that are easy to search because they operate similarly. The logic is there and the solution supplies a pretty good explanation. Basically, DNIF spelled out is the opposite of FIND. You have to find commands whenever you want to search something. For example, a highway gets you to your destination but there is an alternate way people don't yet know about. Gartner or Forrester haven't yet studied it. We were a bit nervous when we were trying to get familiar with the solution. We wondered if we could realize ROI because the commands and ways of pulling data were different to us. We raised a case with the support team and their professionals provided the needed support. The command line is user friendly once you understand it. If you need immediate use, then you might want to get assistance from someone who is well-versed in methods for using key patterns to find things. Lengthier files for threat hunting or analysis are needed. The correlation happens, but exporting a large number of files to abstract them is not possible. For example, I want to present raw data to management so I should be able to customize a date range in my query and download the files.
Read full review
reviewer1469784 - PeerSpot reviewer
reviewer1469784
Senior Manager at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Helps us detect cyber threats quickly and integrate multiple feeds effectively
Overall, the product is good, but when it comes to some infrastructure issues, we have to dig into more logs. There is no straightforward indication of an issue. Health check kind of dashboards are not available. More AI would help us, and more optimization, since security products run more queries. The AI module could suggest solutions, optimizing queries or workload balancing. If the product itself advises on running queries during peak times, it would be similar to what ChatGPT currently offers. We see quite a few issues on stability. Even last week, we faced something, and identifying bottlenecks is not easy. We need more SMEs, and there is no mechanism to tell us about indexer or search head issues. Self-monitoring dashboards could be beneficial. The technical support still requires more improvement. Often, primary support takes a lot of time and forwards most solutions to the engineering side. The primary support team has very limited knowledge to provide.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Great for scaling productivity for log monitoring purposes."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is the number of EPS it can handle."
"I like the MITRE table, a feature I saw for the first time in the same solution. There was one MITRE tactic table, which can be used to identify threats if you have all kinds of rules enabled or if you have rules for all the tactics in the MITRE table. There are 14 tables in MITRE, and those 14 tables consist of multiple columns, tactics, and techniques. It was one of the first SIEM tools I saw that had that particular MITRE table. On that basis, you can create new rules and identify existing ones. At any point, if an alert is triggered, it will try to match it to any of those MITRE tactics. I liked that creating a workbook on MITRE business was straightforward. I also like that you can search using SQL or DQL."
"Has a great search capability."
"The solution is quite stable and offers good performance. It also works on a virtual machine. We haven't found any issues with it so far. It's been reliable."
"The beauty of the solution is that you can develop infrastructure for a data lake using open sources that are separate from the licenses."
"The User Behavior Analytics is a built-in threat-hunting feature. It detects and reports on any kind of malware or ransomware that enters the network."
"The response time on queries is super-fast."
More DNIF HYPERCLOUD pros
"Splunk Enterprise Security gives us a single pane of glass so that we can use just one tool instead of having to use different tools."
"The user interface is excellent, and since I'm using Splunk as a power user, it's easy to create dashboards."
"From a visibility perspective, the solution has significantly improved our organization by providing a single platform to visualize our entire IT landscape."
"The product is adept at log mining."
"The ability to manage large amounts of generated data and to protect all devices from unauthorized use are the most valuable features."
"Splunk's schema on demand is incredibly useful. I do not have to worry about what my users will need when we onboard their data."
"The integration is seamless with many devices and operating systems."
"The most valuable feature of Splunk is the log monitoring."
More Splunk Enterprise Security pros
 

Cons

"Dependency on the DNIF support team was frustrating."
"The solution's command line should be simpler so that routine commands can be used."
"The EBA could be improved."
"I think DNIF HYPERCLOUD can implement the ability to export more than 100,000. At the moment, we can't go beyond that. So many times, if you're checking for the firewall logs and working on something related to authentication or network-related traffic, while that log count is low, the account goes beyond that. You can't restrict the logs or the amount of data you can export. It's very important for my situation. It would be better if they could increase the capacity of exports. Although there are many more types of searching in DNIF HYPERCLOUD, people still struggle to query out what they want because not everyone is good at SQL or DQL. The easiest way to query out in DNIF is using the GUI-based interface. But in the GUI interface, you can use operator calls. It gets tricky when you want to search for a specific type of event. You don't know where it will be passed and whether it will be consistent. In the initial phase, it's tough for us to use DNIF. You cannot pass every event in a stable DNIF. When we used that particular tool, we used to get those logs, but sometimes many things are not getting passed. So, we used to export the sheet or export the data into Excel and weigh the required details. In the next release, I would like them to improve the export of the columns and make the application more user-friendly. I would also like a threat-hunting feature in the next release."
"There are currently some issues with machine learning plug-ins."
"The vendor is fairly new and it's not as big as some of the international competitors. It's not a mature product. If you ask them to move data, it might take a lot of time."
"I feel that DNIF needs to invest more in marketing, considering that it operates at a very competitive speed."
"The solution should be able to connect to endpoints, such as desktops and laptops... If this solution had a smart connector to these logs- Windows, Linux, or any other logs - without affecting the performance of the connector, that would be wonderful."
"When we do a rollout from the server or host or anything, we'd like to see more automation. It would save us time."
"Being a SIEM solution with a centralized dashboard, we would like to have more options to customize it."
"My organization does not completely utilize risk-based alerting in Splunk Enterprise Security as it's not fully mature."
"The initial setup is complex, but this is necessary. We needed to take into consideration how to direct log files from thousands of machines to Splunk, and how to ingest those files."
"The UI can be improved. Dashboards and reports can be better in terms of graphics."
"The incident response technique should be available out of the box. That isn't as available as we would expect."
"I want Splunk Enterprise Security to release more AI and machine learning features in the future."
"It needs a better way to export dynamic views without requiring a ton of code and user/pw."
More Splunk Enterprise Security cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution requires a huge infrastructure and that is costly."
"Price-wise, the product is quite economical. I rate the solution's price as three or four on a scale of one to ten, where one is considered to be a very economically priced tool."
"The pricing is based on the log size."
"Splunk Enterprise Security is priced lower than competitors."
"In terms of pricing, I believe Splunk is unreasonably costly for the majority of mid and small-sized companies."
"Splunk Enterprise becomes extremely expensive after the 20GB/month license."
"I think we recently switched to the SVC pricing compared to the ingest pricing."
"Regarding the product's pricing, I think it has always been difficult to have a conversation with Splunk."
"Splunk's cost is very high. They need to review the pricing. They have to go back and totally readdress the market."
"The price of Splunk is too high for our market."
"Unlike other security tools, Splunk provides a fixed amount of gigabytes per day, and we are required to pay for any additional usage beyond that limit, in addition to our monthly cost."
More Splunk Enterprise Security pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
879,310 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

VS
Vinod Shankar
Manager, Enterprise Risk Consulting at a tech company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Feb 26, 2015
HP ArcSight vs. IBM QRadar vs. ​McAfee Nitro vs. Splunk vs. RSA Security vs. LogRhythm
We at Infosecnirvana.com have done several posts on SIEM. After the Dummies Guide on SIEM, we are following it up with a SIEM Product Comparison – 101 deck. So, here it is for your viewing pleasure. Let me know what you think by posting your comments below. The key products compared here are…
Read full review
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Transportation Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Performing Arts
6%
Construction Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise3
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business109
Midsize Enterprise50
Large Enterprise263
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with DNIF HYPERCLOUD?
A lot of people don't know about DNIF HYPERCLOUD, but they do know about products like Splunk, QRadar, ArcSight, and some other SIEM solutions. DNIF is not a known name in the market. From an impro...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for DNIF HYPERCLOUD?
DNIF HYPERCLOUD is a good SIEM solution. One of the tools' features is very high scalability in terms of the events generated per second. The product is aligned with the MITRE ATT&CK framework....
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering DNIF HYPERCLOUD?
The tool's ability in the area of its analytic capabilities has enhanced our company's security poster in a good way, especially when compared to some of the other competitors in the market, like S...
See all answers
What SOC product do you recommend?
For tools I’d recommend: -SIEM- LogRhythm -SOAR- Palo Alto XSOAR Doing commercial w/o both (or at least an XDR) is asking to miss details that are critical, and ending up a statistic. Also, rememb...
See all answers
What is a better choice, Splunk or Azure Sentinel?
It would really depend on (1) which logs you need to ingest and (2) what are your use cases Splunk is easy for ingestion of anything, but the charge per GB/Day Indexed and it gets expensive as log ...
See all answers
How does Splunk compare with Azure Monitor?
Splunk handles a high amount of data very well. We use Splunk to capture information and as an aggregator for monitoring information from different sources. Splunk is very good at alerting us if we...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Seceon Open Threat Management Platform vs DNIF HYPERCLOUD Logo
Seceon Open Threat Management Platform vs DNIF HYPERCLOUD
Compared 12% of the time
IBM Security QRadar vs DNIF HYPERCLOUD Logo
IBM Security QRadar vs DNIF HYPERCLOUD
Compared 10% of the time
Elastic Security vs DNIF HYPERCLOUD Logo
Elastic Security vs DNIF HYPERCLOUD
Compared 10% of the time
Fortinet FortiSIEM vs DNIF HYPERCLOUD Logo
Fortinet FortiSIEM vs DNIF HYPERCLOUD
Compared 8% of the time
Rapid7 InsightOps vs DNIF HYPERCLOUD Logo
Rapid7 InsightOps vs DNIF HYPERCLOUD
Compared 7% of the time
More DNIF HYPERCLOUD Competitors
IBM Security QRadar vs Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
IBM Security QRadar vs Splunk Enterprise Security
Compared 9% of the time
Wazuh vs Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Wazuh vs Splunk Enterprise Security
Compared 6% of the time
Dynatrace vs Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Dynatrace vs Splunk Enterprise Security
Compared 5% of the time
Datadog vs Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Datadog vs Splunk Enterprise Security
Compared 4% of the time
Sentinel vs Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Sentinel vs Splunk Enterprise Security
Compared 3% of the time
More Splunk Enterprise Security Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
DNIF HYPERCLOUD
December 2025
DNIF HYPERCLOUD reportDownload DNIF HYPERCLOUD product report
Buyer's Guide
Splunk Enterprise Security
December 2025
Splunk Enterprise Security reportDownload Splunk Enterprise Security product report
 

Overview

DNIF HYPERCLOUD is a cloud native platform that brings the functionality of SIEM, UEBA and SOAR into a single continuous workflow to solve cybersecurity challenges at scale. DNIF HYPERCLOUD is the flagship SaaS platform from NETMONASTERY that delivers key detection functionality using big data analytics and machine learning. NETMONASTERY aims to deliver a platform that helps customers in ingesting machine data and automatically identify anomalies in these data streams using machine learning and outlier detection algorithms. The objective is to make it easy for untrained engineers and analysts to use the platform and extract benefit reliably and efficiently.

NETMONASTERY

Splunk Enterprise Security delivers powerful log management, rapid searches, and intuitive dashboards, enhancing real-time analytics and security measures. Its advanced machine learning and wide system compatibility streamline threat detection and incident response across diverse IT environments.

Splunk Enterprise Security stands out in security operations with robust features like comprehensive threat intelligence and seamless data integration. Its real-time analytics and customizable queries enable proactive threat analysis and efficient incident response. Integration with multiple third-party feeds allows detailed threat correlation and streamlined data visualization. Users find the intuitive UI and broad compatibility support efficient threat detection while reducing false positives. Despite its strengths, areas such as visualization capabilities and integration processes with cloud environments need enhancement. Users face a high learning curve, and improvements in automation, AI, documentation, and training are desired to maximize its potential.

What Are the Key Features of Splunk Enterprise Security?
  • Log Management: Efficiently manages and organizes a vast amount of logs for better data handling.
  • Rapid Data Search: Quickly retrieves relevant data for fast decision-making.
  • Flexible Dashboards: Customizable dashboards provide clear data visualization.
  • Comprehensive Threat Intelligence: Offers detailed insights to preemptively defend against threats.
  • Real-Time Analytics: Analyzes data in real-time to enhance response times.
  • Integration with Third-Party Feeds: Streamlines information flow from multiple sources.
What Benefits Should Users Investigate in Reviews?
  • Efficient Incident Response: Enhances the ability to respond promptly to threats.
  • False Positive Reduction: Minimizes incorrect threat alarms, making monitoring more efficient.
  • Threat Detection Speed: Accelerates the identification and evaluation of security threats.
  • Cost-Effectiveness: Potential savings through better licensing options and operational efficiency.
  • User Adaptability: Enhancements in documentation and training resources aid in overcoming the learning curve.

In specific industries like finance and healthcare, Splunk Enterprise Security is instrumental for log aggregation, SIEM functionalities, and compliance monitoring. Companies leverage its capabilities for proactive threat analysis and response, ensuring comprehensive security monitoring and integration with various tools for heightened operational intelligence.

Splunk
 

Sample Customers

Mahindra & Mahindra, Tata Consultancy Services (TCS), ICICI Bank, Yes Bank, Tata Motors, RBL Bank
Splunk has more than 7,000 customers spread across over 90 countries. These customers include Telenor, UniCredit, ideeli, McKenney's, Tesco, and SurveyMonkey.
Buyer's Guide
DNIF HYPERCLOUD vs. Splunk Enterprise Security
December 2025
Free Report: DNIF HYPERCLOUD vs. Splunk Enterprise Security
Find out what your peers are saying about DNIF HYPERCLOUD vs. Splunk Enterprise Security and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
879,310 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our DNIF HYPERCLOUD vs. Splunk Enterprise Security report.
See our list of best Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) vendors and best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.