NetWitness Platform vs Trellix Network Detection and Response comparison

The compared NetWitness and Trellix solutions aren't in the same category. NetWitness is ranked #34 in Log Management , with an average rating of 8.3, and holds a 0.8% mindshare in the category. Trellix is ranked #13 in ATP , with an average rating of 8.0, and holds a 3.5% mindshare. Additionally, 75% of NetWitness users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Trellix users who would recommend it.

NetWitness Platform

Read 36 NetWitness Platform reviews

2,362 Views
1,252 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

Trellix Network Detection a...

Read 40 Trellix Network Detection and Response reviews

2,614 Views
1,307 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

NetWitness Platform

Trellix Network Detection a...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between NetWitness Platform and Trellix Network Detection and Response based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Log Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed NetWitness Platform vs. Trellix Network Detection and Response Report (Updated: September 2022).

Buyer's Guide

NetWitness Platform vs. Trellix Network Detection and Response

September 2022

Download the complete report

Helped 885,667 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

NetWitness Platform

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (34th), Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (33rd)

Trellix Network Detection a...

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (13th), Network Detection and Response (NDR) (9th)

Mindshare comparison

NetWitness Platform and Trellix Network Detection and Response aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. NetWitness Platform is designed for Log Management and holds a mindshare of 0.8%, up 0.3% compared to last year.
Trellix Network Detection and Response, on the other hand, focuses on Advanced Threat Protection (ATP), holds 3.5% mindshare, down 3.6% since last year.

Log Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
NetWitness Platform	0.8%
Wazuh	7.5%
Splunk Enterprise Security	6.8%
Other	84.9%

Log Management

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Trellix Network Detection and Response	3.5%
Microsoft Defender for Office 365	7.6%
Palo Alto Networks WildFire	7.5%
Other	81.4%

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

Featured Reviews

reviewer2256927

Head of Information Security, Cyber Defense and IT Risk Management at HCT. at a transportation company with 201-500 employees

A solid SIEM solution that should improve technical support and online resources to be easier to use

A big problem with the product is that we don't have much professional experience in Israel installing, implementing, and integrating this product. There is not enough of a knowledge base. There is no support for this product in this country, so problems have to be resolved through global technical teams. We like to work locally because of the language, and when the product is only supported outside the country, it's a little difficult to implement and use this product. Moreover, AI is something that must be added immediately. Artificial intelligence is a part of the competitors' products, and it's not been implemented for us.

Read full review

Jose Vargas

Agente De Servicios Técnicos at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

Has improved threat detection workflows and supports seamless customer monitoring

The best features Trellix Network Detection and Response offers include very good threat detection, and I believe that it is one of the best XDR tools. For example, ePO and XDR components are very comfortable and similar to many other tools for this type of monitoring, and I have received very good feedback for this tool. What makes Trellix Network Detection and Response stand out for me compared to other tools is the way you can detect threats. It is very easy and comfortable to use, and the detection shows clearly on the screen, which is very easy to understand. Regarding the features, I think that the integration with other platforms is very comfortable with the customer because we can integrate it with any switch or firewall, and it is comfortable to add this tool. Trellix Network Detection and Response has positively impacted my organization as I have improved my knowledge about detection and response. I have already used some other tools such as CrowdStrike and Umbrella, but Trellix is one of the best that I have tested. I believe that for my organization, Trellix has helped a lot with detection and supported our customers effectively. Trellix Network Detection and Response is a great tool that integrates with a lot of security tools such as Palo Alto, which is a good firewall. If you have these types of tools, your organization would benefit greatly.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It gives customers visibility about their most important servers and devices."

"It gives the capability for the incident response team to correlate logs to identify any kind of problem like malware and incidents in a general sense, both for logs and packets."

"The most valuable feature is the security that it provides."

"Offers a good wireless feature."

"The solution is really scalable for the high-end power, enterprise customer."

"The most valuable features are the packet inspection and the automated incident response."

"Integration is exceedingly minimal, since its project development is much easier than that of LogRythm or IBM."

"Overall, it is easy to implement."

More NetWitness Platform pros

"I also like its logging method. Its logging is very powerful and useful for forensic purposes. You can see the traffic or a specific activity or how something entered your network and where it went."

"Application categorization is the most valuable feature for us."

"The POC quickly revealed areas for improvement and potential threats that the traditional defenses had utterly missed."

"The MVX Engine seems to be very capable against threats and the way it handles APTs is impressive."

"It allows us to be more hands off in checking on emails and networking traffic. We can set up a bunch of different alerts and have it alert us."

"Once we had a chance to do our own due diligence, it was clear that there is really nothing else that compares with the FireEye appliance."

"It is stable and quite protective. It has a lot of features to scan a lot of malicious things and vulnerabilities."

"We wanted to cross-reference that activity with the network traffic just to be sure there was no lateral movement. With Trellix, we easily confirmed that there was no lateral network involvement and that nothing else was infected. It helped us correlate the events and feel confident in our containment."

More Trellix Network Detection and Response pros

Cons

"RSA NetWitness Logs and Packets is far behind the competition."

"The initial setup is complex. There are other solutions that are easier to implement."

"The multi-tenant capabilities are lagging compared to IBM QRadar."

"The product continues to crash. Even with tech support help, it does not resolve itself."

"I believe they could improve their support, there are often delays."

"We have encountered issues with unresolved crashes."

"Nowadays, their support is a little subpar compared to other solutions. I rate RSA support six out of 10."

"The solution should have more integration capabilities with different platforms."

More NetWitness Platform cons

"The initial setup was complex because of the nature of our environment."

"Management of the appliance could be greatly improved."

"The initial setup was complex because of the nature of our environment. When it comes to the type of applications and functions which we were looking at in terms of identifying malicious threats, there would be some level of complexity, if we were doing it right."

"Management of the appliance could be greatly improved."

"I would love to see better reporting. Because you can't export some of the reports in proper formats, it is hard to extract the data from reports."

"It would be very helpful if there were better integration with other solutions from other vendors, such as Fortinet and Palo Alto."

"The product is pricey. We'd like it to cost less. Not all customers can afford it."

"FireEye Network Security should have better integration with other vendors' firewalls or proxies, such as Palo Alto and Fortinet. Files that are being submitted should happen through the API or automatically."

More Trellix Network Detection and Response cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is a licensing fee and the customer can choose whether he wishes this to be subscription-based or perpetual."

"The licenses are good but the cost is very expensive."

"Many clients are not able to purchase the packet capability because there is a huge amount of data, and the cost depends on the number of EPS (Events per second), as well as the number of gigabytes of data per day."

"The product is expensive."

"Our license is for one year."

"The NetWitness Platform may be affordable only for enterprise-level customers, as it may not be within the budget of small and medium-sized businesses."

"It provides tools to assist in selecting the appropriate license and usage scenarios."

"The tool is very expensive, so I rate the pricing a ten out of ten. The solution has an annual subscription."

More NetWitness Platform pricing and cost advice

"Its price is a bit high. A small customer cannot buy it. Its licensing is on a yearly basis."

"There are some additional services that I understand the vendor provides, but our approach was to package all of the features that we were looking to use into the product."

"When I compare this solution to its competitors in the market, I find that it is a little expensive."

"The pricing is a little high."

"Because of what the FireEye product does, it has significantly decreased our mean time in being able to identify and detect malicious threats. The company that I work with is a very mature organization, and we have seen the meantime to analysis decrease by at least tenfold."

"We're partners with Cisco so we get a reasonable price. It's cheaper than Palo Alto in terms of licensing."

"The pricing is fair, a little expensive, but fair. We've evaluated other products, and they're similarly priced."

"It's an expensive solution."

More Trellix Network Detection and Response pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

Vinod Shankar

Manager, Enterprise Risk Consulting at a tech company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Feb 26, 2015

HP ArcSight vs. IBM QRadar vs. McAfee Nitro vs. Splunk vs. RSA Security vs. LogRhythm

We at Infosecnirvana.com have done several posts on SIEM. After the Dummies Guide on SIEM, we are following it up with a SIEM Product Comparison – 101 deck. So, here it is for your viewing pleasure. Let me know what you think by posting your comments below. The key products compared here are…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Construction Company

Performing Arts

Comms Service Provider

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	20

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	20
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	19

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about NetWitness Platform?

The product's initial setup phase was not at all difficult.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NetWitness Platform?

The pricing is comparable to others, and I consider the cost to be intermediate. Specific cost details are unknown to me.

See all answers

What needs improvement with NetWitness Platform?

There is currently no need for improvement in the SIEM ( /categories/security-information-and-event-management-siem ), though there could be potential enhancements by integrating with AI.

See all answers

What do you like most about FireEye Network Security?

We wanted to cross-reference that activity with the network traffic just to be sure there was no lateral movement. With Trellix, we easily confirmed that there was no lateral network involvement an...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for FireEye Network Security?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Trellix Network Detection and Response is very great.

See all answers

What needs improvement with FireEye Network Security?

I would like to see in Trellix Network Detection and Response more explanation about some details of the threat, and I wish it had more actions that you can take to contain the host or move it some...

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM Security QRadar vs NetWitness Platform

Compared 7% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs NetWitness Platform

Compared 6% of the time

RSA enVision vs NetWitness Platform

Compared 4% of the time

Sumo Logic Security vs NetWitness Platform

Compared 4% of the time

More NetWitness Platform Competitors

Fortinet FortiSandbox vs Trellix Network Detection and Response

Compared 6% of the time

Palo Alto Networks WildFire vs Trellix Network Detection and Response

Compared 6% of the time

Vectra AI vs Trellix Network Detection and Response

Compared 5% of the time

Darktrace vs Trellix Network Detection and Response

Compared 4% of the time

Zabbix vs Trellix Network Detection and Response

Compared 3% of the time

More Trellix Network Detection and Response Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

NetWitness Platform

March 2026

Download NetWitness Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

Trellix Network Detection and Response

March 2026

Trellix Network Detection and Response report

Download Trellix Network Detection and Response product report

Also Known As

RSA Security Analytics

FireEye Network Security, FireEye

Overview

NetWitness Platform is an evolved SIEM and threat detection and response solution that functions as a single, unified platform for ALL your security data. It features an advanced analyst workbench for triaging alerts and incidents, and it orchestrates security operations programs end to end. In short: NetWitness Platform is all you need to run an intelligent SOC.

NetWitness

Detect the undetectable and stop evasive attacks. Trellix Network Detection and Response (NDR) helps your team focus on real attacks, contain intrusions with speed and intelligence, and eliminate your cybersecurity weak points.

Trellix

Sample Customers

Los Angeles World Airports, Reply

FFRDC, Finansbank, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Investis, Kelsey-Seybold Clinic, Bank of Thailand, City of Miramar, Citizens National Bank, D-Wave Systems

Buyer's Guide

NetWitness Platform vs. Trellix Network Detection and Response

September 2022

Free Report: NetWitness Platform vs. Trellix Network Detection and Response

Find out what your peers are saying about NetWitness Platform vs. Trellix Network Detection and Response and other solutions. Updated: September 2022.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our NetWitness Platform vs. Trellix Network Detection and Response report.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.