NetWitness Platform vs Trellix Network Detection and Response comparison

The compared NetWitness and Trellix solutions aren't in the same category. NetWitness is ranked #37 in Log Management , with an average rating of 8.0, and holds a 0.3% mindshare in the category. Trellix is ranked #12 in ATP , with an average rating of 7.6, and holds a 5.3% mindshare. Additionally, 75% of NetWitness users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Trellix users who would recommend it.

NetWitness Platform

Read 37 NetWitness Platform reviews

1,551 Views
713 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

Trellix Network Detection a...

Read 39 Trellix Network Detection and Response reviews

2,152 Views
1,011 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

NetWitness Platform

Trellix Network Detection a...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between NetWitness Platform and Trellix Network Detection and Response based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Log Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed NetWitness Platform vs. Trellix Network Detection and Response Report (Updated: September 2022).

Buyer's Guide

NetWitness Platform vs. Trellix Network Detection and Response

September 2022

Download the complete report

Helped 861,524 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

NetWitness Platform

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (37th), Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (29th)

Trellix Network Detection a...

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (12th), Network Detection and Response (NDR) (10th)

Mindshare comparison

NetWitness Platform and Trellix Network Detection and Response aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. NetWitness Platform is designed for Log Management and holds a mindshare of 0.3%, down 0.4% compared to last year.
Trellix Network Detection and Response, on the other hand, focuses on Advanced Threat Protection (ATP), holds 5.3% mindshare, up 4.5% since last year.

Log Management

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

Featured Reviews

MOTASHIM Al Razi

CISO at One Bank Limited

It is a stable solution, but they should make the user interface easier to understand

The solution's initial setup takes work. We have to organize multiple paths and many features. The deployment process takes less than a week. But it takes a month to complete if we want to make the solution smarter by integrating it with various devices. I rate the process as a six out of ten.

Read full review

BiswabhanuPanda

Senior technical consultant at Hitachi Systems Micro Clinic

Offers in-depth investigation capabilities, integrates well and smoothly transitioned from a lower-capacity appliance to a higher one

The in-depth investigation capabilities are a major advantage. When the system flags something as malicious, it provides a packet capture of that activity within the environment. That helps my team quickly identify additional context that most other tools wouldn't offer – like source IP or base64 encoded data. We can also see DNS requests and other details that aren't readily available in solutions like Check Point or others that we've tried. The detection itself is solid, and their sandboxing is powerful. There's a learning curve – you need a strong grasp of OS-level changes, process forking, registry changes, and the potential impact of those. But with that knowledge, the level of information Trellix provides is far greater than what we've seen elsewhere. The real-time response capability of Trellix has been quite effective, although it's not very fast. The key is this solution's concept of 'preference zero.' They don't immediately act on a zero-day. For example, the solution has seen a piece of malware for the first time. It'll let it in, then do sandboxing. Maybe after four or five minutes, it identifies that specific file's DNX Secure Store as malicious. At that point, they update the static analysis engine, and it gets detected if anything else tries to download the same file. There is that initial 'preference zero' concept, like with Panda. You may not hold traffic in the network. That's standard in the industry; we don't do much about it. To address that, we also have endpoint solutions. We use SentinelOne in our environment, which helps us identify threats like Western Bureaus and others.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the ability to write rules and triggers for network communication, and then being able to investigate based on that."

"Offers a good wireless feature."

"The solution is really scalable for the high-end power, enterprise customer."

"NetWitness Platform offers flexibility for deployment and robust integration capabilities."

"Possibility to investigate incidents based on logs and raw packets, such as extracting files sent over the network"

"The most valuable features are the integration and ease of use."

"NetWitness Platform is valuable for creating rules that the solution must detect."

"The most valuable feature is the correlation. It can report in real-time and monitor the management."

More NetWitness Platform pros

"Its ability to find zero-day threats, malware and anything malicious has greatly improved my customer's organization, especially for protecting the users' browser."

"It is stable and quite protective. It has a lot of features to scan a lot of malicious things and vulnerabilities."

"Initially, we didn't have much visibility around what is occurring at our applications lower level. For instance, if we are exposed to any malicious attacks or SQL injections. But now we've integrated FireEye with Splunk, so now we get lots of triggers based on policy content associated with FireEye. The solution has allowed for growth and improvement in our information security and security operations teams."

"The solution can scale."

"The most valuable feature is the view into the application."

"The installation phase was easy."

"Support is very helpful and responsive."

"The scalability has not been a problem. We have deployed the product in very high bandwidth networks. We have never had a problem with the FireEye product causing latency issues within our networks."

More Trellix Network Detection and Response pros

Cons

"The log system is a bit complex and has room for improvement."

"The solution should have more integration capabilities with different platforms."

"The documentation is not as structured as I would like, personally, and I think that it can be improved and made much more user-friendly."

"The initial setup is very complex and should be simplified."

"More customizability is required, which is something that they need to improve on."

"RSA NetWitness Logs and Packets can improve the threat level aspect, it is lacking compared to other solutions. Whenever any hacking activity or any other threat factor occurred they used to provide the coverages very fast when comparing RSA NetWitness Logs and Packets. I heard the other three solutions, from a discussion with my team members who had experience in other solutions, they used to say that. Whenever any issues happened across the globe RSA NetWitness Logs and Packets are a little bit slow improving those detection mechanisms."

"Security needs improvement."

"An area for improvement would be better automation and more inbuilt use cases."

More NetWitness Platform cons

"It would be a good idea if we could get an option to block based upon the content of an email, or the content of a file attachment."

"The problem with FireEye is that they don't allow VM or sandbox customization. The user doesn't have control of the VMs that are inside the box. It comes from the vendor as-is. Some users like to have control of it. Like what type of Windows and what type of applications and they have zero control over this."

"The solution's support needs to improve their support."

"It is not a very secure product."

"Based on what we deployed, they should emphasize the application filtering and the web center. We need to look deeper into the SSM inspection. If we get the full solution with that module, we don't need to get the SSM database from another supplier."

"Stability issues manifested in terms of throughput maximization."

"FireEye Network Security should have better integration with other vendors' firewalls or proxies, such as Palo Alto and Fortinet. Files that are being submitted should happen through the API or automatically."

"The product's integration capabilities are an area of concern where improvements are required."

More Trellix Network Detection and Response cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It provides tools to assist in selecting the appropriate license and usage scenarios."

"The product price was reasonable for my region and the market."

"We are on an annual license for the use of the solution."

"It’s cheaper to run virtual machines in a VMware environment."

"The product is expensive."

"The licenses are good but the cost is very expensive."

"It is cheap."

"This is a pricey solution; it's not cheap."

More NetWitness Platform pricing and cost advice

"FireEye is comparable to other products, such as HX, but seems expensive. It may cause us to look at other products in the market."

"There are some additional services that I understand the vendor provides, but our approach was to package all of the features that we were looking to use into the product."

"When I compare this solution to its competitors in the market, I find that it is a little expensive."

"The pricing is fair, a little expensive, but fair. We've evaluated other products, and they're similarly priced."

"We're partners with Cisco so we get a reasonable price. It's cheaper than Palo Alto in terms of licensing."

"The user fee is not as high but the maintenance fee is expensive."

"It's an expensive solution."

"Its price is a bit high. A small customer cannot buy it. Its licensing is on a yearly basis."

More Trellix Network Detection and Response pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

Vinod Shankar

Manager, Enterprise Risk Consulting at Deloitte & Touche

Feb 26, 2015

HP ArcSight vs. IBM QRadar vs. McAfee Nitro vs. Splunk vs. RSA Security vs. LogRhythm

We at Infosecnirvana.com have done several posts on SIEM. After the Dummies Guide on SIEM, we are following it up with a SIEM Product Comparison – 101 deck. So, here it is for your viewing pleasure. Let me know what you think by posting your comments below. The key products compared here are…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

17%

Manufacturing Company

Real Estate/Law Firm

Financial Services Firm

13%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Computer Software Company

10%

Government

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about NetWitness Platform?

The product's initial setup phase was not at all difficult.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NetWitness Platform?

The pricing is comparable to others, and I consider the cost to be intermediate. Specific cost details are unknown to me.

See all answers

What needs improvement with NetWitness Platform?

There is currently no need for improvement in the SIEM ( /categories/security-information-and-event-management-siem ), though there could be potential enhancements by integrating with AI.

See all answers

What do you like most about FireEye Network Security?

We wanted to cross-reference that activity with the network traffic just to be sure there was no lateral movement. With Trellix, we easily confirmed that there was no lateral network involvement an...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for FireEye Network Security?

While I do not handle pricing directly, it is known that there is a variety of customers with different licensing needs, which depends on the organization's size and policy.

See all answers

What needs improvement with FireEye Network Security?

The Trellix solution could be improved by enhancing the Central Management Console for faster visibility, which would help in network detection response. Networking often involves complexity that c...

See all answers

Comparisons

Splunk Enterprise Security vs NetWitness Platform

Compared 23% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs NetWitness Platform

Compared 21% of the time

Elastic Security vs NetWitness Platform

Compared 14% of the time

RSA enVision vs NetWitness Platform

Compared 9% of the time

USM Anywhere vs NetWitness Platform

Compared 8% of the time

More NetWitness Platform Competitors

Palo Alto Networks WildFire vs Trellix Network Detection and Response

Compared 14% of the time

Fortinet FortiSandbox vs Trellix Network Detection and Response

Compared 11% of the time

Trend Micro Deep Discovery vs Trellix Network Detection and Response

Compared 8% of the time

Darktrace vs Trellix Network Detection and Response

Compared 7% of the time

Check Point SandBlast Network vs Trellix Network Detection and Response

Compared 3% of the time

More Trellix Network Detection and Response Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

NetWitness Platform

June 2025

Download NetWitness Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

Trellix Network Detection and Response

June 2025

Trellix Network Detection and Response report

Download Trellix Network Detection and Response product report

Also Known As

RSA Security Analytics

FireEye Network Security, FireEye

Overview

NetWitness Platform is an evolved SIEM and threat detection and response solution that functions as a single, unified platform for ALL your security data. It features an advanced analyst workbench for triaging alerts and incidents, and it orchestrates security operations programs end to end. In short: NetWitness Platform is all you need to run an intelligent SOC.

NetWitness

Detect the undetectable and stop evasive attacks. Trellix Network Detection and Response (NDR) helps your team focus on real attacks, contain intrusions with speed and intelligence, and eliminate your cybersecurity weak points.

Trellix

Sample Customers

Los Angeles World Airports, Reply

FFRDC, Finansbank, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Investis, Kelsey-Seybold Clinic, Bank of Thailand, City of Miramar, Citizens National Bank, D-Wave Systems

Buyer's Guide

NetWitness Platform vs. Trellix Network Detection and Response

September 2022

Free Report: NetWitness Platform vs. Trellix Network Detection and Response

Find out what your peers are saying about NetWitness Platform vs. Trellix Network Detection and Response and other solutions. Updated: September 2022.

DOWNLOAD NOW

861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our NetWitness Platform vs. Trellix Network Detection and Response report.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.