NetWitness Platform vs Trellix Network Detection and Response comparison

The compared NetWitness and Trellix solutions aren't in the same category. NetWitness is ranked #32 in Log Management , with an average rating of 9.0, and holds a 0.9% mindshare in the category. Trellix is ranked #13 in ATP , with an average rating of 7.8, and holds a 3.8% mindshare. Additionally, 75% of NetWitness users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Trellix users who would recommend it.

NetWitness Platform

Read 36 NetWitness Platform reviews

2,953 Views
1,595 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

Trellix Network Detection a...

Read 40 Trellix Network Detection and Response reviews

3,130 Views
1,628 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

NetWitness Platform

Trellix Network Detection a...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between NetWitness Platform and Trellix Network Detection and Response based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Log Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed NetWitness Platform vs. Trellix Network Detection and Response Report (Updated: September 2022).

Buyer's Guide

NetWitness Platform vs. Trellix Network Detection and Response

September 2022

Download the complete report

Helped 887,041 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

NetWitness Platform

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (32nd), Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (34th)

Trellix Network Detection a...

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (13th), Network Detection and Response (NDR) (9th)

Mindshare comparison

NetWitness Platform and Trellix Network Detection and Response aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. NetWitness Platform is designed for Log Management and holds a mindshare of 0.9%, up 0.3% compared to last year.
Trellix Network Detection and Response, on the other hand, focuses on Advanced Threat Protection (ATP), holds 3.8% mindshare, up 3.6% since last year.

Log Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
NetWitness Platform	0.9%
Splunk Enterprise Security	6.6%
Wazuh	6.1%
Other	86.4%

Log Management

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Trellix Network Detection and Response	3.8%
Palo Alto Networks WildFire	7.5%
Microsoft Defender for Office 365	6.9%
Other	81.8%

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

Featured Reviews

reviewer2256927

Head of Information Security, Cyber Defense and IT Risk Management at HCT. at a transportation company with 201-500 employees

A solid SIEM solution that should improve technical support and online resources to be easier to use

A big problem with the product is that we don't have much professional experience in Israel installing, implementing, and integrating this product. There is not enough of a knowledge base. There is no support for this product in this country, so problems have to be resolved through global technical teams. We like to work locally because of the language, and when the product is only supported outside the country, it's a little difficult to implement and use this product. Moreover, AI is something that must be added immediately. Artificial intelligence is a part of the competitors' products, and it's not been implemented for us.

Read full review

Jose Vargas

Agente De Servicios Técnicos at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

Has improved threat detection workflows and supports seamless customer monitoring

The best features Trellix Network Detection and Response offers include very good threat detection, and I believe that it is one of the best XDR tools. For example, ePO and XDR components are very comfortable and similar to many other tools for this type of monitoring, and I have received very good feedback for this tool. What makes Trellix Network Detection and Response stand out for me compared to other tools is the way you can detect threats. It is very easy and comfortable to use, and the detection shows clearly on the screen, which is very easy to understand. Regarding the features, I think that the integration with other platforms is very comfortable with the customer because we can integrate it with any switch or firewall, and it is comfortable to add this tool. Trellix Network Detection and Response has positively impacted my organization as I have improved my knowledge about detection and response. I have already used some other tools such as CrowdStrike and Umbrella, but Trellix is one of the best that I have tested. I believe that for my organization, Trellix has helped a lot with detection and supported our customers effectively. Trellix Network Detection and Response is a great tool that integrates with a lot of security tools such as Palo Alto, which is a good firewall. If you have these types of tools, your organization would benefit greatly.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It gives the ability to investigate into network traffic in the Net and the organization what we couldn't do before."

"The software is scalable to whatever is required, and you can also put a lot of resources in the cloud."

"The most valuable features are its ingestion of logs and raising of alerts based on those logs."

"I can have enterprise security, email security, next generation firewall security log, HIDS and NIDS logs, etc. all on the same dashboard. It makes it easy to pinpoint or correlate our server to this. I can find out if there is lateral movement. This is the biggest advantage of this solution."

"NetWitness Platform is valuable for creating rules that the solution must detect."

"The most valuable feature is the security that it provides."

"The development of use cases on the SSA console is quite user friendly. This means that the security analyst or the researcher does not have to learn another language."

"The product's initial setup phase was not at all difficult."

More NetWitness Platform pros

"Before FireEye, most of the times that an incident would happen nobody would be able to find out where or why the incident occurred and that the system is compromised. FireEye is a better product because if the incident already happened I know that the breach is there and that the system is compromised so we can take appropriate action to prevent anything from happening."

"Initially, we didn't have much visibility around what is occurring at our applications lower level. For instance, if we are exposed to any malicious attacks or SQL injections. But now we've integrated FireEye with Splunk, so now we get lots of triggers based on policy content associated with FireEye. The solution has allowed for growth and improvement in our information security and security operations teams."

"Both for our clients and for ourselves, ROI was almost 200% more than we expected."

"I would definitely recommend this product because I have seen many cases where other solutions were not able to catch malware, but FireEye raised a red flag."

"For our customers, it added a layer of inspection that might be missed by traditional IPS or antivirus products, and that is the capability of catching new malware that might not have been identified or seen in the wild before."

"The most valuable feature is the network security module."

"There are sandbox capabilities; you can submit malicious files and get great feedback, including if there is malware and what it is doing, and it can give you simulations in different operating systems and applications to provide real insights from the perspective of a real environment."

"Before FireEye, most of the times that an incident would happen nobody would be able to find out where or why the incident occurred and that the system is compromised, FireEye is a better product because if the incident already happened I know that the breach is there and that the system is compromised so we can take appropriate action to prevent anything from happening."

More Trellix Network Detection and Response pros

Cons

"We have encountered issues with unresolved crashes."

"An area for improvement would be better automation and more inbuilt use cases."

"I cannot say that the solution was stable because it tended to crash."

"Sometimes, it gives me static when integrating Windows-based systems. This solution should trigger a meaningful log or message indicating the reason the user or implementer can't get into the machine."

"Health monitoring of the event sources and devices."

"The threat detection capability and centralizing and upgrading capability need to be improved. The threat alert capability needs to be improved as well because there is some lag time at present. They need to work on their database search too."

"I am not happy with the RSA support. Sometimes they can be really annoying because it takes so long to get the support that you need."

"The log system is a bit complex and has room for improvement."

More NetWitness Platform cons

"Its documentation can be improved. The main problem that I see with FireEye is the documentation."

"There is a lot of room for Improvement in the offering, from cost to functionality. It is pretty straightforward to implement which is an advantage. However, it falls short in pricing, detection capabilities, and, most importantly, reporting and policy management."

"I heard that FireEye recently was hacked, and a lot of things were revealed. We would like FireEye to be more secure as an organization. FireEye has to be more protective because it is one of the most critical devices that we are using in our environment. They have a concept called SSL decryption, but that is only the packet address. We would like FireEye to also do a lot of decryption inside the packet. Currently, FireEye only does encryption and decryption of the header, but we would like them to do encryption and decryption of the entire packet."

"The initial setup was complex because of the nature of our environment."

"A lot of false positives."

"Cluster option is not available in NX, and for false positives we need some customization configuration available, such as a whitelist."

"Stability is fine as long as we don't go deeper into the system. Once we go deeper into the SSM, inspection, and decryption, we get some issues."

"The world is currently shifting to AI, but FIreEye is not following suit."

More Trellix Network Detection and Response cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"In comparison to other SIEM solutions such as Splunk, NetWitness is less costly."

"The product price was reasonable for my region and the market."

"The NetWitness Platform may be affordable only for enterprise-level customers, as it may not be within the budget of small and medium-sized businesses."

"It provides tools to assist in selecting the appropriate license and usage scenarios."

"The licenses are good but the cost is very expensive."

"We have a perpetual license, so the total cost of ownership is not very expensive. It's a good investment."

"Many clients are not able to purchase the packet capability because there is a huge amount of data, and the cost depends on the number of EPS (Events per second), as well as the number of gigabytes of data per day."

"We are on an annual license for the use of the solution."

More NetWitness Platform pricing and cost advice

"There are some additional services that I understand the vendor provides, but our approach was to package all of the features that we were looking to use into the product."

"When you purchase FireEye Network Security NX, will need to purchase a megabit per second package. You must know your needs from day one."

"When I compare this solution to its competitors in the market, I find that it is a little expensive."

"We're partners with Cisco so we get a reasonable price. It's cheaper than Palo Alto in terms of licensing."

"Because of what the FireEye product does, it has significantly decreased our mean time in being able to identify and detect malicious threats. The company that I work with is a very mature organization, and we have seen the meantime to analysis decrease by at least tenfold."

"Its price is a bit high. A small customer cannot buy it. Its licensing is on a yearly basis."

"The tool is a bit pricey."

"FireEye is comparable to other products, such as HX, but seems expensive. It may cause us to look at other products in the market."

More Trellix Network Detection and Response pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

887,041 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

Vinod Shankar

Manager, Enterprise Risk Consulting at a tech company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Feb 26, 2015

HP ArcSight vs. IBM QRadar vs. McAfee Nitro vs. Splunk vs. RSA Security vs. LogRhythm

We at Infosecnirvana.com have done several posts on SIEM. After the Dummies Guide on SIEM, we are following it up with a SIEM Product Comparison – 101 deck. So, here it is for your viewing pleasure. Let me know what you think by posting your comments below. The key products compared here are…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Construction Company

Performing Arts

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

14%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	20

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	20
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	19

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NetWitness Platform?

The pricing is comparable to others, and I consider the cost to be intermediate. Specific cost details are unknown to me.

See all answers

What needs improvement with NetWitness Platform?

There is currently no need for improvement in the SIEM ( /categories/security-information-and-event-management-siem ), though there could be potential enhancements by integrating with AI.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for NetWitness Platform?

I use NetWitness Platform ( /products/netwitness-platform-reviews ) in the financial industry as a good product with excellent capabilities and integration with various devices.

See all answers

What do you like most about FireEye Network Security?

We wanted to cross-reference that activity with the network traffic just to be sure there was no lateral movement. With Trellix, we easily confirmed that there was no lateral network involvement an...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for FireEye Network Security?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Trellix Network Detection and Response is very great.

See all answers

What needs improvement with FireEye Network Security?

I would like to see in Trellix Network Detection and Response more explanation about some details of the threat, and I wish it had more actions that you can take to contain the host or move it some...

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM Security QRadar vs NetWitness Platform

Compared 7% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs NetWitness Platform

Compared 7% of the time

RSA enVision vs NetWitness Platform

Compared 4% of the time

Palo Alto Networks WildFire vs NetWitness Platform

Compared 4% of the time

Fortinet FortiSIEM vs NetWitness Platform

Compared 2% of the time

More NetWitness Platform Competitors

Palo Alto Networks WildFire vs Trellix Network Detection and Response

Compared 6% of the time

Fortinet FortiSandbox vs Trellix Network Detection and Response

Compared 6% of the time

Vectra AI vs Trellix Network Detection and Response

Compared 4% of the time

Darktrace vs Trellix Network Detection and Response

Compared 3% of the time

Ixia ThreatARMOR vs Trellix Network Detection and Response

Compared 3% of the time

More Trellix Network Detection and Response Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

NetWitness Platform

April 2026

Download NetWitness Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

Trellix Network Detection and Response

March 2026

Trellix Network Detection and Response report

Download Trellix Network Detection and Response product report

Also Known As

RSA Security Analytics

FireEye Network Security, FireEye

Overview

NetWitness Platform is an evolved SIEM and threat detection and response solution that functions as a single, unified platform for ALL your security data. It features an advanced analyst workbench for triaging alerts and incidents, and it orchestrates security operations programs end to end. In short: NetWitness Platform is all you need to run an intelligent SOC.

NetWitness

Detect the undetectable and stop evasive attacks. Trellix Network Detection and Response (NDR) helps your team focus on real attacks, contain intrusions with speed and intelligence, and eliminate your cybersecurity weak points.

Trellix

Sample Customers

Los Angeles World Airports, Reply

FFRDC, Finansbank, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Investis, Kelsey-Seybold Clinic, Bank of Thailand, City of Miramar, Citizens National Bank, D-Wave Systems

Buyer's Guide

NetWitness Platform vs. Trellix Network Detection and Response

September 2022

Free Report: NetWitness Platform vs. Trellix Network Detection and Response

Find out what your peers are saying about NetWitness Platform vs. Trellix Network Detection and Response and other solutions. Updated: September 2022.

DOWNLOAD NOW

887,041 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our NetWitness Platform vs. Trellix Network Detection and Response report.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.