DX NetOps vs Zenoss Cloud comparison

Broadcom and Zenoss are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Broadcom is ranked #44 with an average rating of 8.0, while Zenoss is ranked #76. Broadcom holds a 0.5% mindshare in NMS, compared to Zenoss’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Zenoss users who would recommend it.

DX NetOps

Read 7 DX NetOps reviews

1,135 Views
676 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Zenoss Cloud

Read 8 Zenoss Cloud reviews

633 Views
444 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

DX NetOps

Zenoss Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

Zenoss Cloud and DX NetOps compete in the network monitoring and management category. Zenoss Cloud is favored for its user-friendly experience, while DX NetOps is preferred for comprehensive monitoring capabilities in larger enterprises.

Features: Zenoss Cloud offers real-time performance monitoring, predictive analytics, and robust integrations. DX NetOps provides network visibility, extensive reporting capabilities, and scalability for expansive networks.

Room for Improvement: Zenoss Cloud could improve its alerting system, enhance dashboard customization, and further develop specific features. DX NetOps users recommend better interoperability with third-party tools, a more intuitive settings menu, and enhancing adaptability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Zenoss Cloud has a straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service. DX NetOps requires a more complex setup but compensates with comprehensive customer support to streamline complex integrations.

Pricing and ROI: Zenoss Cloud is perceived as cost-effective with lower initial setup costs and quicker ROI. DX NetOps, though higher in cost, justifies its price with an extensive feature set and long-term benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed DX NetOps vs. Zenoss Cloud Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

DX NetOps vs. Zenoss Cloud

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,849 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

DX NetOps

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

44th

Ranking in AIOps

17th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Zenoss Cloud

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

76th

Ranking in AIOps

20th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Infrastructure (33rd), Event Monitoring (14th), Server Monitoring (23rd), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (53rd), Container Monitoring (10th), Cloud Monitoring Software (40th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of DX NetOps is 0.5%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zenoss Cloud is 0.4%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Mark Tukh

Principal Presale Consultant at Ness Technologies

Leverages comprehensive network monitoring and AI-driven automation for enhanced performance analysis

There is a model for network traffic analysis in the NetOps product called NetOps Flow Analyzer. It provides all the necessary protocols and analysis. DX NetOps supports network monitoring across hybrid environments, though I hope it works out of the box. The product features include automation through AI, allowing out-of-the-box analysis of performance data, building baseline trends, and enabling configuration of dynamic thresholds relative to collected data.

Read full review

ClaudiaChen

Cloud Architect - Senior Technology Architect at Telstra

Generates close to real-time alerts so users can resolve issues, but needs more integration and public cloud monitoring features

As Zenoss Service Dynamics is more for network-centric devices and you want to monitor, for example, a server, its services, IP addresses, and interfaces, if it's a network and you're going to monitor multiple items, you'll be charged multiple times. This is what Zenoss Service Dynamics needs to improve to make sure that customers pay just one fee to monitor the entire server. What I'd like to see in Zenoss Service Dynamics in the future is a public cloud monitoring feature, particularly for the Azure public cloud. Another additional feature I'd like to see in the next release of the solution is integration with the Azure public cloud because I know that there are some services from Azure that Zenoss Service Dynamics is currently unable to monitor.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I rate the stability of the product as ten on a scale of one to ten, indicating that it is very stable."

"I like that it provides an overall view of our network. From the topology view to every event, we can view it. We can also see the interface utilization for future capacity planning. It fits our use case and environment."

"The product features include automation through AI, allowing out-of-the-box analysis of performance data, building baseline trends, and enabling configuration of dynamic thresholds relative to collected data."

"A highly scalable solution."

"The solution is stable."

"It's good for root cause analysis for network problems and network link problems."

"It is straightforward to configure, and you can quickly gather data from your infrastructure."

"The AI is the best feature in this solution."

"The product offers good documentation that helps with initial training."

"The custom built integration is one of the most valuable features because you can see all the especially critical items."

"What I like most about Zenoss Service Dynamics is that it monitors the devices and gives close to real-time alerts. For example, in case the device is not available, Zenoss Service Dynamics generates an alert so my team can resolve the issue."

"The most valuable feature is the flexible discovery mechanism."

"Its Docker Container concept is mind blowing. It is the first monitoring tool which comes with Docker features."

"They have also accommodated many state-of-the-art technologies like Docker and ZooKeeper."

"It's easy to use."

Cons

"The licensing cost of DX NetOps is expensive, not very affordable, and on the top of the price range in the market."

"Technical support needs to be better. They need to be more knowledgeable and responsive."

"One improvement that could make the product better is to streamline its modules into a more cohesive solution."

"It would be better if they had an NFA network analysis feature. We appreciate features like extended network security for bucket flows, but it would be better to have some IDs, IPS functionalities, DDoS, or something like that."

"It would be useful to have more AI features."

"Technical support could be more responsive."

"Lacks dashboards and better integration with other solutions."

"The hardware requirements can be improved."

"There was a problem with Zenoss and storage monitoring."

"It would be ideal if the product offered sound alerts."

"As Zenoss Service Dynamics is more for network-centric devices and you want to monitor, for example, a server, its services, IP addresses, and interfaces, if it's a network and you're going to monitor multiple items, you'll be charged multiple times. This is what Zenoss Service Dynamics needs to improve to make sure that customers pay just one fee to monitor the entire server. What I'd like to see in Zenoss Service Dynamics in the future is a public cloud monitoring feature, particularly for the Azure public cloud. Another additional feature I'd like to see in the next release of the solution is integration with the Azure public cloud because I know that there are some services from Azure that Zenoss Service Dynamics is currently unable to monitor."

"The inclusion of a feature to show a graphical view of the network would be a helpful improvement."

"The AI aspect needs to improve."

"Now it is stable, but they should design threshold parameters in percentage instead of raw values."

"There is room for improvement with the administrative part. They introduced Control Center to manage things in Zenoss 5. The services that Zenoss provides remained the same, but the administrative part, since they introduced Docker, etc., has become a little complex"

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The pricing depends on the environment, the number of services, and the size of the data center. It can go from $100,000 to a million dollars."

"It depends on the customer, what he wants."

"It is very cost-effective compared to the tools I worked with in the past. The company is gaining a lot with respect to the cost factor. It provides agentless monitoring and in a very cheap way."

"There are additional costs you'll have to pay apart from the license fee for Zenoss Service Dynamics. I can't remember exactly how much my company is paying because I don't handle the finance part, but the cost is paid annually. On a scale of one to five, with one being the cheapest and five being the most expensive, I'm rating the solution three out of five."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,849 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

Computer Software Company

24%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about DX NetOps?

It is straightforward to configure, and you can quickly gather data from your infrastructure.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for DX NetOps?

The licensing cost of DX NetOps is expensive, not very affordable, and on the top of the price range in the market. However, there are no extra expenses in addition to the standard licensing fee.

See all answers

What needs improvement with DX NetOps?

It would be useful to have more AI features.

See all answers

What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?

In my experience, I worked with many monitoring software, but the one that gave me the most functionalities of a large-scale company is Zenoss, due to its ability to monitor completely hybrid and a...

See all answers

Comparisons

DX Spectrum vs DX NetOps

Compared 36% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs DX NetOps

Compared 21% of the time

AppNeta by Broadcom vs DX NetOps

Compared 14% of the time

vRealize Network Insight vs DX NetOps

Compared 12% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs DX NetOps

Compared 10% of the time

More DX NetOps Competitors

Zabbix vs Zenoss Cloud

Compared 39% of the time

Nagios XI vs Zenoss Cloud

Compared 34% of the time

SolarWinds AppOptics vs Zenoss Cloud

Compared 15% of the time

Centreon vs Zenoss Cloud

Compared 12% of the time

More Zenoss Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

DX NetOps

April 2025

Download DX NetOps product report

Buyer's Guide

Zenoss Cloud

March 2025

Download Zenoss Cloud product report

Also Known As

No data available

Cloud Monitoring, Zenoss Service Dynamics

Overview

DX NetOps by CA Technologies, a Broadcom company, improves your time to value through advanced AI capabilities and unified network visibility that delivers simplified NetOps intelligence into the user experience that traverses modern architectures. DX NetOps accomplishes this through high scale, unified network monitoring that enables full-stack analytics for assuring traditional and modern architectures. DX NetOps converts inventory, topology, device metrics, faults, flow and packet analysis into actionable intelligence for network operations teams. Complimented by our AIOps solution, DX NetOps enables IT teams to establish proactive, autonomous remediation capabilities across the applications, infrastructure, and networks that fuel superior user experiences.

Broadcom

Zenoss Cloud revolutionizes IT infrastructure monitoring with a service-centric approach, prioritizing the overall health of services and applications. Harnessing the power of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning (AIOps), Zenoss Cloud offers end-to-end visibility across servers, networks, storage, and applications. Real-time monitoring, event correlation, and automated remediation ensure immediate insights and efficient issue resolution. The customizable dashboards empower users to tailor visualizations to their needs, while scalability accommodates diverse infrastructures. Zenoss Cloud guarantees improved application performance, reduced downtime, and enhanced IT efficiency, making it an ideal choice for businesses of all sizes, from small enterprises seeking simplicity to large corporations requiring advanced scalability. Experience unified monitoring and proactive management with Zenoss Cloud, a comprehensive solution that transforms IT infrastructure optimization in today's complex environments.

Zenoss

Sample Customers

Fujitsu

2degrees, Rackspace, State of North Dakota, El Paso Independent School District, NWN Corporation

Buyer's Guide

DX NetOps vs. Zenoss Cloud

April 2025

Free Report: DX NetOps vs. Zenoss Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about DX NetOps vs. Zenoss Cloud and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,849 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our DX NetOps vs. Zenoss Cloud report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors and best AIOps vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.