Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Eightfold Talent Intelligence Platform vs Gloat comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Eightfold Talent Intelligen...
Ranking in Talent Management
16th
Ranking in Talent Acquisition
8th
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
Talent Intelligence (1st)
Gloat
Ranking in Talent Management
29th
Ranking in Talent Acquisition
12th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Talent Management category, the mindshare of Eightfold Talent Intelligence Platform is 1.6%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Gloat is 0.9%, down from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Talent Management
 

Featured Reviews

Luis Nino - PeerSpot reviewer
May 15, 2022
Talent intelligence platform that optimizes the matching of talent with opportunities in a scalable way
This solution is easy to use for our business case. Not all of our employees have used Eightfold's features yet. It is still contained to talent-related professionals who have found it easy to use. It only takes a couple of hours for people with no knowledge at all to start to leverage the benefits of this solution. The platform's ability to understand skills versus keywords as a talent intelligence platform is its key differentiator. The power of Eightfold is that you get to understand skills in a dynamic way and in real-time. This solution has allowed our team to focus on higher-value activities and to make sure that they are optimizing time to identify talent and match it to opportunities. They can then focus on the layers where humans are necessary. One of the valuable aspects of solutions like Eightfold is their ability to talk to and integrate with other solutions. It has increased the opportunity for candidates to find jobs that they are genuinely interested in.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This is a fairly expensive solution compared to others on the market. However, the solution offers functionality of a number of other different solutions combined. From that perspective, it is competitively priced."
"I would rate the pricing a seven out of ten, with one being cheap and ten being expensive."
"The pricing is fair compared to the market."
"The pricing is fairly competitive. The licensing is fairly flexible to have all employees take advantage of it in any given capacity."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Talent Management solutions are best for your needs.
815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
18%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Computer Software Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Computer Software Company
9%
Insurance Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about eightfold.ai?
Stability is fantastic. In the two years we've used it, I've only experienced one outage.
What needs improvement with eightfold.ai?
From my perspective, I think the usability could use some attention. Eightfold.ai offers modules for talent acquisition, talent management, and other areas like projects. They try to use a common U...
What is your primary use case for eightfold.ai?
We've done some customizations on top of it, but it really focuses on leader management at the executive level – things like succession planning and leader development. We haven't used it from a ta...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Learn More

 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Workday, Oracle and others in Talent Management. Updated: October 2024.
815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.