Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

ElectroNeek vs Jiffy.ai Automate comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 4, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.4
ElectroNeek customer service is generally responsive and effective, with high ratings despite occasional delays in addressing issues.
Sentiment score
6.9
Jiffy.ai Automate excels in responsive customer service and support, despite limited staff, ensuring satisfaction with complex integrations.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
4.3
ElectroNeek needs improved integration, pricing, custom activities, remote desktop support, Edge compatibility, OCR, and web scraping features.
Sentiment score
4.5
Jiffy.ai Automate struggles with complexity, limited customization, and inadequate support, posing challenges for non-IT users.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
6.5
ElectroNeek is considered moderately to highly scalable, supporting modular programming in JavaScript and Python for diverse applications.
Sentiment score
7.5
Jiffy.ai Automate is scalable and effective across departments, managing large transactions and adapting processes with minimal changes.
 

Setup Cost

Sentiment score
5.9
ElectroNeek offers affordable enterprise solutions with initial costs offset by low recurrent fees, receiving a satisfaction rating of 7-8/10.
Sentiment score
6.2
Jiffy.ai Automate offers cost-effective enterprise licensing with potential support costs, yet its features provide valuable for the price.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.0
ElectroNeek is stable and cost-effective, though users report interface challenges and stability issues across platform versions.
Sentiment score
6.4
Jiffy.ai Automate is stable across systems, cost-effective, but faces network issues; users rate stability seven out of ten.
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.4
ElectroNeek offers affordable, user-friendly automation with no-code features, unlimited bots, intuitive design, and comprehensive learning resources.
Sentiment score
8.4
Jiffy.ai Automate features a user-friendly interface, advanced integration, computer vision, and supports no-code to low-code automation.
 

Categories and Ranking

ElectroNeek
Ranking in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)
16th
Average Rating
7.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
9
Ranking in other categories
Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) (10th)
Jiffy.ai Automate
Ranking in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)
25th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Robotic Process Automation (RPA) category, the mindshare of ElectroNeek is 0.7%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Jiffy.ai Automate is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Robotic Process Automation (RPA)
 

Featured Reviews

Sarath Gopinathan Nair - PeerSpot reviewer
User-friendly, good UI, but does not work well with Microsoft Edge
We use the solution to automate processes such as the pay slips within the consol portal The solution is user-friendly with a really good UI and ID. The support is good. ElectroNeek has video recordings that enable us to easily automate tasks, and it includes a wide variety of activities. The…
JG
Removes the burden of having to do some tasks manually
Initially, in version 3, Jiffy.ai did not have support for containerization. In our environment, we are heavy users of containers and container illustrators. So, the initial deployment option was running based on individual hosts that we deployed in the cloud. That created a singularity in the way that we deployed services in our system. However, in the latest version release (4), they have full support for containerization. This has been a great improvement and one of the driving factors for switching from version 3 to version 4 very soon. The containerization capability will make a huge difference in our deployment process, because it doesn't create exceptions in the way we would deploy services. All the rest of the system is containers, so if you now have a product from a vendor that doesn't support containerization that means you must have a different process of deploying services, then accompany it with corresponding policies, because we have policies on how systems need to be configured to be reliable, secure, etc. Also, there are the BCDR aspects of it: the disaster recovery and business continuity. So, if you're introducing a new way of deploying services, now you need to have a BCDR plan dedicated to that as well, as opposed to deploying everything using a single model of deployment (mainly containers). Therefore, this will simplify a lot of things, in terms of DevOps.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions are best for your needs.
823,875 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
13%
Computer Software Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Financial Services Firm
24%
Transportation Company
11%
Computer Software Company
11%
Healthcare Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ElectroNeek?
The product's initial setup phase was easy.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ElectroNeek?
My company has made a payment towards the purchase of a license from ElectorNeek.
What do you like most about Jiffy.ai Automate?
Its initial setup process was quite efficient.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Jiffy.ai Automate?
The solution's price is reasonable in terms of its performance. The licensing costs approximately $10,000 per year. There are no additional costs involved.
What needs improvement with Jiffy.ai Automate?
The solution's support services need improvement.
 

Also Known As

ElectroNeek RPA
No data available
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

UFP, Clariant, Ricoh, FMBCapital, RePower
Southwest Airlines
Find out what your peers are saying about ElectroNeek vs. Jiffy.ai Automate and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
823,875 professionals have used our research since 2012.