Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Jiffy.ai Automate vs Nintex RPA comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 4, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.1
Jiffy.ai Automate boosts efficiency by automating tasks, reducing errors, and saving staff efforts, driving significant ROI.
Sentiment score
7.3
Users report cost savings, reduced errors, and improved efficiency with Nintex RPA, achieving savings up to $300,000.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.9
Jiffy.ai Automate excels in responsive customer service and support, despite limited staff, ensuring satisfaction with complex integrations.
Sentiment score
7.4
Nintex RPA users praise responsive technical support and proactive service, though some experience delays and desire direct phone support.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.5
Jiffy.ai Automate is scalable and effective across departments, managing large transactions and adapting processes with minimal changes.
Sentiment score
6.9
Nintex RPA is scalable and flexible, enabling easy expansion and deployment, though data analysis at scale presents challenges.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
6.4
Jiffy.ai Automate is stable across systems, cost-effective, but faces network issues; users rate stability seven out of ten.
Sentiment score
7.1
Users rate Nintex RPA stable at 8/10, noting minor issues from updates, system changes, or configuration errors.
 

Room For Improvement

Jiffy.ai Automate struggles with complexity, limited customization, and inadequate support, posing challenges for non-IT users.
Nintex RPA requires better object recognition, OCR, integration, AI updates, and improvements in training, compatibility, and debugging tools.
 

Setup Cost

Jiffy.ai Automate offers cost-effective enterprise licensing with potential support costs, yet its features provide valuable for the price.
Nintex RPA offers moderate pricing, ranging from $5,000 to $100,000, with separate charges for infrastructure and optional features.
 

Valuable Features

Jiffy.ai Automate features a user-friendly interface, advanced integration, computer vision, and supports no-code to low-code automation.
Nintex RPA offers intuitive workflows, cross-platform integration, task mining, scalability, and competitive pricing, enhancing document handling efficiency.
 

Categories and Ranking

Jiffy.ai Automate
Ranking in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)
25th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Nintex RPA
Ranking in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)
10th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
30
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Robotic Process Automation (RPA) category, the mindshare of Jiffy.ai Automate is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nintex RPA is 1.9%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Robotic Process Automation (RPA)
 

Featured Reviews

JG
Removes the burden of having to do some tasks manually
Initially, in version 3, Jiffy.ai did not have support for containerization. In our environment, we are heavy users of containers and container illustrators. So, the initial deployment option was running based on individual hosts that we deployed in the cloud. That created a singularity in the way that we deployed services in our system. However, in the latest version release (4), they have full support for containerization. This has been a great improvement and one of the driving factors for switching from version 3 to version 4 very soon. The containerization capability will make a huge difference in our deployment process, because it doesn't create exceptions in the way we would deploy services. All the rest of the system is containers, so if you now have a product from a vendor that doesn't support containerization that means you must have a different process of deploying services, then accompany it with corresponding policies, because we have policies on how systems need to be configured to be reliable, secure, etc. Also, there are the BCDR aspects of it: the disaster recovery and business continuity. So, if you're introducing a new way of deploying services, now you need to have a BCDR plan dedicated to that as well, as opposed to deploying everything using a single model of deployment (mainly containers). Therefore, this will simplify a lot of things, in terms of DevOps.
JonathanNg - PeerSpot reviewer
Helped us identify areas where frontline staff aren't following standard procedures or using unexpected systems, giving us better insight into our end users' workflows
To analyze and make sense of the data generated by Kryon process discovery can be a lot of effort. It's not as automatic as some might think. It really depends on how many processes you have and how actively you use them. But the scalability aspect isn't necessarily about deployment or technical maintenance. It's really about how you analyze and gain insights from the data gathering. I'd rate the scalability a seven out of ten because the solution has been scaling well for a long time. It's very easy to deploy. But getting value out of it at scale can be a challenge, just like with any deployment. We use it mainly for process discovery. We actually proceed it from different teams. So, we have 15 licenses that we rotate with different people, actually through different teams. So, we do discovery for the online team; we gather the results after about two weeks to a month. We analyze those results, and then we deploy them again on the analytics team. We regularly deploy it to different teams. So, it's in constant use. It just runs on the systems through discovery mode most of the time.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions are best for your needs.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
24%
Transportation Company
11%
Computer Software Company
11%
Healthcare Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
23%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Government
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Jiffy.ai Automate?
Its initial setup process was quite efficient.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Jiffy.ai Automate?
The solution's price is reasonable in terms of its performance. The licensing costs approximately $10,000 per year. There are no additional costs involved.
What needs improvement with Jiffy.ai Automate?
The solution's support services need improvement.
Best RPA tools for IBM iSeries
We have found that Foxtrot (Now NintexRPA) is a very solid solution for IBM iSeries integration using the IBM ACS 5250 emulator, in addition Datamatics TruBot is an alternative solution.
What do you like most about Nintex RPA?
Nintex RPA often includes security features, including encryption and user access controls, which ensure the protection of sensitive data and compliance with security standards.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nintex RPA?
Although Nintex RPA is expensive, it is somewhat affordable considering its features. I would rate the cost aspect as an eight out of ten.
 

Also Known As

No data available
Kryon RPA
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Southwest Airlines
Amazon, Audi, Chevron, Toyota, Uber, Walmart
Find out what your peers are saying about Jiffy.ai Automate vs. Nintex RPA and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.