Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Entrust Identity Enterprise vs Thales Authenticators comparison

Entrust Datacard and Thales Cloud Security are both solutions in the Authentication Systems category. Entrust Datacard is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.6, while Thales Cloud Security is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.0. Entrust Datacard holds a 1.6% mindshare in AS, compared to Thales Cloud Security’s 2.6% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Entrust Datacard users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Thales Cloud Security users who would recommend it.
Entrust Identity Enterprise
Read 7 Entrust Identity Enterprise reviews
  • 1,007 Views
  • 754 Comparison Views
85% willing to recommend
Thales Authenticators
Read 6 Thales Authenticators reviews
  • 1,292 Views
  • 1,138 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 11, 2024

Thales Authenticators and Entrust Identity Enterprise offer robust authentication solutions. Based on user reviews, Entrust Identity Enterprise appears to have the upper hand due to its advanced features and comprehensive offerings.

What features are offered by Thales Authenticators in comparison to Entrust Identity Enterprise?

Thales Authenticators provide diverse authentication methods, strong integration capabilities, and straightforward deployment. Entrust Identity Enterprise offers advanced security features, seamless user management, and a more comprehensive feature set.

What areas of improvement can be found in Thales Authenticators in comparison to Entrust Identity Enterprise?

Thales Authenticators could enhance mobile support, expand third-party integrations, and improve user-friendly mobile capabilities. Entrust Identity Enterprise needs a more intuitive setup process, better product documentation, and could simplify the deployment process further.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of Thales Authenticators in comparison to Entrust Identity Enterprise?

Thales Authenticators are noted for their straightforward deployment and responsive customer service. Entrust Identity Enterprise users report a more complex deployment but commend the dedicated support team for their assistance in navigating the intricate setup.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with Thales Authenticators in comparison to Entrust Identity Enterprise?

Thales Authenticators are highlighted for their affordability and quick ROI. Entrust Identity Enterprise users find the higher cost justified by the solid ROI over time, offering long-term value for the higher investment.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Entrust Identity Enterprise vs. Thales Authenticators Report (Updated: December 2024).
Buyer's Guide
Entrust Identity Enterprise vs. Thales Authenticators
December 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 824,053 peers since 2012
 

Categories and Ranking

Entrust Identity Enterprise
Ranking in Authentication Systems
10th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (11th)
Thales Authenticators
Ranking in Authentication Systems
16th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Authentication Systems category, the mindshare of Entrust Identity Enterprise is 1.6%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Thales Authenticators is 2.6%, up from 2.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Authentication Systems
 

Featured Reviews

Iwegbue Godspower Isioma - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides strong authentication feature, which requires users to enter a one-time password (OTP)
The main issue I've noticed pertains to setting up the desktop client on virtual machines in Azure, GCP, or AWS, specifically for Entrust Identity Enterprise intended for on-premises use. It works for on-premises, but I'm not sure if it's fully supported in cloud environments. If support were added, it would function perfectly with on-premises configurations. So, it functions well on-premises, but integrating it with cloud services like AWS or Azure could be challenging. There are issues with cloud integrations, such as Azure, AWS, and GCP.
Read full review
Gustavo Merighi - PeerSpot reviewer
Has an easy-to-use management interface and a straightforward initial setup process
Our primary use cases include multifactor authentication for VPN connections and access to security tools like jump servers and firewalls. We also use it to enhance security measures in an enterprise environment The most valuable feature is the YAML 2.0 integration. It has an easy-to-use…
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"This solution is flexible and easy to use for our clients. We use it with different kinds of applications and integrate it with different processes."
"I am impressed with Entrust because they are one of the most advanced identity access management companies. Their portfolio of products is well aligned with the CISA zero trust framework. If you compare the features of Entrust products with the CISA pillars of zero trust, you'll see that they're perfectly matched with CISA requirements."
"Entrust is an enterprise account, and they have a support system. Their training is also top-notch, and they are willing to share their knowledge with their partners."
"It is a scalable solution. You can add users and credentials without problems."
"The integration matrix of the solution is huge compared to others."
"The technical support services are good."
"I like how the solution allows me to support different types of hardware tokens and integrate with OTP."
"We use this solution to log into virtual machines like VMware and VMware Horizon."
"The most valuable feature of SafeNet Authentication Manager is authentication."
"One valuable feature is Thales' ability to provide off-site tokens."
"Scalable and stable."
 

Cons

"The product is very costly compared to other alternative solutions."
"It functions well on-premises, but integrating it with cloud services like AWS or Azure could be challenging. There are issues with cloud integrations, such as Azure, AWS, and GCP."
"I would like to improve the tool's implementation and pricing."
"We are introducing new processes and are migrating to a new version. Once we explore new functionalities, we'll be able to assess what could be improved."
"The solution should allow for support of multi-tenant architecture."
"The stability could improve."
"We faced issues due to slow ticket responses, which improved over time."
"The product could be improved by adding more features for sending tokens via SMS or phone calls."
"The problem with SafeNet is that it's not integrated with Microsoft 365."
"Lacks integration with other platforms."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's worth the money."
"The subscription could be yearly or monthly, depending upon your choice."
"I would rate the product's pricing a five out of ten."
"Thales is more expensive than its competitors."
"There is an annual licensing fee."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Authentication Systems solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Government
7%
Comms Service Provider
6%
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Government
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Entrust IdentityGuard?
The main issue I've noticed pertains to setting up the desktop client on virtual machines in Azure, GCP, or AWS, specifically for Entrust Identity Enterprise intended for on-premises use. It works ...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Entrust IdentityGuard?
I use it for an extra layer of security, that is two-factor authentication (2FA).
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering Entrust IdentityGuard?
I would recommend it. I've used it for three years now, and I'm very happy with it. Overall, I would rate the solution a nine out of ten.
See all answers
What do you like most about Thales Authenticators?
We use this solution to log into virtual machines like VMware and VMware Horizon.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Thales Authenticators?
Currently, the solution fulfills our requirements. We are very satisfied with its features, and do not have any specific ideas for improvement right now. Perhaps, in the future, three-factor authen...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Thales Authenticators?
Our employees, whether working on-site or remotely, use Thales Authenticators for two-factor authentication to log in to their laptops or PCs. This is our primary use case.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Microsoft Entra ID vs Entrust Identity Enterprise Logo
Microsoft Entra ID vs Entrust Identity Enterprise
Compared 28% of the time
Cisco Duo vs Entrust Identity Enterprise Logo
Cisco Duo vs Entrust Identity Enterprise
Compared 20% of the time
DigiCert PKI Platform vs Entrust Identity Enterprise Logo
DigiCert PKI Platform vs Entrust Identity Enterprise
Compared 10% of the time
Venafi vs Entrust Identity Enterprise Logo
Venafi vs Entrust Identity Enterprise
Compared 9% of the time
More Entrust Identity Enterprise Competitors
Yubico YubiKey vs Thales Authenticators Logo
Yubico YubiKey vs Thales Authenticators
Compared 30% of the time
Microsoft Entra ID vs Thales Authenticators Logo
Microsoft Entra ID vs Thales Authenticators
Compared 13% of the time
Cisco Duo vs Thales Authenticators Logo
Cisco Duo vs Thales Authenticators
Compared 10% of the time
Utimaco SecurityServer vs Thales Authenticators Logo
Utimaco SecurityServer vs Thales Authenticators
Compared 10% of the time
More Thales Authenticators Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Entrust Identity Enterprise
December 2024
Entrust Identity Enterprise reportDownload Entrust Identity Enterprise product report
Buyer's Guide
Authentication Systems
December 2024
Thales Authenticators reportDownload Thales Authenticators product report
 

Also Known As

IdentityGuard
Gemalto Ezio, Ezio, Gemalto Authenticators, SafeNet Authentication Manager
 

Learn More

Entrust Datacard
Thales Cloud Security
 

Overview

Identity Enterprise is an integrated IAM platform that supports a full suite of workforce, consumer, and citizen use cases. Ideally suited for high-assurance applications that require a Zero Trust approach for thousands or millions of users, Identity Enterprise can be deployed on-premises.

Offering the broadest range of authentication methods and form factors, Thales allows customers to address numerous use cases, assurance levels, and threat vectors with unified, centrally managed policies—managed from one authentication back end delivered in the cloud or on premise.

 

Sample Customers

Bank of New Zealand, CRISIL, Banco Mercantil, G_teborg University, Ministry of Economic Development of New Zealand, Ocean Systems, Skanska, Societe Generale, Susquehanna Bancshares
Standard Chartered Bank (SCB)
Buyer's Guide
Entrust Identity Enterprise vs. Thales Authenticators
December 2024
Free Report: Entrust Identity Enterprise vs. Thales Authenticators
Find out what your peers are saying about Entrust Identity Enterprise vs. Thales Authenticators and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Entrust Identity Enterprise vs. Thales Authenticators report.
See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.

We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.