Entrust Identity Enterprise vs Microsoft Entra ID comparison

Entrust Datacard and Microsoft are both solutions in the Authentication Systems category. Entrust Datacard is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.6, while Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.7. Entrust Datacard holds a 1.6% mindshare in AS, compared to Microsoft’s 17.6% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Entrust Datacard users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Entrust Identity Enterprise

Read 7 Entrust Identity Enterprise reviews

1,007 Views
754 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Microsoft Entra ID

Read 218 Microsoft Entra ID reviews

14,818 Views
10,868 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Entrust Identity Enterprise

Microsoft Entra ID

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 11, 2024

Entrust Identity Enterprise and Microsoft Entra ID are two prominent identity management solutions. Entrust Identity Enterprise offers robust features suited for high-security needs, and user reviews highlight its effective encryption and extensive authentication methods. Microsoft Entra ID integrates seamlessly with Microsoft’s ecosystem, providing a user-friendly experience that leverages existing Microsoft 365 applications.

What features are offered by Entrust Identity Enterprise in comparison to Microsoft Entra ID?

Entrust Identity Enterprise is valued for its advanced encryption and multi-factor authentication, which users cite as crucial for protecting sensitive data. Microsoft Entra ID, on the other hand, is praised for its seamless integration with Microsoft 365, making it a convenient choice for existing Microsoft users. The primary difference is that Entrust Identity Enterprise focuses on security enhancements, while Microsoft Entra ID excels in integration capabilities.

What areas of improvement can be found in Entrust Identity Enterprise in comparison to Microsoft Entra ID?

Users suggest that Entrust Identity Enterprise could improve its reporting tools and user training resources. Microsoft Entra ID users often mention the need for more advanced security features and better scalability options. Entrust Identity Enterprise needs better usability enhancements, while Microsoft Entra ID requires security advancements.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of Entrust Identity Enterprise in comparison to Microsoft Entra ID?

Entrust Identity Enterprise has a more complex deployment model, which users feel requires significant technical expertise. Microsoft Entra ID boasts a smoother deployment process due to its integration with the Microsoft suite. Users find customer service for Entrust satisfactory but slower than Microsoft’s prompt support. Entrust Identity Enterprise’s complexity is a barrier, while Microsoft Entra ID's integration eases deployment challenges.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with Entrust Identity Enterprise in comparison to Microsoft Entra ID?

Entrust Identity Enterprise has higher setup costs but is seen to provide significant ROI through enhanced security features. Microsoft Entra ID is perceived as offering better value for existing Microsoft users due to lower initial costs and integration benefits, though some users feel the ROI is limited by its need for additional security measures. Entrust Identity Enterprise has higher initial costs with notable security ROI, while Microsoft Entra ID offers economical entry with integration advantages.

To learn more, read our detailed Entrust Identity Enterprise vs. Microsoft Entra ID Report (Updated: November 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Entrust Identity Enterprise vs. Microsoft Entra ID

November 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,053 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Entrust Identity Enterprise

Ranking in Authentication Systems

10th

Ranking in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

11th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Microsoft Entra ID

Ranking in Authentication Systems

1st

Ranking in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

1st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

218

Ranking in other categories

Single Sign-On (SSO) (1st), Identity Management (IM) (1st), Access Management (1st), Microsoft Security Suite (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Authentication Systems category, the mindshare of Entrust Identity Enterprise is 1.6%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Entra ID is 17.6%, down from 24.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Authentication Systems

Featured Reviews

Iwegbue Godspower Isioma

Cyber Security Analyst at Platview Technologies

Provides strong authentication feature, which requires users to enter a one-time password (OTP)

The main issue I've noticed pertains to setting up the desktop client on virtual machines in Azure, GCP, or AWS, specifically for Entrust Identity Enterprise intended for on-premises use. It works for on-premises, but I'm not sure if it's fully supported in cloud environments. If support were added, it would function perfectly with on-premises configurations. So, it functions well on-premises, but integrating it with cloud services like AWS or Azure could be challenging. There are issues with cloud integrations, such as Azure, AWS, and GCP.

Read full review

Vinod Survase

M365 Senior Consultant at Capgemini

Saves us time and money and features Conditional Access policies, SSPR, and MFA

I want better integration between Azure AD and the on-prem environment because there are currently limitations that can hamper employee experience. We use a feature called password writeback, that can be challenging to implement in a hybrid environment. Employees can change their passwords using a self-service password reset (SSPR) feature, which reflects from the cloud to the on-prem identity, but not the other way around. Currently, there is no way to reflect passwords from on-prem identities to the cloud. There are other similar limitations, such as a cap on the number of identities that can be synchronized in a particular time frame, which can be an issue for large enterprises with 300,000 employees or more.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The integration matrix of the solution is huge compared to others."

"It is a scalable solution. You can add users and credentials without problems."

"This solution is flexible and easy to use for our clients. We use it with different kinds of applications and integrate it with different processes."

"Entrust is an enterprise account, and they have a support system. Their training is also top-notch, and they are willing to share their knowledge with their partners."

"I am impressed with Entrust because they are one of the most advanced identity access management companies. Their portfolio of products is well aligned with the CISA zero trust framework. If you compare the features of Entrust products with the CISA pillars of zero trust, you'll see that they're perfectly matched with CISA requirements."

"When logging on to Azure AD it's pretty quick."

"Don't delay implementing this solution, it's the best thing you can do for your identity protection."

"The single sign-on is very convenient for us."

"We can centralize and manage everything much more effectively with this tool."

"Just because I've been in the Azure space since it started out and in the Microsoft Cloud AD since the BPOS days in the early 2000s, and it's just a product that made life simpler for my clients to be able to integrate everything."

"It offers good Microsoft integration capabilities."

"Overall, I think the support and the pictorial format of this web portal are very good."

"From an administrative perspective, we can now manage users from a single pane of glass, which enhances efficiency."

More Microsoft Entra ID pros

Cons

"We are introducing new processes and are migrating to a new version. Once we explore new functionalities, we'll be able to assess what could be improved."

"The product is very costly compared to other alternative solutions."

"It functions well on-premises, but integrating it with cloud services like AWS or Azure could be challenging. There are issues with cloud integrations, such as Azure, AWS, and GCP."

"I would like to improve the tool's implementation and pricing."

"I think the documentation and configuration are both areas that need improvement."

"You can manage the users from the Office 365 administration center, and you can manage them from Azure Active Directory. Those are two different environments, but they do the same things. They can gather the features in one place, and it might be better if that place were Azure."

"The conditional access rules are a little limiting. There's greater scope for the variety of rules and conditions you could put in that rules around a more factual authentication for other users. If you have an Azure AD setup, you can then connect to other people's Azure AD, but you don't have a huge amount of control in terms of what you can do. Greater control over guest users and guest access would be better. It's pretty good as it is but that could be improved."

"Private access and internet access should be available in a less expensive licensing model."

"The documentation could be better."

"The technical support could improve by having a faster response time."

"I faced difficulties from Micorosft's end and during the transition from Microsoft Active Directory to Microsoft Entra ID. Sometimes, some of Microsoft's documentation could be a little outdated."

"Compared to what we can do on-prem, Azure AD lacks a feature for multiple hierarchical groups. For example, Group A is part of group B. Group B is part of group C. Then, if I put someone into group A, which is part of already B, they get access to any system that group B has access to, and that provisioning is automatically there."

More Microsoft Entra ID cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's worth the money."

"The subscription could be yearly or monthly, depending upon your choice."

"I would rate the product's pricing a five out of ten."

"Pricing-wise, they offer a stepladder approach. You can start with the lowest level features, then start increasing based on new requirements."

"Microsoft Entra ID service can be quite costly due to its hidden expenses linked to usage."

"If you have a different IDP today, I would take a close look at what your licensing looks like, then reevaluate the licensing that you have with Microsoft 365, and see if you're covered for some of this other stuff. Folks sometimes don't realize that, "Oh, I'm licensed for that service in Azure." This becomes one of those situations where you have the "aha" moment, "Oh, I didn't know we can do that. Alright, let's go down this road." Then, they start to have conversations with Microsoft to see what they can gain. I would recommend that they work closely with their TAM, just to make sure that they are getting the right level of service. They may just not be aware of what is available to them."

"It's pretty good. We're using the native features. It's bundled with our Office 365 licenses. We aren't paying anything extra for Azure Active Directory. It's pretty good for us because it's complementary to Office 365. We're only paying for Office 365."

"The solution can be cheaper."

"The price of the solution was reasonable."

"Microsoft has a free version of Azure AD. So, if you don't do a lot of advanced features, then you can use the free version, which is no cost at all because it is underpinning Office 365. Because Microsoft gives it to you as a SaaS, so there are no infrastructure costs whatsoever that you need to incur. If you use the free version, then it is free. If you use the advanced features (that we use), it is a license fee per user."

"The licensing model makes it difficult to understand the real cost of the solution, especially because it changes all the time."

More Microsoft Entra ID pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Authentication Systems solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Government

Comms Service Provider

Educational Organization

32%

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Entrust IdentityGuard?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Entrust IdentityGuard?

I use it for an extra layer of security, that is two-factor authentication (2FA).

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Entrust IdentityGuard?

I would recommend it. I've used it for three years now, and I'm very happy with it. Overall, I would rate the solution a nine out of ten.

See all answers

How does Duo Security compare with Microsoft Authenticator?

We switched to Duo Security for identity verification. We’d been using a competitor but got the chance to evaluate Duo for 30 days, and we could not be happier. Duo Security is easy to configure a...

See all answers

What do you like most about Azure Active Directory?

It is very simple. The Active Directory functions are very easy for us. Its integration with anything is very easy. We can easily do third-party multifactor authentication.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Active Directory?

Most features of Entra ID are part of Microsoft's ecosystem and included in Microsoft 365 bundles, which means there are no additional costs associated with pricing and licensing.

See all answers

Comparisons

Cisco Duo vs Entrust Identity Enterprise

Compared 20% of the time

DigiCert PKI Platform vs Entrust Identity Enterprise

Compared 10% of the time

Venafi vs Entrust Identity Enterprise

Compared 9% of the time

RSA SecurID vs Entrust Identity Enterprise

Compared 7% of the time

RSA Authentication Manager vs Entrust Identity Enterprise

Compared 7% of the time

More Entrust Identity Enterprise Competitors

Microsoft Intune vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 11% of the time

Google Cloud Identity vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 10% of the time

Okta Workforce Identity vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 8% of the time

Auth0 vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 5% of the time

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 5% of the time

More Microsoft Entra ID Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Entrust Identity Enterprise

December 2024

Download Entrust Identity Enterprise product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Entra ID

December 2024

Download Microsoft Entra ID product report

Also Known As

IdentityGuard

Azure AD, Azure Active Directory, Azure Active Directory, Microsoft Authenticator

Learn More

Entrust Datacard

Microsoft

Interactive Demo

Demo not available

Entrust Datacard

Microsoft

Overview

Identity Enterprise is an integrated IAM platform that supports a full suite of workforce, consumer, and citizen use cases. Ideally suited for high-assurance applications that require a Zero Trust approach for thousands or millions of users, Identity Enterprise can be deployed on-premises.

Microsoft Entra ID is used for extending on-premises Active Directory to the cloud, managing application access, enabling multi-factor authentication, and single sign-on. It facilitates policy enforcement and secure access, ensuring centralized identity management across cloud and on-premises resources.

Organizations utilize Microsoft Entra ID for robust user and group management, identity synchronization, and conditional access. Its seamless integration with third-party apps, scalability, and support for remote work make it a preferred choice. The admin center streamlines identity and access tasks, enhancing efficiency and security with features like privileged identity management and audit logs.

What are the key features of Microsoft Entra ID?

Single Sign-On: Simplifies user access to multiple applications with one login.
Multifactor Authentication: Enhances security by requiring additional verification.
Conditional Access: Establishes policies that determine how users' access cloud apps.
Integration: Easily integrates with various third-party applications.
User Identity Protection: Safeguards user identities from threats.
Privileged Identity Management: Manages elevated access to sensitive resources.
Audit Logs: Provides thorough activity logs for oversight and compliance.

What benefits should users look for in Microsoft Entra ID reviews?

Enhanced Security: Offers strong multifactor authentication and identity protection.
Administrative Efficiency: Simplifies identity and access management tasks.
Scalability: Supports growing user bases and remote work environments.
Integration Capabilities: Compatible with numerous third-party applications.
User-Friendly Interface: Makes managing user identities straightforward.

Microsoft Entra ID implementation varies across industries. Tech firms leverage it for secure, scalable access management, while healthcare organizations utilize its identity protection features to safeguard patient data. Educational institutions adopt Entra ID for streamlined user management and policy enforcement, ensuring secure access for students and staff across on-premises and cloud resources.

Sample Customers

Bank of New Zealand, CRISIL, Banco Mercantil, G_teborg University, Ministry of Economic Development of New Zealand, Ocean Systems, Skanska, Societe Generale, Susquehanna Bancshares

Microsoft Entre ID is trusted by companies of all sizes and industries including Walmart, Zscaler, Uniper, Amtrak, monday.com, and more.

Buyer's Guide

Entrust Identity Enterprise vs. Microsoft Entra ID

November 2024

Free Report: Entrust Identity Enterprise vs. Microsoft Entra ID

Find out what your peers are saying about Entrust Identity Enterprise vs. Microsoft Entra ID and other solutions. Updated: November 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Entrust Identity Enterprise vs. Microsoft Entra ID report.

See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors and best Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.