Entrust Identity Enterprise vs Microsoft Entra ID comparison

Entrust Datacard and Microsoft are both solutions in the Authentication Systems category. Entrust Datacard is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.6, while Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.7. Entrust Datacard holds a 1.3% mindshare in AS, compared to Microsoft’s 16.2% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Entrust Datacard users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Entrust Identity Enterprise

Read 7 Entrust Identity Enterprise reviews

897 Views
649 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Microsoft Entra ID

Read 223 Microsoft Entra ID reviews

10,865 Views
8,066 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Entrust Identity Enterprise

Microsoft Entra ID

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 11, 2024

Entrust Identity Enterprise and Microsoft Entra ID are two prominent identity management solutions. Entrust Identity Enterprise offers robust features suited for high-security needs, and user reviews highlight its effective encryption and extensive authentication methods. Microsoft Entra ID integrates seamlessly with Microsoft’s ecosystem, providing a user-friendly experience that leverages existing Microsoft 365 applications.

What features are offered by Entrust Identity Enterprise in comparison to Microsoft Entra ID?

Entrust Identity Enterprise is valued for its advanced encryption and multi-factor authentication, which users cite as crucial for protecting sensitive data. Microsoft Entra ID, on the other hand, is praised for its seamless integration with Microsoft 365, making it a convenient choice for existing Microsoft users. The primary difference is that Entrust Identity Enterprise focuses on security enhancements, while Microsoft Entra ID excels in integration capabilities.

What areas of improvement can be found in Entrust Identity Enterprise in comparison to Microsoft Entra ID?

Users suggest that Entrust Identity Enterprise could improve its reporting tools and user training resources. Microsoft Entra ID users often mention the need for more advanced security features and better scalability options. Entrust Identity Enterprise needs better usability enhancements, while Microsoft Entra ID requires security advancements.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of Entrust Identity Enterprise in comparison to Microsoft Entra ID?

Entrust Identity Enterprise has a more complex deployment model, which users feel requires significant technical expertise. Microsoft Entra ID boasts a smoother deployment process due to its integration with the Microsoft suite. Users find customer service for Entrust satisfactory but slower than Microsoft’s prompt support. Entrust Identity Enterprise’s complexity is a barrier, while Microsoft Entra ID's integration eases deployment challenges.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with Entrust Identity Enterprise in comparison to Microsoft Entra ID?

Entrust Identity Enterprise has higher setup costs but is seen to provide significant ROI through enhanced security features. Microsoft Entra ID is perceived as offering better value for existing Microsoft users due to lower initial costs and integration benefits, though some users feel the ROI is limited by its need for additional security measures. Entrust Identity Enterprise has higher initial costs with notable security ROI, while Microsoft Entra ID offers economical entry with integration advantages.

To learn more, read our detailed Entrust Identity Enterprise vs. Microsoft Entra ID Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Entrust Identity Enterprise vs. Microsoft Entra ID

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 847,862 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Entrust Identity Enterprise

Ranking in Authentication Systems

10th

Ranking in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

11th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Microsoft Entra ID

Ranking in Authentication Systems

1st

Ranking in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

1st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

223

Ranking in other categories

Single Sign-On (SSO) (1st), Identity Management (IM) (1st), Access Management (1st), Microsoft Security Suite (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Authentication Systems category, the mindshare of Entrust Identity Enterprise is 1.3%, down from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Entra ID is 16.2%, down from 22.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Authentication Systems

Featured Reviews

Iwegbue Godspower Isioma

Cyber Security Analyst at Platview Technologies

Provides strong authentication feature, which requires users to enter a one-time password (OTP)

The main issue I've noticed pertains to setting up the desktop client on virtual machines in Azure, GCP, or AWS, specifically for Entrust Identity Enterprise intended for on-premises use. It works for on-premises, but I'm not sure if it's fully supported in cloud environments. If support were added, it would function perfectly with on-premises configurations. So, it functions well on-premises, but integrating it with cloud services like AWS or Azure could be challenging. There are issues with cloud integrations, such as Azure, AWS, and GCP.

Read full review

Aaron Liang

System engineer at a energy/utilities company with 501-1,000 employees

Has significantly improved secure access to applications and resources in our environment

Microsoft Entra ID has helped by simplifying our management of permissions for APIs. We are not directly exposing credentials, as we use tokens instead. It has made management easier and more secure, especially in a multi-user environment. The implementation of Microsoft Entra ID significantly improved secure access to applications and resources in our environment, primarily through the widespread use of single-sign-on. Managing API permissions became much easier, as application registration often involves calling an API to utilize services without directly exposing credentials, relying instead on token-based authentication. This streamlined approach benefits end-users by simplifying access while remaining transparent to them. Ultimately, my role focuses on ensuring a smooth and user-friendly experience, even if the underlying technology remains unseen by the end-users. Our company strongly emphasizes passwordless authentication, primarily through device-bound passkeys in Microsoft Authenticator. While administrators with high-privileged accounts utilize YubiKeys and passwords for tasks like accessing Microsoft Graph, we are actively transitioning all other users towards passwordless methods such as Windows Hello biometrics. This approach streamlines authentication and enhances security. Though initial deployment in 2022 presented challenges due to hardware limitations and the lingering effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, the technology has significantly improved and provides a simple and effective user experience.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The integration matrix of the solution is huge compared to others."

"Entrust is an enterprise account, and they have a support system. Their training is also top-notch, and they are willing to share their knowledge with their partners."

"This solution is flexible and easy to use for our clients. We use it with different kinds of applications and integrate it with different processes."

"I am impressed with Entrust because they are one of the most advanced identity access management companies. Their portfolio of products is well aligned with the CISA zero trust framework. If you compare the features of Entrust products with the CISA pillars of zero trust, you'll see that they're perfectly matched with CISA requirements."

"It is a scalable solution. You can add users and credentials without problems."

"Conditional Access is a helpful feature because it allows us to provide better security for our users."

"We have the ability to define the email user in the designated field."

"For some applications, it's not only working for authentication but it's also being used to apply roles for users. From the management perspective, it's much better to have this because in the past we constantly needed to go into the console of the different solutions and create or delete users or modify their roles and permissions. Now, with Azure Active Directory, we can do that from a single point. That makes our management model much easier."

"We're using the whole suite: device management, user credentials, everything that's possible."

"Azure Active Directory has many automation capabilities, and you can apply policies on top. You can do a lot of things with these combinations and integrate other tools like PingFederate."

"This solution serves as the basis to understand the MS SSO and MFA capabilities."

"The solution offers business to business and client to business support."

"We have a complex scenario with several applications, and we're trying to achieve SSO for most of our applications, but some of our legacy applications don't support SSO or modern protocols. Our core applications are ready for SSO or to be federated. We've centralized our authentication process using Entra ID, so we can collect sign-offs from the users and filter using conditional access."

More Microsoft Entra ID pros

Cons

"I would like to improve the tool's implementation and pricing."

"It functions well on-premises, but integrating it with cloud services like AWS or Azure could be challenging. There are issues with cloud integrations, such as Azure, AWS, and GCP."

"The product is very costly compared to other alternative solutions."

"We are introducing new processes and are migrating to a new version. Once we explore new functionalities, we'll be able to assess what could be improved."

"The pricing is okay, however, it could always be better in the future."

"Entra ID is not battle-tested or stable enough to support a business of our size. There are some design issues specifically around support for legacy services."

"One thing that bothers me about Azure AD is that I can't specify login hours. I have to use an on-premises instance of Active Directory if I want to specify the hours during which a user can log in. For example, if I want to restrict login to only be possible during working hours, to prevent overtime payments or to prevent lawsuits, I can't do this using only Azure AD."

"Overall, it's not a very intuitive solution."

"In a hybrid deployment, when we update a license by changing the UPN or email address of a user, it does not get updated automatically during normal sync. This means that we have to update it manually from Azure, which is something that needs to be corrected."

"I think something that is key would be the group policies replication over the cloud, in order to prevent or to avoid relying on the on-premise Active Directory servers and to manage group policies."

"There should be guidance on features, especially security features, in Entra ID and whether they are sufficient on their own. The solution could become expensive when paying extra for enhanced security features, so Microsoft needs to offer better clarity on this matter."

"The downside is that we now have all our eggs in one basket with Microsoft. We have this great authentication and single sign-on, but if Microsoft has an outage in North America or globally, on Outlook or Teams, we're dead in the water... We get some type of hiccup once a quarter."

More Microsoft Entra ID cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The subscription could be yearly or monthly, depending upon your choice."

"I would rate the product's pricing a five out of ten."

"It's worth the money."

"MFA and P2 licenses for two Azures for fully-enabled scenarios and features cost a lot of money. This is where Okta is trying to get the prices down."

"I don't pay for it. Going by how I feel, I see the prices for any MFA solution going down because the more different alternatives there are, the cheaper things should be. Microsoft Authenticator app would be the preferred application, but there are too many ways to implement MFA. I don't know how much it cost, but the price should go down."

"I'm not sure about the specific costs or how they're calculated, but essentially, the costs go up based on the level of security that is required by the organization."

"The E5 plan we are using contains the premium plans for Azure Active Directory. We are not paying only for the Azure Active Directory Premium licenses. We have it already included within our E5 plan."

"Our customers are looking for advanced features and processes for it to be cost-effective for their organizations. They see it as an overpriced product. They are enjoying using Azure Active Directory, but they are looking for better prices."

"The pricing depends on the use case and can be negotiated based on volume."

"We have a yearly license."

"Azure AD has four licensing options- Free, Office 365 apps, Premium P1, and Premium P2. The free option has a limited number of identities and features, and the Office 365 version comes included in several Office 365 subscriptions. With the P1 and P2 licenses, we get all the freeware features plus additional security features, but these come at a higher price. The base price for P1 and P2 is $6 and $9 per user per month, respectively."

More Microsoft Entra ID pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Authentication Systems solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

847,862 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

12%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

32%

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Entrust IdentityGuard?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Entrust IdentityGuard?

I use it for an extra layer of security, that is two-factor authentication (2FA).

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Entrust IdentityGuard?

I would recommend it. I've used it for three years now, and I'm very happy with it. Overall, I would rate the solution a nine out of ten.

See all answers

How does Duo Security compare with Microsoft Authenticator?

We switched to Duo Security for identity verification. We’d been using a competitor but got the chance to evaluate Duo for 30 days, and we could not be happier. Duo Security is easy to configure a...

See all answers

What do you like most about Azure Active Directory?

It is very simple. The Active Directory functions are very easy for us. Its integration with anything is very easy. We can easily do third-party multifactor authentication.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Active Directory?

Microsoft Entra ID is reportedly quite expensive for each user regarding security features. The renewal cost is particularly high according to the teams managing purchases.

See all answers

Comparisons

Cisco Duo vs Entrust Identity Enterprise

Compared 19% of the time

Venafi vs Entrust Identity Enterprise

Compared 16% of the time

Entrust Identity Essentials vs Entrust Identity Enterprise

Compared 12% of the time

DigiCert PKI Platform vs Entrust Identity Enterprise

Compared 12% of the time

RSA SecurID vs Entrust Identity Enterprise

Compared 10% of the time

More Entrust Identity Enterprise Competitors

Microsoft Intune vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 11% of the time

Google Cloud Identity vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 10% of the time

Okta Workforce Identity vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 9% of the time

Auth0 vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 6% of the time

Amazon Cognito vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 4% of the time

More Microsoft Entra ID Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Entrust Identity Enterprise

April 2025

Download Entrust Identity Enterprise product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Entra ID

March 2025

Download Microsoft Entra ID product report

Also Known As

IdentityGuard

Azure AD, Azure Active Directory, Azure Active Directory, Microsoft Authenticator

Interactive Demo

Demo not available

Entrust Datacard

Microsoft

Overview

Identity Enterprise is an integrated IAM platform that supports a full suite of workforce, consumer, and citizen use cases. Ideally suited for high-assurance applications that require a Zero Trust approach for thousands or millions of users, Identity Enterprise can be deployed on-premises.

Entrust Datacard

Microsoft Entra ID is used for extending on-premises Active Directory to the cloud, managing application access, enabling multi-factor authentication, and single sign-on. It facilitates policy enforcement and secure access, ensuring centralized identity management across cloud and on-premises resources.

Organizations utilize Microsoft Entra ID for robust user and group management, identity synchronization, and conditional access. Its seamless integration with third-party apps, scalability, and support for remote work make it a preferred choice. The admin center streamlines identity and access tasks, enhancing efficiency and security with features like privileged identity management and audit logs.

What are the key features of Microsoft Entra ID?

Single Sign-On: Simplifies user access to multiple applications with one login.
Multifactor Authentication: Enhances security by requiring additional verification.
Conditional Access: Establishes policies that determine how users' access cloud apps.
Integration: Easily integrates with various third-party applications.
User Identity Protection: Safeguards user identities from threats.
Privileged Identity Management: Manages elevated access to sensitive resources.
Audit Logs: Provides thorough activity logs for oversight and compliance.

What benefits should users look for in Microsoft Entra ID reviews?

Enhanced Security: Offers strong multifactor authentication and identity protection.
Administrative Efficiency: Simplifies identity and access management tasks.
Scalability: Supports growing user bases and remote work environments.
Integration Capabilities: Compatible with numerous third-party applications.
User-Friendly Interface: Makes managing user identities straightforward.

Microsoft Entra ID implementation varies across industries. Tech firms leverage it for secure, scalable access management, while healthcare organizations utilize its identity protection features to safeguard patient data. Educational institutions adopt Entra ID for streamlined user management and policy enforcement, ensuring secure access for students and staff across on-premises and cloud resources.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Bank of New Zealand, CRISIL, Banco Mercantil, G_teborg University, Ministry of Economic Development of New Zealand, Ocean Systems, Skanska, Societe Generale, Susquehanna Bancshares

Microsoft Entre ID is trusted by companies of all sizes and industries including Walmart, Zscaler, Uniper, Amtrak, monday.com, and more.

Buyer's Guide

Entrust Identity Enterprise vs. Microsoft Entra ID

April 2025

Free Report: Entrust Identity Enterprise vs. Microsoft Entra ID

Find out what your peers are saying about Entrust Identity Enterprise vs. Microsoft Entra ID and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

847,862 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Entrust Identity Enterprise vs. Microsoft Entra ID report.

See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors and best Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.