ERPScan SMART Cybersecurity Platform vs GitLab comparison

"The core scanning, the scanning process, has got a very nice pass management module. It's fantastic."

"GitLab's best features are maintenance, branch integration, and development infrastructure."

"The merging feature makes it easy later on for the deployment."

"CI/CD and GitLab scanning are the most valuable features."

"This product is always evolving, and they listen to the customers."

"It's a great toolbox where the CI/CD pipeline is the fundamental component, but there are so many other features that you can pull from, which makes it a very powerful tool. My current client is using AWS, and they can, of course, use AWS CodePipeline, but GitLab is much more mature than that, and it also gives you the freedom to decide to go to another platform or have a multi-cloud strategy and things like that. That freedom for me is also very valuable."

"Key features allow creation of well-presented Wiki that includes ideas, development, and domains."

"Their CI/CD engine is very mature. It's very comprehensive and flexible, and compared to other projects, I believe that GitLab is number one right now from that perspective."

"We use GitLab in the new project for CI/CD, integration, and deployment."

"The anomaly detection could be improved."

"I don't really like the new Kubernetes integration because it is pretty focused on the on-premise environment, but we're in a hybrid environment."

"GitLab's Windows version is yet not available and having this would be an improvement."

"GitLab could improve the patch repository. It does not have support for Conan patch version regions. Additionally, better support for Kubernetes deployment is needed as part of the package."

"I would like to see security increased in the future. A secure environment is very important."

"Reporting could be improved."

"As GitLab is not perfect, what needs improvement in the solution is the Wiki feature of the groups or the repertories because currently, it's not searchable by default. You'll need an indexing service such as Elasticsearch to make it searchable, and that requires too much work, so for me, it's the main feature that should be improved in GitLab. In the next version of the solution, from the top of my head, the documentation could be improved. Besides the Wiki, it would be good if there's documentation that would be automatically generated based on the code repository. In other words, there should be some tutorials from GitLab for developers in the next release."

"This solution could be improved by adding modifications such as slack notifications."

"Some of the scripts that we encountered in GitLab were not fully functional and threw up errors."

"In total, I believe we have more than 300 licenses spread over about 100 users, though I can't comment on the costs involved."

"There are different licensing options available, including a free limited-user license."

"GitLab's pricing is good compared to others on the market."

"The solution's pricing is acceptable."

"The price is okay."

"The solution's standard license is paid annually. They have changed the pricing model and it used to be better. There is a free version available."

"We are using the free version of GitLab."

"We are using its free version, and we are evaluating its Premium version. Its Ultimate version is very expensive."