SS&C Blue Prism vs erwin Data Modeler by Quest comparison

erwin by Quest and SS&C Technologies are both solutions in the Business Process Design category. erwin by Quest is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.1, while SS&C Technologies is ranked #21 with an average rating of 7.7. erwin by Quest holds a 2.2% mindshare in BPD, compared to SS&C Technologies’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of erwin by Quest users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of SS&C Technologies users who would recommend it.

erwin Data Modeler by Quest

Read 39 erwin Data Modeler by Quest reviews

1,858 Views
1,038 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

SS&C Blue Prism

Read 3 SS&C Blue Prism reviews

70 Views
44 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

erwin Data Modeler by Quest

SS&C Blue Prism

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 12, 2025

erwin Data Modeler by Quest and SS&C Blue Prism compete in data management and automation. erwin excels in data modeling due to its comprehensive architecture capabilities, while SS&C Blue Prism is superior in process automation and operational efficiency.

Features: erwin Data Modeler provides intricate data modeling, reverse engineering, and versatile database design capabilities, facilitating complex data management. SS&C Blue Prism emphasizes process automation with tools for creating automated workflows, task optimization, and enhancing operational efficiency.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: erwin Data Modeler is known for straightforward deployment and effective customer support, ensuring seamless integration and quick problem-solving. SS&C Blue Prism, despite offering strong customer support, requires a more comprehensive setup due to its extensive features.

Pricing and ROI: erwin Data Modeler typically offers a lower initial cost, appealing to organizations focused on data management, generating ROI through efficient data handling. SS&C Blue Prism might present a higher upfront cost but offers significant ROI for its extensive process automation capabilities, leading to increased efficiency.

To learn more, read our detailed SS&C Blue Prism vs. erwin Data Modeler by Quest Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

SS&C Blue Prism vs. erwin Data Modeler by Quest

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 846,617 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

erwin Data Modeler by Quest

Ranking in Business Process Design

9th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Architecture Management (3rd)

SS&C Blue Prism

Ranking in Business Process Design

21st

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Management (BPM) (34th), Process Automation (26th), Medical Insurance Claims Software (3rd), Insurance Claims Processing (5th), Document Management Software (15th), Low-Code Development Platforms (25th), Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) (16th), Loan Management Software (2nd), Document Automation Software (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Business Process Design category, the mindshare of erwin Data Modeler by Quest is 2.2%, down from 2.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SS&C Blue Prism is 0.2%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Design

Featured Reviews

JorgeSanz

Data Governance Senior Advisor at Abu Dhabi National Oil Company

Streamline data modeling and automate network changes for increased efficiency

The initial setup depends on the tool if you are using the data model environment. Stopping the server could be complex and require strong expertise. If you have everything set up and configured, Erwin is straightforward. You can deploy it in a few hours. In our case, it took a couple of months to address internal conditions, assign machines, and set up everything for the services. I rate the initial setup a six out of ten, where one is difficult and ten is easy.

Read full review

Gavin Beckett

Intelligent Automation Solution Architect at Digiblu

Design studio enables effective automation while licensing needs improvement

I noticed that it lacks the ability to automatically record the process steps like some of its competitors. Having this capability could accelerate the process. The delivery methodology felt somewhat waterfall in style and not sufficiently agile. Additionally, the licensing model was somewhat prohibitive. It was not developed in a consumption-based manner, however, rather in a fixed-price licensing model that did not account for volumes.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The fitting model is very intuitive."

"The solution’s code generation ensures accurate engineering of data sources, as there is no development time. Code doesn't even have to be reviewed. We have been using this solution for so long and all the code which has been generated is accurate with the requirements. Once we generate the DDLs out of the erwin tools, the development team does a quick review of the script line by line. They will just be running the script on the database and looking into other requirements, such as the index. So, there is less effort from development side to create tables or build a database."

"We can create mappings in erwin and possibly data dictionaries."

"Forward engineering, DDL generation, reverse engineering, and reporting are the most valuable features of the solution."

"The modeling portion of the tool is the most valuable. There are some notes, naming standards, and other functions that we use as well. There's a whole boatload of functionality in this thing and we use maybe 10% of it. It seems to be pretty common that not all the functionality is fully utilized. But it's just got gobs and gobs of stuff that you can implement if you so choose to."

"There is absolutely no problem with the stability."

"We use the macros with naming standards patterns, domains, datatypes, and some common attributes. As far as other automations, a feature of the Bulk Editor is mass updates. When it sees something is nonstandard or inaccurate, it will export the better data out. Then, I can easily see which entities and attributes are not inline or standard. I can easily make changes to what was uploaded to the Bulk Editor. When taking on a new project, it can save you about a half a day on a big project across an entire team."

"The logical model gives developers, as well as the data modelers, an understanding of exactly how each object interacts with the others, whether a one-to-many, many-to-many, many-to-one, etc."

More erwin Data Modeler by Quest pros

"I find the design studio, where I can build the automation, and the control room feature, which allows me to run and monitor the automation, to be the most useful."

"The key feature of SS&C that I find valuable is the general workflow visibility."

"Some important features include the language capabilities, which are crucial since RPA has to read the documents provided by the customer."

Cons

"I still use Visio for conceptual modeling, and that's mainly because it is easier to change things, and you can relax some of the rules. DM's eventual target is a database, which means you actually have to dot all the Is and cross all the Ts, but in a conceptual model, you don't often know what you're working with. So, that's probably a constraint with erwin. They have made it a lot easier, and they've done a lot, but there is probably still room for improvement in terms of the ease of presentation back to the business. I'm comparing it with something like Visio where you can change colors on a box, change the text color and that sort of stuff, and change the lines. Such things are a whole lot easier in Visio, but once you get a theme organized in erwin, you can apply that theme to all of the objects. So, it becomes easier, but you do have to set up that theme."

"erwin generally fails to successfully reverse engineer our Oracle Databases into erwin data models. The way that they are engineered on our side, the syntax is correct from an Oracle perspective, but it seems to be very difficult for erwin to interpret. What I end up doing is using Oracle Data Modeler to reverse engineer into the Oracle data model, then forward engineer the DDL into an Oracle syntax, and importing that DDL into erwin in order to successfully bring in most of the information from our physical data models. That is a bit of a challenge."

"The Bulk Editor needs improvement. If you had something that was a local model to your local machine, you could connect to the API, then it would write directly into the repository. However, when you have something that is on the centralized server, that functionality did not work. Then, you had to export out to a CSV and upload up to the repository. It would have been nice to be able to do the direct API without having that whole download and upload thing. Maybe I didn't figure it out, but I'm pretty sure that didn't work when it was a model that sat on a centralized repository."

"The reverse engineering in Oracle Databases needs improvement, as there are issues."

"In terms of new features, it would be great to have a cloud base. We should be able to put it on the cloud for better collaboration and data models sharing."

"The erwin Data Modeler is quite complex to use."

"The only real complaint I have is the time it takes to do a database comparison on a large model. If they could speed that up, that would be the only thing I can think of that needs improvement."

"The solution's model mark could be better because it crashes sometimes."

More erwin Data Modeler by Quest cons

"I noticed that it lacks the ability to automatically record the process steps like some of its competitors."

"There is a need for improved integration with external systems in SS&C."

"Blue Prism is more costly than UiPath in terms of robotic licenses and orchestrators."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing of the solution is cheap. I rate the pricing a five out of ten."

"erwin is expensive compared to other solutions. We are paying almost $6,000 per seat a month."

"The price should be lower in order to be on the same level as its competitors."

"We've continued to use the product for many years and compared it with others on the market. The pricing is reasonable considering what the solution offers and what we pay. There are cheaper tools, but they may not be as robust and easy to use, so it's worth the money."

"It is not a very expensive solution. Only the licensing and maintenance fee needs to be paid."

"There is either a one-year or three-year license. It is not a pay-as-you-go license like a SaaS solution. It’s more of a traditional licensing. They are a little bit on the pricier side."

"The primary reasons that erwin was selected were that it was much more affordable for us [than Embarcadero] and it was easily maintainable."

"erwin has this option where you pay a one-time fee and you have the license for six years, which makes sense because I don't upgrade my database engine every other year. I have an application that depends on it. This is something weird about PowerDesigner. There are no additional costs beyond the standard licensing fee."

More erwin Data Modeler by Quest pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Design solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

19%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

24%

Computer Software Company

16%

Insurance Company

13%

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about erwin Data Modeler by Quest?

Forward engineering, DDL generation, reverse engineering, and reporting are the most valuable features of the solution.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for erwin Data Modeler by Quest?

The product is expensive. I rate the product’s pricing a nine out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with erwin Data Modeler by Quest?

As a documenting tool, it's solid, though its reporting could be more robust. The reporting mechanisms could be more intuitive regarding report creation. It can generate reports in CSV files, displ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SS&C Blue Prism?

The pricing was not particularly competitive. It wasn't flexible for different geographies. For instance, in Africa, they didn't have a different pricing model to account for affordability. The pri...

See all answers

What needs improvement with SS&C Blue Prism?

There is a need for improved integration with external systems in SS&C. Currently, integration is limited to web services and K scripts for connecting to third-party systems, which I believe ca...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SS&C Blue Prism?

My primary use case for SS&C is managing migration projects. We are currently working on migrating from ViewStation's 3.5 version using K scripts to the new version in SS&C and rebuilding t...

See all answers

Comparisons

SAP PowerDesigner vs erwin Data Modeler by Quest

Compared 31% of the time

IDERA ER/Studio vs erwin Data Modeler by Quest

Compared 18% of the time

Lucidchart vs erwin Data Modeler by Quest

Compared 15% of the time

Visio vs erwin Data Modeler by Quest

Compared 8% of the time

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs erwin Data Modeler by Quest

Compared 7% of the time

More erwin Data Modeler by Quest Competitors

Camunda vs SS&C Blue Prism

Compared 37% of the time

Appian vs SS&C Blue Prism

Compared 22% of the time

IBM BPM vs SS&C Blue Prism

Compared 21% of the time

FIS Commercial Lending Suite vs SS&C Blue Prism

Compared 19% of the time

More SS&C Blue Prism Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

erwin Data Modeler by Quest

April 2025

Download erwin Data Modeler by Quest product report

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Design

April 2025

Download SS&C Blue Prism product report

Also Known As

erwin DM

SS&C AWD

Overview

erwin pioneered data modeling, and erwin Data Modeler (erwin DM) remains trusted, award-winning software for data modeling and database design, automating complex and time-consuming tasks. Use it to discover and document any data from anywhere for consistency, clarity and artifact reuse across large-scale data integration, master data management, metadata management, Big Data, business intelligence and analytics initiatives – all while supporting data governance and intelligence efforts.

erwin by Quest

SS&C Blue Prism provides scalable, intelligent automation for dynamic business environments. Its technology enhances process efficiency and delivers significant operational benefits. Users leverage its capabilities in task automation and broader digital transformation strategies.

SS&C Blue Prism incorporates advanced robotic process automation aimed at optimizing workflows and enabling end-to-end automation. It allows businesses to automate repetitive tasks, integrate systems, and improve process accuracy. With a focus on enterprise-grade security and compliance, it helps organizations achieve digital transformation milestones while maintaining robust control frameworks.

What are the critical features of SS&C Blue Prism?

Robust Automation: Enables complex process automation with scalability.
Integration Capabilities: Easily connects with many systems and applications.
Security and Compliance: Ensures data protection and regulatory adherence.

What benefits or ROI should users seek in reviews?

Operational Efficiency: Significant time savings and resource optimization.
Cost Reduction: Decreased operational costs through task automation.
Accuracy: Enhanced precision in process execution and data handling.

SS&C Blue Prism finds implementation across industries like finance, healthcare, and retail, where automation is harnessed to optimize high-volume transactional tasks. In finance, it automates reconciliation processes, while in healthcare, it aids in patient data management, showcasing its versatility.

SS&C Technologies

Sample Customers

Premera, America Honda Motors, Aetna, Kaiser Permanente, Dental Dental Cali, Cigna, Staples

AWS, EY, Deloitte, ABBYY, Microsoft, GLYNT.AI, Pfizer, Invesco, Western Union

Buyer's Guide

SS&C Blue Prism vs. erwin Data Modeler by Quest

April 2025

Free Report: SS&C Blue Prism vs. erwin Data Modeler by Quest

Find out what your peers are saying about SS&C Blue Prism vs. erwin Data Modeler by Quest and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our SS&C Blue Prism vs. erwin Data Modeler by Quest report.

See our list of best Business Process Design vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.