Exabeam vs Securonix SOAR comparison

Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Sentinel
Sponsored
Ranking in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
87
Ranking in other categories
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (2nd), Microsoft Security Suite (5th)
Exabeam
Ranking in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)
13th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (28th), User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (5th), Security Incident Response (7th), Threat Intelligence Platforms (21st), AI-Powered Cybersecurity Platforms (4th)
Securonix SOAR
Ranking in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)
26th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2024, in the Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) category, the mindshare of Microsoft Sentinel is 22.4%, up from 20.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Exabeam is 1.6%, down from 2.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Securonix SOAR is 0.2%, down from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)
Unique Categories:
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
11.8%
Microsoft Security Suite
5.5%
User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)
5.0%
No other categories found
 

Featured Reviews

TC
Jun 18, 2024
Improves our visibility, centralizes out-of-the-box content, and is user-friendly
Microsoft Sentinel helps us identify security threats through built-in machine learning. It analyzes network traffic patterns and can detect anomalies, like unusually high data transfers outside typical hours. These anomalies trigger alerts, allowing for early intervention. Microsoft Sentinel shines in its ability to bridge hybrid and multi-cloud environments. It seamlessly integrates with on-premises infrastructure through Azure Arc, and even private clouds can be connected via Azure Gateway and a VPN to the Azure Log Analytics workspace. This unified approach ensures all our security data, regardless of origin, is ingested and analyzed for potential threats. Microsoft recently launched Content Hub, a marketplace for pre-configured security solutions within Azure Sentinel. Unlike our previous experience setting up data connectors a few years ago, Content Hub offers a one-stop shop for integrating security tools. When we choose a data connector, we also get pre-built correlation rules, playbooks, and workbooks – all packaged together for faster and more effective security monitoring. The content hub streamlines onboarding pre-built SIEM content, especially during the initial SOC setup. When starting fresh with a new environment and unsure of specific use cases, we can search for relevant data sources in the hub. Once integrated, the content hub provides pre-configured rules alongside those connectors. Simply enabling these rules offers substantial coverage for our MITRE ATT&CK mapping, a framework that assesses our ability to detect various attack techniques. By leveraging these out-of-the-box tools, we gain significant initial security coverage with minimal effort. The content hub helps us centralize all of the out-of-the-box content available from Sentinel. Sentinel acts as a central hub, bringing together information from various sources both internal, first-party, and external, third-party into a single, unified view. This allows us to analyze logs stored in different tables, regardless of their naming conventions. By defining correlation routes, Sentinel can examine specific activities across these disparate sources. For example, we could create a route that checks firewall logs for suspicious activity and then correlates it with specific user actions in Windows device logs, providing a more comprehensive picture of potential security incidents. Sentinel improves our visibility into user and network behavior through a feature called User Entity Behavior Analytics. This leverages Microsoft's machine learning to analyze user and device activity. If we're investigating multiple security incidents involving a user or device, UEBA provides a broader view. We can directly access the user's history of incidents and visualize their connections to other alerts and impacted devices in a graph format. This allows for efficient investigation of complex incidents impacting multiple users and devices. Microsoft Sentinel streamlines security incident investigation. The incident page clearly displays involved entities and details of triggered alerts, including logs. This allows SOC analysts to quickly assess the situation and potentially predict the nature of the activity, even before diving into event logs. Sentinel's powerful query language further simplifies investigation by enabling easy data visualization, formatting, and custom functions, all within various timeframes. This significantly accelerates the overall investigation process. Sentinel has streamlined our event investigation process. By allowing us to predefine keyword queries for specific alerts, it eliminates the need to manually craft queries each time. Similar to how SOCs use pre-defined playbooks for various incidents, Sentinel lets us define queries that return relevant data quickly. This cuts down on investigation time by allowing us to focus on the specific alert and the data it generates.
SD
Nov 24, 2020
Easy to use, good integration with AWS, and the incident response functionality works well
We are a solution provider that does a lot of work in the cybersecurity space. Exabeam is one of the SIEM products that we implement for our clients The solution is easy to use and on a whole, it is pretty valuable. The way it can connect with AWS is very useful, and the integrations are pretty…
Use Securonix SOAR?
Share your opinion

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I am not involved on the financial side, but from an enterprise-wide use perspective, I think the price is good enough."
"The price is reasonable because Sentinel includes features like user behavior analytics and SOAR that are typically sold separately. Overall, a standalone on-prem solution would require some high-end servers, and there's a different cost. It is a cloud-based solution, so there are backend cloud computing costs, but they are negligible."
"It is consumption-based pricing. It is an affordable solution."
"It is certainly the most expensive solution. The cost is very high. We need to do an assessment using the one-month trial so that we can study the cost side. Before implementing it, we must do a careful calculation."
"Microsoft can enhance the licensing side. I feel there is confusion sometimes... They should have a single license in which we have the opportunity to use the EDR or CASB solution."
"Some of the licensing models can be a little bit difficult to understand and confusing at times, but overall it's a reasonable licensing model compared to some other SIEMs that charge you a lot per data."
"Azure Sentinel is very costly, or at least it appears to be very costly. The costs vary based on your ingestion and your retention charges."
"From a cost point of view, it is not a cheap product. It's, like, an enterprise-level application. So if you compare it with a low-level application, it's expensive, but if you compare it with the same-level application, it's pretty much cost-effective, I think."
"Exabeam Fusion SIEM's pricing is reasonable."
"They have a great model for pricing that can be based either on user count or gigabits per day."
"There is an annual license required to use Exabeam Fusion SIEM. The price of the solution should be reduced."
"The solution is expensive."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) solutions are best for your needs.
790,637 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
8%
Financial Services Firm
17%
Computer Software Company
12%
Energy/Utilities Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Is there a common threat intelligence tool that aggregates multiple threat intelligence sources?
Yes, Azure Sentinel is a SIEM on the Cloud. Multiple data sources can be uploaded and analyzed with Azure Sentinel an...
What is a better choice, Splunk or Azure Sentinel?
It would really depend on (1) which logs you need to ingest and (2) what are your use cases Splunk is easy for ingest...
Which is better - Azure Sentinel or AWS Security Hub?
We like that Azure Sentinel does not require as much maintenance as legacy SIEMs that are on-premises. Azure Sentinel...
What are the biggest differences between Securonix UEBA, Exabeam, and IBM QRadar?
It mostly depends on your use-cases and environment. Exabeam and Securonix have a stronger UEBA feature set, friendli...
What do you like most about Exabeam Fusion SIEM?
The solution's initial setup process is easy.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

Azure Sentinel
No data available
Securonix Security Orchestration Automation and Response
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Microsoft Sentinel is trusted by companies of all sizes including ABM, ASOS, Uniper, First West Credit Union, Avanade, and more.
Hulu, ADP, Safeway, BBCN Bank
Intermountain Healthcare, Pfizer
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Palo Alto Networks, Splunk and others in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR). Updated: June 2024.
790,637 professionals have used our research since 2012.