ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 vs Fidelis Elevate comparison

ExtraHop Networks and Fidelis Security are both solutions in the Extended Detection and Response (XDR) category. ExtraHop Networks is ranked #24 with an average rating of 9.0, while Fidelis Security is ranked #23 with an average rating of 9.0. ExtraHop Networks holds a 0.3% mindshare in XDR, compared to Fidelis Security’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of ExtraHop Networks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Fidelis Security users who would recommend it.

ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Read 3 ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 reviews

252 Views
182 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Fidelis Elevate

Read 7 Fidelis Elevate reviews

612 Views
367 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Fidelis Elevate

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Fidelis Elevate and ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 are network security platforms. Based on user reviews, ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 appears to have the upper hand due to its superior features and higher return on investment.

Features: Fidelis Elevate offers robust threat detection, automated response capabilities, and is valued for its customer-friendly deployment. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 excels with comprehensive traffic visibility, real-time analytics, and delivers in-depth network insights for complex environments.

Room for Improvement: Fidelis Elevate needs better scalability, more integration with third-party tools, and enhanced reporting functions. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 could improve by reducing complexity, easing the learning curve, and streamlining the implementation process.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Fidelis Elevate offers straightforward deployment and highly responsive customer service, useful for both setup and troubleshooting. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360, while initially more complex, includes extensive documentation and training resources, complemented by solid customer support.

Pricing and ROI: Fidelis Elevate presents competitive setup costs with satisfactory ROI, appealing to budget-conscious users. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 requires a higher initial investment yet provides significant ROI through a rich feature set and improved network performance, making it a strong choice for enterprises seeking comprehensive security.

To learn more, read our detailed ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 vs. Fidelis Elevate Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 vs. Fidelis Elevate

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 846,617 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Ranking in Extended Detection and Response (XDR)

24th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) (19th), Container Security (25th), Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) (9th)

Fidelis Elevate

Ranking in Extended Detection and Response (XDR)

23rd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (35th), Threat Deception Platforms (6th), SSL/TLS Decryption (2nd), Network Detection and Response (NDR) (14th), Managed Detection and Response (MDR) (25th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Extended Detection and Response (XDR) category, the mindshare of ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Fidelis Elevate is 0.6%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Extended Detection and Response (XDR)

Featured Reviews

Maksym Toporkov

Head of Research And Development at Quipu GmbH

A competitive choice for network detection and response with exceptional user interface, ease of implementation and minimal false positives

The NDR feature analyzes network traffic, creating records with connection details. While these records offer insights, there's a limitation in investigating payloads directly. ExtraHop provides an option for an additional server to save payloads, but its temporary storage has constraints. Unlike some competitors, it lacks an automatic payload-saving feature for each detection, presenting an improvement opportunity. Suggested enhancement involves the main sensor prompting payload storage for specific detections, streamlining the investigation process, and contributing to a more efficient workflow. A drawback includes packet storage limitations for payload data, necessitating timely extraction for thorough investigations.

Read full review

Mostafa Ameen

Information Security Engineer at ICT Misr

Advanced threat detection capabilities with comprehensive incident response features providing robust cybersecurity for organizations

The initial aspect concerns two engines. The first one mentioned is available for searching behaviors directly. The second engine involves the Google Ade tool, which operates on the machine. The challenge arises when attempting to rectify protection rules, causing confusion. It would be beneficial to enhance Rigixs Query. I encounter difficulty removing certain entries in behavior or alerts; likewise, I am unable to add specific calls.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is very easy to collect and handle data in ExtraHop Reveal(X) Cloud. Integration with Big Data is also easy. Many of our customers integrate it with Big Data platforms like Splunk or Elastic. It is also easy to handle and easy to understand."

"It stands out for its intuitive and efficient user interface, robust detection capabilities with minimal false positives, and the ability to handle encrypted traffic, making it a valuable asset for network security and management."

"It is scalable."

"The solution's technical support is perfect, so I rate the technical support a ten out of ten"

"Compared to similar solutions, it's quite scalable. You just need to add more storage to scale-up."

"It has also improved our hunt ability with quick search tools, to zone in on malware or other anomalies. It is able to link items to incidents from other consoles, and works natively with the SIEM."

"After rack and stack, devices were up and running base configurations within two hours. As with any IPS, tuning is required to stop false positives. This is no different, but the ease of use of the interface allowed my team to start making adjustments within a few hours."

"The initial setup is very straightforward. The deployment of the server doesn't take so long; about a day or two max."

"What I like the most about this solution is the complexity. It covers a lot of areas, unlike other solutions."

"It has a rating system now so you can rate things up or down, depending on your environment. This means alerting can be customized, yet still pick up anomalies."

"Reporting is great, it is easy to do a quick search through 45 days of data for something of interest."

More Fidelis Elevate pros

Cons

"They can include integration with SAP. Currently, no vendor provides network performance monitoring in the SAP market. It is a very big market. We have around 400 customers for SAP in Korea. In the USA, there are more than 10,000 customers."

"A drawback includes bucket storage limitations for payload data, necessitating timely extraction for thorough investigations."

"There needs to be more support."

"I encounter difficulty removing certain entries in behavior or alerts; likewise, I am unable to add specific calls."

"We position the solution as an antivirus, but this part of the solution needs improvement. They need to generally enhance the features that they have, rather than adding anything new."

"The interface bug needs to be squashed once and for all. This has been the predominant issue with an otherwise stellar product. It reboots itself unscheduled, about once a month, due to a memory buffer flaw in the interface."

"The reports in the endpoint area of Elevate can be improved."

"There is room for improvement in email security. It's a security issue. If you're aiming for XDR, covering the entire threat landscape is crucial."

"Fidelis Endpoint is an expensive product making it one of its shortcomings that needs improvement."

"Configuration, in terms of building the collector and communicating with endpoints, is complex."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"When compared to other solutions, it aligns with the market average, indicating a competitive pricing level."

"Fidelis Endpoint is an expensive product. My company makes yearly payments toward the licensing cost of the solution."

"You license by the number of days of logs you need to maintain visibility for. Forty-five days is a good solid number for a company with around a 10k user base."

"It's somehow expensive. From one to ten, I would rate it a five. They need to improve the prices. It's very high."

"It's quite expensive but we can customize it to reduce the price."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Extended Detection and Response (XDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

10%

Insurance Company

University

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

23%

Computer Software Company

12%

Energy/Utilities Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360?

It stands out for its intuitive and efficient user interface, robust detection capabilities with minimal false positives, and the ability to handle encrypted traffic, making it a valuable asset for...

See all answers

What needs improvement with ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360?

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360?

I recommend prioritizing demos over POCs when engaging with vendors. Organizing POCs involves significant time and resource investments for both parties. Instead, invest time in multiple demo sessi...

See all answers

What do you like most about Fidelis Elevate?

It ensures the stability of network behavior across various aspects of our network and offers responsive capabilities to address incidents promptly

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fidelis Elevate?

It's somehow expensive. From one to ten, I would rate it a five. They need to improve the prices. It's very high. We lose customers for price. It's not always worth it for them. Even for enterprise...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Fidelis Elevate?

See all answers

Comparisons

ExtraHop Reveal(x) vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Compared 36% of the time

Wiz vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Compared 16% of the time

Corelight vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Compared 15% of the time

Stellar Cyber Open XDR vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Compared 14% of the time

Forescout Platform vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Compared 11% of the time

More ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 Competitors

NetWitness NDR vs Fidelis Elevate

Compared 15% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Fidelis Elevate

Compared 11% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs Fidelis Elevate

Compared 10% of the time

Cynet vs Fidelis Elevate

Compared 8% of the time

Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs Fidelis Elevate

Compared 7% of the time

More Fidelis Elevate Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)

April 2025

Download ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 product report

Buyer's Guide

Fidelis Elevate

January 2025

Download Fidelis Elevate product report

Also Known As

ExtraHop Reveal(X) Cloud, Reveal(X) Cloud

Fidelis Elevate Platform, Fidelis Enterprise, Fidelis Cloud, Fidelis Managed Detection and Response, Fidelis Deception, Fidelis Decryption, Fidelis Endpoint, Fidelis Network

Overview

Cloud is where your business operates, where it innovates, how it enables employees, and how it connects with customers. Adversaries know this, and that's why attacks against cloud assets in IaaS, PaaS, and SaaS environments are increasing. With Reveal(x) 360, you can mitigate the blast radius of advanced threats like ransomware and supply chain attacks with unified security across multicloud and hybrid environments in a single management pane.

ExtraHop Networks

Fidelis Elevate integrates network visibility, data loss prevention, deception, and endpoint detection and response into one unified solution. Now your security team can focus on the most urgent threats and protect sensitive data rather than spending time validating and triaging thousands of alerts.

Fidelis Security

Sample Customers

Wizards of the Coast

First Midwest Bank

Buyer's Guide

ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 vs. Fidelis Elevate

March 2025

Free Report: ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 vs. Fidelis Elevate

Find out what your peers are saying about ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 vs. Fidelis Elevate and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 vs. Fidelis Elevate report.

See our list of best Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vendors and best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Extended Detection and Response (XDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.