ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 vs Lumu comparison

ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 and Lumu compete in the network security category. Lumu appears to have the upper hand in features due to its comprehensive threat intelligence, whereas ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 holds pricing and support advantages.

Features: ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 is known for advanced analytics, real-time network traffic visibility, and thorough threat detection. Lumu offers proactive threat analysis, effective threat intelligence, and is user-friendly in its operation. ExtraHop also extends its focus to performance monitoring, distinguishing it from Lumu's emphasis on threat intelligence.

Room for Improvement: ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 needs enhanced integration capabilities, better customization, and greater adaptability to different networks. Lumu users desire better scalability, additional detailed threat context, and enhanced adaptability to varying environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 is straightforward to deploy but has mixed reviews on customer service responsiveness. Lumu's deployment is fast and intuitive, with high marks in customer support, showing a considerable advantage in user satisfaction.

Pricing and ROI: ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 is cost-effective with a solid ROI. Lumu, despite higher initial setup costs, is seen as providing greater long-term value due to its advanced threat detection, justifying the expense for many users.