ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 vs Lumu comparison

ExtraHop Networks and Lumu Technologies are both solutions in the Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) category. ExtraHop Networks is ranked #19 with an average rating of 8.5, while Lumu Technologies is ranked #11 with an average rating of 9.2. ExtraHop Networks holds a 0.7% mindshare in ID, compared to Lumu Technologies’s 2.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of ExtraHop Networks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Lumu Technologies users who would recommend it.

ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Read 3 ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 reviews

263 Views
201 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Lumu

Read 7 Lumu reviews

728 Views
409 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Lumu

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 and Lumu compete in the network security category. Lumu appears to have the upper hand in features due to its comprehensive threat intelligence, whereas ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 holds pricing and support advantages.

Features: ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 is known for advanced analytics, real-time network traffic visibility, and thorough threat detection. Lumu offers proactive threat analysis, effective threat intelligence, and is user-friendly in its operation. ExtraHop also extends its focus to performance monitoring, distinguishing it from Lumu's emphasis on threat intelligence.

Room for Improvement: ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 needs enhanced integration capabilities, better customization, and greater adaptability to different networks. Lumu users desire better scalability, additional detailed threat context, and enhanced adaptability to varying environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 is straightforward to deploy but has mixed reviews on customer service responsiveness. Lumu's deployment is fast and intuitive, with high marks in customer support, showing a considerable advantage in user satisfaction.

Pricing and ROI: ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 is cost-effective with a solid ROI. Lumu, despite higher initial setup costs, is seen as providing greater long-term value due to its advanced threat detection, justifying the expense for many users.

To learn more, read our detailed ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 vs. Lumu Report (Updated: November 2024).

Buyer's Guide

ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 vs. Lumu

November 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,067 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Ranking in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)

19th

Ranking in Extended Detection and Response (XDR)

26th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Container Security (26th), Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) (10th)

Lumu

Ranking in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)

11th

Ranking in Extended Detection and Response (XDR)

17th

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Detection and Response (NDR) (9th)

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) category, the mindshare of ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 is 0.7%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Lumu is 2.6%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)

Featured Reviews

Maksym Toporkov

Head of Research And Development at Quipu GmbH

A competitive choice for network detection and response with exceptional user interface, ease of implementation and minimal false positives

The NDR feature analyzes network traffic, creating records with connection details. While these records offer insights, there's a limitation in investigating payloads directly. ExtraHop provides an option for an additional server to save payloads, but its temporary storage has constraints. Unlike some competitors, it lacks an automatic payload-saving feature for each detection, presenting an improvement opportunity. Suggested enhancement involves the main sensor prompting payload storage for specific detections, streamlining the investigation process, and contributing to a more efficient workflow. A drawback includes packet storage limitations for payload data, necessitating timely extraction for thorough investigations.

Read full review

Juan Solano

IT Director at Atlantic Quantum Innovations

Protects against threats and handles it in time with moderate pricing

Mostly, Lumu is an automatic tool. We'll deploy on firewalls and DNS servers. Lumu detects every attack on our network. The other day, we had CLC, the command controller, and the tool reacted automatically. It detected the attack and immediately blocked it without intervention from my team. The improvement is in the security process, as it's now entirely automated. We no longer require a technician or engineer to monitor our network 24/7. Lumu updates with AI and global threat intelligence, which greatly assists us. Since our workload is lighter, Lumu handles all of our tasks. We're using FortiGate for the firewall and Kaspersky for endpoints. If you are going to Lumu, you need another solution for the endpoint. You need to integrate with other tools like firewalls or another antivirus. I recommend the solution based on the price, usability, and service offered by the solution. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is scalable."

"It is very easy to collect and handle data in ExtraHop Reveal(X) Cloud. Integration with Big Data is also easy. Many of our customers integrate it with Big Data platforms like Splunk or Elastic. It is also easy to handle and easy to understand."

"It stands out for its intuitive and efficient user interface, robust detection capabilities with minimal false positives, and the ability to handle encrypted traffic, making it a valuable asset for network security and management."

"I like Lumu's simple user interface. When we deployed it, we got full access, allowing us to identify IP addresses on the network and connect machine names to users. It helped us identify and block threats via the firewall. I also appreciate the chat support and ticket closure process. We're currently reviewing network detection solutions, and my recommendations include Lumu, Sentinel, and a few others. Regarding functionality and user-friendliness, I would recommend Lumu over the others."

"Lumu protects against threats immediately and handles them in time."

"It's been helpful for overall extended network visibility."

"Most of it is automated, so I do not have to watch it to get alerts."

"You can access external links, playbooks, MITRE Matrix, and a lot of information."

"The tool's support team helps partners resolve any problems with the product."

"The context provided by the tool is very complete, it includes the miter matrix, playbooks, links, hashes, and much more."

Cons

"A drawback includes bucket storage limitations for payload data, necessitating timely extraction for thorough investigations."

"There needs to be more support."

"They can include integration with SAP. Currently, no vendor provides network performance monitoring in the SAP market. It is a very big market. We have around 400 customers for SAP in Korea. In the USA, there are more than 10,000 customers."

"Nothing so far needs to be improved."

"I am happy with the current features. However, one important one is to improve the reports."

"It would be good if we could access the physical logs."

"The free version is minimal compared to the full version."

"Lumu's ability to discover threats is an area of concern where improvements are needed."

"The integration with different vendors and endpoints could be improved."

"The reports need improvement."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"When compared to other solutions, it aligns with the market average, indicating a competitive pricing level."

"Compared to Lumu, other solutions are more expensive. SentinelOne was a bit cheaper, and another provider's price structure is unclear, but Lumu fit our budget nicely. SentinelOne's cost depends on the number of devices, and it might be similar to Lumu's, depending on deployment."

"The tool is available at a good price. The tool offers a good and competitive price for customers."

"It is the cheapest solution we found."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

University

Insurance Company

Educational Organization

13%

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

10%

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360?

It stands out for its intuitive and efficient user interface, robust detection capabilities with minimal false positives, and the ability to handle encrypted traffic, making it a valuable asset for...

See all answers

What needs improvement with ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360?

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360?

I recommend prioritizing demos over POCs when engaging with vendors. Organizing POCs involves significant time and resource investments for both parties. Instead, invest time in multiple demo sessi...

See all answers

What do you like most about Lumu?

Lumu protects against threats immediately and handles them in time.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Lumu?

Lumu's ability to discover threats is an area of concern where improvements are needed.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Lumu?

My company is currently dealing with Lumu's onboarding process. Lumu is used to monitor the environment permanently and validate if there is ransomware that can exploit our infrastructure.

See all answers

Comparisons

ExtraHop Reveal(x) vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Compared 47% of the time

Corelight vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Compared 16% of the time

Wiz vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Compared 13% of the time

Forescout Platform vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Compared 13% of the time

Stellar Cyber Open XDR vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Compared 11% of the time

More ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 Competitors

Darktrace vs Lumu

Compared 54% of the time

Stellar Cyber Open XDR vs Lumu

Compared 11% of the time

ExtraHop Reveal(x) vs Lumu

Compared 8% of the time

Fortinet FortiGate IPS vs Lumu

Compared 6% of the time

Vectra AI vs Lumu

Compared 5% of the time

More Lumu Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)

November 2024

Download ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Detection and Response (NDR)

December 2024

Download Lumu product report

Also Known As

ExtraHop Reveal(X) Cloud, Reveal(X) Cloud

No data available

Learn More

Video not available

ExtraHop Networks

Lumu Technologies

Overview

Cloud is where your business operates, where it innovates, how it enables employees, and how it connects with customers. Adversaries know this, and that's why attacks against cloud assets in IaaS, PaaS, and SaaS environments are increasing. With Reveal(x) 360, you can mitigate the blast radius of advanced threats like ransomware and supply chain attacks with unified security across multicloud and hybrid environments in a single management pane.

Lumu Technologies is a cyber-security company that illuminates threats, attacks, and adversaries affecting enterprises worldwide. Using actionable intelligence, Lumu provides a radical way to secure networks by enhancing and augmenting existing defense capabilities established over the past 25 years.

Sample Customers

Wizards of the Coast

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 vs. Lumu

November 2024

Free Report: ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 vs. Lumu

Find out what your peers are saying about ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 vs. Lumu and other solutions. Updated: November 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 vs. Lumu report.

See our list of best Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) vendors and best Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vendors.

We monitor all Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.