Fivetran vs SnapLogic comparison

Fivetran and SnapLogic are both solutions in the Data Integration category. Fivetran is ranked #12 with an average rating of 7.9, while SnapLogic is ranked #21 with an average rating of 7.3. Fivetran holds a 2.1% mindshare in DI, compared to SnapLogic’s 1.6% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Fivetran users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of SnapLogic users who would recommend it.

Fivetran

Read 25 Fivetran reviews

3,430 Views
2,417 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

SnapLogic

Read 24 SnapLogic reviews

2,670 Views
1,806 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Fivetran

SnapLogic

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 3, 2024

SnapLogic and Fivetran are competing products in the data integration space. SnapLogic seems to have the upper hand in flexibility and support, while Fivetran's feature set provides significant ROI.

Features: SnapLogic provides a user-friendly drag-and-drop interface with extensive connectors for complex data workflows. Its low-code environment makes it easy for non-developers to build integrations using snaps. The platform also offers robust customization capabilities, allowing users to write their own scripts if needed. Fivetran excels in automated pipeline management, ensuring minimal manual intervention. It offers reliable data synchronization, only syncing necessary changes, which makes it efficient. The integration with transformation tools such as dbt enhances its utility for end-to-end data management.

Room for Improvement: SnapLogic could improve by enhancing its speed for large-scale operations and providing more granular control over execution environments. Simplifying the initial learning curve and offering more pre-built connectors could further strengthen its position. Fivetran could focus on expanding its customization options, allowing users to tweak configurations more freely. Greater control over scheduling and data extraction processes is necessary, as well as reducing reliance on external transformation tools to provide more built-in options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SnapLogic supports flexible deployments across cloud, on-premise, and hybrid environments, with responsive customer service. It is easy to implement, with straightforward initial setup and configuration. Fivetran simplifies deployment with automated setups optimized for cloud environments, offering intuitive interfaces. However, it might lack the customization flexibility available in SnapLogic due to its highly automated nature.

Pricing and ROI: SnapLogic offers adaptable pricing, appealing to enterprises seeking flexibility. Its pricing structure promises a good ROI owing to its comprehensive feature suite. In contrast, Fivetran's cost reflects its robust feature set, providing significant ROI through dependable data management and minimal maintenance. Fivetran's scalability is advantageous, allowing cost-effectiveness as data volume increases, justifying its pricing tier.

To learn more, read our detailed Fivetran vs. SnapLogic Report (Updated: February 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Fivetran vs. SnapLogic

February 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 842,388 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fivetran

Ranking in Data Integration

12th

Ranking in Cloud Data Integration

8th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Replication (3rd)

SnapLogic

Ranking in Data Integration

21st

Ranking in Cloud Data Integration

12th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Process Automation (15th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (9th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of Fivetran is 2.1%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SnapLogic is 1.6%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Erik Jones

Head of BI and Analytics at HyperScience

Solution reduces time-to-value; high ROI

Fivetran has room for improvement in data pipeline observability. The Fivetran logs are fairly basic, compared to, for example, the insight Fivetran gives into helping users understanding the performance of data pipelines. So I think their observability into the pipeline itself could be improved. In addition, Fivetran is in the very early stages of allowing other companies to access its metadata API, but that's something that could use improvement, and I know that they're working on right now. We use a separate tool for "reverse ETL", which is the opposite of what Fivetran does; it pushes data from your data warehouse back out to business applications. If Fivetran pulls data from those same applications, they should also enable users to push it back. I would love to do both ETL and reverse ETL in the same tool. It would be nice if Fivetran offered both their regular offering plus the reverse ETL option as well.

Read full review

VinethSuresh

Senior Data Analyst at a pharma/biotech company with 10,001+ employees

Achieves rapid results in data migration and has an intuitive user interface

I find SnapLogic to be user-friendly, especially for beginners with limited experience in data engineering or ETL. The interface is interactive, allowing me to quickly learn how to run pipelines and achieve production-ready results swiftly. This agility translates to cost savings, especially for smaller projects and proofs of concept, as less time and effort are needed to deliver results.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"You can manage all of your connectors individually, which gives you a very good ability to trace which one of your ETL processes is running and when."

"The simplicity and scalability are the strongest features of Fivetran."

"The compare feature is the most valuable piece of it."

"The most valuable feature of Fivetran is that it only synchronizes what needs to be synchronized."

"The product has some seamless connectors, which are readily available."

"The most important feature of the solution is its ability to build data pipelines in less time."

"It is not like a traditional ETL, but it gives quite a lot of flexibility."

"The product is very easy to use and very easy to configure."

More Fivetran pros

"Overall product rating is nine out of ten."

"By using snaps instead of functions in code, you can see the building blocks of the integration visually. This helps a lot."

"The technical support from SnapLogic is excellent, and I would give it a complete ten."

"I find SnapLogic to be user-friendly, especially for beginners with limited experience in data engineering or ETL."

"The product is easy to use and has many connectivity options."

"It's more developer-friendly, and development can be done at a faster phase."

"I found SnapLogic valuable and what I found most valuable about it was its ETL feature. I also found its automation feature valuable. It can be used for automating manual activities. It can be used as a middleware for certain transactional data processing and minimal datasets and ETL activities."

"The feature I found most valuable in SnapLogic is low-code development. Low-code development has been very useful for simple processes, which is required for business users such as extracting details from a file or getting things reported by calling your web service. Calling your web service also becomes easier with SnapLogic because of the snaps available, so if you have the documentation, you can call an API. You don't have to write all those clients to call an API, so that is another feature I found very easy in SnapLogic. Configuring and managing all the file systems also become very handy with the solution."

More SnapLogic pros

Cons

"It should have a few more monitoring functionalities."

"Fivetran could improve in the area of customization, especially in how they socialize their tools."

"I would like to see an improvement in the support offered by Fivetran."

"The documentation can be laid out better to make it easier to find things, and I really wish there was built-in support for changing passwords. Some features don't work as advertised for the platform/repository database, and HVR is not always the fastest at getting results."

"Some of the pain points we're looking at are trying to integrate some of the items in the Microsoft stack, so SharePoint and Excel, and then some of the newer Azure services."

"There is not a lot of options to customize the pipeline, and the cost is high."

"The environment must be more development-friendly."

"More connectors are needed for exotic, popular, and rising star portals."

More Fivetran cons

"If the AI capabilities and integrations were more intuitive and easy for new users to learn, it would be greatly beneficial."

"The solution isn't ideal for complex processing or logic. We use another solution for that."

"I don't think the support has better knowledge about technologies and tool support. There were lots of times when we had an issue, and it took me quite a long time to explain the problem. I feel like some of the support staff don't know their product well."

"SnapLogic should have some inbuilt protocol mechanism in order to speed up."

"The problem is that SnapLogic doesn't offer a wide variety of connectors. For example, integrating with Salesforce is not that easy."

"What could be improved in SnapLogic is that it was not capable in terms of processing a large number of datasets, but at that point, SnapLogic was evolving. It didn't give a lot of Snaps. I heard recently there are a lot of Snaps getting added and the solution was being enhanced, particularly to connect different data sources. When I was working with SnapLogic six months to one year back, I faced the issue of it not being capable of handling a huge volume of datasets or didn't have much of Snaps, and that was the drawback. If there is any large number of data sets, that's based on or depends on your configuration. If it is a huge volume of data, other traditional ETL tools such as Informatica and Talend can process millions and billions of records, while in SnapLogic, the Snaplex fails or it returns an error in terms of processing that huge volume of data. Informatica, Talend, or any other ETL tool can run for hours in terms of jobs, while SnapLogic jobs fail when the threshold is reached. SnapLogic isn't able to withstand processing, but I don't know if that's still an issue at present, because the solution is getting enhanced and it's been more than six months to one year since I last worked with SnapLogic. There are now a lot of Snaps getting added to the solution, and if it can overcome the limitations I mentioned, SnapLogic could be the go-to tool because currently, it's not being used as much in organizations. It's being used comparatively less compared to other retail tools."

"While it performs well, there is some room for improvement in this area."

"One area for improvement in SnapLogic is the transparency in the flow of data. It needs to have more transparency. Right now, users only have a preview option at the end of any job flow, so at the end of any Snap Pack, there is a data preview option that lets you review the data and see how it's moving. What would make the solution better is more debugging and more access to change data from the preview panel or more functionality in terms of the preview option."

More SnapLogic cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing costs are extremely high for the usage of somebody who has one GB or two GB of usage per day for real-time traffic. There are many other players in the market which are similarly priced or competitively priced. On average per month, it used to come around 12,000-15,000 USD, which is very high."

"The pricing model is okay and mid to large companies will not have an issue with it."

"The solution is affordable."

"I don't have the exact information, but I know it is high, and it is on a yearly basis. There is no additional cost for what we're doing. We're always open to doing things cheaper, so we might potentially implement a different solution."

"I rate the pricing a six out of ten."

"When you have a lot of workflows and complex use cases, pricing goes down as you use it more."

"In the first year, we were given a very good discount. It was approximately 20,000 Euros per year. In the third year, we purchased credit for two years and the price was 33,000 Euros per year."

"I would say they're a little bit on the expensive side, and their contract process is not particularly good, but there is a lot of potential flexibility."

More Fivetran pricing and cost advice

"From the ROI perspective, the price is extremely high"

"SnapLogic's price is high compared to the other tools available in the market."

"It is a higher initial cost than other easy-to-use integration apps."

"The license model is based on consumption."

"SnapLogic is not expensive. It's reasonably priced."

"I used the free trial."

"The cost with SnapLogic is an annual license and better than Informatica."

"When comparing it with solutions like Apigee or MuleSoft, it still offers better value."

More SnapLogic pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

842,388 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

26%

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

25%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

Real Estate/Law Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What's the deal with the HVR software acquisition?

As a user of HVR Software I followed this deal closely. Fivetran is apparently trying to establish more in its sector and by buying an already established data replication software, they become som...

See all answers

Does HVR Software provide reliable insights?

I honestly can't think of another data replication software that can give you better statistics and insight than HVR Software. There's the feature for topology and statistics and both of them can ...

See all answers

How much traffic can HVR Software handle?

As someone who works at a company where a high volume of information is replicated and has tried several data replication softwares, I can tell you that you're looking at the right one. HVR Softwar...

See all answers

What do you like most about SnapLogic?

Despite having no prior experience in SnapLogic, we managed to build, test, and prepare it for release in just three hours, handling heavy data efficiently.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SnapLogic?

I am quite happy with the solution and do not have specific requirements at the moment. I tend to frequently communicate with SnapLogic to ask for additional features, and they have been responsive...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SnapLogic?

I mainly use it for data integration and some API tasks.

See all answers

Comparisons

AWS Database Migration Service vs Fivetran

Compared 16% of the time

Oracle GoldenGate vs Fivetran

Compared 14% of the time

Qlik Replicate vs Fivetran

Compared 9% of the time

Azure Data Factory vs Fivetran

Compared 7% of the time

Confluent vs Fivetran

Compared 5% of the time

More Fivetran Competitors

AWS Glue vs SnapLogic

Compared 16% of the time

IBM InfoSphere DataStage vs SnapLogic

Compared 8% of the time

Alteryx Designer vs SnapLogic

Compared 7% of the time

Azure Data Factory vs SnapLogic

Compared 6% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs SnapLogic

Compared 5% of the time

More SnapLogic Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Fivetran

March 2025

Download Fivetran product report

Buyer's Guide

SnapLogic

March 2025

Download SnapLogic product report

Also Known As

No data available

DataFlow

Overview

Fivetran, the global leader in data movement, is trusted by companies like OpenAI, LVMH, Pfizer, Verizon and Spotify to centralize data from SaaS applications, databases, files, and other sources into cloud destinations, including data lakes. With high-performance pipelines, seamless interoperability, and enterprise-grade security, Fivetran empowers organizations to modernize their data infrastructure, power analytics and AI, ensure compliance, and achieve transformative business outcomes. Learn more at Fivetran.com

Fivetran

The SnapLogic Intelligent Integration Platform uses AI-powered workflows to automate all stages of IT integration projects – design, development, deployment, and maintenance – whether on-premises, in the cloud, or in hybrid environments. The platform’s easy-to-use, self-service interface enables both expert and citizen integrators to manage all application integration, data integration, API management, B2B integration, and data engineering projects on a single, scalable platform. With SnapLogic, organizations can connect all of their enterprise systems quickly and easily to automate business processes, accelerate analytics, and drive transformation.

SnapLogic

Sample Customers

Autodesk, Condé Nast, JetBlue, Morgan Stanley, OpenAI, LVMH, Pfizer, Verizon, SpotifyNational Australia Bank, Saks, Cemex, Okta, Dropbox, Pitney Bowes, World Fuel Services,Lufthansa, AutoZone, ASICS, ASOS, Coupa, Databricks, Hermes, New Relic, Intercom,Canva, Honeywell, Square, DocuSign, Nandos, Oldcastle Infrastructure

Adobe, ADP, BlackBerry, Bonobos, Box, Capital One, Dannon, Eero, Endo, Gensler, HCL, HP, Grovo, HIS, iRobot, Leica, Merck, Sans, Target, Verizon, Vodafone, Yelp, Yahoo!

Buyer's Guide

Fivetran vs. SnapLogic

February 2025

Free Report: Fivetran vs. SnapLogic

Find out what your peers are saying about Fivetran vs. SnapLogic and other solutions. Updated: February 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

842,388 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fivetran vs. SnapLogic report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.