Fivetran vs SnapLogic comparison

Fivetran and SnapLogic are both solutions in the Data Integration category. Fivetran is ranked #13 with an average rating of 7.9, while SnapLogic is ranked #25 with an average rating of 7.0. Additionally, 88% of Fivetran users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 86% of SnapLogic users who would recommend it.

Fivetran

Read 25 Fivetran reviews

3,872 Views
2,678 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

SnapLogic

Read 23 SnapLogic reviews

2,925 Views
1,985 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

Fivetran

SnapLogic

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 3, 2024

SnapLogic and Fivetran are competing products in the data integration space. SnapLogic seems to have the upper hand in flexibility and support, while Fivetran's feature set provides significant ROI.

Features: SnapLogic provides a user-friendly drag-and-drop interface with extensive connectors for complex data workflows. Its low-code environment makes it easy for non-developers to build integrations using snaps. The platform also offers robust customization capabilities, allowing users to write their own scripts if needed. Fivetran excels in automated pipeline management, ensuring minimal manual intervention. It offers reliable data synchronization, only syncing necessary changes, which makes it efficient. The integration with transformation tools such as dbt enhances its utility for end-to-end data management.

Room for Improvement: SnapLogic could improve by enhancing its speed for large-scale operations and providing more granular control over execution environments. Simplifying the initial learning curve and offering more pre-built connectors could further strengthen its position. Fivetran could focus on expanding its customization options, allowing users to tweak configurations more freely. Greater control over scheduling and data extraction processes is necessary, as well as reducing reliance on external transformation tools to provide more built-in options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SnapLogic supports flexible deployments across cloud, on-premise, and hybrid environments, with responsive customer service. It is easy to implement, with straightforward initial setup and configuration. Fivetran simplifies deployment with automated setups optimized for cloud environments, offering intuitive interfaces. However, it might lack the customization flexibility available in SnapLogic due to its highly automated nature.

Pricing and ROI: SnapLogic offers adaptable pricing, appealing to enterprises seeking flexibility. Its pricing structure promises a good ROI owing to its comprehensive feature suite. In contrast, Fivetran's cost reflects its robust feature set, providing significant ROI through dependable data management and minimal maintenance. Fivetran's scalability is advantageous, allowing cost-effectiveness as data volume increases, justifying its pricing tier.

To learn more, read our detailed Fivetran vs. SnapLogic Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Fivetran vs. SnapLogic

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 831,265 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fivetran

Ranking in Data Integration

13th

Ranking in Cloud Data Integration

7th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Replication (3rd)

SnapLogic

Ranking in Data Integration

25th

Ranking in Cloud Data Integration

13th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Process Automation (16th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (10th)

Featured Reviews

Erik Jones

Head of BI and Analytics at HyperScience

Solution reduces time-to-value; high ROI

Fivetran has room for improvement in data pipeline observability. The Fivetran logs are fairly basic, compared to, for example, the insight Fivetran gives into helping users understanding the performance of data pipelines. So I think their observability into the pipeline itself could be improved. In addition, Fivetran is in the very early stages of allowing other companies to access its metadata API, but that's something that could use improvement, and I know that they're working on right now. We use a separate tool for "reverse ETL", which is the opposite of what Fivetran does; it pushes data from your data warehouse back out to business applications. If Fivetran pulls data from those same applications, they should also enable users to push it back. I would love to do both ETL and reverse ETL in the same tool. It would be nice if Fivetran offered both their regular offering plus the reverse ETL option as well.

Read full review

VinethSuresh

Senior Data Analyst at a pharma/biotech company with 10,001+ employees

Achieves rapid results in data migration and has an intuitive user interface

I find SnapLogic to be user-friendly, especially for beginners with limited experience in data engineering or ETL. The interface is interactive, allowing me to quickly learn how to run pipelines and achieve production-ready results swiftly. This agility translates to cost savings, especially for smaller projects and proofs of concept, as less time and effort are needed to deliver results.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of Fivetran is that it only synchronizes what needs to be synchronized."

"The general data ingestion is valuable. It's used for a lot of data. It provides about 90% of the data we use in our data warehouse without needing data engineering."

"There's the general feature of the platform where it just makes it very easy to integrate different things, but I would say a specific difference is their integration of DBT,."

"SysTrack load is the best feature."

"The product is very easy to use and very easy to configure."

"You can manage all of your connectors individually, which gives you a very good ability to trace which one of your ETL processes is running and when."

"Fivetran can perform data migration incredibly fast, depending on the source and target."

"It is easy for users to get accustomed to the tool due to its gentle learning curve and clear error transparency."

More Fivetran pros

"What I found most valuable in SnapLogic is the ETL feature, particularly the Transform Snap Pack, for example, any kind of reading or writing on Transform Snaps. Other than that, all the third-party connectivity tools such as the SAP Snap Pack, Salesforce Snap Pack, Workday Snap Pack, even the ServiceNow Snap Pack, I find all those are pretty useful in SnapLogic."

"You can use other languages, such as Python, and easily connect to other systems."

"It is a scalable solution."

"SnapLogice is a low-code development tool."

"I found SnapLogic valuable and what I found most valuable about it was its ETL feature. I also found its automation feature valuable. It can be used for automating manual activities. It can be used as a middleware for certain transactional data processing and minimal datasets and ETL activities."

"The solution could improve its API management."

"The feature I found most valuable in SnapLogic is low-code development. Low-code development has been very useful for simple processes, which is required for business users such as extracting details from a file or getting things reported by calling your web service. Calling your web service also becomes easier with SnapLogic because of the snaps available, so if you have the documentation, you can call an API. You don't have to write all those clients to call an API, so that is another feature I found very easy in SnapLogic. Configuring and managing all the file systems also become very handy with the solution."

"The technical support from SnapLogic is excellent, and I would give it a complete ten."

More SnapLogic pros

Cons

"The environment must be more development-friendly."

"The solution is very expensive. I would like to have a better integration of the solution with Azure."

"Fivetran would be improved by adding the ability to integrate the data from third-party APIs."

"I would like for them to incorporate additional transformations. A valuable aspect of the product is that it does inflight transformations and that could be expanded."

"There is not a lot of options to customize the pipeline, and the cost is high."

"HVR Software's technical support could be improved. Whenever we log a case, the response that we get from the support is a bit delayed."

"More connectors are needed for exotic, popular, and rising star portals."

"The documentation can be laid out better to make it easier to find things, and I really wish there was built-in support for changing passwords. Some features don't work as advertised for the platform/repository database, and HVR is not always the fastest at getting results."

More Fivetran cons

"SnapLogic doesn't provide any on-premises software, so users have only cloud-based software to use."

"One of the areas for improvement in SnapLogic is that the connectors for some of the applications should be more available in terms of testing in the dev environment. Another area for improvement is that the logging should be standardized, for example, the integration with an ELK stack should be required out-of-the-box, so you can ship the log and have it in the ELK stack. There should be integration with ELK stack for the log shipping."

"It needs some more snaps. I would like to see some of the features be changed in some of the snaps."

"We'd like zero downtime in the future."

"Connecting to data behind enterprise firewalls has been tricky."

"The biggest issue we have faced in our company with SnapLogic is regarding the EDI format"

"The dashboards regarding scheduled tasks need further improvement."

"What could be improved in SnapLogic is that it was not capable in terms of processing a large number of datasets, but at that point, SnapLogic was evolving. It didn't give a lot of Snaps. I heard recently there are a lot of Snaps getting added and the solution was being enhanced, particularly to connect different data sources. When I was working with SnapLogic six months to one year back, I faced the issue of it not being capable of handling a huge volume of datasets or didn't have much of Snaps, and that was the drawback. If there is any large number of data sets, that's based on or depends on your configuration. If it is a huge volume of data, other traditional ETL tools such as Informatica and Talend can process millions and billions of records, while in SnapLogic, the Snaplex fails or it returns an error in terms of processing that huge volume of data. Informatica, Talend, or any other ETL tool can run for hours in terms of jobs, while SnapLogic jobs fail when the threshold is reached. SnapLogic isn't able to withstand processing, but I don't know if that's still an issue at present, because the solution is getting enhanced and it's been more than six months to one year since I last worked with SnapLogic. There are now a lot of Snaps getting added to the solution, and if it can overcome the limitations I mentioned, SnapLogic could be the go-to tool because currently, it's not being used as much in organizations. It's being used comparatively less compared to other retail tools."

More SnapLogic cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"When you have a lot of workflows and complex use cases, pricing goes down as you use it more."

"I don't have the exact information, but I know it is high, and it is on a yearly basis. There is no additional cost for what we're doing. We're always open to doing things cheaper, so we might potentially implement a different solution."

"I rate the pricing a six out of ten."

"The solution is affordable."

"In the first year, we were given a very good discount. It was approximately 20,000 Euros per year. In the third year, we purchased credit for two years and the price was 33,000 Euros per year."

"The licensing costs are extremely high for the usage of somebody who has one GB or two GB of usage per day for real-time traffic. There are many other players in the market which are similarly priced or competitively priced. On average per month, it used to come around 12,000-15,000 USD, which is very high."

"The product is reasonably expensive"

"I would say they're a little bit on the expensive side, and their contract process is not particularly good, but there is a lot of potential flexibility."

More Fivetran pricing and cost advice

"They have pricing/usage tiers that are easy to move up or down."

"SnapLogic is not expensive. It's reasonably priced."

"It is a higher initial cost than other easy-to-use integration apps."

"The cost with SnapLogic is an annual license and better than Informatica."

"The license model is based on consumption."

"SnapLogic's price is high compared to the other tools available in the market."

"By scaling the solution incrementally the cost is controlled and more beneficial to the client."

"When comparing it with solutions like Apigee or MuleSoft, it still offers better value."

More SnapLogic pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

30%

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

26%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Real Estate/Law Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What's the deal with the HVR software acquisition?

As a user of HVR Software I followed this deal closely. Fivetran is apparently trying to establish more in its sector and by buying an already established data replication software, they become som...

See all answers

Does HVR Software provide reliable insights?

I honestly can't think of another data replication software that can give you better statistics and insight than HVR Software. There's the feature for topology and statistics and both of them can ...

See all answers

How much traffic can HVR Software handle?

As someone who works at a company where a high volume of information is replicated and has tried several data replication softwares, I can tell you that you're looking at the right one. HVR Softwar...

See all answers

What do you like most about SnapLogic?

Despite having no prior experience in SnapLogic, we managed to build, test, and prepare it for release in just three hours, handling heavy data efficiently.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SnapLogic?

SnapLogic is doing well in evolving with the AI landscape. However, if the AI capabilities and integrations were more intuitive and easy to learn for new users, it would be greatly beneficial. Addi...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SnapLogic?

I utilize SnapLogic for data migration and data integration projects. I use it mainly as a middleware tool, working with a lot of SAP data. By transferring SAP data into more cost-effective databas...

See all answers

Comparisons

AWS Database Migration Service vs Fivetran

Compared 15% of the time

Oracle GoldenGate vs Fivetran

Compared 12% of the time

Qlik Replicate vs Fivetran

Compared 9% of the time

Azure Data Factory vs Fivetran

Compared 8% of the time

StreamSets vs Fivetran

Compared 6% of the time

More Fivetran Competitors

AWS Glue vs SnapLogic

Compared 15% of the time

IBM InfoSphere DataStage vs SnapLogic

Compared 9% of the time

Azure Data Factory vs SnapLogic

Compared 9% of the time

Alteryx Designer vs SnapLogic

Compared 7% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs SnapLogic

Compared 6% of the time

More SnapLogic Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Fivetran

January 2025

Download Fivetran product report

Buyer's Guide

SnapLogic

December 2024

Download SnapLogic product report

Also Known As

No data available

DataFlow

Learn More

Fivetran

SnapLogic

Overview

Fivetran is a data integration and migration solution that centralizes data from various sources into a data warehouse (such as Snowflake or BigQuery) for analytics. Its most valuable features include replication and managed pipelines, integration with DBT for data transformation, and many source connections.

Fivetran is easy to use, with fast data migration and an intuitive portal for easy setup and troubleshooting. It has helped organizations integrate and manage data, saving time and resources.

The SnapLogic Intelligent Integration Platform uses AI-powered workflows to automate all stages of IT integration projects – design, development, deployment, and maintenance – whether on-premises, in the cloud, or in hybrid environments. The platform’s easy-to-use, self-service interface enables both expert and citizen integrators to manage all application integration, data integration, API management, B2B integration, and data engineering projects on a single, scalable platform. With SnapLogic, organizations can connect all of their enterprise systems quickly and easily to automate business processes, accelerate analytics, and drive transformation.

Sample Customers

DocuSign, Oldcastle Infrastructure, Crossmedia, Talkdesk, Chubbies, Brandwatch

Adobe, ADP, BlackBerry, Bonobos, Box, Capital One, Dannon, Eero, Endo, Gensler, HCL, HP, Grovo, HIS, iRobot, Leica, Merck, Sans, Target, Verizon, Vodafone, Yelp, Yahoo!

Buyer's Guide

Fivetran vs. SnapLogic

January 2025

Free Report: Fivetran vs. SnapLogic

Find out what your peers are saying about Fivetran vs. SnapLogic and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fivetran vs. SnapLogic report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.