Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Fortinet FortiClient vs ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.8
Fortinet FortiClient improves productivity, network efficiency, and security, boasting cost-effectiveness despite some implementation challenges, leading to positive financial outcomes.
Sentiment score
8.2
ThreatLocker enhances security and productivity with real-time protection, leading to revenue growth and improved efficiency in one year.
The measurable benefits of using ThreatLocker include ensuring real-time protection of organizational resources and maintaining user authentication and protection levels to reduce risks.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.0
Fortinet FortiClient support is rated variably; responsiveness and effectiveness depend on service packages and can be inconsistent.
Sentiment score
8.8
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection offers highly-rated, efficient customer service, with rapid response times and knowledgeable support, achieving user satisfaction.
They initiate the troubleshooting process quickly and resolve issues in a timely manner.
Technical support can be logged on Fortinet's support portal.
The main issue revolves around addressing bugs in the endpoint.
ThreatLocker's technical support process could be streamlined by reducing the number of steps required to reach a human agent.
It could be better, especially with response times.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.6
Fortinet FortiClient efficiently scales from small to large organizations, handling user growth smoothly despite occasional licensing concerns.
Sentiment score
8.3
ThreatLocker efficiently scales for all business sizes, seamlessly managing thousands of endpoints without issues, supporting diverse infrastructures.
We can recommend FortiClient for small organizations with 50 to 60 users as well as for larger enterprises due to its extensive features.
I hope Fortinet will start an insider developer program where professionals can provide feedback on new releases to ensure improvements.
We can add more licenses and Fortinet tokens, demonstrating excellent scalability.
It is scalable to an extent, depending on where it is used.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.2
Fortinet FortiClient is generally stable, with occasional disconnections and bugs, but updates usually enhance performance and reliability.
Sentiment score
6.8
ThreatLocker offers stable endpoint protection, with minimal issues that are quickly resolved, enhancing reliability and performance for users.
Stability can be improved as there are times it goes down or requires management to adjust policies.
 

Room For Improvement

Fortinet FortiClient users seek improvements in management, features, pricing, compatibility, support, performance, and security, including AI integration.
ThreatLocker could enhance its platform with flexible training, user interface improvements, better integrations, and more comprehensive support.
FortiClient needs improvement in restricting user information and ensuring more secure customer data to better protect source code and reduce the risk of security breaches.
Fortinet frequently releases updates without thorough testing.
There are advanced features like Zero Trust that I currently do not use but could be beneficial for security.
This is problematic when immediate attention is needed.
Comprehensive 24-hour log monitoring is a valuable enhancement for both business and enterprise-level users.
 

Setup Cost

Enterprise buyers find Fortinet FortiClient pricing competitive, with discounts available, though some report price hikes and seek affordability.
Enterprise users value ThreatLocker's cost-effective Zero Trust Platform for its comprehensive features, excellent support, and customizable tiered pricing.
FortiClient is cost-effective since the client itself is free with the purchase of Fortinet.
Justifying the price to clients can be difficult.
FortiClient is included in a package with the UTM features, so there is no separate cost for it.
The pricing is reasonable and normal.
 

Valuable Features

Fortinet FortiClient offers a user-friendly, feature-rich endpoint protection with robust VPN, seamless integration, strong security, and easy management.
ThreatLocker offers mobile access, zero trust protection, granular control, and support, enhancing security and reducing management costs.
We appreciate its VPN capabilities and the features that offer extra security functionalities like antivirus and malware scanning.
The most valuable feature of FortiClient is its high security level.
The integration with Active Directory is a valuable feature, allowing SSO for users.
ThreatLocker's most valuable feature is its scanning capability, which executes all types of executable files.
 

Categories and Ranking

Fortinet FortiClient
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
16th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
96
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Compliance (1st), Enterprise Infrastructure VPN (2nd)
ThreatLocker Zero Trust End...
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
12th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
18
Ranking in other categories
Network Access Control (NAC) (5th), Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (8th), Application Control (4th), ZTNA (8th), Ransomware Protection (6th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Fortinet FortiClient is 2.3%, down from 2.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform is 0.7%, down from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
 

Featured Reviews

MuhammadJahangir - PeerSpot reviewer
Users only need to install the VPN and authenticate with their email address
I primarily use remote VPN solutions to connect securely. We have configured both site-to-site VPN and remote VPN, and it is connected to FortiClient Implementing this solution has streamlined time management in our organization. Without SSO, we would need manual configuration for each PC, but…
Roy Richardson - PeerSpot reviewer
Integration is simple, deployment is straightforward, and extensive well-written documentation is available online
We use ThreatLocker's Allowlisting to whitelist specific applications and prevent unauthorized software from running. We utilize Ringfencing to establish guardrails around implementations, ensuring that applications operate within defined boundaries. We leverage network access control to granularly control interactions between computer systems and servers. This enables us to restrict communication between specific applications, even within a locked-down environment. We employ storage control to impose additional security measures on data storage. This includes controlling access to network shares, network files, and folders, as well as USB storage devices. We can whitelist specific devices based on their serial numbers or allow access based on predefined conditions. We rely on ThreatLocker's Cyber Hero support, which provides exceptional assistance and responsiveness. At any time, we can initiate a chat session and receive immediate support. If the issue requires escalation, it is promptly handled. Cyber Hero support also plays a crucial role in vetting application updates. When a user attempts to install or update an application, and the update has not been approved from a security standpoint, it is blocked by ThreatLocker. A notification is presented to the user, informing them of the block and providing an option to justify the application's need. These requests are then reviewed by ThreatLocker's Cyber Hero support team, who evaluate them against our security criteria and make an informed decision to allow or deny the application. We utilize ThreatLocker's elevated control feature for applications that require administrator-level access. We avoid granting full administrative privileges to end users, as this elevates the risk of compromise if the device is infiltrated. Instead, elevated control allows us to precisely define the execution conditions for specific applications, such as QuickBooks updates. By verifying the application's signature and certificate, we can enable the update to run with administrative privileges while restricting the user's overall administrative access. Integrating ThreatLocker with other products is simple and only requires a few clicks. ThreatLocker's deployment is also very straightforward. The company provides extensive and well-written online documentation, which is continuously being improved. They also offer a variety of training resources, including university courses, training videos, webinars, and conferences. I have no complaints about the level of support and knowledge transfer provided by the company. ThreatLocker is also developing a new reporting tool, which I had the opportunity to beta test. The company has also been showcasing the new reporting tool at conferences. The new reporting tool provides a level of detail that is unmatched by any other product on the market.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
42%
Computer Software Company
10%
Government
5%
Manufacturing Company
5%
Computer Software Company
38%
Retailer
8%
Financial Services Firm
5%
Manufacturing Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How does Fortinet FortiClient compare with Open VPN Access Server?
Fortinet FortiClient is a feature-rich solution that is easy to use and deploy without sacrificing safety and security. It has a very fast connection rate and has a built-in VPN. With this solution...
What's the difference between Fortinet's FortiEDR and FortiClient?
I suggest Fortinet’s FortiEDR over FortiClient for several reasons. For starters, FortiEDR guarantees solid protection because it continually scans servers for emerging vulnerabilities, which gives...
What do you like most about ThreatLocker Allowlisting?
The interface is clean and well-organized, making it simple to navigate and find what we need.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ThreatLocker Allowlisting?
I handle the technical aspects, while my manager deals with pricing. Although the pricing seems good, there have been inconsistencies in contract negotiations. What we are told during calls sometim...
What needs improvement with ThreatLocker Allowlisting?
ThreatLocker would benefit from incorporating an antivirus feature or comprehensive 24-hour log monitoring, a valuable enhancement for both business and enterprise-level users.
 

Also Known As

FortiClient
Protect, Allowlisting, Network Control, Ringfencing
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Black Gold Regional Schools, Amadeus Hospitality, Jefferson County, Chunghwa Telecom, City of Boroondara, Dimension Data
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet FortiClient vs. ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.