Fortinet FortiGate vs Lumu comparison

Fortinet and Lumu Technologies are both solutions in the Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) category. Fortinet is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.5, while Lumu Technologies is ranked #11 with an average rating of 9.0. Fortinet holds a 16.6% mindshare in ID, compared to Lumu Technologies’s 2.6% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Fortinet users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Lumu Technologies users who would recommend it.

Fortinet FortiGate

Read 575 Fortinet FortiGate reviews

72,802 Views
6,552 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Lumu

Read 8 Lumu reviews

1,503 Views
782 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Fortinet FortiGate

Lumu

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2025

Fortinet FortiGate and Lumu compete in the network security domain. Fortinet FortiGate has strengths in pricing and customer support, making it favorable for budget-conscious buyers. Lumu leads in feature capabilities, especially in advanced threat intelligence.

Features: Fortinet FortiGate offers robust firewall capabilities, secure VPN options, and a suite of security services. In contrast, Lumu focuses on proactive threat intelligence, continuous exposure assessment, and effective network visibility.

Room for Improvement: Fortinet FortiGate could enhance its threat detection capabilities and simplify its complex architecture for quicker deployment. Improvements in advanced intelligence features would benefit its competitiveness. Lumu might improve by reducing pricing perception barriers and expanding customer support services for broader market appeal. Additional optimization in deployment integration could enhance its effectiveness in varied environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Fortinet FortiGate provides straightforward deployment for familiar users and offers reliable support post-installation. Lumu excels in cloud-based deployment models, ensuring a quick setup with minimal on-premise interference, accompanied by accessible support channels for seamless operation.

Pricing and ROI: Fortinet FortiGate offers competitive setup costs and ROI through sustainable security features, appealing to budget constraints. Lumu's initial costs may be perceived as higher but provide significant ROI, backed by innovative threat detection and minimization of network vulnerabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Fortinet FortiGate vs. Lumu Report (Updated: October 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Fortinet FortiGate vs. Lumu

October 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,952 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fortinet FortiGate

Ranking in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)

1st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

575

Ranking in other categories

Secure Web Gateways (SWG) (2nd), Firewalls (1st), Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions (1st), WAN Edge (1st), ZTNA (2nd), Unified Threat Management (UTM) (1st)

Lumu

Ranking in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)

11th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Detection and Response (NDR) (6th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (18th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) category, the mindshare of Fortinet FortiGate is 16.6%, down from 19.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Lumu is 2.6%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Fortinet FortiGate	16.6%
Lumu	2.6%
Other	80.8%

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)

Featured Reviews

Vasu Gala

Manager, Information Technology Operation/Presales at TechMonarch

A stable solution with an intuitive interface and quick customer service

I have been working with Fortinet FortiGate, WatchGuard, Sophos, and SonicWall. I'm not as comfortable with SonicWall because of their UI and limitations. I prefer Fortinet above all other options. When it comes to configuration, I am confident in my ability to handle various tasks, including creating policies such as firewall rules, web policies, and application policies. Additionally, I can configure VPNs and implement load balancing, among other tasks. Overall, I feel much more comfortable working with Fortinet. Fortinet has made significant improvements by integrating AI with firewalls for threat analysis and prevention. In the past 2-3 years, they have launched FortiSASE and SIEM, and they also provide SOC services. Both Palo Alto and Fortinet FortiGate are excellent. While Fortinet FortiGate comes at higher prices, the functionality and support justify the cost. They promptly resolve firmware issues and inform all support providers about configuration changes.

Read full review

Juan Solano

IT Director at Atlantic Quantum Innovations

Protects against threats and handles it in time with moderate pricing

Mostly, Lumu is an automatic tool. We'll deploy on firewalls and DNS servers. Lumu detects every attack on our network. The other day, we had CLC, the command controller, and the tool reacted automatically. It detected the attack and immediately blocked it without intervention from my team. The improvement is in the security process, as it's now entirely automated. We no longer require a technician or engineer to monitor our network 24/7. Lumu updates with AI and global threat intelligence, which greatly assists us. Since our workload is lighter, Lumu handles all of our tasks. We're using FortiGate for the firewall and Kaspersky for endpoints. If you are going to Lumu, you need another solution for the endpoint. You need to integrate with other tools like firewalls or another antivirus. I recommend the solution based on the price, usability, and service offered by the solution. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Initial setup is straightforward. There weren't too many issues with setting it up. It takes one hour or so."

"FortiGate also makes GRE tunneling possible."

"Anti-Spam web content filterinG."

"Layer-3 firewall and routing are the most valuable features."

"Its user interface is good, and it is always working fine."

"The reliability of Fortinet FortiGate is through the roof, we're experiencing 99.999% availability consistently."

"It's very similar to a Cisco firewall, yet less expensive."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is Quota."

More Fortinet FortiGate pros

"The context provided by the tool is very complete, it includes the miter matrix, playbooks, links, hashes, and much more."

"Lumu protects against threats immediately and handles them in time."

"I like Lumu's simple user interface. When we deployed it, we got full access, allowing us to identify IP addresses on the network and connect machine names to users. It helped us identify and block threats via the firewall. I also appreciate the chat support and ticket closure process. We're currently reviewing network detection solutions, and my recommendations include Lumu, Sentinel, and a few others. Regarding functionality and user-friendliness, I would recommend Lumu over the others."

"Most of it is automated, so I do not have to watch it to get alerts."

"The automated response to incidents works effectively out of the box, and the number of interfaces and platforms it can work with is impressive."

"The tool's support team helps partners resolve any problems with the product."

"You can access external links, playbooks, MITRE Matrix, and a lot of information."

"It's been helpful for overall extended network visibility."

Cons

"It needs more available central management."

"Fortinet's support team consists of a huge networking team, because of which there is a delay in response at times."

"The support costs and licensing are sometimes so expensive."

"They sometimes hide some features and if you want to enable them, you have to go in the CLI, enable the feature and configure it through the CLI. Customers, typically, like everything to be done by the GUI."

"The reports are very basic."

"Overall, the integration could be better."

"They can do more tests before they release new versions because I would like to be more assured. We had some experiences where they release something new and great, but some of the old features are disabled or they don't work well, which impacts the product satisfaction. The manufacturer should be able to prove that everything works or not only that it might work. This is applicable to most of the other services, software, and hardware companies. They all should work on this. We cannot trust every new release, such as a beta release, on the first day. We wait for some comments on the forums and from other companies that we know. We always wait a few weeks before we use the updated version. They should also extend the VPN client application, especially for Linux versions. Currently, it has an application for Linux devices, but it doesn't work the way we want to connect to the VPN. They use only the old connection, not the new one. They have VPN client applications for Windows and Mac, but they can add more useful features to better manage the devices and monitor the current health of each device. Such features would be helpful for our company."

"The firmware needs improvement because there are bugs when a new release comes through. Sometimes, the configuration changes, and it's a bit harder to see where the fail is. The first time that you have the firmware, it tends to have some issues, and it's better to wait a bit to update the equipment."

More Fortinet FortiGate cons

"Nothing so far needs to be improved."

"Having a larger support network would be beneficial. Nobody I know has heard of Lumu, so they are in the same space as Darktrace or CrowdStrike, but people give blank stares."

"The reports need improvement."

"The integration with different vendors and endpoints could be improved."

"Lumu's ability to discover threats is an area of concern where improvements are needed."

"The free version is minimal compared to the full version."

"I am happy with the current features. However, one important one is to improve the reports."

"It would be good if we could access the physical logs."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool is a bit pricey for small businesses, but it is still bearable in terms of cost."

"Its pricing is good. The advantages of Fortinet FortiGate over its competitors include good pricing and meeting our requirements at a lower cost."

"The price is fine."

"The product is expensive."

"I rate the pricing an eight and a half on a scale of one to ten, where one is low, and ten is high."

"Its pricing is fine. It is on a yearly basis. Other than the licensing fee, there is no extra fee."

"Our licensing costs are on a yearly basis."

"It is a cost-effective solution that meets the user's needs."

More Fortinet FortiGate pricing and cost advice

"The tool is available at a good price. The tool offers a good and competitive price for customers."

"It is the cheapest solution we found."

"Compared to Lumu, other solutions are more expensive. SentinelOne was a bit cheaper, and another provider's price structure is unclear, but Lumu fit our budget nicely. SentinelOne's cost depends on the number of devices, and it might be similar to Lumu's, depending on deployment."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,952 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user216600

Senior Technical Consultant with 51-200 employees

Jan 3, 2016

Sophos UTM vs. Fortinet FortiGate

I have used both Sophos and Fortinet products in production and I have found the Sophos UTM appliances (hardware and virtual) to be a better fit most of the time -- with a few caveats which I will touch on below. In both instances, the transition from TMG will be mostly straightforward. The main…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

10%

Educational Organization

10%

Insurance Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	351
Midsize Enterprise	130
Large Enterprise	187

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

Which is the better NGFW: Fortinet Fortigate or Cisco Firepower?

When you compare these firewalls you can identify them with different features, advantages, practices and usage at large. In my opinion, Fortinet would be the best option and l use Fortinet too...

See all answers

What is the biggest difference between Sophos XG and FortiGate?

From my experience regarding both the Sophos and FortiGate firewalls, I personally would rather use FortiGate. I know the firewalls change every 5 to 7 years as stated but you really do need to upg...

See all answers

What are the biggest technical differences between Sophos UTM and Fortinet FortiGate?

As a solution, Sophos UTM offers a lot of functionality, it scales well, and the stability and performance are quite good. The most valuable features for me are their web and email filtering. I wou...

See all answers

What do you like most about Lumu?

Lumu protects against threats immediately and handles them in time.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Lumu?

There is always room for improvement. I am not giving it a perfect score because I am sure there is something that could be enhanced.Having some sort of certification or training, along with more p...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Lumu?

We use it as our managed SOC instead of contracting with an MSP. It coordinates endpoint and gives us a single pane of glass for our security events.It fulfills the role of a SIEM, serving as our d...

See all answers

Comparisons

Sophos XG vs Fortinet FortiGate

Compared 18% of the time

Cisco Secure Firewall vs Fortinet FortiGate

Compared 11% of the time

Netgate pfSense vs Fortinet FortiGate

Compared 9% of the time

OPNsense vs Fortinet FortiGate

Compared 4% of the time

Cisco Meraki MX vs Fortinet FortiGate

Compared 4% of the time

More Fortinet FortiGate Competitors

Darktrace vs Lumu

Compared 48% of the time

Wazuh vs Lumu

Compared 14% of the time

Stellar Cyber Open XDR vs Lumu

Compared 13% of the time

Vectra AI vs Lumu

Compared 8% of the time

More Lumu Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Fortinet FortiGate

October 2025

Download Fortinet FortiGate product report

Buyer's Guide

Lumu

October 2025

Download Lumu product report

Overview

Fortinet FortiGate excels in providing integrated VPN, firewalling, and Unified Threat Management (UTM) with centralized management and high availability. It supports remote access and comprehensive threat protection, making it a preferred choice for securing networks.

Fortinet FortiGate offers a robust security platform with features such as strong intrusion prevention, application control, and web filtering. Its integration with Active Directory and SD-WAN functionality provides scalable solutions for large networks. Users appreciate its ease of use through centralized management interfaces, ensuring robust security with flexible configurations. However, FortiGate could enhance its graphical interface and technical support responsiveness, address firmware bugs and costly licensing, improve logging, integrate better with third-party tools, and strengthen scalability and memory for log storage. Complexity in configuration and the need for intuitive features are noted challenges, and there's a demand for advanced security, zero-trust capabilities, and AI integration.

What are the key features of Fortinet FortiGate?

VPN: Secure remote access and connectivity.
Firewalling: Protects networks from unauthorized access and attacks.
UTM: Offers a comprehensive approach to threat management.
SD-WAN: Optimizes traffic routing for efficient network performance.
Web Filtering: Controls and monitors web access and ensures Internet security.

What benefits or ROI should be considered?

Centralized Management: Simplifies administration and monitoring.
High Availability: Ensures consistent security and network availability.
Scalability: Adapts to the needs of growing networks.
Comprehensive Threat Protection: Provides robust security measures.
Ease of Use: Minimizes the complexity of security management.

Fortinet FortiGate is widely implemented across industries like education, finance, and government. Companies use it for firewall protection, VPN, and SD-WAN capabilities, ensuring secure perimeter and data center security. It facilitates remote access management and traffic routing optimization, offering reliable security and connectivity solutions.

Fortinet

Lumu Technologies is a cyber-security company that illuminates threats, attacks, and adversaries affecting enterprises worldwide. Using actionable intelligence, Lumu provides a radical way to secure networks by enhancing and augmenting existing defense capabilities established over the past 25 years.

Lumu Technologies

Sample Customers

Amazon Web Services, Microsoft, IBM, Cisco, Dell, HP, Oracle, Verizon, AT&T, T-Mobile, Sprint, Vodafone, Orange, BT Group, Telstra, Deutsche Telekom, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, CenturyLink, NTT Communications, Tata Communications, SoftBank, China Mobile, Singtel, Telus, Rogers Communications, Bell Canada, Telkom Indonesia, Telkom South Africa, Telmex, Telia Company, Telkom Kenya

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Fortinet FortiGate vs. Lumu

October 2025

Free Report: Fortinet FortiGate vs. Lumu

Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet FortiGate vs. Lumu and other solutions. Updated: October 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,952 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fortinet FortiGate vs. Lumu report.

See our list of best Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) vendors.

We monitor all Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.