Fortinet FortiGate vs Lumu comparison

Fortinet and Lumu Technologies are both solutions in the Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) category. Fortinet is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.5, while Lumu Technologies is ranked #11 with an average rating of 9.0. Fortinet holds a 13.2% mindshare in ID, compared to Lumu Technologies’s 2.2% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Fortinet users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Lumu Technologies users who would recommend it.

Fortinet FortiGate

Read 581 Fortinet FortiGate reviews

69,102 Views
6,219 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Lumu

Read 8 Lumu reviews

1,896 Views
872 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Fortinet FortiGate

Lumu

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 28, 2025

Fortinet FortiGate and Lumu are both network security solutions, catering to different aspects of security. Fortinet FortiGate has the upper hand in versatility and scalability, whereas Lumu excels in advanced threat detection and real-time threat intelligence.

Features: Fortinet FortiGate provides robust firewall capabilities, advanced threat protection, and seamless integration into network infrastructures. Additionally, it includes virtual domains, SSL VPN, and application control. Lumu offers real-time threat intelligence, mapping malicious activity across networks, and focuses on continuous threat evaluation to improve detection precision.

Room for Improvement: Fortinet FortiGate could improve in areas such as simplifying initial configuration processes and enhancing user interface flexibility. Additionally, optimizing specific advanced features could enhance user experience. Lumu might improve by expanding its integration capabilities with third-party systems, providing more detailed reporting, and enhancing its user-friendliness for non-technical users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Fortinet FortiGate has a comprehensive deployment model that may require significant setup and configuration time. However, it offers extensive support options. Lumu offers straightforward deployment with faster setup times and highly personalized, responsive customer service, benefiting initial deployment phases.

Pricing and ROI: Fortinet FortiGate has a higher initial cost, justified by its extensive feature set appealing to enterprises for long-term investments. Lumu provides a more cost-effective model with faster return on investment through its focus on continuous threat evaluation. While FortiGate's pricing reflects premium security solutions, Lumu's pricing is geared towards quick threat detection ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Fortinet FortiGate vs. Lumu Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Fortinet FortiGate vs. Lumu

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,565 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fortinet FortiGate

Ranking in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)

1st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

581

Ranking in other categories

Secure Web Gateways (SWG) (2nd), Firewalls (1st), Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions (1st), WAN Edge (1st), ZTNA (1st), Unified Threat Management (UTM) (1st)

Lumu

Ranking in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)

11th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Detection and Response (NDR) (8th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (17th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) category, the mindshare of Fortinet FortiGate is 13.2%, down from 19.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Lumu is 2.2%, up from 2.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Fortinet FortiGate	13.2%
Lumu	2.2%
Other	84.6%

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)

Featured Reviews

Vasu Gala

Manager, Information Technology Operation/Presales at TechMonarch

A stable solution with an intuitive interface and quick customer service

I have been working with Fortinet FortiGate, WatchGuard, Sophos, and SonicWall. I'm not as comfortable with SonicWall because of their UI and limitations. I prefer Fortinet above all other options. When it comes to configuration, I am confident in my ability to handle various tasks, including creating policies such as firewall rules, web policies, and application policies. Additionally, I can configure VPNs and implement load balancing, among other tasks. Overall, I feel much more comfortable working with Fortinet. Fortinet has made significant improvements by integrating AI with firewalls for threat analysis and prevention. In the past 2-3 years, they have launched FortiSASE and SIEM, and they also provide SOC services. Both Palo Alto and Fortinet FortiGate are excellent. While Fortinet FortiGate comes at higher prices, the functionality and support justify the cost. They promptly resolve firmware issues and inform all support providers about configuration changes.

Read full review

Jeremiah Johnson

Director, Information Technology at a educational organization with 201-500 employees

Constant monitoring and analysis boosts network security

There is always room for improvement. I am not giving it a perfect score because I am sure there is something that could be enhanced.Having some sort of certification or training, along with more periodic webinars might be helpful. Having a larger support network would be beneficial. Nobody I know has heard of Lumu, so they are in the same space as Darktrace or CrowdStrike, but people give blank stares. As the community grows for Lumu then that will improve, but that is not really a criticism of Lumu, they simply have not been around that long.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Fortinet FortiGate is easy to use. Anyone can easily maintain it."

"I'm looking forward to FortiGate's dashboard features, insights, application oversight, and monitoring, which could help us significantly."

"This solution works well on a daily basis, detecting various types of malicious traffic."

"FortiGate is on the cheaper end, and it offers good value."

"I would advise others considering or evaluating the Fortinet FortiGate to buy it."

"The performance is very good and the solution is simple to manage."

"The reliability of Fortinet FortiGate is through the roof, we're experiencing 99.999% availability consistently."

"I love the interface."

More Fortinet FortiGate pros

"Most of it is automated, so I do not have to watch it to get alerts."

"Lumu protects against threats immediately and handles them in time."

"I like Lumu's simple user interface. When we deployed it, we got full access, allowing us to identify IP addresses on the network and connect machine names to users. It helped us identify and block threats via the firewall. I also appreciate the chat support and ticket closure process. We're currently reviewing network detection solutions, and my recommendations include Lumu, Sentinel, and a few others. Regarding functionality and user-friendliness, I would recommend Lumu over the others."

"The context provided by the tool is very complete, it includes the miter matrix, playbooks, links, hashes, and much more."

"The automated response to incidents works effectively out of the box, and the number of interfaces and platforms it can work with is impressive."

"It's been helpful for overall extended network visibility."

"The tool's support team helps partners resolve any problems with the product."

"You can access external links, playbooks, MITRE Matrix, and a lot of information."

Cons

"The web-cache feature which was previously on the FortiGate device, but was deleted with the recent upgrade should be returned. It was a very valuable feature for us."

"Security is a continuous process. In every product, there is a requirement for improvement. Its pricing should also be improved according to Indian market requirements. They must also improve on the reporting part. Its reporting can be more precise. If we can get a real-time report in a specific format, it will be helpful for customers to know about the current status of their security."

"Backup can be improved."

"One drawback of Fortinet FortiGate is that they provide two types of models: one with a hard disk and another without. The model without a hard disk has very low ROM where you can store very few logs, after which you need to upload it to the cloud or purchase a firewall with SSD. That's the only drawback."

"FortiManager has not been my favorite. I don't use it and cannot say I really care for FortiManager for managing the firewalls."

"The graphical user interface of Fortinet FortiGate SWG is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"The stability of Fortinet FortiGate could improve."

"Some configuration elements cannot be easily altered once created."

More Fortinet FortiGate cons

"Nothing so far needs to be improved."

"The integration with different vendors and endpoints could be improved."

"Lumu's ability to discover threats is an area of concern where improvements are needed."

"I am happy with the current features. However, one important one is to improve the reports."

"The free version is minimal compared to the full version."

"It would be good if we could access the physical logs."

"The reports need improvement."

"Having a larger support network would be beneficial. Nobody I know has heard of Lumu, so they are in the same space as Darktrace or CrowdStrike, but people give blank stares."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Fortinet has more device options that are affordable for small businesses than Palo Alto, and its enterprise-level models are also cheaper. Palo Alto also has a separate license for VPN connections and SD-WAN, but FortiGate offers these features standard."

"The product is a little bit expensive."

"I rate the product's pricing a seven out of ten. The additional cost depends on the extra feature requirements."

"The pricing is fair."

"Compared to Palo Alto, which we have used in the past, pricing and licensing are okay."

"It has been two years. I don't remember the actual price, but it was affordable. We buy the boxes and then use the license for three years."

"There is an annual license to use this solution. The prices have been increasing over the years."

"It cost us around $73,000 for three years."

More Fortinet FortiGate pricing and cost advice

"The tool is available at a good price. The tool offers a good and competitive price for customers."

"Compared to Lumu, other solutions are more expensive. SentinelOne was a bit cheaper, and another provider's price structure is unclear, but Lumu fit our budget nicely. SentinelOne's cost depends on the number of devices, and it might be similar to Lumu's, depending on deployment."

"It is the cheapest solution we found."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,565 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user216600

Senior Technical Consultant with 51-200 employees

Jan 3, 2016

Sophos UTM vs. Fortinet FortiGate

I have used both Sophos and Fortinet products in production and I have found the Sophos UTM appliances (hardware and virtual) to be a better fit most of the time -- with a few caveats which I will touch on below. In both instances, the transition from TMG will be mostly straightforward. The main…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Insurance Company

Educational Organization

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	357
Midsize Enterprise	133
Large Enterprise	189

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

Which is the better NGFW: Fortinet Fortigate or Cisco Firepower?

When you compare these firewalls you can identify them with different features, advantages, practices and usage at large. In my opinion, Fortinet would be the best option and l use Fortinet too...

See all answers

What is the biggest difference between Sophos XG and FortiGate?

From my experience regarding both the Sophos and FortiGate firewalls, I personally would rather use FortiGate. I know the firewalls change every 5 to 7 years as stated but you really do need to upg...

See all answers

What are the biggest technical differences between Sophos UTM and Fortinet FortiGate?

As a solution, Sophos UTM offers a lot of functionality, it scales well, and the stability and performance are quite good. The most valuable features for me are their web and email filtering. I wou...

See all answers

What do you like most about Lumu?

Lumu protects against threats immediately and handles them in time.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Lumu?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Lumu?

We use it as our managed SOC instead of contracting with an MSP. It coordinates endpoint and gives us a single pane of glass for our security events.It fulfills the role of a SIEM, serving as our d...

See all answers

Comparisons

Sophos Firewall vs Fortinet FortiGate

Compared 20% of the time

Cisco Secure Firewall vs Fortinet FortiGate

Compared 14% of the time

Netgate pfSense vs Fortinet FortiGate

Compared 5% of the time

Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls vs Fortinet FortiGate

Compared 4% of the time

OPNsense vs Fortinet FortiGate

Compared 3% of the time

More Fortinet FortiGate Competitors

Darktrace vs Lumu

Compared 27% of the time

Wazuh vs Lumu

Compared 11% of the time

Stellar Cyber Open XDR vs Lumu

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft Defender XDR vs Lumu

Compared 7% of the time

Cynet vs Lumu

Compared 3% of the time

More Lumu Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Fortinet FortiGate

January 2026

Download Fortinet FortiGate product report

Buyer's Guide

Lumu

January 2026

Download Lumu product report

Also Known As

Fortinet FortiGate Next-Generation Firewall

No data available

Overview

Fortinet FortiGate is a versatile network security tool offering features like VPN, firewall, web filtering, intrusion prevention, and scalability. It is known for its performance and integration with other Fortinet products, making it a preferred choice for robust cybersecurity.

Fortinet FortiGate stands out as a comprehensive cybersecurity solution with strong performance and ease of configuration. It delivers unified threat management, integrating features such as dynamic routing, SD-WAN support, and centralized management. Despite its strengths, improvements in the web interface's stability, pricing structures, and reporting capabilities are needed. Users seek better integration with third-party tools and automation advancements to enhance the experience further. These enhancements, alongside improvements in bandwidth management and the reduction of licensing costs, are points of interest for users looking to capitalize on FortiGate's extensive capabilities.

What are Fortinet FortiGate's key features?

VPN: Ensures secure remote connections.
Firewall: Protects against unauthorized access.
Web Filtering: Blocks malicious sites and content.
Application Control: Manages and controls applications.
Intrusion Prevention: Detects and prevents vulnerabilities.
SSL Inspection: Enhances security by inspecting encrypted traffic.

What benefits should be considered when evaluating Fortinet FortiGate?

Affordability: Offers cost-effective security solutions.
Reliability: Known for consistent and stable performance.
Integration: Seamlessly integrates with other Fortinet products.
Comprehensive Protection: Provides broad threat protection capabilities.

Fortinet FortiGate is widely implemented across industries as a primary firewall system for securing internet gateways and safeguarding data centers. It supports businesses in achieving SD-WAN integration and enhances cybersecurity by providing essential features like antivirus, web filtering, and application control. Enterprises utilize FortiGate for securing remote connections and ensuring compliance with security standards, making it adaptable for different network sizes and industries.

Fortinet

Lumu Technologies is a cyber-security company that illuminates threats, attacks, and adversaries affecting enterprises worldwide. Using actionable intelligence, Lumu provides a radical way to secure networks by enhancing and augmenting existing defense capabilities established over the past 25 years.

Lumu Technologies

Sample Customers

Amazon Web Services, Microsoft, IBM, Cisco, Dell, HP, Oracle, Verizon, AT&T, T-Mobile, Sprint, Vodafone, Orange, BT Group, Telstra, Deutsche Telekom, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, CenturyLink, NTT Communications, Tata Communications, SoftBank, China Mobile, Singtel, Telus, Rogers Communications, Bell Canada, Telkom Indonesia, Telkom South Africa, Telmex, Telia Company, Telkom Kenya

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Fortinet FortiGate vs. Lumu

February 2026

Free Report: Fortinet FortiGate vs. Lumu

Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet FortiGate vs. Lumu and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,565 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fortinet FortiGate vs. Lumu report.

See our list of best Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) vendors.

We monitor all Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.