Frontegg vs Microsoft Entra ID comparison

Frontegg and Microsoft are both solutions in the Single Sign-On (SSO) category. Frontegg is ranked #18, while Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.7. Frontegg holds a 2.1% mindshare in SSO, compared to Microsoft’s 29.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Frontegg users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Frontegg

Read 6 Frontegg reviews

1,042 Views
714 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Entra ID

Read 217 Microsoft Entra ID reviews

12,415 Views
9,201 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Frontegg

Microsoft Entra ID

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 11, 2024

Microsoft Entra ID and Frontegg are identity management solutions. Microsoft Entra ID edges out due to its integration and scalability within the Microsoft ecosystem, whereas Frontegg holds strong with its customizability and advanced authentication features.

What features are offered by Microsoft Entra ID in comparison to Frontegg?

Microsoft Entra ID offers seamless integration with Microsoft products, scalability for growing enterprises, and robust security features. Frontegg provides extensive customizability, advanced authentication mechanisms, and rich developer-friendly tools for integrations.

What areas of improvement can be found in Microsoft Entra ID in comparison to Frontegg?

Microsoft Entra ID could improve its documentation, enhance customer support response times, and expand third-party integration capabilities. Frontegg needs to provide more comprehensive onboarding materials, increase integration options with third-party apps, and improve the user experience for non-developers.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of Microsoft Entra ID in comparison to Frontegg?

Microsoft Entra ID is known for straightforward deployment within Microsoft environments and has a solid customer support structure. Frontegg is praised for its intuitive setup process and responsive customer service team, making it user-friendly for diverse environments.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with Microsoft Entra ID in comparison to Frontegg?

Microsoft Entra ID has competitive setup costs within the Microsoft suite, often yielding substantial ROI due to integration efficiencies. Frontegg's pricing is higher but users justify the cost by the specific features provided, perceiving higher long-term value aligned with its feature set.

To learn more, read our detailed Frontegg vs. Microsoft Entra ID Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Frontegg vs. Microsoft Entra ID

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 823,795 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Frontegg

Ranking in Single Sign-On (SSO)

18th

Ranking in Authentication Systems

32nd

Average Rating

9.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) (8th)

Microsoft Entra ID

Ranking in Single Sign-On (SSO)

1st

Ranking in Authentication Systems

1st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

217

Ranking in other categories

Identity Management (IM) (1st), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (1st), Access Management (1st), Microsoft Security Suite (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Single Sign-On (SSO) category, the mindshare of Frontegg is 2.1%, down from 3.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Entra ID is 29.7%, up from 28.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Single Sign-On (SSO)

Featured Reviews

reviewer1658712

Co-Founder & CTO at Finout

Great granularity for roles and permissions and is multi-tenant by design

Today the features we’re using the most include the registration page, user and tenants management (including storing custom data on the tenant level to use as “feature flags”), and the admin portal. I like the admin portal since it allows us a full-stack solution for user management. The frontend side is a major benefit that I am happy I can give my customers from day one, without compromising. It helps us grow fast and focus our dev team on the core product while providing important user infrastructure to our customers. Another important benefit we discovered is the ease of integration. The integration with Frontegg is almost immediate, and the support is great. If you’re thinking of developing it on your own, don’t.

Read full review

Vinod Survase

M365 Senior Consultant at Capgemini

Saves us time and money and features Conditional Access policies, SSPR, and MFA

I want better integration between Azure AD and the on-prem environment because there are currently limitations that can hamper employee experience. We use a feature called password writeback, that can be challenging to implement in a hybrid environment. Employees can change their passwords using a self-service password reset (SSPR) feature, which reflects from the cloud to the on-prem identity, but not the other way around. Currently, there is no way to reflect passwords from on-prem identities to the cloud. There are other similar limitations, such as a cap on the number of identities that can be synchronized in a particular time frame, which can be an issue for large enterprises with 300,000 employees or more.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Their developers were always willing to meet even though we are in very different time zones."

"The MFA policy via Frontegg allows us to enable/disable/enforce the Multi-Factor Authentication policy of our users and to enhance security and adhere to modern standards."

"Every feature is multi-tenant by design, making different customer requests effortless to provide."

"We like the SSO, permissions and roles, multiple workspaces, and react login components."

"It has Audit Log and many cool features that if we were to develop them by ourselves, it would require a lot of research and development resources. Frontegg gives us everything we need to ensure that our customers have a safe and reliable authentication system in which they can also manage some of the features and roles by themself which gives them more control over their environment."

"The admin portal layer is super useful and saves valuable front-end development time."

"Microsoft Entra ID's valuable features include integration capabilities, a simplified Active Directory approach, scalability, conditional access, and privileged identity management."

"Its ability to provide secure connections to people at all locations is the most valuable. It is mostly used by enterprises."

"Single sign-on is the reason we use AD."

"The features around permissions are excellent."

"It also has features that help improve security posture. The most important of these features include multifactor authentication, which is very useful for connecting to the organization, especially from outside the boundaries of the organization. That is very helpful when it comes to user security."

"It is a central point where we provide the cloud lock-in for our company. We focus the multi-factor authentication within Azure AD before jumping to other clouds or software as a service offerings. So, it is the central point when you need to access something for our company within the cloud. You go to Azure AD and can authenticate there, then you move from there to the target destination or the single sign-on."

"The initial setup was very straightforward."

"The single sign-on is very convenient for us."

More Microsoft Entra ID pros

Cons

"Frontegg is fairly stable, however, we are looking forward to some promised capabilities, such as more tightly integrated Feature Flag support."

"We're hoping to see more user management-related features, according to Frontegg's roadmap."

"It would be nice to have a backup export with all tenant/users so that in case of a mistake we can have the option to restore the users."

"The web interface is missing a way to delete a workspace. I have accidentally created a workspace and was not able to delete it. It's a minor thing that should be supported."

"We really like the ability to add the same user across tenants. From a UX perspective, the flow can be betterized."

"The PHP SDK is limited. It's not a huge deal as we can just use their web API directly, but it is something to note if you're using PHP.‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‏‏‎ ‎‏‏‎ ‎‏‏‎ ‎‏‏‎ ‎‏‏‎"

"The product takes at least ten minutes to activate privilege identity management roles."

"There are many new features being added all the time, and Microsoft is advancing at a pace that aligns with our needs. I can't think of anything immediate that needs improvement."

"In a hybrid deployment, when we update a license by changing the UPN or email address of a user, it does not get updated automatically during normal sync. This means that we have to update it manually from Azure, which is something that needs to be corrected."

"There are some features, where if you want to access them, then you need to make use of PowerShell. If someone is not really versed in PowerShell scripting, then they would definitely have issues using some of those features in Azure Active Directory."

"Overall, it's not a very intuitive solution."

"The onboarding process for new users can be improved. It can be made simpler for people who have never registered to Azure AD previously and need to create an account and enable the MFA. The initial setup can be made simpler for non-IT people. It should be a bit simpler to use. Unless you get certifications, such as AZ-300 and AZ-301, it is not a simple thing to use at the enterprise scale."

"From time to time it takes a little bit of time to replicate, with some of the applications—something like five to 10 minutes. I know that the design is not supposed to enable real-time replication with some of the applications. But, as an administrator, I would like to run a specific change or modification in Azure Active Directory and see it replicated almost immediately."

"The downside of using a single password to access the entire system is that if those credentials are compromised, the hacker will have full access."

More Microsoft Entra ID cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"It's pretty good. We're using the native features. It's bundled with our Office 365 licenses. We aren't paying anything extra for Azure Active Directory. It's pretty good for us because it's complementary to Office 365. We're only paying for Office 365."

"The solution has three types of tiers: E1 has very basic features. You get limited stuff in E2 and cannot have Office 360 associated with it. E3 is on the costly side and has all the features."

"Licensing fees are paid on a monthly basis and the cost depends on the number of users."

"The price of the solution was reasonable."

"Azure AD has four licensing options- Free, Office 365 apps, Premium P1, and Premium P2. The free option has a limited number of identities and features, and the Office 365 version comes included in several Office 365 subscriptions. With the P1 and P2 licenses, we get all the freeware features plus additional security features, but these come at a higher price. The base price for P1 and P2 is $6 and $9 per user per month, respectively."

"Pricing could always be better. You pay the premium for Microsoft. Sometimes, it is worth it, and at other times, you wish to have more licensing options, especially for smaller companies."

"Most features of Entra ID are part of Microsoft's ecosystem and included in Microsoft 365 bundles, which means there are no additional costs associated with pricing and licensing."

"Active Directory is bundled with a package of Microsoft services, so it doesn't cost much. I don't know about the individual license of Active Directory."

More Microsoft Entra ID pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

823,795 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

13%

Educational Organization

Retailer

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

31%

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How does Duo Security compare with Microsoft Authenticator?

We switched to Duo Security for identity verification. We’d been using a competitor but got the chance to evaluate Duo for 30 days, and we could not be happier. Duo Security is easy to configure a...

See all answers

What do you like most about Azure Active Directory?

It is very simple. The Active Directory functions are very easy for us. Its integration with anything is very easy. We can easily do third-party multifactor authentication.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Active Directory?

Most features of Entra ID are part of Microsoft's ecosystem and included in Microsoft 365 bundles, which means there are no additional costs associated with pricing and licensing.

See all answers

Comparisons

Auth0 vs Frontegg

Compared 68% of the time

Descope vs Frontegg

Compared 13% of the time

WorkOS vs Frontegg

Compared 9% of the time

More Frontegg Competitors

Microsoft Intune vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 11% of the time

Google Cloud Identity vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 10% of the time

Okta Workforce Identity vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 8% of the time

Auth0 vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 5% of the time

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 5% of the time

More Microsoft Entra ID Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Single Sign-On (SSO)

December 2024

Download Frontegg product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Entra ID

November 2024

Download Microsoft Entra ID product report

Also Known As

No data available

Azure AD, Azure Active Directory, Azure Active Directory, Microsoft Authenticator

Learn More

Frontegg

Microsoft

Interactive Demo

Demo not available

Frontegg

Microsoft

Overview

Frontegg is a user management platform, designed for the Product-Led Growth (PLG) era. Frontegg provides blazing-fast integration of a powerful user infrastructure, designed to handle modern application use-cases.

Our platform supports app builders by covering all the way from fundamental authentication flows to the most advanced capabilities such as complex organizational structures (multi-tenancy), fine-grained authorization, API-token management, self-service admin portal for end-users, subscription enforcement, single-sign-on (SSO), and much more.

Frontegg’s interfaces are embedded as a UI layer within your app and becomes a customer-facing management interface for your end-users, both on the personal and workspace levels. Frontegg also powers-up your backend through rich SDKs supported in various languages and frameworks.

Pricing: Starts at $249/m

Microsoft Entra ID is used for extending on-premises Active Directory to the cloud, managing application access, enabling multi-factor authentication, and single sign-on. It facilitates policy enforcement and secure access, ensuring centralized identity management across cloud and on-premises resources.

Organizations utilize Microsoft Entra ID for robust user and group management, identity synchronization, and conditional access. Its seamless integration with third-party apps, scalability, and support for remote work make it a preferred choice. The admin center streamlines identity and access tasks, enhancing efficiency and security with features like privileged identity management and audit logs.

What are the key features of Microsoft Entra ID?

Single Sign-On: Simplifies user access to multiple applications with one login.
Multifactor Authentication: Enhances security by requiring additional verification.
Conditional Access: Establishes policies that determine how users' access cloud apps.
Integration: Easily integrates with various third-party applications.
User Identity Protection: Safeguards user identities from threats.
Privileged Identity Management: Manages elevated access to sensitive resources.
Audit Logs: Provides thorough activity logs for oversight and compliance.

What benefits should users look for in Microsoft Entra ID reviews?

Enhanced Security: Offers strong multifactor authentication and identity protection.
Administrative Efficiency: Simplifies identity and access management tasks.
Scalability: Supports growing user bases and remote work environments.
Integration Capabilities: Compatible with numerous third-party applications.
User-Friendly Interface: Makes managing user identities straightforward.

Microsoft Entra ID implementation varies across industries. Tech firms leverage it for secure, scalable access management, while healthcare organizations utilize its identity protection features to safeguard patient data. Educational institutions adopt Entra ID for streamlined user management and policy enforcement, ensuring secure access for students and staff across on-premises and cloud resources.

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Microsoft Entre ID is trusted by companies of all sizes and industries including Walmart, Zscaler, Uniper, Amtrak, monday.com, and more.

Buyer's Guide

Frontegg vs. Microsoft Entra ID

December 2024

Free Report: Frontegg vs. Microsoft Entra ID

Find out what your peers are saying about Frontegg vs. Microsoft Entra ID and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

823,795 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Frontegg vs. Microsoft Entra ID report.

See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors and best Authentication Systems vendors.

We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.