Frontegg vs Microsoft Entra ID comparison

Frontegg and Microsoft are both solutions in the Single Sign-On (SSO) category. Frontegg is ranked #18, while Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.7. Frontegg holds a 1.8% mindshare in SSO, compared to Microsoft’s 27.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Frontegg users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Frontegg

Read 6 Frontegg reviews

835 Views
566 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Entra ID

Read 219 Microsoft Entra ID reviews

10,254 Views
7,546 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Frontegg

Microsoft Entra ID

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 11, 2024

Microsoft Entra ID and Frontegg are identity management solutions. Microsoft Entra ID edges out due to its integration and scalability within the Microsoft ecosystem, whereas Frontegg holds strong with its customizability and advanced authentication features.

What features are offered by Microsoft Entra ID in comparison to Frontegg?

Microsoft Entra ID offers seamless integration with Microsoft products, scalability for growing enterprises, and robust security features. Frontegg provides extensive customizability, advanced authentication mechanisms, and rich developer-friendly tools for integrations.

What areas of improvement can be found in Microsoft Entra ID in comparison to Frontegg?

Microsoft Entra ID could improve its documentation, enhance customer support response times, and expand third-party integration capabilities. Frontegg needs to provide more comprehensive onboarding materials, increase integration options with third-party apps, and improve the user experience for non-developers.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of Microsoft Entra ID in comparison to Frontegg?

Microsoft Entra ID is known for straightforward deployment within Microsoft environments and has a solid customer support structure. Frontegg is praised for its intuitive setup process and responsive customer service team, making it user-friendly for diverse environments.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with Microsoft Entra ID in comparison to Frontegg?

Microsoft Entra ID has competitive setup costs within the Microsoft suite, often yielding substantial ROI due to integration efficiencies. Frontegg's pricing is higher but users justify the cost by the specific features provided, perceiving higher long-term value aligned with its feature set.

To learn more, read our detailed Frontegg vs. Microsoft Entra ID Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Frontegg vs. Microsoft Entra ID

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 842,194 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Frontegg

Ranking in Single Sign-On (SSO)

18th

Ranking in Authentication Systems

29th

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) (9th)

Microsoft Entra ID

Ranking in Single Sign-On (SSO)

1st

Ranking in Authentication Systems

1st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

219

Ranking in other categories

Identity Management (IM) (1st), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (1st), Access Management (1st), Microsoft Security Suite (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Single Sign-On (SSO) category, the mindshare of Frontegg is 1.8%, down from 2.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Entra ID is 27.5%, up from 27.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Single Sign-On (SSO)

Featured Reviews

reviewer1645395

Developer at Kovrr

Intuitive with reCaptcha integration and helpful technical support

Frontegg's solution fits us very well, as it removes the extra work of developing, maintaining, storing, and securing all of the user-management platforms. It saves us a lot of time and money every single day. Frontegg allows our organization to focus on what matters - creating meaningful, innovative solutions for our customers without wasting time and energy on problems that were already solved by the industry many, many times before. Without Frontegg, our dev velocity would have been compromised greatly, since we would have to invest in a lot of resources to maintain a properly secured, granular, and flexible user-management framework.

Read full review

Aaron Liang

System engineer at a energy/utilities company with 501-1,000 employees

Has significantly improved secure access to applications and resources in our environment

Microsoft Entra ID has helped by simplifying our management of permissions for APIs. We are not directly exposing credentials, as we use tokens instead. It has made management easier and more secure, especially in a multi-user environment. The implementation of Microsoft Entra ID significantly improved secure access to applications and resources in our environment, primarily through the widespread use of single-sign-on. Managing API permissions became much easier, as application registration often involves calling an API to utilize services without directly exposing credentials, relying instead on token-based authentication. This streamlined approach benefits end-users by simplifying access while remaining transparent to them. Ultimately, my role focuses on ensuring a smooth and user-friendly experience, even if the underlying technology remains unseen by the end-users. Our company strongly emphasizes passwordless authentication, primarily through device-bound passkeys in Microsoft Authenticator. While administrators with high-privileged accounts utilize YubiKeys and passwords for tasks like accessing Microsoft Graph, we are actively transitioning all other users towards passwordless methods such as Windows Hello biometrics. This approach streamlines authentication and enhances security. Though initial deployment in 2022 presented challenges due to hardware limitations and the lingering effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, the technology has significantly improved and provides a simple and effective user experience.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Their developers were always willing to meet even though we are in very different time zones."

"It has Audit Log and many cool features that if we were to develop them by ourselves, it would require a lot of research and development resources. Frontegg gives us everything we need to ensure that our customers have a safe and reliable authentication system in which they can also manage some of the features and roles by themself which gives them more control over their environment."

"The MFA policy via Frontegg allows us to enable/disable/enforce the Multi-Factor Authentication policy of our users and to enhance security and adhere to modern standards."

"Every feature is multi-tenant by design, making different customer requests effortless to provide."

"We like the SSO, permissions and roles, multiple workspaces, and react login components."

"The admin portal layer is super useful and saves valuable front-end development time."

"My two preferred features are conditional access and privileged identity management."

"Entra ID provides an excellent overview of the applications and the options applied to them."

"The feature that I have found most valuable is its authentication security. That is Azure Active Directory's purpose - making cloud services' security and integration easier."

"It is easy to manage. I can manage systems with policies and automate our systems. Any professional system can be easily integrated with Azure Active Directory. It is widely used with Windows versions."

"The most valuable feature is that it is very easy to implement, you don't need a lot of effort to set up the solution. This is the most advantageous point, that you can do anything on Azure without taking too much time."

"Microsoft customer service is the best in the industry."

"The technical support is pretty good."

"The user management groups are valuable. It is a pretty basic product, but user management, in general, is valuable with the ability to differentiate between business lines and add different policies, group-based management, and dynamic user groups."

More Microsoft Entra ID pros

Cons

"The web interface is missing a way to delete a workspace. I have accidentally created a workspace and was not able to delete it. It's a minor thing that should be supported."

"The PHP SDK is limited. It's not a huge deal as we can just use their web API directly, but it is something to note if you're using PHP.‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‏‏‎ ‎‏‏‎ ‎‏‏‎ ‎‏‏‎ ‎‏‏‎"

"We really like the ability to add the same user across tenants. From a UX perspective, the flow can be betterized."

"It would be nice to have a backup export with all tenant/users so that in case of a mistake we can have the option to restore the users."

"We're hoping to see more user management-related features, according to Frontegg's roadmap."

"Frontegg is fairly stable, however, we are looking forward to some promised capabilities, such as more tightly integrated Feature Flag support."

"The product needs to be more user-friendly."

"Some systems do not integrate very well with Azure AD. We thought of going for Okta, but later on we were able to achieve it, but not the way we wanted. It was not as easy as we thought it would be. The integration was not very seamless."

"Active Directory could always be more secure. Right now, we've got two-factor authentications. All services based on Active Directory have a username and password. If somebody hacked our username, they could easily get all the data from our side. So I want two-factor authentication and a stronger password policy from Active Directory. The domain controllers should be more secure as well."

"There are issues using it with ADFS."

"Documentation I think is always the worst part with what Azure's doing right now across the board."

"It doesn't function the same way as an Active Directory inside of an infrastructure, that is, a physical infrastructure. In the cloud, it is all flat. That's one of the disadvantages."

"The area that needs improvement is integrating IDs between multiple environments and forests. In our case, it's hard to get the identities from multiple forests into one location. This is probably our biggest challenge."

"Azure Active Directory could improve the two-factor authentication."

More Microsoft Entra ID cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"It is very expensive. Its price should be lower. Price is the most important factor for Turkish people."

"The price is fine. It's a good value for the money compared with other solutions."

"The E5 plan we are using contains the premium plans for Azure Active Directory. We are not paying only for the Azure Active Directory Premium licenses. We have it already included within our E5 plan."

"It's pretty good. We're using the native features. It's bundled with our Office 365 licenses. We aren't paying anything extra for Azure Active Directory. It's pretty good for us because it's complementary to Office 365. We're only paying for Office 365."

"The solution has three types of tiers: E1 has very basic features. You get limited stuff in E2 and cannot have Office 360 associated with it. E3 is on the costly side and has all the features."

"Azure Active Directory is expensive."

"There are four different levels of subscription including the free level, one that includes the Office 365 applications, the Premium 1 (P1) level, and the Premium 2 (P2) level."

"I feel Microsoft is very costly compared to other products. That is also what management is thinking. But when we consider security and support, Microsoft is better than any other product."

More Microsoft Entra ID pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

842,194 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Educational Organization

Government

Financial Services Firm

Educational Organization

33%

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How does Duo Security compare with Microsoft Authenticator?

We switched to Duo Security for identity verification. We’d been using a competitor but got the chance to evaluate Duo for 30 days, and we could not be happier. Duo Security is easy to configure a...

See all answers

What do you like most about Azure Active Directory?

It is very simple. The Active Directory functions are very easy for us. Its integration with anything is very easy. We can easily do third-party multifactor authentication.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Active Directory?

We are an enterprise customer with an enterprise agreement in place with many of our partner companies, so there are no special questions or issues about pricing, setup cost, or licensing.

See all answers

Comparisons

Auth0 vs Frontegg

Compared 66% of the time

Descope vs Frontegg

Compared 12% of the time

WorkOS vs Frontegg

Compared 11% of the time

More Frontegg Competitors

Microsoft Intune vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 11% of the time

Google Cloud Identity vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 10% of the time

Okta Workforce Identity vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 9% of the time

Auth0 vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 6% of the time

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 5% of the time

More Microsoft Entra ID Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Single Sign-On (SSO)

March 2025

Download Frontegg product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Entra ID

March 2025

Download Microsoft Entra ID product report

Also Known As

No data available

Azure AD, Azure Active Directory, Azure Active Directory, Microsoft Authenticator

Interactive Demo

Demo not available

Frontegg

Microsoft

Overview

Frontegg is a user management platform, designed for the Product-Led Growth (PLG) era. Frontegg provides blazing-fast integration of a powerful user infrastructure, designed to handle modern application use-cases.

Our platform supports app builders by covering all the way from fundamental authentication flows to the most advanced capabilities such as complex organizational structures (multi-tenancy), fine-grained authorization, API-token management, self-service admin portal for end-users, subscription enforcement, single-sign-on (SSO), and much more.

Frontegg’s interfaces are embedded as a UI layer within your app and becomes a customer-facing management interface for your end-users, both on the personal and workspace levels. Frontegg also powers-up your backend through rich SDKs supported in various languages and frameworks.

Pricing: Starts at $249/m

Frontegg

Microsoft Entra ID is used for extending on-premises Active Directory to the cloud, managing application access, enabling multi-factor authentication, and single sign-on. It facilitates policy enforcement and secure access, ensuring centralized identity management across cloud and on-premises resources.

Organizations utilize Microsoft Entra ID for robust user and group management, identity synchronization, and conditional access. Its seamless integration with third-party apps, scalability, and support for remote work make it a preferred choice. The admin center streamlines identity and access tasks, enhancing efficiency and security with features like privileged identity management and audit logs.

What are the key features of Microsoft Entra ID?

Single Sign-On: Simplifies user access to multiple applications with one login.
Multifactor Authentication: Enhances security by requiring additional verification.
Conditional Access: Establishes policies that determine how users' access cloud apps.
Integration: Easily integrates with various third-party applications.
User Identity Protection: Safeguards user identities from threats.
Privileged Identity Management: Manages elevated access to sensitive resources.
Audit Logs: Provides thorough activity logs for oversight and compliance.

What benefits should users look for in Microsoft Entra ID reviews?

Enhanced Security: Offers strong multifactor authentication and identity protection.
Administrative Efficiency: Simplifies identity and access management tasks.
Scalability: Supports growing user bases and remote work environments.
Integration Capabilities: Compatible with numerous third-party applications.
User-Friendly Interface: Makes managing user identities straightforward.

Microsoft Entra ID implementation varies across industries. Tech firms leverage it for secure, scalable access management, while healthcare organizations utilize its identity protection features to safeguard patient data. Educational institutions adopt Entra ID for streamlined user management and policy enforcement, ensuring secure access for students and staff across on-premises and cloud resources.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Microsoft Entre ID is trusted by companies of all sizes and industries including Walmart, Zscaler, Uniper, Amtrak, monday.com, and more.

Buyer's Guide

Frontegg vs. Microsoft Entra ID

March 2025

Free Report: Frontegg vs. Microsoft Entra ID

Find out what your peers are saying about Frontegg vs. Microsoft Entra ID and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

842,194 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Frontegg vs. Microsoft Entra ID report.

See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors and best Authentication Systems vendors.

We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.