Frontegg vs Red Hat Single Sign On comparison

Frontegg and Red Hat are both solutions in the Single Sign-On (SSO) category. Frontegg is ranked #18, while Red Hat is ranked #11 with an average rating of 9.7. Frontegg holds a 1.8% mindshare in SSO, compared to Red Hat’s 2.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Frontegg users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Red Hat users who would recommend it.

Frontegg

Read 6 Frontegg reviews

781 Views
530 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Red Hat Single Sign On

Read 5 Red Hat Single Sign On reviews

1,084 Views
685 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Frontegg

Red Hat Single Sign On

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Red Hat Single Sign On and Frontegg are competing products in the Single Sign On market. Based on user reviews, Frontegg appears to be preferred for its feature set and rapid deployment, despite Red Hat SSO having strong integration capabilities and robust security.

Features: Red Hat Single Sign On is known for its comprehensive integration capabilities, robust security features, and extensive customization options. Frontegg is praised for its flexibility, ease of implementation, and user-friendly feature set.

Room for Improvement: Red Hat Single Sign On users suggest enhancing its documentation, improving support resources, and simplifying initial setup. Frontegg users indicate the need for better customer service response times, more comprehensive support options, and additional customization capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Red Hat Single Sign On’s deployment model is well-regarded though complex initially. Frontegg's deployment is straightforward and quick. Red Hat SSO users find customer service response times satisfactory, whereas Frontegg users see a need for faster support responses.

Pricing and ROI: Red Hat Single Sign On offers a good ROI despite higher setup costs. Frontegg provides excellent value for its price with lower initial costs and better immediate ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Frontegg vs. Red Hat Single Sign On Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Frontegg vs. Red Hat Single Sign On

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 846,617 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Frontegg

Ranking in Single Sign-On (SSO)

18th

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Authentication Systems (30th), Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) (9th)

Red Hat Single Sign On

Ranking in Single Sign-On (SSO)

11th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Single Sign-On (SSO) category, the mindshare of Frontegg is 1.8%, down from 2.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat Single Sign On is 2.2%, down from 2.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Single Sign-On (SSO)

Featured Reviews

reviewer1645395

Developer at Kovrr

Intuitive with reCaptcha integration and helpful technical support

Frontegg's solution fits us very well, as it removes the extra work of developing, maintaining, storing, and securing all of the user-management platforms. It saves us a lot of time and money every single day. Frontegg allows our organization to focus on what matters - creating meaningful, innovative solutions for our customers without wasting time and energy on problems that were already solved by the industry many, many times before. Without Frontegg, our dev velocity would have been compromised greatly, since we would have to invest in a lot of resources to maintain a properly secured, granular, and flexible user-management framework.

Read full review

Giovanni Baruzzi

Owner at Syntlogo GmbH

A stable and flexible solution with some basic capabilities

I set up Red Hat Single Sign-On in half an hour. I had to install a single sign-on solution for a customer. I reviewed a list of all available products, which were no more than fifty, and analyzed them. I chose it because it was convincing, modern, and based on technology from 2015. I put my trust in this product, and after nine years, I feel confident in my decision. Deploying this solution usually takes half an hour. You need an operating system running, then deploy the packages and prepare the interfaces. I rate the initial setup a ten out of ten, where one is difficult and ten is easy.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Every feature is multi-tenant by design, making different customer requests effortless to provide."

"The admin portal layer is super useful and saves valuable front-end development time."

"It has Audit Log and many cool features that if we were to develop them by ourselves, it would require a lot of research and development resources. Frontegg gives us everything we need to ensure that our customers have a safe and reliable authentication system in which they can also manage some of the features and roles by themself which gives them more control over their environment."

"Their developers were always willing to meet even though we are in very different time zones."

"The MFA policy via Frontegg allows us to enable/disable/enforce the Multi-Factor Authentication policy of our users and to enhance security and adhere to modern standards."

"We like the SSO, permissions and roles, multiple workspaces, and react login components."

"The product’s most valuable feature is its ability to assign only one password for the user at a false value."

"Red Hat SSO has a lot of very concise, well laid out documentation, which is available in the free edition as well."

"It is very easy to scale and use as you want."

"Good support for single sign-on protocols."

"The solution is flexible and has the same basic capabilities right out of the box. The most important feature of this product is that it is a Red double-sided product. One side is a well-known open-source project; the other is a Red Hat commercial product. The commercial product benefits from all the experience and contributions of the community, making it a very well-developed product."

"Red Hat SSO integrates well with our other solutions. Using OIDC protocols and ITL integration, employees can authenticate with Red Hat SSO and access our microservices."

Cons

"The web interface is missing a way to delete a workspace. I have accidentally created a workspace and was not able to delete it. It's a minor thing that should be supported."

"It would be nice to have a backup export with all tenant/users so that in case of a mistake we can have the option to restore the users."

"We really like the ability to add the same user across tenants. From a UX perspective, the flow can be betterized."

"The PHP SDK is limited. It's not a huge deal as we can just use their web API directly, but it is something to note if you're using PHP.‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‏‏‎ ‎‏‏‎ ‎‏‏‎ ‎‏‏‎ ‎‏‏‎"

"Frontegg is fairly stable, however, we are looking forward to some promised capabilities, such as more tightly integrated Feature Flag support."

"We're hoping to see more user management-related features, according to Frontegg's roadmap."

"They could provide more checks and balances to find out if there have been any security lapses, e.g., if somebody is trying to break into the system. Some other products have these detection mechanisms in case someone is trying to hack into the system or find out a user's passwords."

"Security could be improved."

"Red Hat publishes much more and communicates its actions and plans. They could provide words, maps, and other resources."

"Red Hat SSO's architecture could be updated."

"The product’s technical support services could be better."

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"It is a low cost product. This product can be used by non-profit organizations or universities, when they don't want to invest a lot of money."

"Red Hat Single Sign On is expensive."

"If you want support, that is when you use the paid version. There are different support categories that you can pay for, which provide different support levels. E.g., there is a quick response if you pay a higher amount, where the response time is within a few hours."

"The license is around $8000 USD."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Educational Organization

Financial Services Firm

Government

Financial Services Firm

19%

Government

15%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Red Hat Single Sign On?

The product’s most valuable feature is its ability to assign only one password for the user at a false value.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Red Hat Single Sign On?

I rate the product’s pricing a five out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Red Hat Single Sign On?

Red Hat publishes much more and communicates its actions and plans. They could provide words, maps, and other resources. Scalability could be improved, too. It could provide more documentation.

See all answers

Comparisons

Auth0 vs Frontegg

Compared 65% of the time

WorkOS vs Frontegg

Compared 13% of the time

Descope vs Frontegg

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Frontegg

Compared 11% of the time

More Frontegg Competitors

Microsoft Entra ID vs Red Hat Single Sign On

Compared 36% of the time

Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs Red Hat Single Sign On

Compared 20% of the time

Okta Workforce Identity vs Red Hat Single Sign On

Compared 14% of the time

Auth0 vs Red Hat Single Sign On

Compared 13% of the time

Ping Identity Platform vs Red Hat Single Sign On

Compared 10% of the time

More Red Hat Single Sign On Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Single Sign-On (SSO)

March 2025

Download Frontegg product report

Buyer's Guide

Single Sign-On (SSO)

March 2025

Download Red Hat Single Sign On product report

Also Known As

No data available

Red Hat Single Sign-On, Red Hat SSO, RH SSO, RH-SSO

Overview

Frontegg is a user management platform, designed for the Product-Led Growth (PLG) era. Frontegg provides blazing-fast integration of a powerful user infrastructure, designed to handle modern application use-cases.

Our platform supports app builders by covering all the way from fundamental authentication flows to the most advanced capabilities such as complex organizational structures (multi-tenancy), fine-grained authorization, API-token management, self-service admin portal for end-users, subscription enforcement, single-sign-on (SSO), and much more.

Frontegg’s interfaces are embedded as a UI layer within your app and becomes a customer-facing management interface for your end-users, both on the personal and workspace levels. Frontegg also powers-up your backend through rich SDKs supported in various languages and frameworks.

Pricing: Starts at $249/m

Frontegg

Red Hat is the world’s leading provider of enterprise open source solutions, using a community-powered approach to deliver high-performing Linux, cloud, container, and Kubernetes technologies.

Red Hat

Buyer's Guide

Frontegg vs. Red Hat Single Sign On

April 2025

Free Report: Frontegg vs. Red Hat Single Sign On

Find out what your peers are saying about Frontegg vs. Red Hat Single Sign On and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Frontegg vs. Red Hat Single Sign On report.

See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors.

We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.