Microsoft Entra ID vs Red Hat Single Sign On comparison

Microsoft and Red Hat are both solutions in the Single Sign-On (SSO) category. Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.7, while Red Hat is ranked #11 with an average rating of 9.7. Microsoft holds a 29.7% mindshare in SSO, compared to Red Hat’s 3.0% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Red Hat users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Entra ID

Read 218 Microsoft Entra ID reviews

12,415 Views
9,201 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Red Hat Single Sign On

Read 5 Red Hat Single Sign On reviews

1,237 Views
852 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Entra ID

Red Hat Single Sign On

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Microsoft Entra ID and Red Hat Single Sign On are two popular authentication solutions. Microsoft Entra ID has the upper hand in integrations and ease of use, while Red Hat Single Sign On is favored for its flexibility and customization options.

Features: Microsoft Entra ID is known for seamless integration with other Microsoft services, strong security features, and straightforward setup. Red Hat Single Sign On is flexible, highly customizable, and open-source.

Room for Improvement: Microsoft Entra ID could benefit from enhanced reporting features, more flexible pricing options, and better documentation. Red Hat Single Sign On needs improved documentation, a more intuitive setup process, and streamlined deployment steps.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Entra ID is praised for its quick deployment and robust customer support. Red Hat Single Sign On's deployment can be more complex, but it has strong community support.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Entra ID users find value in its subscription pricing model with a higher perceived ROI. Red Hat Single Sign On users appreciate the lower initial setup cost and the open-source licensing model.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Entra ID vs. Red Hat Single Sign On Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Entra ID vs. Red Hat Single Sign On

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,095 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Entra ID

Ranking in Single Sign-On (SSO)

1st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

218

Ranking in other categories

Authentication Systems (1st), Identity Management (IM) (1st), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (1st), Access Management (1st), Microsoft Security Suite (4th)

Red Hat Single Sign On

Ranking in Single Sign-On (SSO)

11th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Single Sign-On (SSO) category, the mindshare of Microsoft Entra ID is 29.7%, up from 28.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat Single Sign On is 3.0%, down from 3.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Single Sign-On (SSO)

Featured Reviews

Vinod Survase

M365 Senior Consultant at Capgemini

Saves us time and money and features Conditional Access policies, SSPR, and MFA

I want better integration between Azure AD and the on-prem environment because there are currently limitations that can hamper employee experience. We use a feature called password writeback, that can be challenging to implement in a hybrid environment. Employees can change their passwords using a self-service password reset (SSPR) feature, which reflects from the cloud to the on-prem identity, but not the other way around. Currently, there is no way to reflect passwords from on-prem identities to the cloud. There are other similar limitations, such as a cap on the number of identities that can be synchronized in a particular time frame, which can be an issue for large enterprises with 300,000 employees or more.

Read full review

Giovanni Baruzzi

Owner at Syntlogo GmbH

A stable and flexible solution with some basic capabilities

I set up Red Hat Single Sign-On in half an hour. I had to install a single sign-on solution for a customer. I reviewed a list of all available products, which were no more than fifty, and analyzed them. I chose it because it was convincing, modern, and based on technology from 2015. I put my trust in this product, and after nine years, I feel confident in my decision. Deploying this solution usually takes half an hour. You need an operating system running, then deploy the packages and prepare the interfaces. I rate the initial setup a ten out of ten, where one is difficult and ten is easy.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We're using the whole suite: device management, user credentials, everything that's possible."

"Being able to use Azure AD means that you can use some of the Azure AD security features like Advanced Password Protection. As well as querying your normal password requirements like lengths and complexity, Azure AD has a feature in which you can put specific words. It can be words to do with your company, words to do with your company location, or words that a lot of your employees would otherwise use. You can disallow them. It's very good at making more obvious passwords, ones they're not allowed to use anymore. That's a good feature."

"The single sign-on is very convenient for us."

"Very stable and scalable IAM service with good SSO and authentication features."

"The technical support is pretty good."

"It's a very intuitive platform. It's easy to create groups and add people."

"Conditional access and Privileged Identity Management (PIM) are the most valuable features from a security perspective."

"The ability to speed up ability is an asset."

More Microsoft Entra ID pros

"Good support for single sign-on protocols."

"The solution is flexible and has the same basic capabilities right out of the box. The most important feature of this product is that it is a Red double-sided product. One side is a well-known open-source project; the other is a Red Hat commercial product. The commercial product benefits from all the experience and contributions of the community, making it a very well-developed product."

"Red Hat SSO integrates well with our other solutions. Using OIDC protocols and ITL integration, employees can authenticate with Red Hat SSO and access our microservices."

"It is very easy to scale and use as you want."

"Red Hat SSO has a lot of very concise, well laid out documentation, which is available in the free edition as well."

"The product’s most valuable feature is its ability to assign only one password for the user at a false value."

Cons

"Something that can be improved is their user interface"

"Microsoft's pricing and licensing are difficult to understand. We engage with Microsoft partners regularly, but Microsoft's frequent rebranding complicates the process for us in the industry."

"Tech support is inconsistent."

"Microsoft Entra ID could benefit from more fine-tuned rights. It is necessary to prevent granting an application or user broad access rights."

"The only issue with Azure AD is that it doesn't have control over the wifi network. You have to do something more to have a secure wifi network. To have it working, you need an active directory server on-premises to take care of the networks."

"I rate Microsoft support four out of 10. Tier 1 and Tier 2 support could be better. It's not timely or professional."

"Better user sign-in logging is needed. We work with Okta, and the two of them do not always work well together. We can have more insight into some of the user information and how it interacts."

"I would like it to be easier to integrate third-party applications."

More Microsoft Entra ID cons

"The product’s technical support services could be better."

"Red Hat publishes much more and communicates its actions and plans. They could provide words, maps, and other resources."

"Security could be improved."

"They could provide more checks and balances to find out if there have been any security lapses, e.g., if somebody is trying to break into the system. Some other products have these detection mechanisms in case someone is trying to hack into the system or find out a user's passwords."

"Red Hat SSO's architecture could be updated."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is relatively affordable, especially compared to Okta, a pricey solution."

"Licensing is easy."

"The P1 version costs $6 per user per month."

"From a pricing standpoint, with all the services that we get, we are okay. I do not see a problem with the pricing structure. We are getting our money's worth."

"It is bundled with other services and the pricing is quite reasonable."

"The cost of Azure AD is one of the biggest benefits, as it is available for use free of charge when you start with Office 365."

"The price of Azure Active Directory and Amazon AWS, are almost the same, but most people prefer Amazon AWS because they find it's a little cheaper to some extent and an easier platform to use."

"I'm not totally aware of the pricing and licensing, but I do know that the pricing and licensing must be quite balanced. We are a pretty old client of Microsoft, and MSA is just one of the services we use from Microsoft. There's a whole Microsoft 365 suite that's implemented as well. I'm sure it is something that is acceptable to both parties."

More Microsoft Entra ID pricing and cost advice

"The license is around $8000 USD."

"If you want support, that is when you use the paid version. There are different support categories that you can pay for, which provide different support levels. E.g., there is a quick response if you pay a higher amount, where the response time is within a few hours."

"Red Hat Single Sign On is expensive."

"It is a low cost product. This product can be used by non-profit organizations or universities, when they don't want to invest a lot of money."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,095 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

32%

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

20%

Government

16%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

11%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Duo Security compare with Microsoft Authenticator?

We switched to Duo Security for identity verification. We’d been using a competitor but got the chance to evaluate Duo for 30 days, and we could not be happier. Duo Security is easy to configure a...

See all answers

What do you like most about Azure Active Directory?

It is very simple. The Active Directory functions are very easy for us. Its integration with anything is very easy. We can easily do third-party multifactor authentication.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Active Directory?

Most features of Entra ID are part of Microsoft's ecosystem and included in Microsoft 365 bundles, which means there are no additional costs associated with pricing and licensing.

See all answers

What do you like most about Red Hat Single Sign On?

The product’s most valuable feature is its ability to assign only one password for the user at a false value.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Red Hat Single Sign On?

I rate the product’s pricing a five out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Red Hat Single Sign On?

Red Hat publishes much more and communicates its actions and plans. They could provide words, maps, and other resources. Scalability could be improved, too. It could provide more documentation.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Intune vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 11% of the time

Google Cloud Identity vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 10% of the time

Okta Workforce Identity vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 8% of the time

Auth0 vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 5% of the time

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 5% of the time

More Microsoft Entra ID Competitors

Auth0 vs Red Hat Single Sign On

Compared 18% of the time

Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs Red Hat Single Sign On

Compared 16% of the time

Okta Workforce Identity vs Red Hat Single Sign On

Compared 10% of the time

AWS IAM Identity Center vs Red Hat Single Sign On

Compared 8% of the time

Ping Identity Platform vs Red Hat Single Sign On

Compared 7% of the time

More Red Hat Single Sign On Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Entra ID

December 2024

Download Microsoft Entra ID product report

Buyer's Guide

Single Sign-On (SSO)

December 2024

Download Red Hat Single Sign On product report

Also Known As

Azure AD, Azure Active Directory, Azure Active Directory, Microsoft Authenticator

Red Hat Single Sign-On, Red Hat SSO, RH SSO, RH-SSO

Learn More

Microsoft

Red Hat

Interactive Demo

Microsoft

Demo not available

Red Hat

Overview

Microsoft Entra ID is used for extending on-premises Active Directory to the cloud, managing application access, enabling multi-factor authentication, and single sign-on. It facilitates policy enforcement and secure access, ensuring centralized identity management across cloud and on-premises resources.

Organizations utilize Microsoft Entra ID for robust user and group management, identity synchronization, and conditional access. Its seamless integration with third-party apps, scalability, and support for remote work make it a preferred choice. The admin center streamlines identity and access tasks, enhancing efficiency and security with features like privileged identity management and audit logs.

What are the key features of Microsoft Entra ID?

Single Sign-On: Simplifies user access to multiple applications with one login.
Multifactor Authentication: Enhances security by requiring additional verification.
Conditional Access: Establishes policies that determine how users' access cloud apps.
Integration: Easily integrates with various third-party applications.
User Identity Protection: Safeguards user identities from threats.
Privileged Identity Management: Manages elevated access to sensitive resources.
Audit Logs: Provides thorough activity logs for oversight and compliance.

What benefits should users look for in Microsoft Entra ID reviews?

Enhanced Security: Offers strong multifactor authentication and identity protection.
Administrative Efficiency: Simplifies identity and access management tasks.
Scalability: Supports growing user bases and remote work environments.
Integration Capabilities: Compatible with numerous third-party applications.
User-Friendly Interface: Makes managing user identities straightforward.

Microsoft Entra ID implementation varies across industries. Tech firms leverage it for secure, scalable access management, while healthcare organizations utilize its identity protection features to safeguard patient data. Educational institutions adopt Entra ID for streamlined user management and policy enforcement, ensuring secure access for students and staff across on-premises and cloud resources.

Red Hat is the world’s leading provider of enterprise open source solutions, using a community-powered approach to deliver high-performing Linux, cloud, container, and Kubernetes technologies.

Sample Customers

Microsoft Entre ID is trusted by companies of all sizes and industries including Walmart, Zscaler, Uniper, Amtrak, monday.com, and more.

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Entra ID vs. Red Hat Single Sign On

December 2024

Free Report: Microsoft Entra ID vs. Red Hat Single Sign On

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Entra ID vs. Red Hat Single Sign On and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,095 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Entra ID vs. Red Hat Single Sign On report.

See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors.

We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.