Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

AWS IAM Identity Center vs Red Hat Single Sign On comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Red Hat are both solutions in the Single Sign-On (SSO) category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.5, while Red Hat is ranked #10 with an average rating of 9.7. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 2.7% mindshare in SSO, compared to Red Hat’s 4.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Red Hat users who would recommend it.
AWS IAM Identity Center
Read 4 AWS IAM Identity Center reviews
  • 385 Views
  • 341 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Red Hat Single Sign On
Read 5 Red Hat Single Sign On reviews
  • 1,296 Views
  • 888 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between AWS IAM Identity Center and Red Hat Single Sign On based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed AWS IAM Identity Center vs. Red Hat Single Sign On Report (Updated: November 2024).
Buyer's Guide
AWS IAM Identity Center vs. Red Hat Single Sign On
November 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 816,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
4.3
AWS IAM Identity Center needs clearer UI, better group management, time-sensitive access control, and improved user management flexibility.
Sentiment score
6.1
Red Hat SSO needs better unauthorized login detection, architecture, support services, communication, scalability, and documentation improvements.
Having a lot of users on one instance is hard to configure, so I hope for more flexibility and ease in configuration.
This involves creating a user with necessary permissions valid for only a specific period and then automatically revoking access.
For more quotes and insights, download the AWS IAM Identity Center report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Red Hat Single Sign On report
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.1
AWS IAM Identity Center scales efficiently, supporting numerous users, groups, and roles without performance issues, despite permissions management complexity.
Sentiment score
8.1
Red Hat Single Sign On offers high scalability on OpenShift, supporting user bases from under a thousand to over one million.
The scalability of AWS IAM Identity Center is excellent.
It can handle both a small number of users and a bigger number of users efficiently.
For more quotes and insights, download the AWS IAM Identity Center report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Red Hat Single Sign On report
 

Setup Cost

Sentiment score
8.8
AWS IAM Identity Center is praised for its affordable pricing, making it cost-effective for managing permissions and federations.
No sentiment score available
<p>Red Hat Single Sign On provides cost-effective, scalable, and integrative subscription pricing tailored for enterprises with flexible support services.</p>
Pricing for AWS IAM Identity Center is very affordable, rated at two out of ten with one being cheap.
For more quotes and insights, download the AWS IAM Identity Center report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Red Hat Single Sign On report
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
9.4
AWS IAM Identity Center is highly reliable, boasting 99.96% uptime and consistently rated ten out of ten for stability.
Sentiment score
9.0
Red Hat Single Sign On is highly rated by users for its stability, often scoring ten out of ten for reliability.
It offers 99.96% uptime.
Stability-wise, it is functioning well without any outages or crashes.
For more quotes and insights, download the AWS IAM Identity Center report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Red Hat Single Sign On report
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.2
AWS IAM Identity Center simplifies access management with centralized policies, templates, and role-based permissions for efficient multi-account security.
Sentiment score
8.7
Red Hat Single Sign On offers open-source use, commercial support, modern protocols, integration, flexibility, and community contributions at a reasonable price.
The most valuable features of AWS IAM Identity Center are role-based permissions and existing permissions templates.
The most valuable feature is the security configuration ease, which is great for me, especially as a beginner.
For more quotes and insights, download the AWS IAM Identity Center report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Red Hat Single Sign On report
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
Customers commend Red Hat Single Sign On for responsive, knowledgeable support, technical competence, efficient problem-solving, and clear communication.
They are prompt, keep you updated, and provide excellent assistance.
For more quotes and insights, download the AWS IAM Identity Center report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Red Hat Single Sign On report
 

Categories and Ranking

AWS IAM Identity Center
Ranking in Single Sign-On (SSO)
13th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (18th)
Red Hat Single Sign On
Ranking in Single Sign-On (SSO)
10th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.8
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Single Sign-On (SSO) category, the mindshare of AWS IAM Identity Center is 2.7%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat Single Sign On is 4.6%, up from 3.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Single Sign-On (SSO)
 

Featured Reviews

Nizamuddeen TZ - PeerSpot reviewer
Helps users provide or revoke accesses whenever needed
I don't think there is any need for improvement in the product since everything has been created architecturally by AWS. AWS has given all the features in the tool. In the product, two groups cannot have the same name. There will be a conflict if the same name is provided to two groups in the tool. If you want to say something to another user, the tool fails to identify which group out of the two having the same name is involved in the activity. In general, the tool does not allow for the duplication of names. The aforementioned area can be considered for improvement in the product.
Read full review
Giovanni Baruzzi - PeerSpot reviewer
A stable and flexible solution with some basic capabilities
I set up Red Hat Single Sign-On in half an hour. I had to install a single sign-on solution for a customer. I reviewed a list of all available products, which were no more than fifty, and analyzed them. I chose it because it was convincing, modern, and based on technology from 2015. I put my trust in this product, and after nine years, I feel confident in my decision. Deploying this solution usually takes half an hour. You need an operating system running, then deploy the packages and prepare the interfaces. I rate the initial setup a ten out of ten, where one is difficult and ten is easy.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
26%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Government
9%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Financial Services Firm
21%
Government
14%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Computer Software Company
11%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AWS IAM Identity Center?
The product is easy for beginners to learn and use.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS IAM Identity Center?
AWS Identity Center is free, making it a cost-effective solution for managing IAM permissions and federations.
See all answers
What needs improvement with AWS IAM Identity Center?
The AWS Identity Center's user interface could be improved to provide a clearer understanding of how the system operates. Although the API side is well-developed, the console can be misleading, and...
See all answers
What do you like most about Red Hat Single Sign On?
The product’s most valuable feature is its ability to assign only one password for the user at a false value.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Red Hat Single Sign On?
I rate the product’s pricing a five out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Red Hat Single Sign On?
Red Hat publishes much more and communicates its actions and plans. They could provide words, maps, and other resources. Scalability could be improved, too. It could provide more documentation.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Microsoft Entra ID vs AWS IAM Identity Center Logo
Microsoft Entra ID vs AWS IAM Identity Center
Compared 67% of the time
Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs AWS IAM Identity Center Logo
Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs AWS IAM Identity Center
Compared 16% of the time
More AWS IAM Identity Center Competitors
Microsoft Entra ID vs Red Hat Single Sign On Logo
Microsoft Entra ID vs Red Hat Single Sign On
Compared 33% of the time
Auth0 vs Red Hat Single Sign On Logo
Auth0 vs Red Hat Single Sign On
Compared 19% of the time
Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs Red Hat Single Sign On Logo
Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs Red Hat Single Sign On
Compared 16% of the time
Okta Workforce Identity vs Red Hat Single Sign On Logo
Okta Workforce Identity vs Red Hat Single Sign On
Compared 10% of the time
Symantec Siteminder vs Red Hat Single Sign On Logo
Symantec Siteminder vs Red Hat Single Sign On
Compared 7% of the time
More Red Hat Single Sign On Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Single Sign-On (SSO)
November 2024
AWS IAM Identity Center reportDownload AWS IAM Identity Center product report
Buyer's Guide
Single Sign-On (SSO)
November 2024
Red Hat Single Sign On reportDownload Red Hat Single Sign On product report
 

Also Known As

AWS Single Sign On, AWS SSO
Red Hat Single Sign-On, Red Hat SSO, RH SSO, RH-SSO
 

Learn More

Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Red Hat
 

Overview

AWS IAM Identity Center is the recommended service for managing your workforce's access to AWS applications or your multiple AWS accounts (or both). It is a flexible solution that can be used to connect your existing identity source or help you create users in AWS. IAM Identity Center can be used alongside your existing AWS account access configurations.

Red Hat is the world’s leading provider of enterprise open source solutions, using a community-powered approach to deliver high-performing Linux, cloud, container, and Kubernetes technologies.

 

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers
Information Not Available
Buyer's Guide
AWS IAM Identity Center vs. Red Hat Single Sign On
November 2024
Free Report: AWS IAM Identity Center vs. Red Hat Single Sign On
Find out what your peers are saying about AWS IAM Identity Center vs. Red Hat Single Sign On and other solutions. Updated: November 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our AWS IAM Identity Center vs. Red Hat Single Sign On report.
See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors.

We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.