Klocwork and GitHub Code Scanning are prominent tools in the static code analysis category. GitHub Code Scanning has an upper hand due to its seamless integration and functionality within existing development workflows.
Features: Klocwork offers robust detection of security vulnerabilities and code issues, extensive customization options, and comprehensive support. GitHub Code Scanning integrates smoothly into development workflows, supports multiple programming languages, and enhances productivity in CI/CD pipelines.
Room for Improvement: Klocwork needs enhancements in documentation, user training resources, and simplifying its initial setup process. GitHub Code Scanning is advised to improve accuracy, reduce false positives, and provide more detailed analysis reports. Improving direct customer support could be beneficial.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Klocwork's initial setup is complex but is offset by its responsive customer support. GitHub Code Scanning offers simple deployment within GitHub's ecosystem, relying more on community forums for support.
Pricing and ROI: Klocwork stands out for its reasonable setup costs and positive ROI due to robust features. GitHub Code Scanning, although having higher initial pricing, delivers ROI through workflow efficiencies and feature richness.
Code scanning is a feature that you use to analyze the code in a GitHub repository to find security vulnerabilities and coding errors. Any problems identified by the analysis are shown in GitHub.
Klocwork detects security, safety, and reliability issues in real-time by using this static code analysis toolkit that works alongside developers, finding issues as early as possible, and integrates with teams, supporting continuous integration and actionable reporting.
We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.