GitHub Code Scanning vs Spirent CyberFlood comparison

GitHub and Spirent are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. GitHub is ranked #17 with an average rating of 9.3, while Spirent is ranked #32 with an average rating of 7.0. GitHub holds a 1.0% mindshare in SAST, compared to Spirent’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of GitHub users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Spirent users who would recommend it.

GitHub Code Scanning

Read 3 GitHub Code Scanning reviews

676 Views
585 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Spirent CyberFlood

Read 5 Spirent CyberFlood reviews

554 Views
331 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

GitHub Code Scanning

Spirent CyberFlood

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Spirent CyberFlood and GitHub Code Scanning serve distinct security testing needs, primarily competing in security testing tools. GitHub Code Scanning seems to hold the upper hand due to its seamless integration and automation efficiencies.

Features: Spirent CyberFlood offers versatile testing capabilities, comprehensive threat simulation, and extensive testing scenarios. GitHub Code Scanning provides automated scanning efficiency, integration within development workflows, and seamless automation within development pipelines.

Room for Improvement: Spirent CyberFlood could improve reporting processes, enhance user accessibility, and simplify its interface. GitHub Code Scanning needs advanced customization options, better detailed scan results, and to expand its language support.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Deployment with Spirent CyberFlood requires technical expertise, though it provides supportive customer service. GitHub Code Scanning offers easy deployment within GitHub's ecosystem, making it user-friendly with reliable customer support.

Pricing and ROI: Spirent CyberFlood may have high setup costs, but contributes to significant ROI through improved network security. GitHub Code Scanning is more cost-effective, offering rapid ROI due to streamlined integration and long-term savings.

To learn more, read our detailed GitHub Code Scanning vs. Spirent CyberFlood Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GitHub Code Scanning vs. Spirent CyberFlood

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 846,617 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitHub Code Scanning

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

17th

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Spirent CyberFlood

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

32nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (35th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of GitHub Code Scanning is 1.0%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Spirent CyberFlood is 0.3%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Featured Reviews

VishalSingh

Consulting & Solutions, BA/BD in Enterprise IT on Open Source, Red Hat & EDB at KEEN AND ABLE COMPUTERS PVT LTD

Traverses the entire network, scanning every system to determine which ports are open

You can use the tool locally on your system or in the cloud. I rate it a nine out of ten. It's a very good tool for people who want to start using GitHubCode Scanning, especially for software development or team collaboration. GitHubCode Scanning allows teams to collaborate by uploading files to repositories. For example, if someone is developing an application, they can host the code on GitHub Code Scanning. Other developers can then download the code for testing purposes. If bugs are found, fixes can be applied using the GitHub Code Scanningrepository, and everyone on the team can see the changes. Software developers often use GitHub Code Scanning for version control, and it's essential for CI/CD pipelines to work.

Read full review

Jos Badimo

Director at BAMS

Test assurance improves compliance and products with good performance

The user interface could be improved to facilitate easier navigation. The most significant issue I encounter with the solution is the user interface. It would be beneficial if I could remain on one screen most of the time. Even if the system navigates me to another screen, it should effectively return me to the main screen.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We use GitHub Code Scanning mostly for source code management."

"GitHub Code Spaces brings significant value with its simplicity and ease of use."

"The solution helps identify vulnerabilities by understanding how ports communicate with applications running on a system. Ports are like house numbers; to visit someone's house, you must know their number. Similarly, ports are used to communicate with applications. For example, if you want to use an HTTP web server, you must use port 80. It is the port on which the web application or your server listens for incoming requests."

"CyberFlood is flexible."

"CyberFlood's best features are its user-friendliness and scheduling function."

"The testing compliance feature is particularly impressive."

"The feature I find most valuable is the traffic generator."

"The testing compliance feature is particularly impressive."

"Our customers use it to check for unauthorized file transfer."

Cons

"One area for improvement could be the ability to have an AI system digest the reports generated from code scanning and provide a summary. Currently, the reports can be extensive, and users may overlook details, such as outdated libraries, which could be highlighted for attention."

"GitHub Code Scanning should add more templates."

"The user interface could be improved to facilitate easier navigation."

"The solution needs more ports, more speed, and more gigabytes."

"The initial setup is not straightforward and can be quite challenging."

"I would also like to see updates on a more frequent schedule."

"CyberFlood's accessibility and support for multiple browsers could be better."

"Sometimes, when you configure parameters the hardware can't run, it will get stuck at those points without telling you what happened. It would be helpful if the error reporting provided more details about why the test setting is not running. It would be nice if there were a space in the hardware module for you to add some external hardware for more rigorous testing."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The minimum pricing for the tool is five dollars a month."

"GitHub Code Scanning is a moderately priced solution."

"CyberFlood is reasonably priced."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitHub Code Scanning?

We use GitHub Code Scanning mostly for source code management.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub Code Scanning?

The minimum pricing for the tool is five dollars a month.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub Code Scanning?

One area for improvement could be the ability to have an AI system digest the reports generated from code scanning and provide a summary. Currently, the reports can be extensive, and users may over...

See all answers

What do you like most about Spirent CyberFlood?

CyberFlood is flexible.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Spirent CyberFlood?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Spirent CyberFlood?

I have been using the solution for a year now. The customers I work with are focused on both custom test assurance and test automation. The solution is utilized in the financial services sector and...

See all answers

Comparisons

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs GitHub Code Scanning

Compared 34% of the time

Coverity vs GitHub Code Scanning

Compared 30% of the time

SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) vs GitHub Code Scanning

Compared 17% of the time

Aikido Security vs GitHub Code Scanning

Compared 9% of the time

Polaris Software Integrity Platform vs GitHub Code Scanning

Compared 5% of the time

More GitHub Code Scanning Competitors

Ixia BreakingPoint vs Spirent CyberFlood

Compared 78% of the time

Ixia BreakingPoint VE vs Spirent CyberFlood

Compared 22% of the time

More Spirent CyberFlood Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

April 2025

Download GitHub Code Scanning product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Tools

April 2025

Download Spirent CyberFlood product report

Also Known As

No data available

CyberFlood Virtual, Spirent Mu Dynamics Application Security Testing, Mu Dynamics Application Security Testing

Overview

Code scanning is a feature that you use to analyze the code in a GitHub repository to find security vulnerabilities and coding errors. Any problems identified by the analysis are shown in GitHub.

GitHub

Spirent’s revolutionary CyberFlood security and application testing solution is now available as a virtual platform offering you simplified use, by consolidating multiple test functions into a completely virtual test environment.

Spirent

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Digicel

Buyer's Guide

GitHub Code Scanning vs. Spirent CyberFlood

April 2025

Free Report: GitHub Code Scanning vs. Spirent CyberFlood

Find out what your peers are saying about GitHub Code Scanning vs. Spirent CyberFlood and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitHub Code Scanning vs. Spirent CyberFlood report.

See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.