We performed a comparison between GitHub CoPilot and Pega BPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Rapid Application Development Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The product's initial setup is straightforward because it's pushed through the updates."
"GitHub CoPilot accelerates productivity. It is an easy-to-use solution that is also helpful in saving the team's time."
"The initial setup of the product is easy."
"The document generation features are valuable."
"The most valuable aspects in terms of features, revolve around its code generation capabilities."
"The product's most valuable feature is vulnerability management features."
"GitHub CoPilot has good stability and performance."
"The product is easy to integrate."
"I have a lot of experience in this kind of industry, and Pega is one of the best solutions in terms of performance, capabilities, and the way we develop."
"The most valuable feature of Pega BPM is step-by-step voice guidance that converts your problem statement into different diagrams and then implements the process."
"The solution provides us with a very good dashboard."
"Pega BPM's most valuable feature is the use of CDX to solve problems."
"Application development is very rapid. A lot of code gets reused while building the applications, which is something we highly appreciate."
"The solution's case management is its most valuable aspect."
"The solution is able to support the size and scale required."
"The most valuable features of Pega BPM are low code, no code, functionality, and easy development."
"Some of the suggestions provided by GitHub CoPilot are not accurate, making it an area of concern where improvements are required."
"In certain instances, OpenAI didn't respond in the expected way. The responses were more general and didn't address the specific point."
"The tool needs to focus on integration, as it is the most important aspect. I would like to see some pre-designed modules included in my projects."
"The suggestions provided by the product must be improved."
"In a few cases, the results aren't correct, so that needs improvement. Also, it would be great if the results could be presented in different formats, not just text. As engineers, it takes time to read through text-based results."
"There's room for improvement to ensure that suggestions align more precisely with the context of what I'm seeking, minimizing instances of unrelated or inaccurate code suggestions."
"The product's price is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"GitHub CoPilot's alerting features need improvement."
"We need more light retail BPM tools within the Pega system. However, Pega is mostly for big companies."
"There is a scarcity of resources who have worked with this solution before."
"Pega should work on redefining their model and creating a demand for their skills."
"They need to support the solution better, at this time the company does not have enough support."
"Pega BPM's documentation should be improved, especially for freshers or new trainees."
"The previous versions had good training documents but the updated versions need to improve the documentation."
"Business specific functionality is needed."
"To learn Pega, you need to be a partner. If someone just wants to learn Pega for the sake of learning, they won't be able to do so as they don't give access to that."
GitHub CoPilot is ranked 15th in Rapid Application Development Software with 11 reviews while Pega BPM is ranked 7th in Rapid Application Development Software with 57 reviews. GitHub CoPilot is rated 8.6, while Pega BPM is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of GitHub CoPilot writes "Though it offers good integration features, the price needs to be lowered". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pega BPM writes "Provides built-in frameworks that can be reused and reduces time and cost". GitHub CoPilot is most compared with GitLab, Oracle Application Express (APEX), ServiceNow, Mendix and OutSystems, whereas Pega BPM is most compared with ServiceNow, Camunda, Appian, IBM BPM and ARIS BPA. See our GitHub CoPilot vs. Pega BPM report.
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.