Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Greenshades vs UKG comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Greenshades
Ranking in Benefits Administration
53rd
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
UKG
Ranking in Benefits Administration
5th
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
124
Ranking in other categories
Talent Management (5th), Employee Scheduling Software (1st), Cloud HCM (5th), Employee Time Tracking Software (3rd), HR Analytics Software (1st), Talent Acquisition (5th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2024, in the Benefits Administration category, the mindshare of Greenshades is 0.0%, down from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UKG is 7.3%, up from 6.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Benefits Administration
 

Featured Reviews

Use Greenshades?
Share your opinion
PN
Apr 4, 2023
User-friendly, good support, and stable
We use UKG to monitor staff time management, specifically their clock-ins, and clock-outs We utilize UKG to track the time when an employee clocks in, takes breaks, and clocks out. This allows us to monitor the productive hours worked by the employee and how long they have been present. The…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"If you're going for the full suite, it can be fairly pricey."
"UKG's pricing and licensing model involves ongoing expenses based on the number of employees paid. The initial implementation cost is low when UKG implements it directly. However, when partners handle the implementation, it becomes more expensive since partners don't receive the monthly recurring fees."
"I wasn't involved in the pricing part. I'm a user, and I believe it is based on the user count. One thing that is nice about Ultimate is that you can learn how to use the system without additional fees. The learning aspect is the life of a product, and the training was a huge reason why we went with Ultimate. We did have some integration costs. They were a part of the implementation because of the integrations to other systems that we included in our implementation."
"While I am unsure of the licensing cost itself, the total cost of implementation and licensing for a company with over 5000 employees would be around 6,00,000. So, there are additional costs beyond licensing."
"The platform is not affordable but also not the most expensive."
"The pricing depends on the number of licenses we buy."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Benefits Administration solutions are best for your needs.
800,688 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Educational Organization
88%
Computer Software Company
2%
Healthcare Company
1%
Financial Services Firm
1%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What needs improvement with UKG?
Our company is testing the UKG Ready Mobile App, but there are some glitches. I feel that in the system when you log on to Kronos, UKG Dimensions, and UKG Workforce Central, we have different modul...
What is your primary use case for UKG?
I worked with UKG globally, assisting with its implementation in 59 countries. In my company, we use it for the timekeeping aspect offered, payroll purposes, and other stuff like that. It is used f...
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Also Known As

No data available
UKG Pro, UKG Dimensons, UKG Ready
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Tesla, Marriott, Yamaha, Aramark, Feeding America, Samsung, Sony Music, Dave & Buster's, Revlon
Find out what your peers are saying about Workday, Oracle, SAP and others in Benefits Administration. Updated: August 2024.
800,688 professionals have used our research since 2012.