Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

SAP SuccessFactors vs UKG comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
5.4
SAP SuccessFactors offers ROI in 1-2 years, with varying outcomes depending on previous systems, enhancing employee experience and cost-effectiveness.
Sentiment score
6.2
Respondents noted improved efficiencies and benefits from UKG, but many were uncertain about measuring precise ROI.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.2
SAP SuccessFactors customer service experiences vary, with efficiency issues in urgent cases and a need for technical improvement.
Sentiment score
7.1
UKG's customer service quality varies; technical support is generally effective but sometimes inconsistent, with excellent or delayed experiences.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.9
SAP SuccessFactors is scalable, effectively supporting large companies with cloud infrastructure, though some modules have limitations.
Sentiment score
7.4
UKG is rated highly for scalability, user-friendliness, and flexibility, supporting medium to large companies effectively.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.5
SAP SuccessFactors is generally stable, with occasional regional challenges primarily related to data centers and integration.
Sentiment score
7.1
UKG is stable with quick issue resolution, despite occasional payroll interruptions, report errors, and time clock hardware problems.
 

Room For Improvement

SAP SuccessFactors requires better analytics, integration, UI, localization, flexible pricing, and advanced mobile features to compete effectively.
UKG needs improved support, clearer processes, seamless integration, and updated features for better usability and system stability.
 

Setup Cost

SAP SuccessFactors offers a comprehensive suite but is costly, suited for medium to large enterprises with flexible pricing options.
UKG's pricing offers mid-range costs with volume discounts, emphasizing module understanding and negotiation for optimal ROI.
 

Valuable Features

SAP SuccessFactors excels in HR management with integration, customization, AI features, and collaboration, ensuring flexibility and usability.
UKG provides payroll processing, self-service features, recruitment tools, and data integration to enhance efficiency and employee retention.
 

Categories and Ranking

SAP SuccessFactors
Ranking in Talent Management
1st
Ranking in Cloud HCM
1st
Ranking in Talent Acquisition
1st
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
93
Ranking in other categories
Global Payroll (2nd)
UKG
Ranking in Talent Management
5th
Ranking in Cloud HCM
5th
Ranking in Talent Acquisition
5th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
124
Ranking in other categories
Benefits Administration (5th), Employee Scheduling Software (1st), Employee Time Tracking Software (2nd), HR Analytics Software (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Cloud HCM category, the mindshare of SAP SuccessFactors is 23.4%, up from 21.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UKG is 4.8%, down from 5.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Cloud HCM
 

Featured Reviews

Marissa Schwan - PeerSpot reviewer
Easy to deploy, stable, and scalable
SuccessFactors has a best practices model for HR across the board, but there are multiple industries. For example, the pharmaceutical, engineering, and professional services industries may have different processes based on their business requirements and operations. SAP and Workday have one approach across industries. As employee experience becomes increasingly important, the kind of employees appointed in an engineering environment, a pharmaceutical environment, and a professional service environment are very different, meaning their experience touchpoints may differ and require adjustments. SuccessFactors should consider building their best practices around critical industries to help companies become more differentiated in the markets they operate in. As a company, we have 118,000 followers on LinkedIn, and the unemployment rate in South Africa is quite high, at more than 30 percent. When we advertise a job, the number of CVs and applications we receive from people who want to work for us is overwhelming, we can get up to 600 CVs for a single vacancy. To make the process more efficient, we need to use artificial intelligence to identify the key elements of the job profile and match them to the CVs of the applicants. The pre-selection questions are helpful in reducing the number of applicants, but they don't measure the suitability of the CVs and profiles. This is something that needs to be built into the system, but it doesn't currently exist in the market. We have a good pre-selection program, but it doesn't take into account experience, qualifications, professional memberships, work experience, or critical performance indicators. We have enough information from CVs and LinkedIn profiles for the system to match the vacancy profile with the applicant's information and rank them from most suitable to least suitable.
Lonnie Fluck - PeerSpot reviewer
Helps us establish system front-end and back-end connectivity, but the recruiting features need improvement
I used UKG to track applicants and create job descriptions. We built the electronic onboarding system to be used nationwide and created a path to integrate with the backend The product's most valuable feature is the ability to establish connectivity between the front and the back end,…
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud HCM solutions are best for your needs.
831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
51%
Computer Software Company
6%
Manufacturing Company
5%
Financial Services Firm
5%
Educational Organization
89%
Computer Software Company
1%
Healthcare Company
1%
Financial Services Firm
1%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What are the biggest differences between Workday, Oracle Cloud and SAP SuccessFactors?
Differences between Workday, Oracle Cloud,w and SAP SuccessFactors:w Oracle: "simple interface and deep customization to suit the purpose." SAP: Multiple functionalities that increase process effi...
What is better, SAP HCM or SAP SuccessFactors?
When it comes to user experience, SuccessFactors is unquestionably superior, as it provides end users with a new experience and an advanced user interface. Additionally, the entire concept of SF is...
What do you like most about SAP SuccessFactors?
The tool is easy to use for performance management. We haven't experienced any issues with SAP SuccessFactors for performance management, which is great. However, since we're still learning to use ...
What needs improvement with UKG?
Our company is testing the UKG Ready Mobile App, but there are some glitches. I feel that in the system when you log on to Kronos, UKG Dimensions, and UKG Workforce Central, we have different modul...
What is your primary use case for UKG?
I worked with UKG globally, assisting with its implementation in 59 countries. In my company, we use it for the timekeeping aspect offered, payroll purposes, and other stuff like that. It is used f...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

SuccessFactors
UKG Pro, UKG Dimensons, UKG Ready
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

City of Cape Town, ADAMA Agricultural Solutions Ltd., TransAlta Corporation, Keolis, PT XL Axiata Tbk, National Football League (NFL), Plan International, Yoh, A Day & Zimmermann Company, China Talent Group (CTG TMO), Umicore S.A., Butterfield Bank, Skril
Tesla, Marriott, Yamaha, Aramark, Feeding America, Samsung, Sony Music, Dave & Buster's, Revlon
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP SuccessFactors vs. UKG and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.