Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Grooper vs OpenText Intelligent Capture comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Valuable Features

No sentiment score available
Grooper efficiently extracts, classifies, and processes data from various files with customizable interfaces and enhanced OCR for quality output.
Sentiment score
8.2
OpenText Intelligent Capture offers accurate document processing with powerful OCR, automation, integration, and adaptable management features.
 

Room For Improvement

No sentiment score available
Grooper must improve extractor functionality, fix OCR bugs, enhance training, and support while ensuring a stable environment.
Sentiment score
6.3
OpenText Intelligent Capture needs improved OCR, duplicate detection, cost-effective licensing, user-friendliness, and mobile capture features.
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
Customer service resolves issues effectively, but front-line assistance needs improvement, especially for resellers, with responsive escalation support.
Sentiment score
4.7
OpenText Intelligent Capture's support gets praise for responsiveness, but issues arise for users lacking professional services packages.
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
8.5
OpenText Intelligent Capture scales well for up to 1500 users, requires Windows expertise, and lacks Linux support.
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.5
OpenText Intelligent Capture is highly stable and reliable, especially in real estate and banking, with minimal issues reported.
 

Categories and Ranking

Grooper
Ranking in Intelligent Document Processing (IDP)
25th
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
OpenText Intelligent Capture
Ranking in Intelligent Document Processing (IDP)
4th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) category, the mindshare of Grooper is 0.5%, down from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Intelligent Capture is 8.3%, down from 10.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Intelligent Document Processing (IDP)
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer1552698 - PeerSpot reviewer
Good data ingestion and classification capabilities, supports various media types and formats, and the interface is easy to use
Currently, we're still using version 2-7-2, and now they're about to do the beta release on their version 2021. In this coming version, we expect that some of our issues will be fixed. We've had challenges in classification tasks where similar documents were flagged as multiple matches. The system would identify them and say, "Hey, I think I've got multiple matches. It could either be this one or that one." Because of that, it required us to instruct the system to either leave it unclassified, or we had to halt the process for somebody to look at it. With the new version for 2021, they have changed the paradigm. As it is now, we're using something called a form type, where pages within the document are referenced using a specific page number. For example, in a ten-page document, you might refer to information specifically on the first or fifth page. In the new paradigm, there is a first, middle, and last page concept, as opposed to having the different form types with all of the different pages. What they're telling me is that it's going to make the classification more accurate. Just because the first page of two different documents looks the same, they will not be considered duplicates. Having multiple points of reference will now allow it to better distinguish them. The other area we have had challenges with is table extractions, where if the data headers were not defined, or the tables did not have descriptions for the columns. My understanding is that in the 2021 version, they've now shown that they're handling that. Again, we don't have it and haven't been able to test it, but it's coming. Technical support is definitely an area that they need improvement in, in terms of the front-line individuals.
Shital Funde - PeerSpot reviewer
A powerful solution for custom scripting but .NET knowledge is required
Knowledge of .NET is required to effectively use the solution or it can be complicated. I was able to train customers to use the solution if they had some .NET experience. The solution should offer a lightweight version that includes the OCR or document scanning and does not include the entire enterprise package with custom scripting.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
16%
Manufacturing Company
14%
Computer Software Company
13%
Government
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about OpenText Intelligent Capture?
The enterprise and capturing feature of OpenText is its valuable feature. As we have integrated CRM with OpenText.
What needs improvement with OpenText Intelligent Capture?
The area for improvement primarily centers around licensing concerns rather than technical issues. Captiva, intended for larger clients, poses challenges for medium and small businesses due to lice...
What is your primary use case for OpenText Intelligent Capture?
It is designed for the automated capture and recognition of documents. Whether obtained through scanning, emails, faxes, or other sources, documents can be captured and data automatically extracted...
 

Also Known As

No data available
OpenText Captivas
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Oklahoma DOT, Mercy Hospital System, OLERS, Oklahoma State University, Change Healthcare, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, American Airlines Credit Union
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Grooper vs. OpenText Intelligent Capture and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.