Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

HighQ vs Microsoft 365 Business comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

HighQ
Ranking in Content Collaboration Platforms
21st
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Microsoft 365 Business
Ranking in Content Collaboration Platforms
7th
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
241
Ranking in other categories
Mobile Device Management (MDM) (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Content Collaboration Platforms category, the mindshare of HighQ is 0.8%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft 365 Business is 1.6%, down from 2.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Content Collaboration Platforms
 

Featured Reviews

LaminDrammeh - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 12, 2024
Improves productivity and allows team collaboration in organizations
Previously, my company did not use a unified communication tool. For unified communication, my company started to use Microsoft 365 Business. My company used to use technology like Slack for team collaboration. My company used to use local products to manage emails. My company had a totally different license for Office 365. Microsoft 365 Business was chosen by our company as a solution to combine everything. My company does not use a similar technology, like Microsoft 365 Business. In general, my company improved by moving away from disintegrated technologies, and now we are able to integrate different technologies using Microsoft 365 Business.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"Licensing fees are paid annually."
"I rate the pricing of the program a seven out of ten."
"The licensing fees are paid yearly."
"There is a subscription needed for this solution."
"It's pretty difficult to make a cost estimation, in cases where we need additional features."
"The solution is not very expensive."
"If you go with Microsoft, they will give you 80 GB in advance and all those kinds of features. They will also keep asking you to go from E1 to E2, E2 to E3, and now E5. Their prices are high, but as long as the organization is happy to pay and your emails are working seamlessly, it shouldn't be an issue."
"The product is expensive and the licensing costs are yearly."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Content Collaboration Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Healthcare Company
7%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Microsoft 365 Business?
The product's initial setup phase was straightforward.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft 365 Business?
The solution's pricing is reasonable and provides value for money. The solution costs approximately $20 per month per user.
What needs improvement with Microsoft 365 Business?
Sometimes, the migration from old software to new software isn't very smooth. Upgrading from the old version to the new version of Microsoft Teams created a lot of issues for small companies and la...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Microsoft 365 E3, Microsoft 365 E5, Microsoft 365 F1, MS 365 Business
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Addleshaw Goddard, Allen & Overy, Maples, Hill Dickinson, Linklaters
Urban Agriculture Co., The Detroit Wallpaper Co., TransBlue Facility Management, Garner Food Company
Find out what your peers are saying about Dropbox, Microsoft, Google and others in Content Collaboration Platforms. Updated: November 2024.
814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.