Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Hitachi Content Platform vs NetApp StorageGRID comparison

Hitachi Vantara and NetApp are both solutions in the File and Object Storage category. Hitachi Vantara is ranked #18 with an average rating of 7.0, while NetApp is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.2. Hitachi Vantara holds a 1.7% mindshare in FaOS, compared to NetApp’s 5.5% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Hitachi Vantara users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of NetApp users who would recommend it.
Hitachi Content Platform
Read 14 Hitachi Content Platform reviews
  • 1,396 Views
  • 972 Comparison Views
88% willing to recommend
NetApp StorageGRID
Read 13 NetApp StorageGRID reviews
  • 3,268 Views
  • 2,650 Comparison Views
85% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 4, 2024

Hitachi Content Platform and NetApp StorageGRID compete in the object storage solutions category. Hitachi Content Platform seems to have the upper hand when pricing and support are key, offering a more streamlined setup and strong customer service. However, NetApp StorageGRID may appeal to organizations requiring advanced storage features due to its expansive capabilities.

Features: Hitachi Content Platform emphasizes data management with integrated search, analytics, data protection, and tiering. NetApp StorageGRID offers high scalability, strong integration with cloud services, and dynamic content storage management suitable for diverse environments.

Room for Improvement: Hitachi Content Platform could improve its cloud integration features and expand its support for different workload types. It may also enhance its scalability options to match larger infrastructures. NetApp StorageGRID might work on simplifying its configuration processes, improving ease of use without relying heavily on documentation, and providing more intuitive user interfaces.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NetApp StorageGRID provides flexible deployment through multiple models and robust documentation, which can benefit complex infrastructures. Hitachi Content Platform simplifies deployment with detailed guidance and intuitive configuration, supporting quick setups with efficient customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Hitachi Content Platform generally offers lower initial setup costs, presenting a cost-effective solution with a positive ROI due to efficient management features. In contrast, NetApp StorageGRID may require higher initial investments, but its advanced features and scalability can deliver significant long-term ROI for enterprises needing extensive data management capabilities.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Hitachi Content Platform vs. NetApp StorageGRID Report (Updated: January 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Hitachi Content Platform vs. NetApp StorageGRID
January 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 831,265 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Hitachi Content Platform
Ranking in File and Object Storage
18th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
14
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
NetApp StorageGRID
Ranking in File and Object Storage
7th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
13
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the File and Object Storage category, the mindshare of Hitachi Content Platform is 1.7%, down from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetApp StorageGRID is 5.5%, up from 4.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
File and Object Storage
 

Featured Reviews

Mir Gulzar Ahmed - PeerSpot reviewer
Integrates well with existing systems but technical support for the platform needs improvement
While deployment is simple, it's not as simple as StorageGRID. The architecture is entirely different, even though the end product uses the same protocols. The user interface isn't as user-friendly, and the management platform UI isn't as intuitive as others. Deployment isn't as centralized either. Although I've deployed Hitachi Content myself in our production head office for the VM team, even though it's simple, it wasn't completely straightforward. They still required my help with the initial configuration environment setup. So, it's not just simple; there are some tricky aspects. The environment is tricky, but if you understand it, configuration can be done quickly.
Read full review
Mir Gulzar Ahmed - PeerSpot reviewer
Object-based storage and offers intuitive management tools, making it easy to configure and maintain
The only thing missing is flexibility in configuration to cater to specific customer requirements. Another area of improvement is marketing. NetApp's marketing of StorageGRID isn't optimal. They should present it more effectively, especially in regions like Pakistan. Here, I haven't seen any marketing campaigns from NetApp for StorageGRID or the Solid State Platform (SSP). While StorageGRID is a globally recognized product, I haven't seen any marketing efforts from NetApp in Pakistan. Even competitors are promoting object storage solutions here, but NetApp seems less efficient in selling StorageGRID. There might be one or two customers, but even as a NetApp partner, I'm not aware of any major sales. I've been trained on StorageGRID, and it is a good product. I'm unsure why it hasn't gained traction in Pakistan compared to other countries. So, I just recommend improving the marketing campaigns in Pakistan. I'm pretty confident that if we have one example of successful StorageGRID implementation in Pakistan, other customers will follow suit.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"We are using Content Platform for data migration, and it integrates with our HNS platform. This is good because we can integrate it with our existing HNS and SAP solutions. The GUI is also user-friendly. It doesn't take much time to do anything. If we know the architecture and the steps, we can do what we need with a few clicks."
"The main selling point is its compatibility with different environments. It functions like an on-prem Google Drive or Dropbox built on top of the object storage."
"The way that they handle the DR is very good because when there is a failover, it is seamless to the users."
"The platform helps in efficient data management with the ease of server provisioning."
"One of the most hidden valuable features is ensuring that you don't have bit rot, so it will go and check every single object that's stored on the system, then ensure that if there's a problem, it'll be repaired from either a local copy or remote copy, depending upon your configuration."
"The product provides the fastest technology."
"The Hitachi Content Platform is a stable and reliable solution."
"Hitachi is a big company, so it's a very strong product."
More Hitachi Content Platform pros
"The backup features are valuable. I've heard from our backup and data protection people that our clients are very satisfied with the performance in junction with the backup, which they archive on this type of object storage."
"The speed of the disks removed the bottleneck from our storage."
"StorageGRID is designed for cloud-based, highly scalable storage. Think big names like service providers like Google who need massive storage volumes with scalability. It also offers cloud-enabled storage capabilities with cloud management functionality. So, if you prioritize scalability and cloud integration, StorageGRID is the way to go. Its object-based storage is built specifically for that purpose."
"Right now, we have an older StorageGRID. I like that we can grow it."
"The management portals have most significantly improved our data retrieval times. They've made it much easier to restore data compared to our previous methods."
"It helps automate our storage infrastructure."
"The ability to get to the StorageGRID from anywhere on my network. The solution is remote. You don't have to be at a physical location."
"Cost-effective and easy to deploy."
More NetApp StorageGRID pros
 

Cons

"The user interface isn't as user-friendly, and the management platform UI isn't as intuitive as others. So it can be more user-friendly."
"This product's ability to track logs for access still needs to be improved."
"Hitachi Content Platform is a complicated solution. You need to put several pieces of the hardware together in order to achieve the capacity or the performance needed."
"They could improve compatibility and offer a more user-friendly GUI."
"There is room for improvement in the capacity for integration with other platforms."
"At present, it is complicated to use the CLI command."
"In terms of the customer support, I can say it's a mixed reaction depending on the country."
"The solution could use more integration with clouds."
More Hitachi Content Platform cons
"One key improvement I'd like to see in StorageGRID is enhanced visibility for management purposes."
"The price is something that NetApp could improve, as with most companies. NetApp is known for not being the cheapest storage option, which is also valid for StorageGRID. There are other storage options on the market which we are aware of and have done proofs of concept for, but you cannot really compare the list prices because, as a big user of NetApp storages, we have totally different prices than some list prices. Still, the price information we got for other options are almost always less expensive than StorageGRID."
"I would like to see them integrate more with the monitoring platforms. It is a bit difficult to get automated monitoring of the system."
"The redundancy and reliability are great, but I also see room for improvement there. I would like to see more efficiency in the storage and dedupe/compression solutions."
"The product's continual innovation and enhancement in integration capabilities with other NetApp solutions could be better."
"The processes around installation and upgrade need improvement."
"The only real issue that we have run into is, when we are cloning, we cannot do a thin provision clone, it has to be a full clone."
"It has its quirks here and there, but it is an older NetApp system."
More NetApp StorageGRID cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing could be better."
"Hitachi is more expensive than StorageGRID."
"I think the ROI for this solution is very good because the pricing for it is in between other solutions."
"The price of the Hitachi Content Platform is very high."
"Overall, it's costly."
"Pricing is comparable to other solutions in the market."
"The product’s cost is average."
"The pricing of StorageGRID falls within the typical range for enterprise-grade solutions and is comparable to other vendors such as Dell, NetApp, and Pure Storage."
"The licensing that the S3 service provides them from a FabricPool standpoint is more attractive than the licensing from AWS or Azure."
"We save money on storage costs from this solution since it allows us to have a source of revenue from customers consuming the service."
"Our licensing is in INR it was around 25 lakhs, which is roughly two million."
"The pricing is quite flexible and depends on the specific customer requirements. The initial cost is primarily based on the desired capacity, so it's not a fixed price."
"With respect to pricing, it is okay. This product is mid-range."
"We chose NetApp because of price and performance."
"Buying the solution is expensive, but it saves you money down the line when you factor in the logistics of not having to buy tapes."
More NetApp StorageGRID pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which File and Object Storage solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
27%
Computer Software Company
21%
Government
10%
Educational Organization
5%
Financial Services Firm
22%
Manufacturing Company
19%
Computer Software Company
16%
Government
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Hitachi Content Platform?
Integrating Hitachi Content Platform with existing systems is not challenging.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Hitachi Content Platform?
In comparison to competitors like Huawei, which can use all storage protocols in the same platform, Hitachi Content Platform lacks the integration of block, file, and object on a single system. Alt...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Hitachi Content Platform?
Mainly, from my project, Hitachi Content Platform is used for archiving. The customer is in banking, so they need to keep their long-term data on the platform. The platform is replacing their exist...
See all answers
What do you like most about NetApp StorageGRID?
The management portals have most significantly improved our data retrieval times. They've made it much easier to restore data compared to our previous methods.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NetApp StorageGRID?
I rate the product pricing around five out of ten—it's negotiable, depending on the circumstances.
See all answers
What needs improvement with NetApp StorageGRID?
The product's continual innovation and enhancement in integration capabilities with other NetApp solutions could be better.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Dell ECS vs Hitachi Content Platform Logo
Dell ECS vs Hitachi Content Platform
Compared 28% of the time
MinIO vs Hitachi Content Platform Logo
MinIO vs Hitachi Content Platform
Compared 27% of the time
Red Hat Ceph Storage vs Hitachi Content Platform Logo
Red Hat Ceph Storage vs Hitachi Content Platform
Compared 12% of the time
Dell PowerScale (Isilon) vs Hitachi Content Platform Logo
Dell PowerScale (Isilon) vs Hitachi Content Platform
Compared 7% of the time
Pure Storage FlashBlade vs Hitachi Content Platform Logo
Pure Storage FlashBlade vs Hitachi Content Platform
Compared 5% of the time
More Hitachi Content Platform Competitors
Dell ECS vs NetApp StorageGRID Logo
Dell ECS vs NetApp StorageGRID
Compared 25% of the time
MinIO vs NetApp StorageGRID Logo
MinIO vs NetApp StorageGRID
Compared 25% of the time
Red Hat Ceph Storage vs NetApp StorageGRID Logo
Red Hat Ceph Storage vs NetApp StorageGRID
Compared 24% of the time
Scality RING vs NetApp StorageGRID Logo
Scality RING vs NetApp StorageGRID
Compared 7% of the time
Pure Storage FlashBlade vs NetApp StorageGRID Logo
Pure Storage FlashBlade vs NetApp StorageGRID
Compared 3% of the time
More NetApp StorageGRID Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Hitachi Content Platform
January 2025
Hitachi Content Platform reportDownload Hitachi Content Platform product report
Buyer's Guide
NetApp StorageGRID
January 2025
NetApp StorageGRID reportDownload NetApp StorageGRID product report
 

Also Known As

HCP, Hitachi Vantara Content Platform, Hitachi Vantara HCP
Storage GRID
 

Learn More

Hitachi Vantara
NetApp
 

Overview

Hitachi Content Platform is an object storage solution that enables IT organizations and cloud service providers to store, share, sync, protect, preserve, analyze and retrieve file data from a single system. It is more efficient, easier to use, and capable of handling much more data than traditional file storage solutions. HCP automates day-to-day IT operations like data protection and readily evolves to changes in scale, scope, applications, storage, server and cloud technologies over the life of data. In IT environements where data grows quickly or must live for years, decades or even indefinitely, these capabilities are invaluable.

Store and manage unstructured data at scale using NetApp StorageGRID for secure, durable object storage. Place content in the right location, at the right time, and on the right storage tier, optimizing workflows and reducing overall costs for globally distributed rich media. 

 

Sample Customers

Rabobank, Xinhua News Agency, Kremsm'ller Industrieanlagenbau KG, KSC Commercial Internet, AIS Group, Shanghai Interactive Television Co. Ltd (SiTV), China Telecom, Spin Master
ASE, DARZ GmbH
Buyer's Guide
Hitachi Content Platform vs. NetApp StorageGRID
January 2025
Free Report: Hitachi Content Platform vs. NetApp StorageGRID
Find out what your peers are saying about Hitachi Content Platform vs. NetApp StorageGRID and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Hitachi Content Platform vs. NetApp StorageGRID report.
See our list of best File and Object Storage vendors.

We monitor all File and Object Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.