Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Dell ECS vs Hitachi Content Platform comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 4, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
8.5
Dell ECS support is mostly positive, with quick responses; challenges include time zones, mergers, and varying service levels by region.
No sentiment score available
Hitachi Content Platform support quality varies by region; satisfaction is high, but responsiveness issues exist, requiring partner calls for cases.
The response time and quality of the technical support are satisfactory.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
4.2
Dell ECS needs better integration, performance, support, clarity, scalability, and features for improved security, cost-effectiveness, and user satisfaction.
Sentiment score
3.1
Hitachi Content Platform needs better integration, improved UI, enhanced support, and streamlined processes for effective global collaboration.
Live logs should be viewable through the GUI like with Logstash or Elasticsearch.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.2
Dell ECS is scalable for diverse organizations, offering efficient growth and supporting numerous users, though upgrades are block-based.
Sentiment score
8.2
Hitachi Content Platform offers efficient scalability, managing diverse client needs, enabling straightforward resource expansion and growth accommodations.
I would rate scalability ten out of ten since you buy what you want.
I would rate scalability between eight or nine, as it provides a good ability to scale and expand storage.
 

Setup Cost

Sentiment score
5.0
Dell ECS pricing opinions vary, seen as cost-effective by some; influenced by discounts, capacity, and performance, requiring annual licenses.
No sentiment score available
Hitachi Content Platform is seen as expensive but cost-effective among Western options despite cheaper alternatives like Huawei and StorageGRID.
The pricing model is on the higher side compared to other vendors.
Compared to others, I would rate the solution six or seven out of ten.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.4
Dell ECS is highly stable and reliable, maintaining performance without significant issues, even with large data volumes.
Sentiment score
8.8
Hitachi Content Platform is valued for its stability and reliability, though it's not recommended as a typical file server.
I'd rate stability maybe 9.5 out of ten.
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.6
Dell ECS is praised for stability, scalability, competitive pricing, ease of use, and excellent unstructured data handling.
Sentiment score
7.8
Hitachi Content Platform offers robust data management with features like replication, encryption, compliance, deduplication, and ransomware protection.
If we encounter any issues or need to upgrade anything, we can simply open a ticket, and the EMC team is there to assist us.
We mainly use the replication feature.
 

Categories and Ranking

Dell ECS
Ranking in File and Object Storage
6th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
28
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Hitachi Content Platform
Ranking in File and Object Storage
18th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
14
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the File and Object Storage category, the mindshare of Dell ECS is 8.8%, down from 10.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Hitachi Content Platform is 1.7%, down from 1.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
File and Object Storage
 

Featured Reviews

Muhammad Alihyder Bhuiyan - PeerSpot reviewer
Enables multiple protocol support, but its IOPS functionality needs improvement in terms of performance
Dell ECS enables multiple protocol support, and we recommend it to other users. Anyone can purchase it depending on specific storage quantity requirements. There are certain IOPS limitations in terms of performance. A loss in IOPS can lead to decreased performance across various aspects, including general system performance, production, and overall functionality. In comparison, IBM has no IOPS limitations and relies on web controllers. I rate the product a seven out of ten. IBM and NetApp also provide good storage and a lot of features.
Mir Gulzar Ahmed - PeerSpot reviewer
Integrates well with existing systems but technical support for the platform needs improvement
While deployment is simple, it's not as simple as StorageGRID. The architecture is entirely different, even though the end product uses the same protocols. The user interface isn't as user-friendly, and the management platform UI isn't as intuitive as others. Deployment isn't as centralized either. Although I've deployed Hitachi Content myself in our production head office for the VM team, even though it's simple, it wasn't completely straightforward. They still required my help with the initial configuration environment setup. So, it's not just simple; there are some tricky aspects. The environment is tricky, but if you understand it, configuration can be done quickly.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which File and Object Storage solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
21%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Computer Software Company
13%
Government
8%
Financial Services Firm
27%
Computer Software Company
20%
Government
11%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Dell EMC ECS?
The solution's cost is quite reasonable, especially considering the long-term benefits, such as scalability and data compression. Over time, it is a cost-efficient platform, particularly when integ...
What needs improvement with Dell EMC ECS?
One area for product improvement would be the garbage collection process. It takes longer than expected, so speeding up that process would be beneficial.
What do you like most about Hitachi Content Platform?
Integrating Hitachi Content Platform with existing systems is not challenging.
What needs improvement with Hitachi Content Platform?
In comparison to competitors like Huawei, which can use all storage protocols in the same platform, Hitachi Content Platform lacks the integration of block, file, and object on a single system. Alt...
What is your primary use case for Hitachi Content Platform?
Mainly, from my project, Hitachi Content Platform is used for archiving. The customer is in banking, so they need to keep their long-term data on the platform. The platform is replacing their exist...
 

Also Known As

EMC ECS, Dell EMC Elastic Cloud Storage, EMC Elastic Cloud Storage
HCP, Hitachi Vantara Content Platform, Hitachi Vantara HCP
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Atos
Rabobank, Xinhua News Agency, Kremsm'ller Industrieanlagenbau KG, KSC Commercial Internet, AIS Group, Shanghai Interactive Television Co. Ltd (SiTV), China Telecom, Spin Master
Find out what your peers are saying about Dell ECS vs. Hitachi Content Platform and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.