Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Dell ECS Logo

Top 10 Dell ECS Alternatives

Vendor: Dell Technologies
4.1 out of 5
Leave a review

Top Dell ECS Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Dell ECS based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Red Hat Ceph Storage, MinIO, and Pure Storage FlashBlade. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Dell Technologies Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Dell Technologies, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Dell ECS Logo
Dell ECS Logo
Red Hat Ceph Storage
4.2 out of 5
Red Hat Ceph Storage offers open-source flexibility and cost efficiency, ideal for businesses handling large unstructured data. In comparison, Dell ECS provides advanced data management and enterprise-level features, appealing to organizations prioritizing scalability and integrated solutions.
Download Dell ECS vs. Red Hat Ceph Storage Report
Red Hat Ceph Storage offers lower setup costs with flexible deployment, while Dell ECS is comparatively higher priced with a focus on scalability and enterprise integration.
View comparison
Pricing
Red Hat Ceph Storage offers lower setup costs with flexible deployment, while Dell ECS is comparatively higher priced with a focus on scalability and enterprise integration.
Dell ECS Logo
MinIO
4.0 out of 5
Dell ECS Logo
MinIO
4.0 out of 5
Dell ECS excels in advanced data protection and seamless enterprise integration, making it ideal for organizations focused on comprehensive security. In comparison, MinIO's lightweight, high-performance storage is perfect for cloud-native environments seeking flexibility, scalability, and cost-effective solutions.
Download Dell ECS vs. MinIO Report
Dell ECS typically involves higher initial setup costs due to its enterprise-grade features, while MinIO offers a more budget-friendly setup, appealing to users seeking affordable storage solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Dell ECS typically involves higher initial setup costs due to its enterprise-grade features, while MinIO offers a more budget-friendly setup, appealing to users seeking affordable storage solutions.
Dell ECS Logo
Dell ECS Logo
Pure Storage FlashBlade
4.4 out of 5
Dell ECS offers scalability and flexibility, appealing to cost-conscious enterprises with its pricing and support advantages. In comparison, Pure Storage FlashBlade excels with a high-performance architecture, catering to buyers seeking rapid data processing and quick deployment alongside effective customer service.
Download Dell ECS vs. Pure Storage FlashBlade Report
Dell ECS has a lower setup cost, while Pure Storage FlashBlade offers advanced features at a higher initial price, appealing to enterprises seeking high-performance storage solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Dell ECS has a lower setup cost, while Pure Storage FlashBlade offers advanced features at a higher initial price, appealing to enterprises seeking high-performance storage solutions.
Dell ECS Logo
VAST Data
5.0 out of 5
Dell ECS Logo
VAST Data
5.0 out of 5
Dell ECS offers competitive pricing and strong compatibility for scalable data storage systems. In comparison, VAST Data excels with advanced performance and rapid analytics capabilities. Dell ECS appeals to budget-conscious businesses, while VAST Data attracts those prioritizing cutting-edge data processing and storage solutions.
Download Dell ECS vs. VAST Data Report
Dell ECS setup cost is budget-friendly, while VAST Data requires higher initial investment, highlighting significant differences in the cost structure.
View comparison
Pricing
Dell ECS setup cost is budget-friendly, while VAST Data requires higher initial investment, highlighting significant differences in the cost structure.
Dell ECS Logo
Dell ECS Logo
Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS)
4.4 out of 5
Dell ECS offers robust object storage, ideal for cloud-native applications, emphasizing scalability and resilience. In comparison, Nutanix Unified Storage provides a versatile platform for block, file, and object storage, tailored for mixed workloads, ensuring comprehensive integration for enterprises needing diverse storage solutions.
Download Dell ECS vs. Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS) Report
Dell ECS has a higher setup cost than Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS), which offers more affordable initial deployment. In comparing the two, Dell ECS may require a larger upfront investment than Nutanix Unified Storage.
View comparison
Pricing
Dell ECS has a higher setup cost than Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS), which offers more affordable initial deployment. In comparing the two, Dell ECS may require a larger upfront investment than Nutanix Unified Storage.
Dell ECS Logo
Qumulo
3.9 out of 5
Dell ECS Logo
Qumulo
3.9 out of 5
Dell ECS provides strong integration with existing IT ecosystems, appealing to those prioritizing seamless support for diverse workloads. In comparison, Qumulo offers advanced analytics and intuitive management, drawing tech buyers seeking real-time data insights and personalized deployment, despite potentially higher costs.
Download Dell ECS vs. Qumulo Report
Dell ECS is known for its straightforward setup without initial costs, while Qumulo involves a higher setup cost but offers comprehensive onboarding support.
View comparison
Pricing
Dell ECS is known for its straightforward setup without initial costs, while Qumulo involves a higher setup cost but offers comprehensive onboarding support.
Dell ECS Logo
NetApp StorageGRID
4.2 out of 5
Dell ECS Logo
NetApp StorageGRID
4.2 out of 5
Dell ECS excels with accessible pricing and customer support, offering seamless integration and efficient data tiering for cost optimization. In comparison, NetApp StorageGRID provides robust policy-driven management and comprehensive cloud integration, appealing to enterprises needing granular control and scalability with thorough deployment documentation.
Download Dell ECS vs. NetApp StorageGRID Report
Dell ECS setup cost is moderate, requiring moderate initial investment, while NetApp StorageGRID demands a lower initial setup cost, making it a more budget-friendly option initially.
View comparison
Pricing
Dell ECS setup cost is moderate, requiring moderate initial investment, while NetApp StorageGRID demands a lower initial setup cost, making it a more budget-friendly option initially.
Dell ECS Logo
Scality RING
4.1 out of 5
Dell ECS Logo
Scality RING
4.1 out of 5
Scality RING appeals with its cost-effective scalability and streamlined hybrid deployment, ideal for budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, Dell ECS attracts those seeking advanced features, providing robust compliance and analytics integration, suitable for enterprises prioritizing comprehensive functionality and customization over initial cost savings.
Download Dell ECS vs. Scality RING Report
Scality RING has a higher initial setup cost compared to Dell ECS, which offers a lower entry price. This cost difference is a key consideration for businesses evaluating their budget constraints.
View comparison
Pricing
Scality RING has a higher initial setup cost compared to Dell ECS, which offers a lower entry price. This cost difference is a key consideration for businesses evaluating their budget constraints.
Dell ECS Logo
Dell ECS Logo
Cloudian HyperStore
4.1 out of 5
Cloudian HyperStore appeals with its scalable storage and cloud integration, ideal for flexible environments. In comparison, Dell ECS entices with edge computing support and extensive infrastructure compatibility, suiting enterprises prioritizing comprehensive integration and feature-rich ROI.
Download Cloudian HyperStore vs. Dell ECS Report
Cloudian HyperStore offers a competitive initial setup cost, making it appealing for budget-conscious businesses, while Dell ECS features a higher setup cost, promising more robust features and scalability.
View comparison
Pricing
Cloudian HyperStore offers a competitive initial setup cost, making it appealing for budget-conscious businesses, while Dell ECS features a higher setup cost, promising more robust features and scalability.
Dell ECS Logo
Zadara
4.3 out of 5
Dell ECS Logo
Zadara
4.3 out of 5
Dell ECS excels in robust data handling with strong support. In comparison, Zadara offers advanced features and real-time scalability. Tech buyers might choose Dell ECS for cost-effectiveness and integration, while others may prefer Zadara's flexible storage and pay-as-you-go model.
Download Dell ECS vs. Zadara Report
Dell ECS offers a competitive setup cost with straightforward implementation, while Zadara presents a flexible pricing structure with potential for lower initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Dell ECS offers a competitive setup cost with straightforward implementation, while Zadara presents a flexible pricing structure with potential for lower initial expenses.
Dell ECS Logo
Dell ECS Logo
Hitachi Content Platform
4.0 out of 5
Dell ECS offers seamless scalability and cloud integration, appealing to budget-conscious businesses. In comparison, Hitachi Content Platform provides advanced data management features with strong security, ideal for enterprises focused on data protection. Dell's straightforward deployment and support contrast with Hitachi's in-depth customer service.
Download Dell ECS vs. Hitachi Content Platform Report
Dell ECS offers a more budget-friendly setup cost compared to Hitachi Content Platform, which requires a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Dell ECS offers a more budget-friendly setup cost compared to Hitachi Content Platform, which requires a higher initial investment.
Dell ECS Logo
Dell ECS Logo
IBM Cloud Object Storage
4.1 out of 5
IBM Cloud Object Storage offers budget-friendly pricing and strong support, ideal for cost-conscious enterprises. In comparison, Dell ECS provides advanced features and robust performance, suitable for those prioritizing functionality and a comprehensive solution for complex IT environments.
Download Dell ECS vs. IBM Cloud Object Storage Report
IBM Cloud Object Storage has a lower setup cost, while Dell ECS involves higher initial expenses, providing a choice between cost-effective deployment and potentially greater long-term value.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM Cloud Object Storage has a lower setup cost, while Dell ECS involves higher initial expenses, providing a choice between cost-effective deployment and potentially greater long-term value.
Dell ECS Logo
Dell ECS Logo
Huawei FusionStorage
3.8 out of 5
Dell ECS excels in pricing and support, ideal for those prioritizing cost-effectiveness and strong customer service. In comparison, Huawei FusionStorage offers advanced scalability and performance, appealing to tech buyers seeking cutting-edge features in large-scale deployments.
Download Dell ECS vs. Huawei FusionStorage Report
Dell ECS has a lower initial setup cost compared to Huawei FusionStorage, making it a more budget-friendly option, while Huawei FusionStorage requires a higher initial investment, which may indicate a focus on premium features.
View comparison
Pricing
Dell ECS has a lower initial setup cost compared to Huawei FusionStorage, making it a more budget-friendly option, while Huawei FusionStorage requires a higher initial investment, which may indicate a focus on premium features.
Dell ECS Logo
DataCore Swarm
5.0 out of 5
Dell ECS Logo
DataCore Swarm
5.0 out of 5
Dell ECS excels in scalability and straightforward integration, making it cost-effective for hybrid setups with strong security. In comparison, DataCore Swarm's advanced capabilities and feature-rich support for multi-cloud environments justify its higher price, appealing to those seeking robust long-term scalability.
Download DataCore Swarm vs. Dell ECS Report
Dell ECS has a higher setup cost compared to DataCore Swarm, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Dell ECS has a higher setup cost compared to DataCore Swarm, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
Dell ECS Logo
Dell ECS Logo
Quantum ActiveScale
3.8 out of 5
Dell ECS excels in flexible scalability, offering robust infrastructure for varying data needs. In comparison, Quantum ActiveScale stands out with exceptional data durability and advanced recovery, appealing to data-critical environments. Dell ECS's competitive pricing contrasts Quantum's higher cost but justifies it with enhanced features.
Download Dell ECS vs. Quantum ActiveScale Report
Dell ECS offers a more budget-friendly setup cost, while Quantum ActiveScale comes with a higher initial expense. The financial implication makes Dell ECS appealing to smaller enterprises compared to Quantum ActiveScale’s focus on larger organizations with bigger budgets.
View comparison
Pricing
Dell ECS offers a more budget-friendly setup cost, while Quantum ActiveScale comes with a higher initial expense. The financial implication makes Dell ECS appealing to smaller enterprises compared to Quantum ActiveScale’s focus on larger organizations with bigger budgets.
Dell ECS Logo
S3 Drive
1 out of 5
Dell ECS Logo
S3 Drive
1 out of 5
Dell ECS attracts tech buyers with its cost-effectiveness and seamless IT integration. In comparison, S3 Drive is chosen for its comprehensive features and adaptability. While Dell ECS targets large-scale storage, S3 Drive offers versatility and ease of use.
Dell ECS incurs a significant initial setup cost, offering a robust enterprise solution, while S3 Drive presents a low-cost entry, highlighting a user-friendly alternative for budget-conscious individuals.
View comparison
Pricing
Dell ECS incurs a significant initial setup cost, offering a robust enterprise solution, while S3 Drive presents a low-cost entry, highlighting a user-friendly alternative for budget-conscious individuals.
Dell ECS Logo
Dell ECS Logo
IBM Storage Fusion
1 out of 5

The IBM Storage Fusion product is a comprehensive solution designed for data management, monitoring, and performance optimization. Users rely on this platform for capacity planning, storage provisioning, and troubleshooting storage-related issues. With predictive analytics capabilities, IBM Storage Fusion enables users to forecast storage requirements and prevent potential downtime. The product also supports resource utilization tracking and automates storage tasks for increased efficiency.

Users have highlighted the intuitive user interface of IBM Storage Fusion, which simplifies storage management. The scalability of the product allows for easy expansion of storage capacity as needed. Furthermore, users appreciate the reliability of IBM Storage Fusion in ensuring data protection and security. The platform is also efficient in optimizing storage performance and reducing costs.

View comparison
Dell ECS Logo
Dell ECS Logo
HPE File Storage and Object Storage
4.5 out of 5
HPE offers intuitive management and easy integration, appealing to those needing quick deployment and lower costs. In comparison, Dell ECS provides advanced features emphasizing scalability and security. Tech buyers may choose HPE for simplicity or Dell ECS for long-term investment benefits.
Download Dell ECS vs. HPE File Storage and Object Storage Report
HPE File Storage and Object Storage are praised for their straightforward setup and low initial costs, while Dell ECS may require a higher setup budget but offsets this with robust scaling features.
View comparison
Pricing
HPE File Storage and Object Storage are praised for their straightforward setup and low initial costs, while Dell ECS may require a higher setup budget but offsets this with robust scaling features.
Dell ECS Logo
Dell ECS Logo
StackPath Object Storage
1 out of 5

Why use StackPath Object Storage?
Frequent (hot) storage shouldn’t cost a lot. And once you’re paying for storage, we don’t believe you should pay AGAIN to access it. Welcome to StackPath’s Object Storage.

View comparison

Related categories

File and Object Storage
Software Defined Storage (SDS)
All-Flash Storage