Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Dell ECS vs Red Hat Ceph Storage comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 4, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
8.5
Dell ECS support is mostly positive, with quick responses; challenges include time zones, mergers, and varying service levels by region.
No sentiment score available
Opinions on Red Hat Ceph Storage support vary; some value it, others prefer community forums or internal solutions.
The response time and quality of the technical support are satisfactory.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
4.2
Dell ECS needs better integration, performance, support, clarity, scalability, and features for improved security, cost-effectiveness, and user satisfaction.
Sentiment score
4.1
Red Hat Ceph Storage faces challenges in performance, usability, documentation, integration, and resource optimization, needing various improvements.
Live logs should be viewable through the GUI like with Logstash or Elasticsearch.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.2
Dell ECS is scalable for diverse organizations, offering efficient growth and supporting numerous users, though upgrades are block-based.
Sentiment score
6.4
Red Hat Ceph Storage scales well with user feedback, though latency and planning challenges require consideration and deployment tools.
I would rate scalability ten out of ten since you buy what you want.
I would rate scalability between eight or nine, as it provides a good ability to scale and expand storage.
 

Setup Cost

Sentiment score
5.0
Dell ECS pricing opinions vary, seen as cost-effective by some; influenced by discounts, capacity, and performance, requiring annual licenses.
No sentiment score available
Enterprise buyers appreciated Red Hat Ceph Storage's reasonable pricing and flexible licensing, with the option for support depending on expertise.
The pricing model is on the higher side compared to other vendors.
Compared to others, I would rate the solution six or seven out of ten.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.4
Dell ECS is highly stable and reliable, maintaining performance without significant issues, even with large data volumes.
Sentiment score
8.7
Red Hat Ceph Storage is highly reliable and stable, with minor issues in data rebalancing, latency, and recovery.
I'd rate stability maybe 9.5 out of ten.
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.6
Dell ECS is praised for stability, scalability, competitive pricing, ease of use, and excellent unstructured data handling.
No sentiment score available
Red Hat Ceph Storage provides scalable, reliable, and flexible storage solutions with self-healing architecture and easy integration for various needs.
If we encounter any issues or need to upgrade anything, we can simply open a ticket, and the EMC team is there to assist us.
We mainly use the replication feature.
 

Categories and Ranking

Dell ECS
Ranking in File and Object Storage
6th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
28
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Red Hat Ceph Storage
Ranking in File and Object Storage
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.2
Number of Reviews
22
Ranking in other categories
Software Defined Storage (SDS) (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the File and Object Storage category, the mindshare of Dell ECS is 8.8%, down from 10.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat Ceph Storage is 22.7%, down from 23.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
File and Object Storage
 

Featured Reviews

Muhammad Alihyder Bhuiyan - PeerSpot reviewer
Enables multiple protocol support, but its IOPS functionality needs improvement in terms of performance
Dell ECS enables multiple protocol support, and we recommend it to other users. Anyone can purchase it depending on specific storage quantity requirements. There are certain IOPS limitations in terms of performance. A loss in IOPS can lead to decreased performance across various aspects, including general system performance, production, and overall functionality. In comparison, IBM has no IOPS limitations and relies on web controllers. I rate the product a seven out of ten. IBM and NetApp also provide good storage and a lot of features.
Soner BÜYÜKATALAY - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides efficient stability and archive storage features, but its maintenance process needs improvement
Red Hat Ceph Storage is difficult to maintain. We use CLI tools for maintenance, and the concept seems challenging. Additionally, it is difficult to expand the product due to balancing errors. It takes some time to re-balance the storage in case of server failure. They could improve the speed of the process.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which File and Object Storage solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
21%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Computer Software Company
13%
Government
8%
Computer Software Company
19%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Dell EMC ECS?
The solution's cost is quite reasonable, especially considering the long-term benefits, such as scalability and data compression. Over time, it is a cost-efficient platform, particularly when integ...
What needs improvement with Dell EMC ECS?
One area for product improvement would be the garbage collection process. It takes longer than expected, so speeding up that process would be beneficial.
How does Red Hat Ceph Storage compare with MiniO?
Red Hat Ceph does well in simplifying storage integration by replacing the need for numerous storage solutions. This solution allows for multiple copies of replicated and coded pools to be kept, ea...
What do you like most about Red Hat Ceph Storage?
The high availability of the solution is important to us.
What needs improvement with Red Hat Ceph Storage?
Some documentation is very hard to find. The documentation must be quickly available.
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

EMC ECS, Dell EMC Elastic Cloud Storage, EMC Elastic Cloud Storage
Ceph
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Atos
Dell, DreamHost
Find out what your peers are saying about Dell ECS vs. Red Hat Ceph Storage and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.