Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Pure Storage FlashBlade vs Qumulo comparison

Pure Storage and Qumulo are both solutions in the File and Object Storage category. Pure Storage is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.9, while Qumulo is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.3. Pure Storage holds a 6.4% mindshare in FaOS, compared to Qumulo’s 3.6% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of Pure Storage users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Qumulo users who would recommend it.
Pure Storage FlashBlade
Read 37 Pure Storage FlashBlade reviews
  • 4,565 Views
  • 3,248 Comparison Views
97% willing to recommend
Qumulo
Read 8 Qumulo reviews
  • 2,400 Views
  • 1,821 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 4, 2024

Qumulo and Pure Storage FlashBlade compete in the data storage market. Pure Storage FlashBlade is seen as superior due to its extensive feature set.

Features: Qumulo provides real-time analytics, flexible scalability options, and simple integration with AWS or Google Cloud. Pure Storage FlashBlade offers high-speed performance, seamless integration for complex workloads, and replication capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Qumulo could enhance its feature set complexity and offer more advanced options for users needing fine-tuning. Additional control over integration with systems like Kubernetes is needed. Pure Storage FlashBlade can improve cost efficiency, enhance data backup processes, and optimize API interactions for better performance.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Qumulo offers straightforward deployment and responsive support, ideal for budget-conscious users. Pure Storage FlashBlade provides user-friendly deployment with comprehensive support options, benefiting enterprise-level applications.

Pricing and ROI: Qumulo has competitive setup costs, offering significant ROI for budget-focused organizations. Pure Storage FlashBlade, while having higher initial costs, delivers powerful performance gains, justifying its investment for advanced solutions.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Pure Storage FlashBlade vs. Qumulo Report (Updated: October 2024).
Buyer's Guide
Pure Storage FlashBlade vs. Qumulo
October 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 816,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
8.2
Pure Storage FlashBlade's customer service is praised for expertise but sometimes experiences slower responses due to growth challenges.
Sentiment score
8.0
Qumulo's customer service is highly regarded for responsiveness, knowledge, and 24-hour availability, though not all have used it.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
5.5
Users want better cloud integration, support, pricing, efficiency, and improvements in analytics, configuration, and backup for FlashBlade.
Sentiment score
5.3
Qumulo users seek improved updates, simpler node replacement, better data protection, cloud integration, and enhanced terminal controls for iMac.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.9
Pure Storage FlashBlade is praised for its scalability and ease of expansion, satisfying various industries like banking and media.
Sentiment score
8.4
Qumulo provides effortless scalability, efficiently supporting large user bases and data volumes, with seamless integration and expansion for any organization.
 

Setup Cost

Sentiment score
7.4
Pure Storage FlashBlade is costlier but valued for performance, ease, and reliability, justifying its comprehensive licensing with included software.
No sentiment score available
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.8
Pure Storage FlashBlade is highly rated for stability, reliability, and performance, with minimal downtime and swift recovery.
Sentiment score
8.6
Qumulo is praised for its stability and reliability, receiving high ratings and positive feedback for its consistent performance.
In case there is any issue with any blade, the data is moved to another.
For more quotes and insights, download the Pure Storage FlashBlade report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Qumulo report
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.0
Pure Storage FlashBlade offers high performance, scalability, and ease of use with excellent data protection and seamless integration for large storage needs.
Sentiment score
7.6
Qumulo excels with real-time analytics, seamless cloud integration, ease of use, cost-effectiveness, and robust disaster recovery features.
We can plug in many blades, and we can have data up to one terabyte.
For more quotes and insights, download the Pure Storage FlashBlade report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Qumulo report
 

Categories and Ranking

Pure Storage FlashBlade
Ranking in File and Object Storage
5th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.9
Number of Reviews
37
Ranking in other categories
All-Flash Storage (18th)
Qumulo
Ranking in File and Object Storage
10th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
NAS (8th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the File and Object Storage category, the mindshare of Pure Storage FlashBlade is 6.4%, up from 5.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Qumulo is 3.6%, up from 3.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
File and Object Storage
 

Featured Reviews

Eric Black - PeerSpot reviewer
The ability to leverage multi-tenancy along with immutability is a huge benefit for us
The only thing I feel FlashBlade is missing is the SOS API. If it had SOS API, that would put it well over the top. Veeam Backup specifically has started to streamline their API, and they are doing that with SOS API. They have optimized it. Any of the S3 devices out there that support this SOS API can have far more API calls at once. On our side, that translates to better restoration. With SOS API, it can leverage far more restorations at a single given time or read from the device in simple terms. That results in maximizing the output and throughput from the device itself.
Read full review
VinceVitro - PeerSpot reviewer
Useful data sharing, simple cluster scaling, and excellent support
One aspect of Qumulo that I hoped to see improved was its software upgrade process, which did see significant progress during my usage. Initially, upgrading the software resulted in several minutes of system downtime. However, by the time I departed last summer, the downtime had reduced to mere ten seconds. Although I am unsure if Qumulo has yet achieved a completely outage-free upgrade, I simply performed the upgrades early in the morning before the marketing department began its workday, so any downtime was inconsequential.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which File and Object Storage solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
37%
Computer Software Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
8%
Financial Services Firm
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Pure Storage FlashBlade?
The tool's most valuable feature is its fast performance, especially in handling snapshots. It helps during power outages when we need to quickly move data between different data centers. It ensure...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Pure Storage FlashBlade?
The pricing for FlashBlade is between cheap and moderate. FlashBlade is worth the money due to the experience and performance it delivers, including quick response times.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Pure Storage FlashBlade?
The documentational aspect of FlashBlade needs improvement. It’s important for documentation to be comprehensive for all users working on FlashBlade. Additionally, more attention to documentation a...
See all answers
What do you like most about Qumulo?
The most valuable features of Qumulo are its rolling updates and all-day availability.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Qumulo?
Initially, the failover was supposed to be implemented in Qumulo itself. This failed to happen mid-case, so we had to devise a middleman solution. It was not the cleanest of solutions, but we did g...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Qumulo?
We use Qumulo for end-user storage and some application storage as well.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Dell PowerScale (Isilon) vs Pure Storage FlashBlade Logo
Dell PowerScale (Isilon) vs Pure Storage FlashBlade
Compared 19% of the time
VAST Data vs Pure Storage FlashBlade Logo
VAST Data vs Pure Storage FlashBlade
Compared 14% of the time
Red Hat Ceph Storage vs Pure Storage FlashBlade Logo
Red Hat Ceph Storage vs Pure Storage FlashBlade
Compared 12% of the time
MinIO vs Pure Storage FlashBlade Logo
MinIO vs Pure Storage FlashBlade
Compared 11% of the time
Super Micro SuperBlade vs Pure Storage FlashBlade Logo
Super Micro SuperBlade vs Pure Storage FlashBlade
Compared 4% of the time
More Pure Storage FlashBlade Competitors
Dell PowerScale (Isilon) vs Qumulo Logo
Dell PowerScale (Isilon) vs Qumulo
Compared 24% of the time
VAST Data vs Qumulo Logo
VAST Data vs Qumulo
Compared 17% of the time
Scality RING vs Qumulo Logo
Scality RING vs Qumulo
Compared 9% of the time
NetApp FAS Series vs Qumulo Logo
NetApp FAS Series vs Qumulo
Compared 9% of the time
Dell ECS vs Qumulo Logo
Dell ECS vs Qumulo
Compared 3% of the time
More Qumulo Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Pure Storage FlashBlade
November 2024
Pure Storage FlashBlade reportDownload Pure Storage FlashBlade product report
Buyer's Guide
NAS
November 2024
Qumulo reportDownload Qumulo product report
 

Learn More

Pure Storage
Qumulo
 

Overview

FlashBlade is the industry’s most advanced scale-out storage for unstructured data, powered by a modern, massively parallel architecture to consolidate complex data silos (like backup appliances and data lakes) and accelerate tomorrow’s discoveries and insights.

Qumulo is a data storage and management platform that promotes object-based storage for users, backup archives, and surveillance. Its primary use case is to provide a cost-effective and feature-rich solution for managing large data. 

Qumulo's data protection algorithm ensures the safety of node data, while its integration with backup platforms like Veeam and Veritas makes it easy to manage backups. The platform offers a good balance between operational cost and complexity versus feature set, making it an attractive option for businesses of all sizes.

 

Sample Customers

ServiceNow, Mercedes-AMG Petronas Motorsport, Dominos, Man AHL
County of Riverside Sheriff Department, Hyundai Mobis Automotive North America, University of Arizona, UCSD - San Diego Supercomputer Center, Medical College of Wisconsin, Sinclair Oil, Royal Dutch Shell, Kaiser Permanente, Deluxe Creative, Vexcel Imaging, University of Florida, The Madison Square Garden Company, Arizona State University, Cinesite, San Diego Padres Baseball, Johns Hopkins University - School of Medicine, IHME, EllieMae, Washington State University.
Buyer's Guide
Pure Storage FlashBlade vs. Qumulo
October 2024
Free Report: Pure Storage FlashBlade vs. Qumulo
Find out what your peers are saying about Pure Storage FlashBlade vs. Qumulo and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Pure Storage FlashBlade vs. Qumulo report.
See our list of best File and Object Storage vendors.

We monitor all File and Object Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.