Hitachi Content Platform vs Red Hat Ceph Storage comparison

Hitachi Vantara and Red Hat are both solutions in the File and Object Storage category. Hitachi Vantara is ranked #18 with an average rating of 7.0, while Red Hat is ranked #2 with an average rating of 7.8. Hitachi Vantara holds a 1.7% mindshare in FaOS, compared to Red Hat’s 22.7% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Hitachi Vantara users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Red Hat users who would recommend it.

Hitachi Content Platform

Read 14 Hitachi Content Platform reviews

1,411 Views
977 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Red Hat Ceph Storage

Read 22 Red Hat Ceph Storage reviews

14,032 Views
12,183 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Hitachi Content Platform

Red Hat Ceph Storage

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 4, 2024

Red Hat Ceph Storage and Hitachi Content Platform compete in the object storage solutions category. Hitachi Content Platform appears to have the upper hand due to its advanced data management and governance features.

Features: Red Hat Ceph Storage offers scalable data storage, flexible integration across platforms, and support for diverse infrastructure. Hitachi Content Platform provides advanced data management, strong governance capabilities, and enhanced control and security over data.

Room for Improvement: Red Hat Ceph Storage could improve its advanced data governance features, interface usability, and initial setup process. Hitachi Content Platform may benefit from more competitive pricing, streamlined integration processes, and enhanced scalability options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Red Hat Ceph Storage provides a flexible deployment model with extensive support resources for smooth integration. Hitachi Content Platform offers a structured deployment process with strong customer service, appealing to businesses seeking reliable assistance.

Pricing and ROI: Red Hat Ceph Storage is praised for competitive initial costs and favorable ROI, making it attractive for budget-conscious buyers. Hitachi Content Platform may have higher upfront costs but delivers significant ROI through its advanced features and long-term benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed Hitachi Content Platform vs. Red Hat Ceph Storage Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Hitachi Content Platform vs. Red Hat Ceph Storage

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 814,649 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Hitachi Content Platform

Ranking in File and Object Storage

18th

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Red Hat Ceph Storage

Ranking in File and Object Storage

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Software Defined Storage (SDS) (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the File and Object Storage category, the mindshare of Hitachi Content Platform is 1.7%, down from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat Ceph Storage is 22.7%, down from 23.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

File and Object Storage

Featured Reviews

Mir Gulzar Ahmed

IT Manager at Synergy Computers

Feb 7, 2024

Integrates well with existing systems but technical support for the platform needs improvement

While deployment is simple, it's not as simple as StorageGRID. The architecture is entirely different, even though the end product uses the same protocols. The user interface isn't as user-friendly, and the management platform UI isn't as intuitive as others. Deployment isn't as centralized either. Although I've deployed Hitachi Content myself in our production head office for the VM team, even though it's simple, it wasn't completely straightforward. They still required my help with the initial configuration environment setup. So, it's not just simple; there are some tricky aspects. The environment is tricky, but if you understand it, configuration can be done quickly.

Read full review

Soner BÜYÜKATALAY

Chief Software Engineer at a manufacturing company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Nov 9, 2023

Provides efficient stability and archive storage features, but its maintenance process needs improvement

We use the product for archive storage, video surveillance systems, and media storage Red Hat Ceph Storage is difficult to maintain. We use CLI tools for maintenance, and the concept seems challenging. Additionally, it is difficult to expand the product due to balancing errors. It takes some time…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The features that I have found most valuable are their retention logs. The other thing I have found most valuable is the way they handle the BHEA. Basically the DNS and everything is managed by itself. It is seamless to the users."

"The main selling point is its compatibility with different environments. It functions like an on-prem Google Drive or Dropbox built on top of the object storage."

"The product provides the fastest technology."

"The platform helps in efficient data management with the ease of server provisioning."

"We are using Content Platform for data migration, and it integrates with our HNS platform. This is good because we can integrate it with our existing HNS and SAP solutions. The GUI is also user-friendly. It doesn't take much time to do anything. If we know the architecture and the steps, we can do what we need with a few clicks."

"Feature-wise, it has a lot of features. The most valuable features include de-duplication, encryption, version controlling, support, and tamper-proof data."

"Companies can scale the solution."

"The way that they handle the DR is very good because when there is a failover, it is seamless to the users."

Cons

"The only thing is that it should be more cost effective."

"Two things that can be improved are pricing and configuration. Mostly the pricing is an issue. And if I were to add anything, I would say more integration with backup solutions such as Veeam Backup."

"In terms of the customer support, I can say it's a mixed reaction depending on the country."

"The user interface isn't as user-friendly, and the management platform UI isn't as intuitive as others. So it can be more user-friendly."

"The solution could use more integration with clouds."

"There is room for improvement in the capacity for integration with other platforms."

"They could improve compatibility and offer a more user-friendly GUI."

"This product's ability to track logs for access still needs to be improved."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I think the ROI for this solution is very good because the pricing for it is in between other solutions."

"The pricing could be better."

"Overall, it's costly."

"The price of the Hitachi Content Platform is very high."

"The product’s cost is average."

"Hitachi is more expensive than StorageGRID."

"Pricing is comparable to other solutions in the market."

"The operational overhead is higher compared to Azure because we own the hardware."

"I rate the product’s pricing an eight out of ten."

"If you can afford a product like Red Hat Ceph Storage then go for it. If you cannot, then you need to test Ceph and get your hands dirty."

"The price of this product isn't high."

"We never used the paid support."

"There is no cost for software."

"The other big advantage is that Ceph is free software. Compared to traditional SAN based storage, it is very economical."

"The price of Red Hat Ceph Storage is reasonable."

More Red Hat Ceph Storage pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which File and Object Storage solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

27%

Computer Software Company

20%

Government

11%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

19%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Hitachi Content Platform?

Integrating Hitachi Content Platform with existing systems is not challenging.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Hitachi Content Platform?

They could improve compatibility and offer a more user-friendly GUI.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Hitachi Content Platform?

We proposed its consultation to our clients and have explored it further. This is important because we partnered with HST, who provided a demonstration box and shipped it from UAE to Pakistan for t...

See all answers

How does Red Hat Ceph Storage compare with MiniO?

Red Hat Ceph does well in simplifying storage integration by replacing the need for numerous storage solutions. This solution allows for multiple copies of replicated and coded pools to be kept, ea...

See all answers

What do you like most about Red Hat Ceph Storage?

The high availability of the solution is important to us.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Red Hat Ceph Storage?

Some documentation is very hard to find. The documentation must be quickly available.

See all answers

Comparisons

Dell ECS vs Hitachi Content Platform

Compared 30% of the time

MinIO vs Hitachi Content Platform

Compared 29% of the time

NetApp StorageGRID vs Hitachi Content Platform

Compared 12% of the time

Dell PowerScale (Isilon) vs Hitachi Content Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Pure Storage FlashBlade vs Hitachi Content Platform

Compared 5% of the time

More Hitachi Content Platform Competitors

MinIO vs Red Hat Ceph Storage

Compared 47% of the time

VMware vSAN vs Red Hat Ceph Storage

Compared 7% of the time

NetApp StorageGRID vs Red Hat Ceph Storage

Compared 4% of the time

Pure Storage FlashBlade vs Red Hat Ceph Storage

Compared 3% of the time

Dell PowerFlex vs Red Hat Ceph Storage

Compared 3% of the time

More Red Hat Ceph Storage Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Hitachi Content Platform

October 2024

Download Hitachi Content Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

Software Defined Storage (SDS)

November 2024

Download Red Hat Ceph Storage product report

Also Known As

HCP, Hitachi Vantara Content Platform, Hitachi Vantara HCP

Ceph

Learn More

Hitachi Vantara

Red Hat

Overview

Hitachi Content Platform is an object storage solution that enables IT organizations and cloud service providers to store, share, sync, protect, preserve, analyze and retrieve file data from a single system. It is more efficient, easier to use, and capable of handling much more data than traditional file storage solutions. HCP automates day-to-day IT operations like data protection and readily evolves to changes in scale, scope, applications, storage, server and cloud technologies over the life of data. In IT environements where data grows quickly or must live for years, decades or even indefinitely, these capabilities are invaluable.

Red Hat Ceph Storage is an enterprise open source platform that provides unified software-defined storage on standard, economical servers and disks. With block, object, and file storage combined into one platform, Red Hat Ceph Storage efficiently and automatically manages all your data.

Sample Customers

Rabobank, Xinhua News Agency, Kremsm'ller Industrieanlagenbau KG, KSC Commercial Internet, AIS Group, Shanghai Interactive Television Co. Ltd (SiTV), China Telecom, Spin Master

Dell, DreamHost

Buyer's Guide

Hitachi Content Platform vs. Red Hat Ceph Storage

October 2024

Free Report: Hitachi Content Platform vs. Red Hat Ceph Storage

Find out what your peers are saying about Hitachi Content Platform vs. Red Hat Ceph Storage and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Hitachi Content Platform vs. Red Hat Ceph Storage report.

See our list of best File and Object Storage vendors.

We monitor all File and Object Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.