HP Wolf Security vs Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert comparison

HP Wolf Security vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert

Download the complete report

Helped 823,875 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

HP Wolf Security

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

40th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

3.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (39th)

Kaspersky Endpoint Detectio...

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

19th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of HP Wolf Security is 2.2%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert is 1.3%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Featured Reviews

reviewer2344002

Owner at a performing arts with 11-50 employees

Adds a layer of safety, especially for laptops operating in various environments

The tool's deployment is easy. HP Wolf Security's deployment was a swift process since it was initially compatible with Windows 10, the operating system on both machines. However, when I transitioned to Windows 11, I encountered minor issues that prompted me to delve deeper into Wolf Security to fine-tune security settings according to my preferences. While I mostly used default settings, there was an initial adjustment where I disabled the AI function related to malware. Currently, the system is running smoothly with no reported issues. Adjusting some settings raised concerns about compatibility between HP Wolf Security and Norton 360. Specifically, aspects of HP Wolf Security, such as the virtual machine component, intrigued me, but I hesitated due to potential conflicts. During my investigation, Windows 11 raised a flag, questioning the system's security settings with Norton 360 and HP Wolf Security. However, it seems that they coexist well without causing issues.

Read full review

Kiarash Heydari

Information security manager at asa com

Solid security and performance; overall a useful tool

My opinion is that behavior detection could work better. This feature gets a high rate of false positives. This service is painful for network administrators. I would like for this solution to better integrate with other solutions, especially with our network solution. I would also like for the support response time to be better.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It has prevented thousands of potential threats by encapsulating them within its own vSentry container, thus providing overall protection and integrity of the operating system."

"I use HP Wolf Security to add a layer of safety, especially for laptops operating in various environments."

"The most valuable feature is the process isolation because it simply stops malware from infecting the machines."

"Now, instead of us having to go through that analysis, they actually give us a monthly report that shows us: "Here's what you got hit with, here's what would have happened, here are the forensics behind the attack," and, obviously, Bromium stopped it."

"We've been able to isolate and prevent malicious code from external email attachments and from downloaded internet files. Those are the two big areas that have really made an impact."

"The isolation feature is the most important because it prevents attacks."

"Our overall security posture has absolutely improved as a result of adding Bromium to our security stack. We continue to have less user impact through a significantly reduced amount of malware infections. It's become a non-event."

"The feature that stands out the most is that when someone clicks on a link in an email... [if] that link is malicious and it has some malware or keylogger attached to it, when it opens up in that Bromium virtualized browser, there's no chance of it actually being on the machine and running, because as soon as they click that "X" in the upper right-hand side of the browser, everything just vanishes. That is an added plus."

"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"The product has an easy-to-use EDR module based on signature-based antivirus detection. It is a complete software."

"The solution's most valuable features are that it offers very strong encryption and acts as an antivirus product."

"The most valuable feature of Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is security. It has better security than other solutions, such as Symantec."

"The most valuable features of Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response are the threat detection technologies, and activity monitoring and support tools. Additionally, the port and USB security, and antivirus are effective."

"The most valuable features are the reports."

"We can scale the solution."

"The solution provides high-end security that is critical for financial institutions and bankers."

More Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert pros

Cons

"The tool behaves differently when I ported to Windows 11."

"When you deploy, not only is the user asked to reboot their computer, they are also asked to wait for 20 minutes while it sits there and initializes. It definitely impacts the end-user. It takes time away from their day."

"Initial setup was complex. There were many configurations that needed to be worked out with the vendor. The setup required hands-on assistance from Bromium."

"Initially, when we came in contact with Bromium a few years ago, it had a nice threat analyst, or a LAVA Pop, which is what they used to call it. Once it detected malware, it would show us the malware's path... I don't see that on the computers now. We only get to see that in the console. I would like to still see that on the individual machines because when we go out to look at a machine, we don't necessarily have access to the console."

"After a major release, there's always a lot of "dust settling." You have to work through all those issues and then you're fine for a while. The problem is, it's stable, it's fine, until the next major release comes out. Then you go back into the cycle again of uncertainty, instability, working through issues until they have patched and remediated all the problems that you're having. It's not unlike any other vendor though"

"They need to improve the compatibility with other applications and its stability. It works well with attacks, but it doesn't work well with all software on the clients. There is a lot of troubleshooting and a lot of things that need to be tuned to make it work and not break things."

"Reporting is one of the shortcomings of the product. We do mine the data that's in there from a forensics perspective... It becomes very difficult because you have to spend a lot of time digging through the volumes of data. Reporting is absolutely the biggest shortcoming."

"They have always struggled with usability. The protection that it offers you is tremendous, but there's definitely an impact with use of resources on the computer. It's gotten a lot better now with Win 10. But sometimes, when you open up a website, it's going to take longer than it would without Bromium, and it's the same with documents."

More HP Wolf Security cons

"My opinion is that behavior detection could work better. This feature gets a high rate of false positives."

"The license prices for this solution are quite high."

"The solution can improve by providing automatic fixing of vulnerabilities and reducing the resources used in the server component and endpoint agent. They are very bulky and use a lot of CPU, memory, and hard drive resources."

"It's not a simple implementation."

"The installation process could be more streamlined."

"There are some issues with EDR's web policy blocking sites that are marked as exceptions."

"The main problem with Endpoint is that Kaspersky is a Russian company, and my clients prefer not to use it."

"The system can be heavy, slowing down performance."

More Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product's pricing is a good value. We only run it on our internet-facing workstations, we don't run it on everything in our environment. We are very selective. Some organizations may want to consider doing something like that to reduce their license count."

"Pricing is reasonable."

"The pricing is very fair compared to the competition. The licensing is straightforward."

"The product came as a bundle with the machine."

"I think the pricing is a good value. All of these security products are always going to be very expensive, but I don't think Bromium is unreasonable. I think Bromium is decently priced. It’s a tiered licensing platform. The more you buy, the cheaper gets per unit, and I think their tiers are very well defined. I think they're fair."

"If one is cheap, ten is expensive, I rate the product’s price as a seven out of ten, especially if I compare it with CrowdStrike."

"There is an annual license to use Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response. The price overall is a bit expensive when compared to other solutions. There are not any additional fees other than the license."

"We have been satisfied with the license of the solution."

"The product has a valuable pricing model. We need to purchase its monthly subscription."

"The solution isn't the cheapest considering what you get. I would rate the pricing as seven out of ten."

"We were on a three-year license to use Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response. The price could be better."

"The pricing is reasonable. Not too cheap, not too expensive."

"EDR is priced on the cheaper side. Licensing for EDR is available on a yearly basis for around 80 SAR a year."

More Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

823,875 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Government

Comms Service Provider

Educational Organization

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HP Wolf Security?

The product came as a bundle with the machine.

What needs improvement with HP Wolf Security?

The tool behaves differently when I ported to Windows 11.

What is your primary use case for HP Wolf Security?

I use HP Wolf Security to add a layer of safety, especially for laptops operating in various environments.

What do you like most about Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert?

The integration with our hypervisor is quite smooth, especially within the Kaspersky Enterprise environment. We have many virtual machines, and the integration is helpful.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert?

If one is cheap, ten is expensive, I rate the product’s price as a seven out of ten, especially if I compare it with CrowdStrike.

What needs improvement with Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert?

I would say that Kaspersky is not too big in the cloud-related area. From an improvement perspective, it would be good if Kaspersky went big in the cloud since it would give the tool a fair chance ...

Norton Small Business vs HP Wolf Security

Comparisons

Compared 17% of the time

Bitdefender Total Security vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 15% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Business vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 10% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 6% of the time

More HP Wolf Security Competitors

Fortinet FortiEDR vs Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert

Compared 35% of the time

Trend Vision One vs Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert

Compared 13% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert

Compared 10% of the time

Cynet vs Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert

Compared 9% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response vs Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert

Compared 7% of the time

More Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert Competitors

Product Reports

HP Wolf Security

Download HP Wolf Security product report

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert

Download Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert product report

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert report

Also Known As

Bromium vSentry

Kaspersky EDR

Learn More

Video not available

Kaspersky

Overview

HP Wolf Security is a comprehensive cybersecurity solution that bolsters your organization's cyber-resilience on multiple fronts. With its full-stack security approach, it ensures layered protection from hardware to the cloud, providing a robust defense against cyber threats. HP Wolf Security introduces endpoint isolation, a cutting-edge feature that effectively halts threats that may go unnoticed by Next-Generation Antivirus (NGAV) and Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) systems. Moreover, it extends its security coverage to printers, equipping them with advanced detection and self-healing capabilities to further safeguard your digital ecosystem. This integrated solution streamlines IT and security risk management, resulting in fewer alerts and false positives, and reduces the time and effort required for endpoint incident analysis and remediation. Notably, HP Wolf Security prioritizes productivity, allowing you to manage risk without disrupting the user experience, enabling worry-free work from anywhere, and offering rapid IT disaster recovery at scale.

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert is a comprehensive cybersecurity solution designed to detect and respond to advanced threats in real time. It combines advanced threat intelligence, machine learning algorithms, and behavioral analysis to provide proactive protection against sophisticated attacks.

With its centralized management console, security teams can easily monitor and investigate incidents, while automated response capabilities enable quick remediation. This solution offers deep visibility into endpoint activities, allowing organizations to identify and mitigate potential risks effectively. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert is a powerful tool for enhancing the overall security posture of businesses, ensuring the protection of critical assets and sensitive data.

Sample Customers

Valspar

Ferrari, Insolar, Tael, Republic of Serbia

HP Wolf Security vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert