Top 10 Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert Alternatives

4.1 out of 5

46 reviews
97% willing to recommend

Top Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Fortinet FortiEDR, and SentinelOne Singularity Complete. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert surpasses its competitors by offering advanced threat intelligence, automated response capabilities, and a user-friendly interface that enhances cybersecurity measures and streamlines incident management for superior protection and efficiency.

Kaspersky Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Kaspersky, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

4.0 out of 5

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

4.0 out of 5

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert offers comprehensive threat detection and protective features. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint excels in seamless integration with Windows, advanced threat analytics, and superior cloud integration. Kaspersky's reporting and navigation complexity contrasts with Microsoft's need for better non-Windows support and alerting mechanisms.

Download Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert vs. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Report

Pricing

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert incurs lower setup costs, while Microsoft Defender for Endpoint offers a premium setup experience with higher costs.

View comparison

Pricing

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert incurs lower setup costs, while Microsoft Defender for Endpoint offers a premium setup experience with higher costs.

Fortinet FortiEDR

4.0 out of 5

Fortinet FortiEDR

4.0 out of 5

Fortinet FortiEDR excels in cost-effectiveness, rapid ROI, and customer service, making it ideal for buyers seeking affordability and support. In comparison, Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert offers advanced threat intelligence and machine learning, appealing to buyers prioritizing superior feature sets despite higher costs.

Download Fortinet FortiEDR vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert Report

Pricing

Fortinet FortiEDR has a lower initial setup cost compared to Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert, which presents a higher expense but offers comprehensive features.

View comparison

Pricing

Fortinet FortiEDR has a lower initial setup cost compared to Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert, which presents a higher expense but offers comprehensive features.

SentinelOne Singularity Complete

4.4 out of 5

SentinelOne Singularity Complete

4.4 out of 5

SentinelOne Singularity Complete offers superior customer support and easier deployment, while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert is praised for its comprehensive feature set. In comparison, SentinelOne provides a streamlined experience, whereas Kaspersky excels in network visibility and advanced threat intelligence.

Download Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert vs. SentinelOne Singularity Complete Report

Pricing

SentinelOne Singularity Complete has a streamlined setup process with moderate costs, while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert involves a more complex setup, incurring higher initial expenses. Each product provides different advantages based on setup requirements and costs.

View comparison

Pricing

IBM Security QRadar

4.0 out of 5

IBM Security QRadar

4.0 out of 5

IBM Security QRadar offers robust threat intelligence and analytics with comprehensive log management, suitable for organizations needing deep security insights. In comparison, Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert provides strong endpoint protection and budget-friendly pricing, appealing to small and medium enterprises prioritizing cost and ease of deployment.

Download IBM Security QRadar vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert Report

Pricing

IBM Security QRadar generally incurs higher initial setup costs, while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert offers a more budget-friendly setup option.

View comparison

Pricing

IBM Security QRadar generally incurs higher initial setup costs, while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert offers a more budget-friendly setup option.

Elastic Security

3.8 out of 5

Elastic Security

3.8 out of 5

Elastic Security offers economical solutions with comprehensive threat hunting and management, providing strong customer service. In comparison, Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert excels in advanced malware detection with low false positives. Elastic Security could improve threat intelligence integration, while Kaspersky could enhance scalability and third-party tool integration.

Download Elastic Security vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert Report

Pricing

Elastic Security has a higher setup cost compared to Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert, making it a more expensive option for initial deployment. Kaspersky's lower setup cost offers a more budget-friendly choice for users.

View comparison

Pricing

Intercept X Endpoint

4.2 out of 5

Intercept X Endpoint

4.2 out of 5

Intercept X Endpoint and Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert are prominent players in the endpoint security market. Users express contentment with both solutions, but Kaspersky's feature set stands out. Despite this, Intercept X is favored for pricing and support. In comparison, Kaspersky offers advanced analytics and incident response, while Intercept X excels with AI capabilities and cost-effectiveness. Tech buyers seeking pricing advantages may prefer Intercept X, whereas those valuing extensive features might choose Kaspersky.

Download Intercept X Endpoint vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert Report

Pricing

Intercept X Endpoint has a higher initial setup cost, while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert offers a more cost-effective setup. These price differences can significantly affect budget allocation for endpoint security implementations.

View comparison

Pricing

HP Wolf Security

3.9 out of 5

HP Wolf Security

3.9 out of 5

HP Wolf Security is known for its affordability, straightforward deployment, and proactive customer service, making it a high-value option for many. In comparison, Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert offers advanced threat detection and extensive analytics, warranting its higher price for those seeking deeper insights and proactive security.

Download HP Wolf Security vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert Report

Pricing

The setup cost for HP Wolf Security is $500, while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert has a setup cost of $750. HP Wolf Security is more cost-effective compared to Kaspersky.

View comparison

Pricing

The setup cost for HP Wolf Security is $500, while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert has a setup cost of $750. HP Wolf Security is more cost-effective compared to Kaspersky.

Check Point Harmony Endpoint

4.4 out of 5

Check Point Harmony Endpoint

4.4 out of 5

Check Point Harmony Endpoint excels in advanced threat prevention and seamless integration with existing security infrastructures. In comparison, Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert offers robust threat detection, automated response, and detailed visibility into endpoint activities, appealing to those seeking extensive features and reliable performance.

Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert Report

Pricing

Check Point Harmony Endpoint has a lower setup cost, while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert requires a higher initial investment. Check Point offers an economical setup, whereas Kaspersky demands a more substantial financial commitment upfront.

View comparison

Pricing

Trend Vision One

4.3 out of 5

Trend Vision One

4.3 out of 5

Trend Vision One offers comprehensive protection for endpoints, networks, and email with centralized visibility. It is valued for its attack surface management, real-time threat detection, integrated management, ease of deployment, and user-friendly interface.

Download Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert vs. Trend Vision One Report

Pricing

It would be nice if it was a little bit cheaper, but I think it has a fair price. It is comparable to others in the market.

The price is reasonable. It's not exorbitant. CrowdStrike and other players are on the higher side.

View comparison

Pricing

It would be nice if it was a little bit cheaper, but I think it has a fair price. It is comparable to others in the market.

The price is reasonable. It's not exorbitant. CrowdStrike and other players are on the higher side.

Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

3.8 out of 5

Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

3.8 out of 5

Trellix ENS offers comprehensive threat detection and intuitive management tools, praised for its straightforward setup and accessible customer support. In comparison, Kaspersky excels with advanced threat intelligence and automated response mechanisms, despite a steeper deployment learning curve, valued for its long-term sophisticated security effectiveness.

Download Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Report

Pricing

Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) features customizable setup options with flexible cost, whereas Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert requires a higher initial investment but offers comprehensive deployment tools.

View comparison

Pricing

Show 10 more products

Related categories

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)