We performed a comparison between IBM Security QRadar and Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The console is easy to read. I also like the scanning part and the ability to move assets from one to the other."
"The product's initial setup phase is very easy."
"It is a scalable solution...The initial setup of Fortinet FortiEDR was straightforward."
"The solution was relatively easy to deploy."
"Having all monitoring, response, tracking, and mitigation tools in one dashboard provides our analysts and SOC team with a comprehensive view at a glance."
"I get alerts when scripts are detected in the environment."
"Fortinet FortiEDR made our clients feel secure and more at ease, knowing that they had an EDR solution that would close the gap in their security posture."
"Fortinet has helped free up around 20 percent of our staff's time to help us out."
"Most of the features are good. It is an excellent solution."
"The product provides a complete platform for ingesting the log, doing the correlations and handling the runtime."
"Vulnerability detection is the most valuable feature. It's the tool that finds the threats."
"The pre-canned rules and reports in this product are a huge plus."
"QRadar has somewhat of a new structure recently from last gen. They have moved from the standard UI based infrastructure."
"The interface is good."
"It also has a graph that shows the traffic history. I can see what happened yesterday or today. If there's an incident, I can check the traffic behavior on QRadar."
"There is a single dashboard that gives us a complete overview of what is happening around the globe."
"Its customer service is quite good."
"Has great behavior detection and a very good firmware scanner."
"The product is very easy to use."
"We can scale the solution."
"This is a feature-rich product."
"Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert offers centralized monitoring where we can monitor everything from a single point. I also like its security and network traffic features."
"I like the tool’s response to malware and trojans."
"We particularly appreciate how scalable this solution is, as we often need to increase our end-user numbers."
More Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert Pros →
"I would like the solution to extend beyond endpoint protection and include other attack surfaces such as other network components."
"It takes about two business days for initial support, which is too slow in urgent situations."
"ZTNA can improve latency."
"We find the solution to be a bit expensive."
"The dashboard isn't easy to access and manage."
"Detections could be improved."
"Integration with Azure and SaaS provisioning tools could improve Fortinet FortiEDR."
"The support needs improvement."
"The solution can be improved by lowering the cost and bettering their technical support."
"The implementation and configuration are not easy."
"Ideally we would like a mobile version so that any alert that comes in will notify us in a mobile app, or by using SMS integration."
"The quoting and the dashboard session could be improved. It should be more user-friendly."
"The threat intelligence functionality can be better. In addition, it can have more monitoring capabilities."
"We would like to see better instrumentation for debugging changes in the log flow."
"The technical support is poor. Mostly because when I open a PMR for IBM, I am stuck with Level 1 staff. As an engineer, nothing that I am bringing them does not require Level 2 or Level 3 support."
"This solution is on-premise and many customers are moving to the cloud base solution."
"The technical support team should respond in a more timely manner."
"It does not cover all of our security issues."
"We'd like more integrations to be available in the future."
"It is not easy to follow the kill chain of a potential infection or malware."
"Could include some additional protection."
"The installation process could be more streamlined."
"They could provide a source of visualization for the product."
"Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert needs to include a traffic interface."
More Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert Cons →
More Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert Pricing and Cost Advice →
IBM Security QRadar is ranked 20th in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 198 reviews while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert is ranked 17th in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 44 reviews. IBM Security QRadar is rated 8.0, while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of IBM Security QRadar writes "A highly stable and scalable solution that provides good technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert writes "Solid security and performance; overall a useful tool". IBM Security QRadar is most compared with Splunk Enterprise Security, Microsoft Sentinel, Wazuh, LogRhythm SIEM and Elastic Security, whereas Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert is most compared with Trend Vision One, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Cynet, Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response and Check Point Harmony Endpoint. See our IBM Security QRadar vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert report.
See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.